Four cases of completion lobectomy for locally relapsed lung cancer after segmentectomy

Oncological feasibility of segmentectomy for inner-located lung cancer

Objective

Oncological feasibility of segmentectomy for internal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been assessed adequately. We assessed the oncological feasibility of segmentectomy for inner-located NSCLC by investigating surgical margins and patient prognosis after undergoing the procedure.

Methods

Of the 3555 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer between 2013 and 2019 at our institution, 659 patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical stage 0 to stage1A NSCLC were included in this study. Patients were separated into 2 groups according to whether the tumor was in the inner or outer third of the lung area. Clinical characteristics and prognoses were retrospectively compared between the groups.

Results

Of the included 659 cases, 183 (27.8%) were inner-located, and 476 (72.2%) had outer-located NSCLC. The surgical margin was significantly shorter in the inner-located group than in the outer group (median, 16 vs 25 mm; P < .001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival probabilities were 91.1%/91.8% (P = .530) and 94.1%/95.6% (P = .345) for inner/outer-located groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that clinical stage IA2 or 3 (P = .043), lymphovascular invasion (P < .001), and surgical margins <20 mm (P = .017) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. The location of the inner or outer tumors was not related to the prognosis.

Conclusions

For clinical stage 0 to stage1A NSCLC, tumor location in the inner two-thirds of the lung was not associated with prognosis after segmentectomy. Because one of the independent prognostic factors is margin distance, segmentectomy for inner-located NSCLC would be oncologically acceptable when an adequate surgical margin is secured.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Completion Lobectomy Long after Wedge Resection or Segmentectomy in the Same Lobe: A Bicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Completion lobectomy (CL) following a prior resection in the same lobe may be complicated by severe pleural or hilar adhesions. The role of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has never been evaluated in this setting.

METHODS

Data were collected from two Italian centers. Between 2015 and 2022, 122 patients (60 men and 62 women, median age 67.7 ± 8.913) underwent U-VATS CL at least 4 weeks after previous lung surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight (22.9%) patients were affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and twenty-five (20.4%) were active smokers. Among the cohort, the initial surgery was performed using U-VATS in 103 (84.4%) patients, triportal-VATS in 8 (6.6%), and thoracotomy in 11 (9.0%). Anatomical segmentectomy was the initial surgery in 46 (37.7%) patients, while hilar lymphadenectomy was performed in 16 (13.1%) cases. CL was performed on 110 (90.2%) patients, segmentectomy on 10 (8.2%), and completion pneumonectomy on 2 (1.6%). Upon reoperation, moderate pleural adhesions were observed in 38 (31.1%) patients, with 2 (1.6%) exhibiting strong adhesions. Moderate hilar adhesions were found in 18 (14.8%) patients and strong adhesions in 11 (9.0%). The median operative time was 203.93 ± 74.4 min. In four (3.3%) patients, PA taping was performed. One patient experienced intraoperative bleeding that did not require conversion to thoracotomy. Conversion to thoracotomy was necessary in three (2.5%) patients. The median postoperative drainage stay and postoperative hospital stay were 5.67 ± 4.44 and 5.52 ± 2.66 days, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 34 (27.9%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was null. Histology was the only factor found to negatively influence intraoperative outcomes (p = 0.000). Factors identified as negatively impacting postoperative outcomes at univariate analyses were male sex (p = 0.003), age > 60 years (p = 0.003), COPD (p = 0.014), previous thoracotomy (p = 0.000), previous S2 segmentectomy (p = 0.001), previous S8 segmentectomy (p = 0.008), and interval between operations > 5 weeks (p= 0.005). In multivariate analysis, only COPD confirmed its role as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (HR: 5.12, 95% CI (1.07-24.50), p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

U-VATS CL seems feasible and safe after wedge resection and anatomical segmentectomy.

Outcomes of Completion Lobectomy for Locoregional Recurrence after Sublobar Resection in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

This retrospective study aimed to determine the treatment patterns and the surgical and oncologic outcomes after completion lobectomy (CL) in patients with locoregionally recurrent stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously underwent sublobar resection.

Methods

Data from 36 patients who initially underwent sublobar resection for clinical, pathological stage IA NSCLC and experienced locoregional recurrence between 2008 and 2016 were analyzed.

Results

Thirty-six (3.6%) of 1,003 patients who underwent sublobar resection for NSCLC experienced locoregional recurrence. The patients' median age was 66.5 (range, 44-77) years at the initial operation, and 28 (77.8%) patients were men. Six (16.7%) patients underwent segmentectomy and 30 (83.3%) underwent wedge resection as the initial operation. The median follow-up from the initial operation was 56 (range, 9-150) months. Ten (27.8%) patients underwent CL, 22 (61.1%) underwent non-surgical treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, concurrent chemoradiation therapy), and 4 (11.1%) did not receive treatment or were lost to follow-up after recurrence. Patients who underwent CL experienced no significant complications or deaths. The median follow-up time after CL was 64.5 (range, 19-93) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were higher in the surgical group than in the non-surgical (p<0.001) and no-treatment groups (p<0.001).

Conclusion

CL is a technically demanding but safe procedure for locoregionally recurrent stage I NSCLC after sublobar resection. Patients who underwent CL had better OS and PRS than patients who underwent non-surgical treatments or no treatments; however, a larger cohort study and long-term surveillance are necessary.

Place of robotic surgery in completion lobectomy after anatomical segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

Although segmentectomy is steadily increasing in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer, recurrence in the ipsilateral lobe is also increasing. Completion lobectomy (CL) is a challenging procedure that has already been described in a few studies using video-assisted thoracic surgery or thoracotomy. In this study, we aimed to show the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted thoracic surgery in cases of CL.

METHODS

Among 2073 major resections performed between January 2018 and september 2022 in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Nancy University Regional Hospital, we retrospectively included patients who underwent CL by robot-assisted thoracic surgery after previous segmentectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Data and perioperative results were described and analysed.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent CL with a median recurrence time after previous segmentectomy of 18 months [interquartile range (IQR): 12]. Four patients (23.5%) had a pulmonary artery injury that was controlled, and no conversion to open thoracotomy was needed. The operative time was 150 min (IQR: 20), and blood loss was 300 ml (IQR: 150). The median postoperative chest tube duration was 2 days (IQR: 1), and the length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR: 3), with no postoperative deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Completion lobectomy is a challenging procedure due to severe adhesions surrounding vessels, which potentially could cause higher rate of PA bleeding than conventional surgeries. With experienced team and surgeons, CL with robotic surgery may be reported as a safe and feasible procedure.

Pulmonary completion lobectomy after segmentectomy: An integrated analysis of perioperative outcomes

Background

Completion lobectomy (CL) after anatomical segmentectomy is technically challenging and rarely performed. Here, we aimed to report perioperative outcomes of a single center real‐world CL data.

Methods

Seven patients who underwent CL after segmentectomy were retrospectively evaluated between 2015–2021. Additionally, 34 patients were included in the review based on relevant studies in the literature until March 2022. A total of 41 patients were finally analyzed and classified into groups, according to surgical approach (video‐assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] and thoracotomy; 12 and 29 patients, respectively) or interval‐to‐CL following initial segmentectomy (≤8 weeks [short] and >8 weeks [long]; 11 and 30 patients, respectively).

Results

There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or complications between the predefined groups. However, a longer operative time was observed in the long interval‐to‐CL group than in the short interval‐to‐CL group (267 vs. 226 min, p = 0.02). The rate of severe hilar adhesions was higher in the thoracotomy versus VATS groups (72 vs. 42%, p = 0.06) and in the long versus short interval‐to‐CL groups (70 vs. 45%, p = 0.15). On multivariable logistic regression analysis of a subgroup (n = 30), completion lobectomy of upper lobes may be associated with severe hilar adhesions (p = 0.02, odds ratio: 13.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36–143.71).

Conclusion

Completion lobectomy after segmentectomy can be performed securely by either VATS or thoracotomy. Although the thoracotomy and long interval‐to‐CL groups retained a greater percentage of severe hilar adhesions, the perioperative outcomes were similar to those of VATS and short interval‐to‐CL groups, respectively.