Comparison of prolonged postoperative ileus between laparoscopic right and left colectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score matching analysis

Predictors and Impact of Ileus on Outcomes After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Ileus is a common complication of major abdominal surgery, including colorectal resection. The present study aimed to assess the predictors of ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective case-control analysis of a prospective IRB-approved database of patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida. Patients who developed ileus after right colectomy were compared to patients without ileus to determine the risk factors of ileus.

RESULTS

The present study included 270 patients with a mean age of 68.7 years. Thirty-six patients (13.3%) experienced ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy. The median duration of ileus was 6 days. Factors associated with ileus were age (71.6 vs 68.2 years, P = .158), emergency colectomy (11.1% vs 3.9%, P = .082), extended hemicolectomy (19.4% vs 6.8%, P = .021), green gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) 4.8mm staple height cartridge (19% vs 8.1%, P = .114), and longer operative time (177.9 vs 160.4 minutes, P = .157). The only independent predictor of ileus was extended colectomy (OR: 16.7, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased age, emergency surgery, green GIA cartridge, and longer operative times were associated with ileus, yet the only independent predictor of ileus was extended right hemicolectomy.

Comparing return of bowel function after right versus extended right hemicolectomy: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is associated with higher morbidity and extended inpatient stay. Although evidence suggests that PPOI is more common following right-sided resections, it is uncertain if return to bowel function is similar following extended right (ERH) versus right hemicolectomy (RH).

METHODS

The recovery of patients undergoing ERH and RH in a regional hospital in New Zealand was retrospectively compared, from 2012 to 2021. Rates of PPOI, return of bowel function and postoperative complications were compared. Other factors potentially relating to PPOI were analysed.

RESULTS

293 patients were included (42 who underwent ERH, and 251 RH). PPOI was more common following ERH than RH (43% vs. 25%, P = 0.02). When accounting for the operative approach, rate of PPOI was not significantly different (42% open ERH vs. 36% open RH; P = 0.56). Excluding PPOI, return of bowel function did not differ between groups. Patient undergoing ERH versus RH had significantly higher length of stay (1 day) and Hb drop (2.5 g/L) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Higher rates of PPOI have been demonstrated in ERH versus RH however when controlling for approach, there was not a significant difference. Further interrogation into rates of PPOI (particularly after laparoscopic surgery) are warranted to tailor locoregional ERAS protocols.

Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery

Objective

We aimed to determine the safety of Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in terms of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) concept for tubal pregnancy surgery and provide a detailed process of vNOTES for tubal pregnancy surgery, including experience and key points for surgeons performing this procedure.

Methods

The Longitudinal Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Study (LovNOTESS), which was conducted in Chengdu, China. A total of 219 patients who underwent tubal ectopic pregnancy surgery between September 2021 and March 2022. The patients underwent salpingectomy or salpingostomy using transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) or vNOTES, according to their preferences. This study prospectively collected perioperative and one-year follow-up data on tubal pregnancy outcomes after vNOTES and compared them with those after LESS.

Results

The vNOTES group showed a shorter surgical duration, hospitalization duration, and postoperative exhaust time and a lower analgesic medication usage rate, but it showed a higher surgical conversion rate. The vNOTES approach reduced the postoperative exhaust time by approximately 9 h (95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.93, -5.57 h, p < .001) and the risk of postoperative analgesic drug use by 77% (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.61, p = .023).

Conclusion

vNOTES can shorten the exhaust time and duration of hospitalization, reduce postoperative pain, and avoid surface surgical scars in tubal pregnancy surgeries, consistent with the ERAS concept. However, more comprehensive preoperative evaluation of patients who choose vNOTES is required to reduce the occurrence of intraoperative conversion.Trial registration: ChiCTR2100053483.

Incidence of and risk factors for postoperative ileus between right and left laparoscopic colectomy using propensity-score-matched analysis: A retrospective multicenter study

INSTRUCTION

In colon cancer, the incidence of postoperative ileus is reportedly higher for the right-side than for the left-side colon, but those studies included small numbers of subjects and contained several biases. Furthermore, risk factors for postoperative ileus remain unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter study reviewed 1986 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy between 2016 and 2021 for right-side (n = 907) and left-side (n = 1079) colon cancer. After propensity score matching, 803 patients in each group were matched.

RESULTS

Postoperative ileus occurred in 97 patients. Before matching, the proportion of female patients and median age were higher and frequency of preoperative stent insertion was lower with right colectomy (P < .001 each). After matching, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (17 vs 15, P < .001) and greater rates of undifferentiated adenocarcinoma (10.6% vs 5.1%, P < .001) and postoperative ileus (6.4% vs 3.2%, P = .004) were higher in right colectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed male gender (hazard ratio, 1.798; 95% confidence interval, 1.049-3.082; P = .32) and history of abdominal surgery (hazard ratio, 1.909; 95% confidence interval, 1.073-3.395; P = .027) as independent predictors of postoperative ileus in right-side colon cancer.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed a higher risk of postoperative ileus after right colectomy with laparoscopic surgery. Male gender and history of abdominal surgery were risk factors for postoperative ileus after right colectomy.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is reported to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in many vital organs by inhibiting a systemic inflammatory response. Inflammation also plays an essential role in the pathophysiology of prolonged post-operative ileus (PPOI) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. However, the role of RIPC is unclear in reducing the incidence of PPOI in patients undergoing CRC surgery.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized trial of RIPC vs. placebo-controlled in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic CRC surgery. Eighty patients were randomized to either a RIPC group or a control group (40 per arm), with computer-generated randomization. The aim was to determine whether RIPC improved the recovery of gut function. The primary outcomes assessed were time to gastrointestinal tolerance and incidence of PPOI.

RESULTS

Median time to stool of the RIPC group was significantly lower than that of the control group [RIPC vs. control, 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) vs. 5.0 (4.0, 7.8) days, p = 0.027]. Median time to gastrointestinal tolerance and incidence of PPOI in the RIPC group were lower than the control group; however, there were no statistical differences between the two groups [RIPC vs. control: 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) vs. 6.0 (4.0, 8.8) days, p = 0.178; 15 vs. 30%, p = 0.108].

CONCLUSION

RIPC could shorten the median time to stool in patients undergoing laparoscopic CRC surgery, but did not improve the overall recovery time of gut function or reduce the incidence of PPOI.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100043313 (http://www.chictr.org.cn).Key pointsQuestion: In patients undergoing laparoscopic CRC surgery, does RIPC improve time to the overall recovery of gut function and reduce the incidence of PPOI?Findings: In this randomized clinical trial that included 80 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic CRC surgery, no significant difference was found between the RIPC group and the control group concerning median time to gastrointestinal tolerance and incidence of PPOI.Meaning: RIPC did not improve the time for overall recovery of gut function or reduce the incidence of PPOI in patients undergoing laparoscopic CRC surgery.