Commentary on two recently published formal guidelines on management of "mosaic" embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)

Embryo drop-out rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a retrospective data analysis from the DoLoRes study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the decline in transferable embryos in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles due to (a) non-biopsable blastocyst quality, (b) failure of genetic analysis, (c) diagnosis of uniform numerical or structural chromosomal aberrations, and/or (d) chromosomal aberrations in mosaic constitution.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study comprised outcomes of 1562 blastocysts originating from 363 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, respectively, 226 IVF couples in the period between January 2016 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were PGT-A cycles with trophectoderm biopsy (TB) and next generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Out of 1562 blastocysts, 25.8% were lost due to non-biopsable and/or non-freezable embryo quality. In 10.3% of all biopsied blastocysts, genetic analysis failed. After exclusion of embryos with uniform or chromosomal aberrations in mosaic, only 18.1% of those originally yielded remained as diagnosed euploid embryos suitable for transfer. This translates into 50.4% of patients and 57.6% of stimulated cycles with no euploid embryo left for transfer. The risk that no transfer can take place rose significantly with a lower number of oocytes and with increasing maternal age. The chance for at least one euploid blastocyst/cycle in advanced maternal age (AMA)-patients was 33.3% compared to 52.1% in recurrent miscarriage (RM), 59.8% in recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and 60.0% in severe male factor (SMF).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that PGT-A is accompanied by high embryo drop-out rates. IVF-practitioners should be aware that their patients run a high risk of ending up without any embryo suitable for transfer after (several) stimulation cycles, especially in AMA patients. Patients should be informed in detail about the frequency of inconclusive or mosaic results, with the associated risk of not having an euploid embryo available for transfer after PGT-A, as well as the high cost involved in this type of testing.

A review of the 2021/2022 PGDIS Position Statement on the transfer of mosaic embryos

The practice of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF) since 2016 has been mostly directed by three highly controversial guidance documents issued by the Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Because these documents are so influential on worldwide IVF practice, the most recent one is here the subject of a detailed review, again revealing important misrepresentations and internal contradictions. Most importantly, however, this most recent guidance document still does not prevent the non-use and/or disposal of large numbers of embryos with substantial pregnancy and live-birth potential and, therefore, continues to propagate an IVF practice harmful to many infertile women.

An Update on Non-invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) aims to reduce the chance of an affected pregnancy or improve success in an assisted reproduction cycle. Since the first established pregnancies in 1990, methodological approaches have greatly evolved, combined with significant advances in the embryological laboratory. The application of preimplantation testing has expanded, while the accuracy and reliability of monogenic and chromosomal analysis have improved. The procedure traditionally employs an invasive approach to assess the nucleic acid content of embryos. All biopsy procedures require high technical skill, and costly equipment, and may impact both the accuracy of genetic testing and embryo viability. To overcome these limitations, many researchers have focused on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) at the preimplantation stage, sampled either from the blastocoel or embryo culture media, to determine the genetic status of the embryo non-invasively. Studies have assessed the origin of cfDNA and its application in non-invasive testing for monogenic disease and chromosomal aneuploidies. Herein, we discuss the state-of-the-art for modern non-invasive embryonic genetic material assessment in the context of PGT. The results are difficult to integrate due to numerous methodological differences between the studies, while further work is required to assess the suitability of cfDNA analysis for clinical application.

Comment on the recent PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos 2021

The worldwide demand of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is still growing. However, chromosomal mosaic results greatly challenge the clinical practice. The recently published PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos is the third PGDIS position statement on how to deal with embryos diagnosed as chromosomal mosaics (CM) and, one of many attempts of different societies and working groups to provide a guideline for clinicians, laboratories, clinics, and genetic counselors. But still, as in previous statements, many issues remained unresolved. Moreover, from our point of view, the question how to deal with embryos diagnosed as CM, consisting of two or more karyological cell lines cannot be separated from all the other aspects of PGT-A including its accuracy. The paucity of clearcut indications for PGT-A and evidence of benefit as well as an overall cost-benefit assessment is given below.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: The management of mosaic embryos

As the resolution and accuracy of diagnostic techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) are improving, more mosaic embryos are being identified. Several studies have provided evidence that mosaic embryos have reproductive potential for implantation and healthy live birth. Notably, mosaic embryos with less than 50% aneuploidy have yielded a live birth rate similar to euploid embryos. This concept has led to a major shift in current PGT-A practice, but further evidence and theoretically relevant data are required. Proper guidelines for selecting mosaic embryos suitable for transfer will reduce the number of discarded embryos and increase the chances of successful embryo transfer. We present an updated review of clinical outcomes and practice recommendations for the transfer of mosaic embryos using PGT-A.

Preimplantation chromosomal mosaics, chimaeras and confined placental mosaicism

Some human preimplantation embryos are chromosomally mosaic. For technical reasons, estimates of the overall frequency vary widely from <15 to >90% and the true frequency remains unknown. Aneuploid/diploid and aneuploid/aneuploid mosaics typically arise during early cleavage stages before the embryonic genome is fully activated and when cell cycle checkpoints are not operating normally. Other mosaics include chaotic aneuploid mosaics and mixoploids, some of which arise by abnormal chromosome segregation at the first cleavage division. Chimaeras are similar to mosaics, in having two genetically distinct cell populations, but they arise from more than one zygote and occur less often. After implantation, the frequency of mosaic embryos declines to about 2% and most are trisomic/diploid mosaics, with trisomic cells confined to the placenta. Thus, few babies are born with chromosomal mosaicism. This review discusses the origin of different types of chromosomal mosaics and chimaeras; their fate and the relationship between preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism and confined placental mosaicism in human conceptuses and animal models. Abnormal cells in mosaic embryos may be depleted by cell death, other types of cell selection or cell correction but the most severely affected mosaic embryos probably die. Trisomic cells could become restricted to placental lineages if cell selection or correction is less effective in placental lineages and/or they are preferentially allocated to a placental lineage. However, the relationship between preimplantation mosaicism and confined placental mosaicism may be complex because the specific chromosome(s) involved will influence whether chromosomally abnormal cells survive predominately in the placental trophoblast and/or placental mesenchyme.

Lay summary

Human cells normally have 23 pairs of chromosomes, which carry the genes. During the first few days of development, some human embryos are chromosomal mosaics. These mosaic embryos have both normal cells and cells with an abnormal number of chromosomes, which arise from the same fertilised egg. (More rarely, the different cell populations arise from more than one fertilised egg and these embryos are called chimaeras.) If chromosomally abnormal cells survive to term, they could cause birth defects. However, few abnormal cells survive and those that do are usually confined to the placenta, where they are less likely to cause harm. It is not yet understood how this restriction occurs but the type of chromosomal abnormality influences which placental tissues are affected. This review discusses the origin of different types of chromosomally abnormal cells, their fate and how they might become confined to the placenta in humans and animal models.

Mitochondrial DNA levels in trophectodermal cells show no association with blastocyst development and pregnancy outcomes

Background:

In patients undergoing assisted reproduction, levels of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in the trophectodermal cells of the developing blastocyst are suggested to be associated with its ability to implant. However, discrepancies exist regarding the use of mtDNA levels as a reliable biomarker to predict outcomes of assisted reproduction.

Aims:

The aim of the study is to explore the association of trophectodermal mtDNA levels to determine blastocyst quality, implantation potential of blastocyst and clinical outcomes in couples who have undergone pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Study Setting:

Private fertility centre.

Study Design:

Retrospective analysis.

Materials and Methods:

We analysed mtDNA levels in the trophectodermal cells of 287 blastocysts from 61 couples undergoing PGT-A. The levels of mtDNA were estimated by next-generation sequencing method. mtDNA levels were correlated with maternal age, blastocyst morphology, ploidy status, implantation rates, miscarriage rate and live birth rate.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Linear regression and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's all column comparison test.

Results:

The trophectodermal mtDNA levels did not correlate with maternal age. There were no significant differences in their levels in grade 1 and grade 2 blastocysts. No significant differences were seen between mtDNA levels of implanted and non-implanted blastocysts or those blastocysts that resulted in miscarriage or live birth. However, significantly lower amounts of mtDNA were seen in euploid blastocysts as compared to that in aneuploid blastocysts.

Conclusion:

mtDNA levels in the trophectodermal cells of the blastocyst do not associate with blastocyst quality (grade 1 and grade 2), implantation potential and clinical outcomes but can differentiate between aneuploid and euploid blastocysts. Our study does not support the use of trophectodermal mtDNA levels as a biomarker for blastocyst quality and predictor of clinical outcomes.

The Disputable Discourse on Accuracy and Effectiveness of PGT-A in Light of Advancements in Genetic Tools

The article's abstract is not available.

From contemplation to classification of chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos

Chromosomal mosaicism is a hallmark of early human embryo development. The last decade yielded an enormous amount of information about diversity and prevalence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos due to progress in preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidies (PGT-A) based exclusively on molecular karyotyping of trophectoderm biopsy. However, the inner cell mass karyotype is still missing for mosaic embryos affecting the success rate of assisted reproductive medicine. Here, a classification model of chromosomal mosaicism is proposed based on the analysis of the primary zygote karyotype, the timing and types of primary and secondary chromosome segregation errors, and the distribution of mosaic cell clones between different embryonic and extraembryonic compartments of the blastocyst. Five basic principles for mosaicism analysis are introduced, namely, the estimation of the primary zygote karyotype, the investigation of additional sample point, the requirement of the second time point analysis, the delineating of reciprocity of chromosome segregation, and comprehensive chromosome screening at the single-cell level. The suggested model allows the prediction of the inner cell mass karyotype of the blastocyst and its developmental potential based on information from trophectoderm biopsy and non-invasive PGT-A using blastocoele fluid sample or spent culture medium as additional sample and time points for analysis and considering the reciprocity as a basic process in chromosome segregation errors between daughter cells in postzygotic cell divisions.

PGT-SR (reciprocal translocation) using trophectoderm sampling and next-generation sequencing: insights from a virtual trial

PURPOSE

The objective of this virtual study was to simulate a full cycle and assess the costs and benefits to a couple with a reciprocal translocation, using current techniques for preimplantation genetic testing and comparing reporting every chromosome with only reporting those involved in the rearrangement.

METHODS

A simulation was constructed for women under the age of 35 years, where vitrified-warmed embryos were transferred one at a time in a first full cycle following preimplantation genetic testing using next-generation sequencing and sampling the trophectoderm at the blastocyst stage. The effect on pregnancy outcomes (live birth, clinical miscarriage and biochemical pregnancy) was evaluated for different reporting strategies for embryo transfer to (i) report only the rearranged chromosomes and transfer embryos with a normal or balanced test result for the translocation (targeted), or (ii) report every chromosome and exclude from transfer all embryos with an abnormal test result (exclusion), or (iii) exclude only those consistent with an unbalanced translocation and/or unrelated non-mosaic whole-chromosome aneuploidy and assign those with samples consistent with a normal or balanced translocation complement and unrelated mosaic aneuploidy or segmental imbalance (embryos of uncertain reproductive potential) a lower transfer priority (ranking). The number of individual women whom might benefit by avoiding an adverse pregnancy outcome (biochemical pregnancy, clinical miscarriage) or be disadvantaged by not achieving a live birth was evaluated. The financial cost of the different reporting strategies and the time taken to complete a cycle were also considered.

RESULTS

The simulation showed that compared to only reporting the translocation chromosomes (targeted reporting), testing every chromosome and ranking embryos by test result for transfer was a cost-effective strategy to avoid an adverse pregnancy without compromising the chance of a live birth. Excluding from transfer embryos with a test result consistent with a normal or balanced translocation complement of uncertain reproductive potential was an inferior strategy because it resulted in fewer live births from a full cycle. Reporting only the translocation chromosomes was an inferior strategy because it was less effective than ranked reporting of every chromosome to avoid an adverse pregnancy. Compared to targeted reporting, the ranked and exclusion strategies marginally reduced the overall cost and time taken to complete a full cycle. The ranking strategy avoided 1 adverse pregnancy for 12 cycles started, compared to 1 in 10 for the exclusion strategy which also resulted in 1 in 22 fewer women achieving a live birth. A minority (< 10%) of couples benefited by avoiding at least 1 adverse pregnancy whilst also reducing the time and cost for a complete cycle; most (> 70% ) couples received no benefit additional to targeted reporting and had the same outcome for pregnancy, time and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary objective of PGT-SR for couples with a reciprocal translocation is to avoid a pregnancy with a chromosomally unbalanced product of the translocation and to reduce the risk of miscarriage, at least to that expected for couples with normal karyotypes. Trophectoderm sampling at the blastocyst stage with testing using NGS is an effective approach; however, ranking and excluding from transfer embryos with abnormal test results for unrelated chromosomes is problematical and is likely to be detrimental to achieving a live birth. Targeted reporting, where only the results of the chromosomes involved in the translocation are known, should be preferred to achieve a live birth. A best effort should be made to follow up and investigate all pregnancies following PGT-SR. Once the reproductive outcome is known (biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, live birth), the chromosomes unrelated to the rearrangement can be analysed as an experimental study. The risk/benefit of avoiding an adverse pregnancy vs reducing the chance of a healthy delivery should be a decision for each individual couple and informed by appropriate genetic counselling for their specific translocation and history.