The effect prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in patients with placenta previa or placental accreta spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pregnancy Outcomes after Uterine Preservation Surgery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to investigate maternal and neonatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies of women with a history of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) compared with women without history of PAS.

STUDY DESIGN

 A retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center between March 2011 and January 2022. We compared women with a history of PAS who had uterine preservation surgery and a subsequent pregnancy, to a control group matched in a 1:5 ratio. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a composite adverse outcome (CAO) including any of the following: uterine dehiscence, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal mechanical ventilation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations with the CAO.

RESULTS

 During the study period, 287 (1.1%) women were diagnosed with PAS and delivered after 25 weeks of gestation. Of these, 32 (11.1%) women had a subsequent pregnancy that reached viability. These 32 women were matched to 139 controls. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the study and control groups. Compared with controls, the proportion of CAO was significantly higher in women with previous PAS pregnancy (40.6 vs. 19.4%, p = 0.019). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, previous PAS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-10.02, p = 0.034) and earlier gestational age at delivery (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI = 2.27-5.49, p < 0.001) were independently associated with CAOs.

CONCLUSION

 A history of PAS in a previous pregnancy is associated with increased risk of CAOs in subsequent pregnancies.

KEY POINTS

· The uterine-preserving approach for PAS delivery is gaining more attention and popularity in recent years.. · Women with a previous pregnancy with PAS had higher rates of CAOs in subsequent pregnancies.. · Previous PAS pregnancy is an independent factor associated with adverse outcomes..

Complete placenta previa and increta after radical trachelectomy: A case report

Background

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders are increasing in incidence and represent a significant contributor to severe maternal morbidity in the US. Prior uterine surgeries other than cesarean section are important, yet less common, risk factors for PAS.

Case

This is a case of a 43-year-old woman with a prior history of cervical cancer necessitating radical trachelectomy. She was subsequently diagnosed with a complete placenta previa with a high degree of suspicion for PAS. Multidisciplinary teams convened to plan for delivery. A cesarean hysterectomy was performed at 32 weeks. Final surgical pathology confirmed the presence of morbidly adherent placenta invading the vaginal cuff.

Conclusion

Patients who are diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancers have the option of fertility-preserving surgical management. Serial ultrasound evaluations, specifically looking for PAS, might be warranted in post-trachelectomy pregnancies.

Comparison of maternal outcomes and clinical characteristics of prenatally vs nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare maternal outcomes of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane database, and Web of Science until November 28, 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies comparing the clinical presentation of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum were included. The primary outcomes were emergent cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, blood loss volume, number of transfused blood product units, urological injury, coagulopathy, reoperation, intensive care unit admission, and maternal death. In addition, the pooled mean values for blood loss volume and the number of transfused blood product units were calculated. The secondary outcomes included maternal age, gestational age at birth, nulliparity, previous cesarean delivery, previous uterine procedure, assisted reproductive technology, placenta increta and percreta, and placenta previa.

METHODS

Study screening was performed after duplicates were identified and removed. The quality of each study and the publication bias were assessed. Forest plots and I2 statistics were calculated for each study outcome for each group. The main analysis was a random-effects analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 415 abstracts and 157 full-text studies were evaluated. Moreover, 31 studies were analyzed. Prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum was associated with a significantly lower rate of emergency cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.67), higher hysterectomy rate (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.83), lower blood loss volume (mean difference, -0.65; 95% confidence interval, -1.17 to -0.13), and lower number of transfused red blood cell units (mean difference, -1.96; 95% confidence interval, -3.25 to -0.68) compared with nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum. The pooled mean values for blood loss volume and the number of transfused blood product units tended to be lower in the prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum groups than in the nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum groups. Nulliparity (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.20), previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 6.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.12-11.25), assisted reproductive technology (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.61), placenta increta and percreta (odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.24-7.03), and placenta previa (odds ratio, 6.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.12-11.25) showed statistical significance. No significant difference was found for the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Despite its severity, the positive effect of prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum on outcomes underscores the necessity of a prenatal diagnosis. In addition, the pooled mean values provide a preoperative preparation guideline.

Placenta Accreta: A Case Report on the Role of Interventional Radiology

Placenta accreta spectrum disorder is a pregnancy-related disorder responsible for important post-partum morbimortality, associated with intractable or massive hemorrhage, leading to uterine loss in up to 64% of women. Despite international recommendations advocating planned preterm cesarean hysterectomy for the management of these patients, uterus preservation management is being continuously reported with the implementation of minimally invasive bleeding reduction strategies, such as prophylactic balloon-assisted occlusion. We present the case of a 40-year-old pregnant woman with a previous cesarean, diagnosed with placenta previa and suspected placenta accreta on magnetic resonance after having second-trimester vaginal bleeding. A peri-operative multidisciplinary panel was involved, in collaboration with the interventional radiologist, and the c-section was scheduled for 36 weeks of gestation. The prophylactic balloon-assisted occlusion was successfully performed, minimizing the blood loss and allowing a uterus-preserving approach.

Current state of interventional procedures to treat pernicious placenta previa accompanied by placenta accreta spectrum: A review

Pernicious placenta previa (PPP) accompanied by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a life-threatening placental implantation that causes a variety of complications, including antepartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, hemorrhagic shock, preterm birth, and neonatal asphyxia. Along with continuous improvements in medical technology, interventional procedures have been widely used to prevent intraoperative hemorrhage associated with PPP. The commonly used interventional procedures include abdominal aorta clamping, prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal or common iliac arteries, and uterine artery embolization. The above-mentioned interventional procedures have their respective advantages and disadvantages. The best procedure for different situations continues to be debated considering the complex pattern of blood supply to the uterus in patients with PPP. The specific choice of interventional procedure depends on the clinical situation of the patient with PPP. For grade III PAS, the need for uterine artery embolization is assessed based on blood loss and preoperative hemostatic effect following abdominal aorta clamping. Repair or hysterectomy may be performed following uterine artery embolization if there is a hybrid operating room for grade III PAS patients with extensive sub-serosal penetration of the uterus and repair difficulty. For grade II PAS (shallow placental implantation), prophylactic balloon occlusion may not be necessary before surgery. Uterine artery embolization can be performed in case of postoperative hemorrhage.

Prophylactic uterine artery embolization during cesarean delivery for management of hemorrhage in complete placenta previa: An observational study

Complete placenta previa is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and fetuses. This study aimed to evaluate whether prophylactic uterine artery embolization (PUAE) could reduce bleeding in patients with complete placenta previa. We retrospectively analyzed patients with complete placenta previa admitted to Taixing People's Hospital for elective cesarean delivery between January 2019 and December 2020. The women were treated with PUAE (PUAE group, n = 20) or without (control group, control, n = 20). Risk factors for bleeding (age, gestational age, pregnancy times, delivery times, cesarean delivery times), intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin difference before and after surgery, transfusions volume, hysterectomy cases, major maternal complication cases, neonatal birth weight, neonatal Apgar score in 1 minute, postoperative hospitalization time were compared between 2 groups. There were no significant differences on risk factors for bleeding, neonatal birth weight, neonatal Apgar score in 1 minute, postoperative hospitalization time between 2 groups. However, the intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin before and after operation, transfusion volume in the PUAE group was significantly lower than the control. There was no case of hysterectomy or major maternal complications in both groups. PUAE during cesarean may be an effective and safe strategy to reduce intraoperative blood loss and transfusion volume for patients with complete placenta previa.

Postpartum hemorrhage - what the interventional radiologist should know

Postpartum hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality around the world and can be caused by multiple etiologies. Distinguishing between the various etiologies that lead to PPH and identifying high risk features are crucial to implementing effective clinical management. In this review, the diagnostic imaging features and management principles of some of the most important causes of postpartum hemorrhage are discussed, with an emphasis on the pearls and pitfalls when minimally invasive treatment via interventional radiologic techniques are employed.

The effect of prophylactic balloon occlusion in patients with placenta accreta spectrum: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) can induce severe life-threatening obstetric hemorrhage. Herein, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis of previous studies to evaluate the relative benefits of different prophylactic balloon occlusion (PBO) procedures.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 2021. Blood loss volume, blood transfusion volume, and hysterectomy rate were regarded as the primary endpoints. The data were pooled using a Bayesian network and traditional pairwise meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine articles with a total sample size of 5150 patients were included. Compared with no PBO (non-PBO) intervention, PBO of the abdominal aorta (PBOAA, mean difference(MD) - 1.02, 95% credible interval (CrI) - 1.4 to - 0.67), common iliac artery (PBOCIA, MD - 0.84; 95%CrI - 1.36 to - 0.06) and internal iliac artery (PBOIIA, MD - 0.42; 95%CrI - 0.72 to - 0.13) significantly lowered blood loss volume, with PBOAA being more effective than PBOIIA (MD - 0.60; 95%CrI - 1.05 to - 0.17). PBOAA and PBOIIA also significantly decreased blood loss volume (MD - 2.33; 95%CrI - 3.74 to - 0.94, MD - 1.57; 95%CrI - 2.77 to - 0.47 respectively) and hysterectomy rate (OR 0.31; 95%CrI 0.16 to 0.54, OR 0.53; 95%CrI 0.29 to 0.92 respectively). PBOAA has the highest probability of being more effective in reducing the blood loss volume, blood transfusion volume, and hysterectomy rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing PBOAA, PBOCIA, or PBOIIA in PAS patients is an effective way to minimize blood loss volume, while PBOAA and PBOIIA also reduce blood transfusion volume and hysterectomy rate. PBOAA is a notably more effective strategy to reduce blood loss volume than PBOIIA.

KEY POINTS

• PBOAA, PBOCIA, and PBOIIA procedures can significantly reduce the blood loss volume compared to non-PBO intervention in PAS patients, of which PBOAA was more effective than the PBOIIA procedure. • PBOAA and PBOIIA could significantly reduce the blood transfusion volume and hysterectomy rate in contrast to the non-PBO intervention in patients with PAS. • According to our statistical treatment ranking, PBOAA was statistically superior in reducing blood transfusion volume, blood transfusion volume, and hysterectomy rate than other PBO procedures.

Placenta accreta risk-antepartum score in predicting clinical outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum: A multicenter validation study

OBJECTIVE

To validate the use of placenta accreta risk-antepartum (PAR-A) score as a predictive tool of clinical outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

METHODS

This is a prospective study, conducted in six PAS specialized centers in six different countries. The study was conducted between October 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Women who were provisionally diagnosed with PAS during pregnancy were considered eligible. A machine-learning-based PAR-A score was calculated. Diagnostic performance of the PAR-A score was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic curve, for perioperative massive blood loss and admission to intensive care unit (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04525001).

RESULTS

Of 97 eligible women, 86 were included. PAS-associated massive blood loss occurred in 10 patients (11.63%). Median PAR-A scores of massive blood loss in the current cohort were 8.9 (interquartile range 6.9-14.1). In predicting massive blood loss, the area under the curve of PAR-A scores was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.95), which was not significantly different from the original cohort (P = 0.2). PAR-A score prediction of intensive care unit admission was slightly higher compared with the original cohort (0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

PAR-A score is a novel scoring system of PAS outcomes, which showed external validity based on current data.

Prophylactic Intraoperative Uterine Artery Embolization During Cesarean Section or Cesarean Hysterectomy in Patients with Abnormal Placentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic intraoperative uterine artery embolization (UAE) performed immediately after fetal delivery during planned cesarean section or cesarean hysterectomy in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorder or placenta previa.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE and Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Studies were selected using the Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcomes (PICO) strategy. The intraoperative blood loss and the rate of emergent peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) were the primary outcomes, whereas the length of hospital stay and volume of blood transfused were the secondary outcomes. A random-effects model was employed to pool each effect size. The cumulative values of the primary outcomes were calculated using the generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective cohort studies and five case series were included, recruiting 421 women who underwent prophylactic intraoperative UAE (UAE group) and 374 women who did not (control group). Compared with the control group, the UAE group had significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.020) during cesarean section or cesarean hysterectomy. Furthermore, the EPH rate was also significantly decreased (p = 0.020; cumulative rate: 19.65%), but not the length of hospital stay (p = 0.850) and volume of pRBC transfused (p = 0.140), after cesarean section in the UAE group. The incidence of major complications was low (3.33%), despite two patients with uterine necrosis.

CONCLUSION

The currently available data provides encouraging evidence that prophylactic intraoperative UAE may contribute to hemorrhage control and fertility preservation in women with abnormal placentation.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration code: CRD42021230581. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/CRD42021230581 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2a, systematic review of retrospective cohort studies.