Effects of localisation of uterine adenomyosis on outcome of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

Type and Location of Adenomyosis in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Assessment

The current knowledge on adenomyosis as a risk factor for RPL is very scant. Overall 120 women were included in this retrospective observational study. They were divided in three groups each of which consisted of 40 subjects: Group 1: women with RPL who were diagnosed to have adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasound (TVS); Group 2: patients with RPL without ultrasonographic findings of adenomyosis; Group 3: patients with ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis without RPL and at least one live birth pregnancy. The copresence of endometriosis was also investigated. Among women with RPL, patients with adenomyosis (Group 1) had higher number of pregnancy losses (p = 0.03) and lower age at first pregnancy loss (p = 0.03) than women without adenomyosis (Group 2). Moreover, they had more frequently primary RPL (p = 0.008). Adenomyosis of the inner myometrium was found more frequently (p = 0.04) in patients of Group 1 than in patients of Group 3 in which adenomyosis was mainly in the outer myometrium (p= 0.02). No differences were found in the severity of adenomyosis between these two groups of women. TVS findings for endometriosis were observed more frequently in women with adenomyosis without RPL (Group 3) than in the other two groups of patients. Adenomyosis can be a factor involved in RPL. Differences in adenomyosis localization are associated with different risks for RPL. Patients with RPL should be investigated for the presence of adenomyosis and also for the type and localization of the disease in the different myometrial layers.

Impact of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization outcomes in women undergoing donor oocyte transfers: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively examine the association between adenomyosis type, location, and severity with reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing single embryo transfer (SET) with embryos derived from donor oocytes.

DESIGN

A prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.

PATIENTS

Patients with infertility with (n = 114) and without (n = 114) adenomyosis who received their first donor oocyte transfer between January 2019 and January 2023 were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Adenomyosis was confirmed with the presence of at least one direct feature visualized by 2- or 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and classified according to type (diffuse or focal), localization (inner or outer myometrium and/or junctional zone [JZ]), and uterine extension (mild, moderate, or severe). After an artificial or natural endometrial preparation cycle, patients underwent SET in the blastocyst stage.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the implantation rate. The secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates after SET.

RESULTS

The presence of adenomyosis did not significantly affect the implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates. However, women with adenomyosis had a significantly higher miscarriage rate than those without adenomyosis (35.4% vs. 18.1%, respectively). The multivariate analysis assessed possible risk factors for each clinical outcome considered in the study and showed that adenomyosis affected the risk of miscarriage. Specifically, transvaginal sonography detection of adenomyosis in the JZ was associated with over threefold higher relative risk of miscarriage (relative risk [RR], 3.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-7.78). Conversely, adenomyosis features detected exclusively in the outer myometrium were associated with a higher ongoing pregnancy rate (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.72). Diffuse adenomyosis in the JZ and severe adenomyosis increased the relative risk of miscarriage two-fold (RR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.22-4.30 and RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.19-4.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that although adenomyosis did not significantly reduce the odds of implantation, the direct signs of adenomyosis in the JZ and disease severity are significant risk factors for miscarriage in patients receiving donor oocyte transfers. This study highlights the importance of thorough ultrasound examination and detailed adenomyosis classification in the assessment and management of patients with infertility.

Understanding Ultrasound Features that Predict Symptom Severity in Patients with Adenomyosis: a Systematic Review

Adenomyosis is associated with pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Several ultrasound-based classifications have been reported, but it is not clear which criteria reflect the severity of symptoms. The aim of this review is to summarize the ultrasound features that correlate with clinical manifestations of adenomyosis and to discuss diagnostic methods for predicting disease severity. A literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar published up to March 2022 was performed. A consensus-based classification was determined primarily by defining the mapping or topography of the lesion. Ultrasound features can be classified into direct (i.e., the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium) and indirect findings (i.e., changes in the myometrial structure and translesional vascularity secondary to myometrial invasion). There are some reports that symptoms are positively correlated with the location and spread of the disease. Indeed, the lesion thickness, diffuse or internal adenomyosis, and focal adenomyosis may be associated with increased risks of dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility, respectively. Two ultrasound markers (i.e., the presence of heterogeneous myometrium and myometrial cysts) appear to be the criteria most clinicians focus on. However, decision-making on treatment necessity is determined by symptom severity rather than the topography of the lesions. There is currently no consensus that symptom severity can be predicted based on ultrasound features, but the ultrasound-based criteria may be helpful in diagnosing adenomyosis.

Junctional zone thickening: an endo-myometrial unit disorder

Adenomyosis is a disease defined by histopathology, mostly of hysterectomy specimens, and classification is challenged by the disagreement of the histologic definition. With the introduction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and two- and three-dimensional ultrasound, the diagnosis of adenomyosis became a clinical entity. In MRI and US, adenomyosis ranges from thickening of the inner myometrium or junctional zone to nodular, cystic, or diffuse lesions involving the entire uterine wall, up to a well-circumscribed adenomyoma or a polypoid adenomyoma. The absence of an accepted classification and the vague and inconsistent terminology hamper basic and clinical research. The sub-endometrial halo seen at US and MRI is a distinct entity, differing from the outer myometrium by its increased nuclear density and vascular structure. The endometrium and the sub-endometrial muscularis or archimetra are of Müllarian origin, while the outer myometrium is non-Mullerian mesenchymal. The junctional zone (JZ) is important for uterine contractions, conception, implantation, and placentation. Thickening of the JZ can be considered inner myometrium adenomyosis, with or without endometrial invasion. Changes in the JZ should be considered a different entity than myometrial clinically associated with impaired conception, implantation, abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain and obstetrical outcome. Pathology of the basal endometrium and JZ is a separate entity and should be identified as an endo-myometrial unit disorder (EMUD).

The effect of adenomyosis types on clinical outcomes of IVF embryo transfer after ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the effect of adenomyosis types on IVF and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) after ultra-long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol?

DESIGN

Patients who underwent the first cycle of IVF-ET with ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol were included in this retrospective cohort study. They were divided into three groups: (A) 428 patients with diffuse adenomyosis; (B) 718 patients with focal adenomyosis; and (C) 519 patients with tubal infertility. Reproduction outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with focal adenomyosis and tubal infertility, diffuse adenomyosis was negatively associated with clinical pregnancy and live birth (clinical pregnancy: A versus B: OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.539 to 0.931, P = 0.013; A versus C: OR 0.663, 95% CI 0.489 to 0.899, P = 0.008; live birth: A versus B: OR 0.530, 95% CI 0.385 to 0.730, P < 0.001; A versus C: OR 0.441, 95% CI 0.313 to 0.623, P < 0.001), but positively associated with miscarriage (A versus B: OR 1.727, 95% CI 1.056 to 2.825, P = 0.029; A versus C: OR 2.549, 95% CI 1.278 to 5.082, P = 0.008). Compared with patients with tubal infertility, focal adenomyosis was also a risk factor for miscarriage (B versus C: OR 1.825, 95% CI 1.112 to 2.995, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients with focal adenomyosis or tubal infertility, the reproduction outcomes of IVF-ET in patients with diffuse adenomyosis seems to be worse.

Heterogeneity of clinical symptoms and therapeutic strategies for different subtypes of adenomyosis: An initial single-center study in China

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification of different clinical symptoms and corresponding therapeutic efficacy in adenomyosis patients.

METHODS

From January 2015 to October 2020, a total of 468 patients diagnosed with adenomyosis through MRI examination at Peking University Third Hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. Totals of 184 (39.3%), 208 (44.4%), 17 (3.6%), and 59 (12.6%) patients were categorized into Subtypes I (intrinsic), II (extrinsic), III (intramural), and IV (penetrating), respectively. Clinical information such as age, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, infertility, assisted reproduction, and drug treatment and its efficacy were analyzed. By comparing the clinical information of different adenomyosis subtypes, we intend to provide better fertility guidance and find better treatment strategies for these patients.

RESULTS

The proportion of dysmenorrhea increased in intrinsic, extrinsic, intramural, and penetrating subtypes (74.5% vs 82.7% vs 94.1% vs 94.9%, respectively, P = 0.002). The proportion of menorrhagia in the intrinsic subtype (53.3%) was significantly higher than that in the extrinsic (28.4%) and intramural (29.4%) subtypes (P < 0.001). The effective rate of progesterone in the intrinsic subtype was significantly lower than that in the extrinsic subtype (52.0% vs 86.5%, P < 0.001). The infertility rates of adenomyosis patients with different subtypes were relatively high (17.6%-41.3%), and that of the extrinsic subtype was the highest among all the subtype groups (41.3%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in age, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, and infertility were found among patients with different subtypes of adenomyosis. A novel classification of adenomyosis was proposed to provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of adenomyosis patients with infertility.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Plenty of studies explored the most optimal treatment protocol for infertile women with adenomyosis in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) /intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), however, there is still no consensus on which treatment protocol is ideal for these women at present. So, we conducted this study comparing the pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis who underwent GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy or long-acting GnRH agonist protocol.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study and a propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis including 282 women diagnosed with adenomyosis undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle from January 2016 to July 2021 at the Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, China. The patients were divided into two groups: the GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy (n = 168) and the long-acting GnRH agonist protocol with fresh embryo transfer (n = 114) according their treatment protocols. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Cumulative live birth rate was also calculated.

RESULTS

After adjusting for confounders, clinical pregnancy rate (49.40% vs 64.04%; odds ratio (OR) 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.37; P = 0.358), live birth rate (36.90% vs 45.61%; OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.61 to 2.00, P = 0.753) and cumulative live birth rate (51.79% vs 64.04%; OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.74, P = 0.796) were not significantly different between the GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol. Similar results were conducted in PSM analysis with clinical pregnancy rate (46.48% vs 60.56%; OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.76 to 2.34; P = 0.321), live birth rate (32.39% vs 45.07%; OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.63 to 2.72, P = 0.463) and cumulative live birth rate (54.90% vs 60.60%; OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.74, P = 0.958).

CONCLUSIONS

For infertile women with adenomyosis, these two treatment protocols resulted in similar pregnancy outcomes. Larger, prospective studies are needed in the future.

Classifications of Adenomyosis and Correlation of Phenotypes in Imaging and Histopathology to Clinical Outcomes: a Review

Purpose of Review

To provide an update on published classification and reporting systems for adenomyosis. There is an urgent need to standardize reporting of various phenotypes of adenomyosis into a validated and globally recognized system. This can be used to examine the nature and severity of adenomyosis symptoms and inform the design, evaluation, and implementation of appropriate treatment options.

Recent Findings

In recent years, several new proposals for adenomyosis classification have emerged. Most are MRI-based and include features such as uterine size, junctional zone thickness, size and location of the lesions, and distribution patterns. To date, none of those proposals has been validated. Only one recent classification based on transvaginal ultrasound was validated for interobserver congruence and correlated to clinical findings. However, the differentiation of diffuse and focal adenomyosis still lacks consensus. In addition, only a few authors advocated imaging-based definitions.

Summary

There is a need for one or a combination of a classification and reporting system for adenomyosis. To date, there is no widely accepted and validated system.

Increased risk of obstetric complications in patients with adenomyosis: A narrative literature review

Background

Reproductive-age women occasionally face the pathological condition of adenomyosis, which is often concurrent with endometriosis. It is believed that endometriosis and adenomyosis increases the risk of obstetric complications. Although new insights into the mechanism of obstetric complications due to endometriosis are emerging, there is little information on the etiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with adenomyosis.

Methods

We performed a literature review focusing on the pathophysiological pathways of obstetric complications in women with adenomyosis using currently available basic and clinical studies. We used the internet search engines PubMed and Google Scholar to search for studies published between January 2000 and June 2021. We carefully read pertinent sections within each document to ensure relevancy.

Main findings

The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis is increased after adjusting for conceiving by assisted reproductive technology. Thus, adenomyosis emerges as a relevant factor associated with several obstetric complications such as preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, small for gestational age/fetal growth restriction, and preeclampsia.

Conclusion

It is plausible that the impact of adenomyosis on pregnancy outcomes is not always the same; rather it is dependent on the degree of uterine involvement and subtypes.