Hospitalized patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: anticoagulation therapy or not?

The clinical outcomes of different doses of rivaroxaban in patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is defined as thrombosis involving the infrapopliteal veins. The optimal anticoagulant therapy of IDDVT remains controversial. This study aimed to assess whether reduced dose of rivaroxaban was suitable in patients with IDDVT.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with acute IDDVT were identified by reviewing the venous thromboembolism (VTE) registry databases. Outcomes including VTE recurrence, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, and death. Patients were followed until the first occurrence of any outcomes or the study end date (December 31, 2018). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed.

RESULTS

A total of 1246 patients were divided into low-dose (10 or 15 mg/day; n = 716) and standard-dose (20 mg/day; n = 530) groups. The incidences of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, CRNM bleeding, and death between the two groups were 9.64% vs 5.66%, 1.68% vs 3.02%, 4.61% vs 8.68%, and 13.83% vs 10.75%, respectively. After the inverse probability of treatment weighting, HRs for standard-dose vs low-dose of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, CRNM bleeding, and death were 0.54 (95% CI, 0.35-0.84), 1.71 (95% CI, 0.80-3.67), 2.28 (95% CI, 1.40-3.74), and 1.30 (95% CI, 0.91-1.86), respectively. For the subgroup analysis, the interaction with anticoagulation duration and treatment was evident for VTE recurrence (P for interaction = .002), but not for major bleeding. Patients with residual vein thrombosis were associated with an increased risk of VTE recurrence (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.29-2.95). The interaction between risk factors and residual vein thrombosis was evident for VTE recurrence (P for interaction = .085).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard-dose rivaroxaban reduced the risk of VTE recurrence without increasing the risk of major bleeding in patients with IDDVT. Anticoagulant therapy for >1.5 months should be preferred over shorter durations. Residual vein thrombosis should be assessed as a predictor of recurrence in patients with IDDVT, especially for patients with non-transient factors.

Generation of a Predictive Clinical Model for Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis (ICMVT) Detection

BACKGROUND Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (ICMVT) increases the risk of pulmonary embolism. Although predictive models are available, their utility in predicting the risk is unknown. To develop a clinical prediction model for isolated distal calf muscle venous thrombosis, data from 462 patients were used to assess the independent risk variables for ICMVT. MATERIAL AND METHODS The area under curve (AUC) for Model A and Model B were calculated and other risk factors were based on age, pitting edema in the symptomatic leg, calf swelling with least 3 cm larger than the asymptomatic leg, recent bed rest for 3 days or more in the past 4 weeks, requiring general or major surgery with regional anesthesia, sex, and local tenderness distributed along the deep venous system as independent predictors of calf muscle venous thrombosis. Model A includes the risk variables for C-reactive protein and D-dimer. RESULTS The area under ROC curve for Model A training set was 0.924 (95% CI: 0.895-0.952), the area under ROC curve for Model B training set was 0.887 (95% CI: 0.852-0.922), and the AUC difference between the 2 models was statistically significant (P<0.001); the area under ROC curve for Model A obtained in the validation set was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.844-0.961), the area under ROC curve for Model B was 0.842 (95% CI: 0. 0.773-0.910), and the difference between the 2 models was statistically significant (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS Predictive Model A better predicts isolated calf muscle venous thrombosis and is able to help clinicians rapidly and early diagnose ICMVT, displaying higher utility for missed diagnosis prevention and disease therapy.

Below the knee, let it be: Management of calf DVT in hospitalized trauma patients

INTRODUCTION

Management of below-knee DVT (BKDVT) in trauma patients is uncertain. We hypothesized that BKDVT can be managed with observation only.

METHODS

Secondary analysis on trauma inpatients March 2017-September 2019 with risk assessment profile ≥5. Management of BKDVT included observation with ultrasound. BKDVT was compared to above-knee DVT (AKDVT), and BKDVT with progression to AKDVT/PE compared to no progression.

RESULTS

Of 1988 patients, 136 (6.8%) BKDVT and 23 (1.2%) AKDVT. 7 (6.9%) BKDVT progressed to AKDVT/PE. 6.9% had BKDVT progression, associated with higher ISS (36.7 vs 21.6, p ​= ​0.005), longer prophylaxis delay (121 vs 45 ​h, p ​= ​0.02) and longer hospital LOS (25.6 vs 7.8, p ​= ​0.01). None experienced post-thrombotic syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Majority of BKDVT in hospitalized trauma patients did not progress to AKDVT. Observation for progression, rather than treatment, was not associated with increased PE risk or thrombotic sequelae. Observation with serial ultrasound may serve as a practical alternative to anticoagulation in trauma patients with BKDVT.