1
|
King O, West E, Alston L, Beks H, Callisaya M, Huggins CE, Murray M, Mc Namara K, Pang M, Payne W, Peeters A, Pithie M, Sayner AM, Wong Shee A. Models and approaches for building knowledge translation capacity and capability in health services: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2024; 19:7. [PMID: 38287351 PMCID: PMC10823722 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Building healthcare service and health professionals' capacity and capability to rapidly translate research evidence into health practice is critical to the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare systems. This review scoped the literature describing programmes to build knowledge translation capacity and capability in health professionals and healthcare services, and the evidence supporting these. METHODS This scoping review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Four research databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo) were searched using a pre-determined strategy. Eligible studies described a programme implemented in healthcare settings to build health professional or healthcare service knowledge translation capacity and capability. Abstracts and full texts considered for inclusion were screened by two researchers. Data from included papers were extracted using a bespoke tool informed by the scoping review questions. RESULTS Database searches yielded 10,509 unique citations, of which 136 full texts were reviewed. Thirty-four papers were included, with three additional papers identified on citation searching, resulting in 37 papers describing 34 knowledge translation capability building programmes. Programmes were often multifaceted, comprising a combination of two or more strategies including education, dedicated implementation support roles, strategic research-practice partnerships and collaborations, co-designed knowledge translation capability building programmes, and dedicated funding for knowledge translation. Many programmes utilised experiential and collaborative learning, and targeted either individual, team, organisational, or system levels of impact. Twenty-seven programmes were evaluated formally using one or more data collection methods. Outcomes measured varied significantly and included participant self-reported outcomes, perceived barriers and enablers of knowledge translation, milestone achievement and behaviour change. All papers reported that programme objectives were achieved to varying degrees. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge translation capacity and capability building programmes in healthcare settings are multifaceted, often include education to facilitate experiential and collaborative learning, and target individual, team, organisational, or supra-organisational levels of impact. Although measured differently across the programmes, the outcomes were positive. The sustainability of programmes and outcomes may be undermined by the lack of long-term funding and inconsistent evaluation. Future research is required to develop evidence-informed frameworks to guide methods and outcome measures for short-, medium- and longer-term programme evaluation at the different structural levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia King
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Monash University, Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| | - Emma West
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Research Unit, Colac Area Health, Colac, VIC, Australia
| | - Hannah Beks
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Michele Callisaya
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine E Huggins
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret Murray
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevin Mc Namara
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Anna Peeters
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Mia Pithie
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Alesha M Sayner
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Wong Shee
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Conte KP, Laycock A, Bailie J, Walke E, Onnis LA, Feeney L, Langham E, Cunningham F, Matthews V, Bailie R. Producing knowledge together: a participatory approach to synthesising research across a large-scale collaboration in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:3. [PMID: 38172892 PMCID: PMC10765661 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01087-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite that stakeholder participation in evidence synthesis could result in more useful outcomes, there are few examples of processes that actively involve them in synthesis work. Techniques are needed that engage diverse stakeholders as equal partners in knowledge co-production. The aims of this paper are to describe an innovative participatory process of synthesising a large body of academic research products and compare the findings of the participatory process against two traditional approaches to synthesis: a rapid review and a structured review. METHODS First, a rapid synthesis of all research outputs (n = 86) was conducted by researchers with in-depth knowledge of the collaboration's research. Second, a team of researchers and service providers conducted a structured synthesis of seventy-eight peer-reviewed articles and reports generated by the collaboration. Fifty-five publications were brought forward for further synthesis in part three, a facilitated participatory synthesis. Finally, we explored the value added by the participatory method by comparing findings generated across the three synthesis approaches. RESULTS Twelve researchers and 11 service providers/policy partners-8 self-identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander-participated in two facilitated workshops (totalling 4 h). Workshop activities engaged participants in reviewing publication summaries, identifying key findings, and evoked review, discussion and refinement. The process explicitly linked experiential knowledge to citations of academic research, clearly connecting the two knowledge types. In comparing the findings generated across all three methods we found mostly consistencies; the few discrepancies did not contradict but gave deeper insights into statements created by the other methods. The participatory synthesis generated the most, detailed, and unique findings, and contextual insights about the relevance of the key messages for practice. CONCLUSION The participatory synthesis engaged stakeholders with diverse backgrounds and skillsets in synthesising a large body of evidence in a relatively short time. The participatory approach produced findings comparable to traditional synthesis methods while extending knowledge and identifying lessons most relevant for the participants who, ultimately, are the end users of the research. This process will interest other large-scale research collaborations seeking to engage stakeholders in evidence synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen P Conte
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
- Oregon Health Sciences University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland State University, Portland, USA.
| | - Alison Laycock
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Jodie Bailie
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Emma Walke
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Leigh-Ann Onnis
- College of Business, Law and Governance, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
| | - Lynette Feeney
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Erika Langham
- Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Frances Cunningham
- Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Australia
| | - Veronica Matthews
- University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Ross Bailie
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Edelman A, Topp SM. Translating, Contexting, and Institutionalising Knowledge Translation Practices in Northern Australia: Some Reflections Comment on "Sustaining Knowledge Translation Practices: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis". Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7587. [PMID: 37579403 PMCID: PMC10461882 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
In this commentary, we reflect on how the three processes of translating, contexting, and institutionalising knowledge translation (KT) practices, as introduced in a critical interpretive synthesis on sustaining KT, might be drawn on to improve KT sustainability in the northern Australian health system, and some likely challenges. The synthesis provides a useful reminder that health systems are social systems and offers an analytical framework against which to map approaches that aim to align knowledge production and utilisation. By positioning "places" of knowledge utilisation and actor roles and networks as key to KT sustainability, the framework also offers the potential to draw attention to non-clinical settings, actors, and relationships that are central to improving health, but that may be historically neglected in KT research and scholarship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Edelman
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bismantara H, Ahern S, Teede HJ, Liew D. Academic health science centre models across the developing countries and lessons for implementation in Indonesia: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051937. [PMID: 36691121 PMCID: PMC9453943 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe models of academic health science centres (AHSCs) across developing countries, in order to inform AHSC development in Indonesia. DESIGN Scoping review with systematic methods. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, ProQuest Central, Wiley online library, Scopus and Web of Sciences were searched for relevant publications from 1 January 2015 to 1 December 2020. 'Grey literature' was hand searched by targeted website searches, Google searches, as well as personal communication held with stakeholders in Indonesia specifically. Relevant articles regarding AHSCs in developing countries are included. The review would be synthesised to focus on the purpose, structure and core activities of AHSCs. Strategies for success were also considered. RESULTS Twenty-six recognised AHSCs in developing countries were identified, located in Asia (n=13), Europe (n=1), South America (n=7) and Africa (n=5). Innovation, health system improvement and enhancement in academic capacity were the common visions. Most centres are functionally integrated and university-led. Most AHSCs include community health services to complement primary stakeholders such as academic institutions and hospitals. Limited information was identified regarding patient and public involvement and workforce capacity building. Five AHSCs have been piloted in Indonesia since 2018, integrating universities, academic hospitals and provincial health offices. However, information regarding their core activities and successes is limited. CONCLUSIONS The review suggests that limited published data are available on AHSC models in developing countries, but they still provide important insight into AHSC development in Indonesia. Innovation and health systems strengthening are the common visions. Functional integration with university leadership is the most common model of governance. Other than universities and hospitals, community health centres, research centres and regional health offices are common partners. There is a little description of community engagement and workforce capacity building.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haryo Bismantara
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Susannah Ahern
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helena J Teede
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Edelman A, Taylor J, Ovseiko PV, Larkins S, Topp SM. The population health role of academic health centres: a multiple-case exploratory study in Australia and England. Health Policy 2022; 126:1051-1061. [PMID: 36031466 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Academic health centres (AHCs) are organisations that aim to mobilise knowledge into practice by improving the responsiveness of health systems to emerging evidence. This study aims to explore the population health role of AHCs in Australia and England, where AHCs represent novel organisational forms. METHODS A multiple-case study design using qualitative methods was used to explore population health goals and activities in four discrete AHCs in both countries during 2017 and 2018. Data from 85 interviews with AHC leaders, clinicians and researchers, direct observation, and documentation were analysed within and across the cases. RESULTS Comparison across cases produced four cross-case themes: health care rather than population health; incremental rather than major health system change; different conceptions of "translation" and "innovation"; and unclear pathways to impact. The ability of the AHCs to define and enact a population health role was hindered during the study period by gaps in knowledge mobilisation strategies at a health system and policy level, the biomedical orientation of government designation schemes for AHCs in Australia and England, and competing expectations of the sovereign partner organisations in AHCs against a backdrop of limited operational resources. DISCUSSION The study identifies several institutional elements that are likely to be needed for AHCs in Australia and England to deliver on both internal and external expectations of their population health role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Edelman
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Judy Taylor
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Pavel V Ovseiko
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Larkins
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephanie M Topp
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Edelman A, Clay-Williams R, Fischer M, Kislov R, Kitson A, McLoughlin I, Skouteris H, Harvey G. Mobilising Knowledge in (and About) Academic Health Science Centres: Boundary Spanning, Inter-organisational Governance and Systems Thinking. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:1238-1240. [PMID: 35490259 PMCID: PMC9808194 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Edelman
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Fischer
- Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roman Kislov
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alison Kitson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ian McLoughlin
- Formerly Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Skouteris
- Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Melder A, Robinson T, Mcloughlin I, Iedema R, Teede H. Integrating the complexity of healthcare improvement with implementation science: a longitudinal qualitative case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:234. [PMID: 35183164 PMCID: PMC8858551 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07505-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation science seeks to enable change, underpinned by theories and frameworks such as the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Yet academia and frontline healthcare improvement remain largely siloed, with limited integration of implementation science methods into frontline improvement where the drivers include pragmatic, rapid change. Using the CIFR lens, we aimed to explore how pragmatic and complex healthcare improvement and implementation science can be integrated. Methods Our research involved the investigation of a case study that was undertaking the implementation of an improvement intervention at a large public health service. Our research involved qualitative data collection methods of semi-structured interviews and non-participant observations of the implementation team delivering the intervention. Thematic analysis identified key themes from the qualitative data. We examined our themes through the lens of CFIR to gain in-depth understanding of how the CFIR components operated in a ‘real-world’ context. Results The key themes emerging from our research outlined that leadership, context and process are the key components that dominate and affect the implementation process. Leadership which cultivates connections with front line clinicians, fosters engagement and trust. Navigating context was facilitated by ‘bottom-up’ governance. Multi-disciplinary and cross-sector capability were key processes that supported pragmatic and agile responses in a changing complex environment. Process reflected the theoretically-informed, and iterative implementation approach. Mapping CFIR domains and constructs, with these themes demonstrated close alignment with the CFIR. The findings bring further depth to CFIR. Our research demonstrates that leadership which has a focus on patient need as a key motivator to engage clinicians, which applies and ensures iterative processes which leverage contextual factors can achieve successful, sustained implementation and healthcare improvement outcomes. Conclusions Our longitudinal study highlights insights that strengthen alignment between implementation science and pragmatic frontline healthcare improvement. We identify opportunities to enhance the relevance of CFIR in the ‘real-world’ setting through the interconnected nature of our themes. Our study demonstrates actionable knowledge to enhance the integration of implementation science in healthcare improvement. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07505-5.
Collapse
|
8
|
Brandenburg C, Ward EC. "There hasn't been a career structure to step into": a qualitative study on perceptions of allied health clinician researcher careers. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:6. [PMID: 35000610 PMCID: PMC8743061 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00801-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are many demonstrated benefits for health service organizations engaging in research. As a result, growing numbers of clinicians are being encouraged to pursue research as part of their clinical roles, including in allied health (AH). However, while the benefits of having clinician researchers embedded in AH services have been well established, the career needs of those engaged in these dual roles are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine perspectives of the career pathway for AH clinicians engaged in “clinician researcher” roles within Australian health services. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted, utilizing semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to ensure selection of varied locations, professions and role types. Results were analysed using thematic analysis. Trustworthiness was established using regular peer debriefing during theme development, and respondent validation of final themes. Results Fifty-seven AH clinician researchers, including those who did and did not have research as a formal component of their current role, participated in semi-structured interviews. Key themes were as follows: (1) clinician researchers prefer roles which are embedded in health services; (2) current opportunities for clinician researcher roles in health are insufficient; (3) there are deficiencies in the pathway for clinician researcher careers; (4) clinician researchers are not always valued or incentivized by health services; (5) the current career challenges impair the viability of clinician researcher careers; and (6) the clinician researcher career path has been improving, and there is hope it will continue to improve. Conclusion This study outlines a number of weaknesses in the current career structure and opportunities for AH clinician researchers in Australian health services. In particular, while there are strong intrinsic drivers to pursue this dual career, extrinsic drivers are poorly developed, including a lack of job opportunities, an unstable career pathway and a lack of valuing or incentivizing this career choice within health services. This often means that clinician researchers feel compelled to choose between a research or clinical career, leading to loss of this valuable combined skill set. The findings of this research may assist health services in developing and supporting improved clinician researcher career pathways. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00801-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Brandenburg
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Health, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth C Ward
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Health, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aguayo GA, Goetzinger C, Scibilia R, Fischer A, Seuring T, Tran VT, Ravaud P, Bereczky T, Huiart L, Fagherazzi G. Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25743. [PMID: 34941554 PMCID: PMC8738987 DOI: 10.2196/25743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research aims to increase the quality and relevance of research by incorporating the perspective of those ultimately affected by the research. Despite these potential benefits, PPI is rarely included in epidemiology protocols. Objective The aim of this study is to provide an overview of methods used for PPI and offer practical recommendations for its efficient implementation in epidemiological research. Methods We conducted a review on PPI methods. We mirrored it with a patient advocate’s viewpoint about PPI. We then identified key steps to optimize PPI in epidemiological research based on our review and the viewpoint of the patient advocate, taking into account the identification of barriers to, and facilitators of, PPI. From these, we provided practical recommendations to launch a patient-centered cohort study. We used the implementation of a new digital cohort study as an exemplary use case. Results We analyzed data from 97 studies, of which 58 (60%) were performed in the United Kingdom. The most common methods were workshops (47/97, 48%); surveys (33/97, 34%); meetings, events, or conferences (28/97, 29%); focus groups (25/97, 26%); interviews (23/97, 24%); consensus techniques (8/97, 8%); James Lind Alliance consensus technique (7/97, 7%); social media analysis (6/97, 6%); and experience-based co-design (3/97, 3%). The viewpoint of a patient advocate showed a strong interest in participating in research. The most usual PPI modalities were research ideas (60/97, 62%), co-design (42/97, 43%), defining priorities (31/97, 32%), and participation in data analysis (25/97, 26%). We identified 9 general recommendations and 32 key PPI-related steps that can serve as guidelines to increase the relevance of epidemiological studies. Conclusions PPI is a project within a project that contributes to improving knowledge and increasing the relevance of research. PPI methods are mainly used for idea generation. On the basis of our review and case study, we recommend that PPI be included at an early stage and throughout the research cycle and that methods be combined for generation of new ideas. For e-cohorts, the use of digital tools is essential to scale up PPI. We encourage investigators to rely on our practical recommendations to extend PPI in future epidemiological studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria A Aguayo
- Deep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Catherine Goetzinger
- Deep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Renza Scibilia
- Diabetes Australia, Melbourne, Australia.,Diabetogenic, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aurélie Fischer
- Deep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Till Seuring
- Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Esch/Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Viet-Thi Tran
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistic Sorbonne Paris Cité, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Ravaud
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistic Sorbonne Paris Cité, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Tamás Bereczky
- European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laetitia Huiart
- Deep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Guy Fagherazzi
- Deep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Enticott JC, Melder A, Johnson A, Jones A, Shaw T, Keech W, Buttery J, Teede H. A Learning Health System Framework to Operationalize Health Data to Improve Quality Care: An Australian Perspective. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:730021. [PMID: 34778291 PMCID: PMC8580135 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.730021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Our healthcare system faces a burgeoning aging population, rising complexity, and escalating costs. Around 10% of healthcare is harmful, and evidence is slow to implement. Innovation to deliver quality and sustainable health systems is vital, and the methods are challenging. The aim of this study is to describe the process and present a perspective on a coproduced Learning Health System framework. The development of the Framework was led by publicly funded, collaborative, Academic Health Research Translation Centres, with a mandate to integrate research into healthcare to deliver impact. The focus of the framework is “learning together for better health,” with coproduction involving leadership by an expert panel, a systematic review, qualitative research, a stakeholder workshop, and iterative online feedback. The coproduced framework incorporates evidence from stakeholders, from research, from data (practice to data and data to new knowledge), and from implementation, to take new knowledge to practice. This continuous learning approach aims to deliver evidence-based healthcare improvement and is currently being implemented and evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne C Enticott
- Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Angela Melder
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Alison Johnson
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Angela Jones
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Tim Shaw
- Sydney Health Partners, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Wendy Keech
- Health Translation South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jim Buttery
- Centre for Health Analytics, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Team V, Jones A, Teede H, Weller CD. Pressure Injury Surveillance and Prevention in Australia: Monash Partners Capacity Building Framework. Front Public Health 2021; 9:634669. [PMID: 34778157 PMCID: PMC8581233 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
A hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) is a common complication across the globe. The severity of HAPI ranges from skin redness and no skin breakdown to full skin and tissue loss, exposing the tendons and bones. HAPI can significantly impact the quality of life. In addition to the human cost, this injury carries a high economic burden with the cost of treatment far outweighing the preventative measures. The HAPI rates are a key indicator of health services performance. Globally, healthcare services aim to reduce its incidence. In Australia, the federal health minister has prioritised the need for improvement in HAPI surveillance and prevention. Capacity building is vital to optimise pressure injury (PI) surveillance and prevention in acute care services. In this perspective article, we provide a framework for capacity building to optimise HAPI prevention and surveillance in a large cross-sector collaborative partnership in Australia. This framework comprises six key action areas in capacity building to optimise the HAPI outcomes, such as research, organisational development, workforce development, leadership, collaboration, and consumer involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Team
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Angela Jones
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Carolina D. Weller
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Melder A, Mcloughlin I, Robinson T, Iedema R, Teede HJ. Using institutional entrepreneurship to understand the role of innovation teams in healthcare: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046750. [PMID: 34526334 PMCID: PMC8444238 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We draw on institutional theory to explore the roles and actions of innovation teams and how this influences their behaviour and capabilities as 'institutional entrepreneurs (IEs)', in particular the extent to which they are both 'willing' and 'able' to facilitate transformational change in healthcare through service redesign. DESIGN A longitudinal qualitative study that applied a 'researcher in residence' as an ethnographic approach. SETTING The development and implementation of two innovation projects within a single public hospital setting in an Australian state jurisdiction. PARTICIPANTS Two innovation teams, with members including senior research fellows, PhD scholars and front-line clinicians (19 participants and 47 interviews). RESULTS Despite being from the same hospital, the two innovation teams occupied contrasting subject positions with one facilitating transformational improvements in service delivery, while the other sought more conservative improvements. Cast as 'IEs' we show how one team took steps to build legitimacy for their interventions enabling spread and scale in improvements and how, in the other case, failure to build legitimacy resulted in unintended consequences which undermined the sustainability of the improvements achieved. CONCLUSIONS Adopting an institutional approach provided insight into the 'willingness' and 'ability' to facilitate transformational change in healthcare through service redesign. The manner in which innovation teams operate from different subject positions influences the structural and normative legitimacy afforded to their activities. Specifically, we observed that those with the most power (organisational or professional) to bring about transformational change can be the least willing to do so in ways which challenge current practice. Those most willing to challenge the status quo (more peripheral organisation members or professionals) can be least able to deliver transformation. Better understanding of these insights can inform healthcare leaders in supporting innovation team efforts, considering their subject position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Melder
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian Mcloughlin
- Monash Business School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tracy Robinson
- School of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Science, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rick Iedema
- Centre for Team Based Practice & Learning in Health Care, King's College, London, UK
| | - Helena J Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Enticott J, Braaf S, Johnson A, Jones A, Teede HJ. Leaders' perspectives on learning health systems: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:1087. [PMID: 33243214 PMCID: PMC7689994 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05924-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Integrated utilisation of digital health data has the power to transform healthcare to deliver more efficient and effective services, and the learning health system (LHS) is emerging as a model to achieve this. The LHS uses routine data from service delivery and patient care to generate knowledge to continuously improve healthcare. The aim of this project was to explore key features of a successful and sustainable LHS to inform implementation in an Academic Health Science Centre context. Methods We purposively identified and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with leaders, experienced in supporting or developing data driven innovations in healthcare. A thematic analysis using NVivo was undertaken. Results Analysis of 26 interviews revealed five themes thought to be integral in an effective, sustainable LHS: (1) Systematic approaches and iterative, continuous learning with implementation into healthcare contributing to new best-practice care; (2) Broad stakeholder, clinician and academic engagement, with collective vision, leadership, governance and a culture of trust, transparency and co-design; (3) Skilled workforce, capability and capacity building; (4) Resources with sustained investment over time and; (5) Data access, systems and processes being integral to a sustainable LHS. Conclusions This qualitative study provides insights into the elements of a sustainable LHS across a range of leaders in data-driven healthcare improvement. Fundamentally, an LHS requires continuous learning with implementation of new evidence back into frontline care to improve outcomes. Structure, governance, trust, culture, vision and leadership were all seen as important along with a skilled workforce and sustained investment. Processes and systems to optimise access to quality data were also seen as vital in an effective, sustainable LHS. These findings will inform a co-designed framework for implementing a sustainable LHS within the Australian healthcare and Academic Health Science Centre context. It is anticipated that application of these findings will assist to embed and accelerate the use of routine health data to continuously generate new knowledge and ongoing improvement in healthcare delivery and health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Enticott
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. .,Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
| | - Sandra Braaf
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Alison Johnson
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Angela Jones
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Helena J Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.,Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| |
Collapse
|