Cost-effectiveness analysis of digital therapeutics for home-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with chronic heart failure: model development and data analysis

Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are an emerging medical therapy comprising evidence-based interventions that are regulatory approved for patient use, or are under development, for a variety of medical conditions, including hypertension, cancer, substance use disorders and mental disorders. DTx have significant potential to reduce the overall burden on healthcare systems and offer potential economic benefits. There is currently no specific legal regulation on DTx in the EU. Although European countries have similar approaches to digital health solutions, the adoption of DTx varies across the continent. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the levels of adoption of DTx in Europe, and to explore possible strategies to improve adoption, with the goal of higher rates of adoption, and more consistent use of DTx across the continent. The article discusses the regulatory and reimbursement landscape across Europe; validation requirements for DTx, and the importance of co-design and an ecosystem-centric approach in the development of DTx. Also considered are drivers of adoption and prescription practices for DTx, as well as patient perspectives on these therapeutics. The article explores potential factors that may contribute to low rates of DTx adoption in Europe, including lack of harmonisation in regulatory requirements and reimbursement; sociodemographic factors; health status; ethical concerns; challenges surrounding the use and validation of AI; knowledge and awareness among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients, and data standards and interoperability. Efforts to improve rates of access to DTx and adoption of these therapeutics across Europe are described. Finally, a framework for improved uptake of DTx in Europe is proposed.

Cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure: progress and gaps in evidence and policy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review synthesizes recent research on the efficacy, optimal design, and delivery methods of cardiac rehabilitation tailored to heart failure patients. Despite established benefits, cardiac rehabilitation referral and access disparities persist, necessitating elucidation of limitations and solutions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improves long-term mortality and hospitalization rates but not short-term mortality. cardiac rehabilitation further enhances quality of life and medical therapy adherence. However, cardiac rehabilitation relies on in-person delivery, presenting access barriers exacerbated during COVID-19. Significant geographic disparities exist, with analyses indicating current capacity only serves 45% of eligible US adults even if fully utilized. Referral rates also lag, disproportionately affecting women and minority groups. Research increasingly focuses on home-based and digital therapeutics modalities to expand reach, with evidence demonstrating comparable improvements across settings. Protocols and research center on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), despite growing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) prevalence.

SUMMARY

Increasing referrals through standardized procedures and addressing multifactorial geographic, economic, and capacity limitations are imperative to ensure equitable cardiac rehabilitation access. Broadening HFpEF rehabilitation research and care standards also constitutes a critical practice gap requiring alignment with projected epidemiologic shifts. Advancing patient-centered, evidence-based solutions can promote rehabilitation as essential secondary prevention for wider cardiac populations.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/HCO/A97.