1
|
Duus KS, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Krølner RF. Implementation of health-promoting retail initiatives in the Healthier Choices in Supermarkets Study-qualitative perspectives from a feasibility study. BMC Med 2024; 22:349. [PMID: 39218867 PMCID: PMC11367934 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03561-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving food environments like supermarkets has the potential to affect customers' health positively. Scholars suggest researchers and retailers collaborate closely on implementing and testing such health-promoting interventions, but knowledge of the implementation of such interventions is limited. We explore the implementation of four health-promoting food retail initiatives selected and developed by a partnership between a research institution, a large retail group, and a non-governmental organisation. METHODS The four initiatives included downsizing of bags for pick'n' mix sweets and soda bottles at the check-out registers, shelf tags promoting healthier breakfast cereal options, and replacing a complimentary bun with a banana offered to children. The initiatives were implemented for 6 weeks (or longer if the store manager allowed it) in one store in Copenhagen, Denmark. Data were collected through observations, informal interviews with customers, and semi-structured interviews with retailers. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts and field notes inspired by process evaluation concepts and included quantitative summaries of selected data. RESULTS Two out of four initiatives were not implemented as intended. The implementation was delayed due to delivery issues, which also resulted in soda bottles not being downsized as intended. The maintenance of the shelf tags decreased over time. Retailers expressed different levels of acceptability towards the initiatives, with a preference for the complimentary banana for children. This was also the only initiative noticed by customers with both positive and negative responses. Barriers and facilitators of implementation fell into three themes: Health is not the number one priority, general capacity of retailers, and influence of customers and other stakeholders on store operation. CONCLUSIONS The retailers' interests, priorities, and general capacity influenced the initiative implementation. Retailers' acceptability of the initiatives was mixed despite their involvement in the pre-intervention phase. Our study also suggests that customer responses towards health-promoting initiatives, as well as cooperation with suppliers and manufacturers in the development phase, may be determining to successful implementation. Future studies should explore strategies to facilitate implementation, which can be applied prior to and during the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrine Sidenius Duus
- The National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
- The National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koorts H, Ma J, Swain CTV, Rutter H, Salmon J, Bolton KA. Systems approaches to scaling up: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of evidence for physical activity and other behavioural non-communicable disease risk factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2024; 21:32. [PMID: 38515118 PMCID: PMC10958859 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01579-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading causes of death worldwide. Systems approaches have potential for creating sustainable outcomes at scale but have rarely been used to support scale up in physical activity/nutrition promotion or NCD prevention more generally. This review aimed to: (i) synthesise evidence on the use of systems approaches in scaling up interventions targeting four behavioural risk factors for NCDs; and (ii) to explore how systems approaches have been conceptualised and used in intervention implementation and scale up. METHOD Seven electronic databases were searched for studies published 2016-2021. Eligible studies targeted at least one of four NCD behavioural risk factors (physical inactivity, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, diet), or described evaluation of an intervention planned for or scaled up. Studies were categorised as having a (i) high, (ii) moderate, or (iii) no use of a systems approach. A narrative synthesis of how systems approaches had been operationalised in scale up, following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Twenty-one intervention studies were included. Only 19% (n = 4) of interventions explicitly used systems thinking to inform intervention design, implementation and scale up (targeting all four risk factors n = 2, diet n = 1, tobacco use n = 1). Five studies ('high use') planned and implemented scale up with an explicit focus on relations between system elements and used system changes to drive impact at scale. Seven studies ('moderate use') considered systems elements impacting scale-up processes or outcomes but did not require achieving system-level changes from the outset. Nine studies ('no use') were designed to work at multiple levels among multiple agencies in an intervention setting, but the complexity of the system and relations between system elements was not articulated. We synthesised reported barriers and facilitators to scaling up, and how studies within each group conceptualised and used systems approaches, and methods, frameworks and principles for scaling up. CONCLUSION In physical activity research, and NCD prevention more broadly, the use of systems approaches in scale up remains in its infancy. For researchers, practitioners and policymakers wishing to adopt systems approaches to intervention implementation at scale, guidance is needed on how to communicate and operationalise systems approaches in research and in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42021287265).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Koorts
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia.
| | - Jiani Ma
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia
| | - Christopher T V Swain
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Harry Rutter
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK
| | - Jo Salmon
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia
| | - Kristy A Bolton
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zorbas C, Blake MR, Brown AD, Peeters A, Allender S, Brimblecombe J, Cameron AJ, Whelan J, Ferguson M, Alston L, Boelsen-Robinson T. A systems framework for implementing healthy food retail in grocery settings. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:137. [PMID: 38195419 PMCID: PMC10777568 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17075-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food retailers can be reluctant to initiate healthy food retail activities in the face of a complex set of interrelated drivers that impact the retail environment. The Systems Thinking Approach for Retail Transformation (START) is a determinants framework created using qualitative systems modelling to guide healthy food retail interventions in community-based, health-promoting settings. We aimed to test the applicability of the START map to a suite of distinct healthy food marketing and promotion activities that formed an intervention in a grocery setting in regional Victoria, Australia. METHODS A secondary analysis was undertaken of 16 previously completed semi-structured interviews with independent grocery retailers and stakeholders. Interviews were deductively coded against the existing START framework, whilst allowing for new grocery-setting specific factors to be identified. New factors and relationships were used to build causal loop diagrams and extend the original START systems map using Vensim. RESULTS A version of the START map including aspects relevant to the grocery setting was developed ("START-G"). In both health-promoting and grocery settings, it was important for retailers to 'Get Started' with healthy food retail interventions that were supported by a proof-of-concept and 'Focus on the customer' response (with grocery-settings focused on monitoring sales data). New factors and relationships described perceived difficulties associated with disrupting a grocery-setting 'Supply-side status quo' that promotes less healthy food and beverage options. Yet, most grocery retailers discussed relationships that highlighted the potential for 'Healthy food as innovation' and 'Supporting cultural change through corporate social responsibility and leadership'. CONCLUSIONS Several differences were found when implementing healthy food retail in grocery compared to health promotion settings. The START-G map offers preliminary guidance for identifying and addressing commercial interests in grocery settings that currently promote less healthy foods and beverages, including by starting to address business outcomes and supplier relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Zorbas
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Miranda R Blake
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew D Brown
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Peeters
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Steve Allender
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Brimblecombe
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Adrian J Cameron
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Jill Whelan
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Megan Ferguson
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Deakin Rural Health, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Tara Boelsen-Robinson
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vogel C, Dijkstra C, Huitink M, Dhuria P, Poelman MP, Mackenbach JD, Crozier S, Seidell J, Baird J, Ball K. Real-life experiments in supermarkets to encourage healthy dietary-related behaviours: opportunities, challenges and lessons learned. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2023; 20:73. [PMID: 37340326 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01448-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supermarkets are the primary source of food for many people yet their full potential as a setting to encourage healthy dietary-related behaviours remains underutilised. Sharing the experiences from research groups who have worked with supermarket chains to evaluate strategies that promote healthy eating could improve the efficiency of building such relationships and enhance the design quality of future research studies. METHODS A collective case study approach was used to synthesise experiences of engaging and sustaining research collaborations with national supermarket chains to test the effectiveness of health-focused in-store interventions. The collective narrative covers studies conducted in three high-income countries: Australia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. RESULTS We have distilled our experiences and lessons learned into six recommendations for conducting high quality public health research with commercial supermarket chains. These include: (i) using personal contacts, knowledge of supermarket activities and engaging executive management to establish a partnership and allowing time to build trust; (ii) using scientifically robust study designs with appropriate sample size calculations; (iii) formalising data exchange arrangements and allocating adequate resource for data extraction and re-categorisation; (iv) assessing effects at individual/households level where possible; (v) designing a mixed-methods process evaluation to measure intervention fidelity, dose and unintended consequences; and (vi) ensuring scientific independence through formal contract agreements. CONCLUSIONS Our collective experiences of working in non-financial partnerships with national supermarket chains could be useful for other research groups looking to develop and implement supermarket studies in an efficient manner. Further evidence from real-life supermarket interventions is necessary to identify sustainable strategies that can improve population diet and maintain necessary commercial outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Vogel
- Centre for Food Policy, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Coosje Dijkstra
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, the Netherlands.
| | - Marlijn Huitink
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, the Netherlands
| | - Preeti Dhuria
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Maartje P Poelman
- Chair group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 8130, Wageningen, 6700 EW, The Netherlands
| | - Joreintje D Mackenbach
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Crozier
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Jacob Seidell
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, the Netherlands
| | - Janis Baird
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Kylie Ball
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Winkler LL, Toft U, Glümer C, Bloch P, Buch-Andersen T, Christensen U. Involving supermarkets in health promotion interventions in the Danish Project SoL. A practice-oriented qualitative study on the engagement of supermarket staff and managers. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:706. [PMID: 37072841 PMCID: PMC10111755 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15501-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supermarkets have been suggested as relevant settings for environmental and educational initiatives encouraging healthier shopping and eating decisions, but in the literature, limited attention has been paid to the context, perspectives, and everyday practices of supermarket staff. The aim of this study was to examine the engagement of supermarket staff in a health promotion project from a practice-oriented perspective. METHODS The study was based on qualitative data collected in the supermarket setting of Project SoL; a community-based health promotion project in Denmark. We conducted 26 in-depth interviews with store managers and other key staff members in seven participating supermarkets. In addition, we collected data on planning, implementation, and perceptions of supermarket staff of in-store interventions and other project-related activities. These field data included short telephone interviews, observational notes, photos, and audiotapes of meetings. Data were analysed from the perspective of practice theory. RESULTS Although supermarket staff found community-based health promotion meaningful to engage in, the study observed that their engagement was challenged by a business mindset, practical routines and structural requirements favouring sales promotion over health promotion. Nevertheless, there were also examples of how health promotion activities and ways of thinking were successfully incorporated in everyday staff practices during and after Project SoL. CONCLUSIONS Our findings point to both potentials and challenges for using supermarkets as settings for health promotion. The voluntary engagement of supermarket staff in community-based health projects cannot stand alone but should be supplemented by more long-lasting strategies and policies regulating this and other food environments. Context-sensitive and practice-oriented analyses in local food environments could inform such strategies and policies to make sure they target unwanted elements and practices and not just individual behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise L Winkler
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark.
| | - Ulla Toft
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Glümer
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark
- Center for Diabetes, Vesterbrogade 121, 3rd floor, København V, 1620, Denmark
| | - Paul Bloch
- Health Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 83, Herlev, 2730, Denmark
| | - Tine Buch-Andersen
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark
| | - Ulla Christensen
- Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Gothersgade 160, København K, 1123, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brimblecombe J, Miles B, Chappell E, De Silva K, Ferguson M, Mah C, Miles E, Gunther A, Wycherley T, Peeters A, Minaker L, McMahon E. Implementation of a food retail intervention to reduce purchase of unhealthy food and beverages in remote Australia: mixed-method evaluation using the consolidated framework for implementation research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2023; 20:20. [PMID: 36803988 PMCID: PMC9938595 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-022-01377-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adoption of health-enabling food retail interventions in food retail will require effective implementation strategies. To inform this, we applied an implementation framework to a novel real-world food retail intervention, the Healthy Stores 2020 strategy, to identify factors salient to intervention implementation from the perspective of the food retailer. METHODS A convergent mixed-method design was used and data were interpreted using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The study was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial in partnership with the Arnhem Land Progress Aboriginal Corporation (ALPA). Adherence data were collected for the 20 consenting Healthy Stores 2020 study stores (ten intervention /ten control) in 19 communities in remote Northern Australia using photographic material and an adherence checklist. Retailer implementation experience data were collected through interviews with the primary Store Manager for each of the ten intervention stores at baseline, mid- and end-strategy. Deductive thematic analysis of interview data was conducted and informed by the CFIR. Intervention adherence scores derived for each store assisted interview data interpretation. RESULTS Healthy Stores 2020 strategy was, for the most part, adhered to. Analysis of the 30 interviews revealed that implementation climate of the ALPA organisation, its readiness for implementation including a strong sense of social purpose, and the networks and communication between the Store Managers and other parts of ALPA, were CFIR inner and outer domains most frequently referred to as positive to strategy implementation. Store Managers were a 'make-or-break' touchstone of implementation success. The co-designed intervention and strategy characteristics and its perceived cost-benefit, combined with the inner and outer setting factors, galvanised the individual characteristics of Store Managers (e.g., optimism, adaptability and retail competency) to champion implementation. Where there was less perceived cost-benefit, Store Managers seemed less enthusiastic for the strategy. CONCLUSIONS Factors critical to implementation (a strong sense of social purpose; structures and processes within and external to the food retail organisation and their alignment with intervention characteristics (low complexity, cost advantage); and Store Manager characteristics) can inform the design of implementation strategies for the adoption of this health-enabling food retail initiative in the remote setting. This research can help inform a shift in research focus to identify, develop and test implementation strategies for the wide adoption of health-enabling food retail initiatives into practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12,618,001,588,280.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Brimblecombe
- Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, Victoria, 3168, Australia. .,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Building 58 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT, 0810, Australia. .,School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Public Health Building, Level 4, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
| | - Bethany Miles
- grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, Victoria, 3168 Australia
| | - Emma Chappell
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Building 58 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT 0810 Australia ,grid.1003.20000 0000 9320 7537School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Public Health Building, Level 4, Herston, QLD 4006 Australia
| | - Khia De Silva
- Arnhem Land Progress Aboriginal Corporation, 70 O’Sullivan Cct, East Arm, NT 0828 Australia
| | - Megan Ferguson
- grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, Victoria, 3168 Australia ,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Building 58 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT 0810 Australia ,grid.1003.20000 0000 9320 7537School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Public Health Building, Level 4, Herston, QLD 4006 Australia
| | - Catherine Mah
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Dalhousie University, 5850 College Street, Second Floor, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7 Canada
| | - Eddie Miles
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Building 58 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT 0810 Australia
| | - Anthony Gunther
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Building 58 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT 0810 Australia
| | - Thomas Wycherley
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 Australia
| | - Anna Peeters
- grid.1021.20000 0001 0526 7079Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC Australia
| | - Leia Minaker
- grid.46078.3d0000 0000 8644 1405School of Planning, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
| | - Emma McMahon
- grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1 264 Ferntree Gully Rd, Notting Hill, Victoria, 3168 Australia ,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Building 58 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT 0810 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cost-Benefit and Cost-Utility Analyses to Demonstrate the Potential Value-for-Money of Supermarket Shelf Tags Promoting Healthier Packaged Products in Australia. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14091919. [PMID: 35565886 PMCID: PMC9103654 DOI: 10.3390/nu14091919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The supermarket environment impacts the healthiness of food purchased and consumed. Shelf tags that alert customers to healthier packaged products can improve the healthiness of overall purchases. This study assessed the potential value-for-money of implementing a three-year shelf tag intervention across all major supermarket chains in Australia. Cost-benefit analyses (CBA) and cost-utility analyses (CUA) were conducted based on results of a 12-week non-randomised controlled trial of a shelf tag intervention in seven Australian supermarkets. The change in energy density of all packaged foods purchased during the trial was used to estimate population-level changes in mean daily energy intake. A multi-state, multiple-cohort Markov model estimated the subsequent obesity-related health and healthcare cost outcomes over the lifetime of the 2019 Australian population. The CBA and CUA took societal and healthcare sector perspectives, respectively. The intervention was estimated to produce a mean reduction in population body weight of 1.09 kg. The net present value of the intervention was approximately AUD 17 billion (B). Over 98% of the intervention costs were borne by supermarkets. CUA findings were consistent with the CBA-the intervention was dominant, producing both health benefits and cost-savings. Shelf tags are likely to offer excellent value-for-money from societal and healthcare sector perspectives.
Collapse
|
8
|
Franckle RL, Boulos RJ, Thorndike AN, Moran AJ, Khandpur N, Blue D, Greene J, Block JP, Rimm EB, Polacsek M. Implementation of a 2-for-1 Price Incentive for Fruits and Vegetables in a Grocery Retail Setting. Health Promot Pract 2022:15248399221086880. [PMID: 35414293 DOI: 10.1177/15248399221086880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There is growing interest in expanding healthy eating interventions in the retail setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a successful 2-for-1 price incentive for fruits and vegetables (F&V), including frozen and canned, that took place in partnership with a large chain grocery retailer in Maine. Intervention Approach. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) pilot study was conducted in 2015-2016, followed by a larger RCT in 2016-2017, to assess whether a supermarket double-dollar F&V incentive increased purchases of these items. EVALUATION METHODS A convergent, parallel mixed-methods design was used to examine barriers and facilitators to implementing the interventions, using six implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, implementation fidelity, and perceived cost. RESULTS The intervention was deemed highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible by shoppers, retailers, and researchers. The F&V discount had a high rate of initial adoption. There was a moderate degree of fidelity, which improved over time based on lessons learned from the pilot and applied to the subsequent RCT. Specific costs associated with implementation from the research perspective are reported. Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research. Partnerships between academic researchers and retailers can be an effective model for improving healthful purchases among shoppers. These findings are relevant for investigators, public health advocates, and retailers interested in implementing similar grocery retail-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R J Boulos
- Maine Public Health Association, Augusta, ME, USA
| | - A N Thorndike
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A J Moran
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - N Khandpur
- University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - D Blue
- Hannaford Supermarkets, Scarborough, ME, USA
| | - J Greene
- Guiding Stars Licensing Company LLC, Ahold Delhaize, USA
| | - J P Block
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E B Rimm
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Polacsek
- University of New England, Portland, ME, USA
| |
Collapse
|