ERCC1 polymorphisms as prognostic markers in T4 breast cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

Breast cancer pharmacogenetics: a systematic review

Breast cancer was declared the most prevalent type of cancer in 2020. Among other factors, treatment response can be affected by genetic polymorphisms - which is the focus of pharmacogenetics - and ethnicity is also a contributing factor in this context. Relevant genes in disease treatment pathways were selected to evaluate treatment response from the pharmacogenetic perspective; polymorphism frequencies and ethnic and continental representation across the available literature were also assessed through a systematic review. The identified associations and gaps have been described in this study with the purpose that, in the future, treatments can be personalized and thus be more effective, safer, and accessible to all.

The Significant Interaction of Excision Repair Cross-complementing Group 1 Genotypes and Smoking to Lung Cancer Risk

BACKGROUND

The study aims to evaluate the contribution of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1), which plays an important role in genome integrity maintenance, to lung cancer risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986 genotypes were identified by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and their association with lung cancer risk was examined among 358 lung cancer patients and 716 controls.

RESULTS

The proportions of CC, CT and TT for the rs11615 genotype were 43.6%, 41.6% and 14.8% in the case group and 50.0%, 41.1% and 8.9% in the control group, respectively (p for trend=0.0082). Allelic analysis showed that ERCC1 rs11615 T-allele carriers have a 1.32-fold higher risk of lung cancer than wild-type C-allele carriers [95%confidence interval (CI)=1.09-1.60, p=0.0039]. In addition, a significant interaction between the rs11615 genotype and smoking status was observed.

CONCLUSION

The T allele of ERCC1 rs11615 jointly with smoking habits may contribute to a higher lung cancer risk in Taiwan.

Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer

ERCC1 is a key regulator of nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway that repairs bulky DNA adducts, including intrastrand DNA adducts and interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Overexpression of ERCC1 has been linked to increased DNA repair capacity and platinum resistance in solid tumors. Multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been detected in ERCC1 gene that may affect ERCC1 protein expression. Platinum-based treatment remains the cornerstone of urothelial cancer treatment. Given the expanding application of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer, there is an emerging need for biomarkers that could distinguish potential responders to cisplatin treatment. Extensive research has been done regarding the prognostic and predictive role of ERCC1 gene expression and polymorphisms in bladder cancer. Moreover, novel compounds have been recently developed to target ERCC1 protein function in order to maximize sensitivity to cisplatin. We aim to review all the existing literature regarding the role of the ERCC1 gene in bladder cancer and address future perspectives for its clinical application.

Clinical research of individualized therapy in advanced esophageal cancer based on the ERCC1 C8092A genotype

The present study aimed to explore the role and clinical value of the detection of Excision repair cross-complementing 1(ERCC1) C8092A polymorphisms in individualized therapy of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. A total of 127 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were enrolled between January 2010 and January 2014 in Anhui Provincial Hospital. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to a standard treatment group or an individualized treatment group, respectively, prior to ERCC1 C8092A assessment. Patients in the standard treatment group were treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin. The DNA was obtained from the peripheral blood of individualized treatment patients, amplified by PCR and sequenced to determine the ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism prior to the administration of chemotherapies. Patients with the ERCC1 C8092A genotype of A/A or A/C received paclitaxel and cisplatin, and those with the genotype of C/C received paclitaxel and fluorouracil. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). The secondary endpoints included toxicity of chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times. Differences between the groups were evaluated by χ² test. Differences in survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The survival rate was analyzed by log-rank test. Follow-up data was obtained until December 2015. The RR was obtained for 15 patients (34.8%) in the standard treatment group and 45 patients (53.6%) in the individualized treatment group (χ²=3.095; P=0.046). For adverse events, nausea and vomiting and anemia were significantly decreased in the individualized treatment group compared with the standard treatment group (P=0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). The median progression free survival time was 4.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI)3.8-5.0 months] in the standard treatment group and 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.4 months) in the individualized treatment group (P=0.018). The median overall survival time was 11.4 months (95% CI, 10.1-12.7 months) in the standard treatment group and 14.2 months (95% CI, 13.2-15.2 months) in the individualized treatment group (P=0.008). The RR, toxicity of chemotherapy, PFS and OS were significantly improved in the individualized treatment group compared with the standard treatment group. Detection of ERCC1 gene polymorphisms maybe performed for patients with advanced esophageal cancer to improve individualized therapy, which requires additional study.

Meta-analysis showing that ERCC1 polymorphism is predictive of osteosarcoma prognosis

To investigate correlations between excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and 2 (ERCC2) polymorphisms and osteosarcoma prognosis, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies published through October 2016. Studies were identified in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Web of Science databases using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS), tumor response (TR), and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated. Our meta-analysis included eleven studies in which four SNPs (ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, ERCC2 rs13181 and rs1799793) reportedly associated with osteosarcoma prognosis were investigated. Each of these studies scored > 6 on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). We found that only one SNP, ERCC1 rs11615, correlated with improved OS and TR. The HR of T vs. C for OS was 1.455 (T/C, 95% CI = 1.151–1.839, P = 0.002, I² = 37.80%). The OR of T vs. C for good TR was 0.554 (T/C, 95% CI = 0.437–0.702, P < 0.001, I² = 0%). Few significant outcome was observed in subgroup analyses stratified based on study characteristics with adjustments for potential confounders. Our results suggest that ERCC1 rs11615 CC is associated with a better clinical outcome. This suggests rs11615 may be a useful genetic marker for predicting osteosarcoma prognosis.

Prognostic value of ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene polymorphisms in patients with gastric cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy

We conducted a prospective study to analyze whether ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986 and ERCC2 rs13181 and rs1799793 gene polymorphisms could serve as potential biomarkers for the prognosis of gastric cancer. A total of 228 patients with pathologically proven gastric cancer and receiving platinum-based chemotherapy were recruited from our hospital between October 2009 and October 2011. The ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986 and ERCC2 rs13181 and rs1799793 polymorphisms were genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay. Conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that patients carrying the CA and AA genotypes of ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism showed a poorer response to chemotherapy compared to the CC genotype (CA vs. CC: OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.06-0.98, P = 0.04; AA vs. CC: OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.06-0.98, P = 0.01). Moreover, the CA+AA genotype of ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism showed a significantly poorer response to chemotherapy (CA+AA vs. CC: OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.27-0.90). Patients with the AA genotype of ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism had a longer overall survival time when compared with the CC genotype (34.91 months vs. 51.19 months, log-rank P = 0.003). The AA genotype of ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism in gastric cancer patients was correlated with a higher risk of death from varying causes by the Cox proportional hazards model, compared to the CC genotype (HR = 6.19, 95% CI = 1.42-30.60). In conclusion, the ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism was found to influence the response to chemotherapy and overall survival of gastric cancer patients.