1
|
Zhang S, Jiang Z, Zeng P. Incorporating genetic similarity of auxiliary samples into eGene identification under the transfer learning framework. J Transl Med 2024; 22:258. [PMID: 38461317 PMCID: PMC10924384 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05053-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The term eGene has been applied to define a gene whose expression level is affected by at least one independent expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL). It is both theoretically and empirically important to identify eQTLs and eGenes in genomic studies. However, standard eGene detection methods generally focus on individual cis-variants and cannot efficiently leverage useful knowledge acquired from auxiliary samples into target studies. METHODS We propose a multilocus-based eGene identification method called TLegene by integrating shared genetic similarity information available from auxiliary studies under the statistical framework of transfer learning. We apply TLegene to eGene identification in ten TCGA cancers which have an explicit relevant tissue in the GTEx project, and learn genetic effect of variant in TCGA from GTEx. We also adopt TLegene to the Geuvadis project to evaluate its usefulness in non-cancer studies. RESULTS We observed substantial genetic effect correlation of cis-variants between TCGA and GTEx for a larger number of genes. Furthermore, consistent with the results of our simulations, we found that TLegene was more powerful than existing methods and thus identified 169 distinct candidate eGenes, which was much larger than the approach that did not consider knowledge transfer across target and auxiliary studies. Previous studies and functional enrichment analyses provided empirical evidence supporting the associations of discovered eGenes, and it also showed evidence of allelic heterogeneity of gene expression. Furthermore, TLegene identified more eGenes in Geuvadis and revealed that these eGenes were mainly enriched in cells EBV transformed lymphocytes tissue. CONCLUSION Overall, TLegene represents a flexible and powerful statistical method for eGene identification through transfer learning of genetic similarity shared across auxiliary and target studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhou Jiang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping Zeng
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Center for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Key Laboratory of Human Genetics and Environmental Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Xuzhou Engineering Research Innovation Center of Biological Data Mining and Healthcare Transformation, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Jiangsu Engineering Research Center of Biological Data Mining and Healthcare Transformation, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shao Z, Wang T, Qiao J, Zhang Y, Huang S, Zeng P. A comprehensive comparison of multilocus association methods with summary statistics in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2022; 23:359. [PMID: 36042399 PMCID: PMC9429742 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-04897-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multilocus analysis on a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) pre-assigned within a gene constitutes a valuable complement to single-marker analysis by aggregating data on complex traits in a biologically meaningful way. However, despite the existence of a wide variety of SNP-set methods, few comprehensive comparison studies have been previously performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. RESULTS We herein sought to fill this knowledge gap by conducting a comprehensive empirical comparison for 22 commonly-used summary-statistics based SNP-set methods. We showed that only seven methods could effectively control the type I error, and that these well-calibrated approaches had varying power performance under the simulation scenarios. Overall, we confirmed that the burden test was generally underpowered and score-based variance component tests (e.g., sequence kernel association test) were much powerful under the polygenic genetic architecture in both common and rare variant association analyses. We further revealed that two linkage-disequilibrium-free P value combination methods (e.g., harmonic mean P value method and aggregated Cauchy association test) behaved very well under the sparse genetic architecture in simulations and real-data applications to common and rare variant association analyses as well as in expression quantitative trait loci weighted integrative analysis. We also assessed the scalability of these approaches by recording computational time and found that all these methods can be scalable to biobank-scale data although some might be relatively slow. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we hope that our findings can offer an important guidance on how to choose appropriate multilocus association analysis methods in post-GWAS era. All the SNP-set methods are implemented in the R package called MCA, which is freely available at https://github.com/biostatpzeng/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhonghe Shao
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ting Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiahao Qiao
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yuchen Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shuiping Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
- Center for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Genetics and Environmental Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
- Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
- Engineering Research Innovation Center of Biological Data Mining and Healthcare Transformation, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping Zeng
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Center for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Key Laboratory of Human Genetics and Environmental Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
- Engineering Research Innovation Center of Biological Data Mining and Healthcare Transformation, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221004, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|