The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters

Enhanced vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diversion

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of enhanced 3D T1-weighted black-blood fast-spin-echo vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (eVW-MRI) and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA) for follow-up evaluation of aneurysms treated with flow diversion (FD).

METHODS

Our study enrolled 77 patients harboring 84 aneurysms treated with FD. Follow-up was by MRI (eVW-MRI and TOF MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Two radiologists, blinded to DSA examination results, independently evaluated the images of aneurysm occlusion and parent artery patency using the Kamran-Byrne Scale. Interobserver diagnostic agreement and intermodality diagnostic agreement were acquired. Pretreatment and follow-up aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) patterns were collected.

RESULTS

Based on the Kamran-Byrne Scale, the intermodality agreement between eVW-MRI and DSA was better than TOF MRA versus DSA for aneurysm remnant detection (weighted ĸ = 0.891 v. 0.553) and parent artery patency (ĸ = 0.950 v. 0.221). Even with the coil artifact, the consistency of eVW-MRI with DSA for aneurysm remnant detection was better than that of TOF MRA (weighted ĸ = 0.891 v. 0.511). The artifact of adjunctive coils might be more likely to affect the accuracy in evaluating parent artery patency with TOF MRA than with eVW-MRI (ĸ = 0.077 v. 0.788). The follow-up AWE patterns were not significantly associated with pretreatment AWE patterns and aneurysm occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The eVW-MRI outperforms TOF MRA as a reliable noninvasive and nonionizing radioactive imaging method for evaluating aneurysm remnants and parent artery patency after FD. The significance of enhancement patterns on eVW-MRI sequences needs more exploration.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The application of enhanced vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging has proven to be a promising tool to depict aneurysm remnant and parent artery stenosis in order to tailor the antiplatelet therapy strategy in patients after flow diversion.

KEY POINTS

• Enhanced vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging has an emerging role in depicting aneurysm remnant and parent artery patency after flow diversion. • With or without the artifact from adjunctive coils, enhanced vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging was better than TOF MRA in detecting aneurysm residual and parent artery stenosis by using DSA imaging as the standard. • Enhanced vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging holds potential to be used as an alternative to DSA for routine aneurysm follow-up after flow diversion.

Diagnostic performance of silent magnetic resonance angiography for endovascularly-treated intracranial aneurysm follow-up: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have reported the clinical usefulness of silent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the follow-up of endovascularly-treated aneurysms. However, most previous studies were retrospective or with small sample sizes. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of silent MRA in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by different interventional approaches.

METHODS

Patients with endovascularly-treated intracranial aneurysms and followed by silent MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were enrolled. The visualization of treated sites on silent MRA was rated on a 5-point scale. The aneurysm occlusion status was evaluated using the Raymond Scale and a simplified two-grade scale.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients with 175 treated aneurysms were enrolled. The average score for the visualization of treated sites was 3.92±0.94, and 93.7% (164/175) had a score ≥3. In the subgroup analysis, except for the simple coiling group which had an obviously higher score (4.95±0.21), there was no significant difference among the stent-assisted coiling group (3.51±0.77), flow diversion group (3.74±0.80), and flow diversion with coiling group (3.40±1.17). Regarding aneurysm occlusion status, silent MRA and DSA were discordant for only one aneurysm using the Raymond Scale, and the inter-modality consistency was almost perfect (κ=0.992, 95% CI 0.977 to 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Silent MRA showed an excellent diagnostic performance in the follow-up of endovascularly-treated intracranial aneurysms, and may be an ideal option for repeated examinations.

Integration- and separation-aware adversarial model for cerebrovascular segmentation from TOF-MRA

PURPOSE

Cerebrovascular segmentation from time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is important but challenging for the simulation and measurement of cerebrovascular diseases. Recently, deep learning has promoted the rapid development of cerebrovascular segmentation. However, model optimization relies on voxel or regional punishment and lacks global awareness and interpretation from the texture and edge. To overcome the limitations of the existing methods, we propose a new cerebrovascular segmentation method to obtain more refined structures.

METHODS

In this paper, we propose a new adversarial model that achieves segmentation using segmentation model and filters the results using discriminator. Considering the sample imbalance in cerebrovascular imaging, we separated the TOF-MRA images and utilized high- and low-frequency images to enhance the texture and edge representation. The encoder weight sharing from the segmentation model not only saves the model parameters, but also strengthens the integration and separation correlation. Diversified discrimination enhances the robustness and regularization of the model.

RESULTS

The adversarial model was tested using two cerebrovascular datasets. It scored 82.26% and 73.38%, respectively, ranking first on both datasets. The results show that our method not only outperforms the recent cerebrovascular segmentation model, but also surpasses the common adversarial models.

CONCLUSION

Our adversarial model focuses on improving the extraction ability of the model on texture and edge, thereby achieving awareness of the global cerebrovascular topology. Therefore, we obtained an accurate and robust cerebrovascular segmentation. This framework has potential applications in many imaging fields, particularly in the application of sample imbalance. Our code is available at the website https://github.com/MontaEllis/ISA-model.

Endovascular treatment of challenging aneurysms with FRED Jr flow diverter stents: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To analyze clinical safety and efficacy of flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) Jr flow diverter for treatment of unruptured, ruptured, or recanalyzed aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 2019 and February 2022, 25 patients with 31 aneurysms treated with FRED Jr were included in the study. Clinical and radiological records, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Eighteen (72%) patients were female. Median age was 48.8 (age range 9-85). Mean follow-up was 21 months (6-28 months). Location of the aneurysms were as follows; 13 in middle cerebral artery (MCA), 7 in anterior cerebral artery (ACA), 4 in posterior cerebral artery (PCA), 3 in true posterior communicating artery (PCom), 2 in anterior communicating artery (ACom), 1 in superior cerebellar artery (SCA), 1 in true ophthalmic artery. Five patients (20%) presented with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

RESULTS

In all procedures, FRED Jr was successfully deployed. Three true Pcom aneurysms and a true ophthalmic aneurysm were treated with FRED Jr. Three patients with two adjacent aneurysms were treated with a single FRED Jr. In two (8%) patients in-stent thrombosis occurred intraoperatively, they were treated with iv tirofiban and thrombectomy without any sequelae. Post-discharge 2 weeks later, intraparenchymal hemorrhage occurred in a patient. He was treated with surgical drainage, the clinical course was modified Rankin score (mRS) 2. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed on 16 (64%) patients with 21 (67%) aneurysms. Near complete-complete occlusion (O'Kelly-Morata grading scale (OKM C-D) was documented in 15/16 (93.7%) patients, 20/21 (95.2%) aneurysms. In nine (36%) patients, no residual filling was observed in the magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Good clinical outcome (mRS 0-1) was achieved in 24/25 (96%) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment of small cerebral aneurysms with FRED Jr is safe and effective even in complex and challenging morphologies allowing high rates of aneurysm occlusion with low periprocedural complications. Our cohort, consisting of a rate 20% acute ruptured aneurysms, is the major additive data to the published literature.

Magnetic Resonance Angiography after Flow Diversion: The use of complementary MRA techniques to monitor aneurysm occlusion as well as device and arterial branch patency after flow diverter placement

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been performed to evaluate flow diversion with MRA. They have shown better success for MRA to assess the aneurysm response but limited success for the stent patency. Further, the patency of arterial branches on MRA remains to be explored.

METHODS

31 consecutive cases of carotid aneurysms treated with flow diversion were retrospectively evaluated with noncontrast time of flight (TOF), contrast enhanced TOF (CTOF) and cine MRA (TWIST) independently by two investigators for aneurysm occlusion, stent patency and arterial branch patency. DSA served as the gold standard technique.

RESULTS

There were 6 males and 25 females in the age range of years (mean ±SD). Stent patency, aneurysm occlusion and branch patency, mostly revealed substantial to perfect interobserver agreement (k >0.60). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the stent patency on source images of TOF were 0.99,0.84, 0.42 and 0.99 and on CTOF were 0.99, 0.89, 0.50 and 0.99 respectively.Sensitivity for the aneurysm response on the three MRAs ranged from 0.88 to 0.93,specificity from 0.64 to 0.75, positive predictive value from 0.69 to 0.79 and negative predictive value from 0.86 to 0.90. Sensitivity for the arterial branch patency among the three MRAs, ranged from 0.55 to 0.93, specificity from 0.61 to 0.68, positive predictive value from 0.79 to 0.93 and negative predictive value from 0.22 to 0.90.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm occlusion, stent patency and arterial branch patency in flow diversion can be successfully evaluated with the combination of three MRA techniques.

Follow-up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Flow Diverters: Evaluation of Parent Artery Patency Using 3D-T1 Gradient Recalled-Echo Imaging with 2-Point Dixon in Combination with 3D-TOF-MRA with Compressed Sensing

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MRA assessment of parent artery patency after flow-diverter placement is complicated by imaging artifacts produced by these devices. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of liver acquisition with volume acceleration-flex technique (LAVA-Flex) MRA in combination with 3D-TOF with HyperSense MRA for the evaluation of parent vessel status after intracranial flow-diverter placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients treated by flow diversion and followed with both DSA and 3T MRA between November 2020 and August 2021 were included. All patients were evaluated for parent artery patency using the same imaging protocol (DSA, noncontrast MRA including 3D-TOF with HyperSense and LAVA-Flex, and contrast-enhanced MRA, including time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics MRA and delayed contrast-enhanced MRA).

RESULTS

With DSA as a criterion standard to evaluate the patency of the parent vessel, noncontrast MRA had a good specificity (0.83) and positive predictive value (0.65), better than contrast-enhanced MRA (0.55 and 0.41, respectively). Both had excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value: noncontrast MRA, 0.93 and 0.97, respectively; contrast-enhanced MRA, 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive value tended to be lower for patients treated with additional devices than for those treated with flow diverters exclusively and for patients treated with a specific type of flow diverter.

CONCLUSIONS

Noncontrast MRA can be used for noninvasive follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverters. The combined use of LAVA-Flex and 3D-TOF with HyperSense sequences allows monitoring the status of the parent artery and aneurysm occlusion.