1
|
Huynh A, Buckle J, Cox A, Czerniecki L, Gowdie P, Renton W, Allen R, Tiller G. The transition process for paediatric rheumatology clinic patients at a single tertiary paediatric rheumatology centre in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health 2024; 60:240-245. [PMID: 38764198 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to examine the transition process of paediatric rheumatology patients from the Monash Children's Hospital (MCH) in Melbourne in order to identify areas that could be improved. METHODS Retrospective review of clinical data from the rheumatology database of paediatric rheumatology patients eligible for transition between January 2015 and September 2020. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-five patients were included; 57 patients were transitioned. Of patients transitioned to an adult service, 38 (88%) were on medication and 14 (33%) had active disease. All patients transitioned to the general practitioner (GP) had inactive disease off medication. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (non-systemic) was the most common diagnosis in patients transitioned. The mean age at which transition was first discussed was 18.0 years; the first referral was made at a mean of 18.3 years. The mean age at the first adult appointment was 18.5 years. Thirty-nine (91%) patients had a referral completed and 8 (19%) had a transfer letter. Thirteen (93%) patients transferred to the GP had a transfer letter. Transfer documents to an adult public rheumatology service rated 4.3 for quality, compared to 5.5 to the GP. Transfer of care was confirmed in 40 (93%) patients transitioned to an adult service; however, correspondence was available for only 3 (7%). CONCLUSION Although the transition process at MCH was adequate, it could be improved through earlier discussion of the process and improved referrals and documentation. A readiness-to-transfer checklist and a young adult clinic have the potential to improve the process of transition to adult rheumatology care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee Huynh
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne Buckle
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Cox
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leanne Czerniecki
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gowdie
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William Renton
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roger Allen
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Georgina Tiller
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tiller G, Hernandez BL, Buckle J, Allen R, Munro J, Gowdie P, Cox A, Akikusa J. Three- and five-year outcomes of an inception cohort of Australian children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 2024; 27:e15189. [PMID: 38769844 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.15189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To describe the 3- and 5-year outcomes of an inception cohort of Australian children with JIA for whom 1-year outcomes have previously been published. METHODS Data regarding clinical outcomes of the original cohort of 134 patients at 3 and 5 years were sought. Relevant clinical features and medication exposures entered prospectively into an electronic record were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Data were available for 110 and 98 patients at 3 and 5 years, respectively. The proportion of patients with active joints progressively decreased from 34% at 12 months to 21% at 3 years and 16% at 5 years. Cumulative exposure to methotrexate increased between 3 and 5 years (75%-80%), however, point prevalence use decreased (45%-41%). Cumulative exposure and point prevalence use of bDMARDS both increased between 3 and 5 years; 30%-42% and 29%-33%, respectively. Thirty-five percent of patients had inactive joint disease off medications at 5 years, which occurred most frequently in patients with sJIA and oligoarthritis. CONCLUSION Five-year outcomes of Australian children with JIA are good, with only a small minority having ongoing active joint disease at 5 years. bDMARDS play an increasing role in management over time; however, methotrexate use remains significant. A majority of children remain on medications at 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Tiller
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Joanne Buckle
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roger Allen
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Munro
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gowdie
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Cox
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan Akikusa
- Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan J, Renton WD, Whittle SL, Takken T, Johnston RV, Tiller G, Munro J, Buchbinder R. Methotrexate for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 2:CD003129. [PMID: 38334147 PMCID: PMC10853975 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003129.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood. Methotrexate has broad immunomodulatory properties and is the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). This is an update of a 2001 Cochrane review. It supports a living guideline for children and young people with JIA. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of methotrexate for children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. SEARCH METHODS The Australian JIA Living Guideline Working Group created a registry of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of JIA by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registries. The date of the most recent search of online databases was 1 February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We searched for RCTs that compared methotrexate with placebo, no treatment, or another DMARD (with or without concomitant therapies) in children and young people (aged up to 18 years) with JIA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. The main comparison was methotrexate versus placebo. Our outcomes were treatment response, sustained clinically inactive disease, function, pain, participant global assessment of well-being, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We identified three new trials in this update, bringing the total number of included RCTs to five (575 participants). Three trials evaluated oral methotrexate versus placebo, one evaluated methotrexate plus intra-articular glucocorticoid (IAGC) therapy versus IAGC therapy alone, and one evaluated methotrexate versus leflunomide. Doses of methotrexate ranged from 5 mg/m2/week to 15 mg/m2/week in four trials, and participants in the methotrexate group of the remaining trial received 0.5 mg/kg/week. Trial size varied from 31 to 226 participants. The average age of participants ranged from four to 10 years. Most participants were females and most had nonsystemic JIA. The study that evaluated methotrexate plus IAGC therapy versus IAGC therapy alone recruited children and young people with the oligoarticular disease subtype of JIA. Two placebo-controlled trials and the trial of methotrexate versus leflunomide were adequately randomised and blinded, and likely not susceptible to important biases. One placebo-controlled trial may have been susceptible to selection bias due to lack of adequate reporting of randomisation methods. The trial investigating the addition of methotrexate to IAGC therapy was susceptible to performance and detection biases. Methotrexate versus placebo Methotrexate compared with placebo may increase the number of children and young people who achieve treatment response up to six months (absolute difference of 163 more per 1000 people; risk ratio (RR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 2.31; I2 = 0%; 3 trials, 328 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, methotrexate compared with placebo may have little or no effect on pain as measured on an increasing scale of 0 to 100 (mean difference (MD) -1.10 points, 95% CI -9.09 to 6.88; 1 trial, 114 participants), improvement in participant global assessment of well-being (absolute difference of 92 more per 1000 people; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.72; 1 trial, 176 participants), occurrence of serious adverse events (absolute difference of 5 fewer per 1000 people; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.97; 3 trials, 328 participants), and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 3.46, 95% CI 0.60 to 19.79; 3 trials, 328 participants) up to six months. We could not estimate the absolute difference for withdrawals due to adverse events because there were no withdrawals in the placebo group. All outcomes were reported within six months of randomisation. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low for all outcomes due to indirectness (suboptimal dosing of methotrexate and diverse outcome measures) and imprecision (few participants and low event rates). No trials reported function or the number of participants with sustained clinically inactive disease. Serious adverse events included liver derangement, abdominal pain, and inadvertent overdose. Methotrexate plus intra-articular corticosteroid therapy versus intra-articular corticosteroid therapy alone Methotrexate plus IAGC therapy compared with IAGC therapy alone may have little or no effect on the probability of sustained clinically inactive disease or the rate of withdrawals due to adverse events up to 12 months in children and young people with the oligoarticular subtype of JIA (low-certainty evidence). We could not calculate the absolute difference in withdrawals due to adverse events because there were no withdrawals in the control group. We are uncertain if there is any difference between the interventions in the risk of severe adverse events, because none were reported. The study did not report treatment response, function, pain, or participant global assessment of well-being. Methotrexate versus an alternative disease-modifying antirheumatic drug Methotrexate compared with leflunomide may have little or no effect on the probability of treatment response or on function, participant global assessment of well-being, risk of serious adverse events, and rate of withdrawals due to adverse events up to four months. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes to low due to imprecision. The study did not report pain or sustained clinically inactive disease. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Oral methotrexate (5 mg/m2/week to 15 mg/m2/week) compared with placebo may increase the number of children and young people achieving treatment response but may have little or no effect on pain or participant global assessment of well-being. Oral methotrexate plus IAGC injections compared to IAGC injections alone may have little or no effect on the likelihood of sustained clinically inactive disease among children and young people with oligoarticular JIA. Similarly, methotrexate compared with leflunomide may have little or no effect on treatment response, function, and participant global assessment of well-being. Serious adverse events due to methotrexate appear to be rare. We will update this review as new evidence becomes available to inform the living guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Tan
- Department of Rheumatology, Children's Health Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - William D Renton
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Samuel L Whittle
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Adelaide, Woodville, Australia
| | - Tim Takken
- Child Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Renea V Johnston
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Georgina Tiller
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Munro
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Renton WD, Tiller G, Munro J, Tan J, Johnston RV, Avery JC, Whittle SL, Arno A, Buchbinder R. Dose reduction and discontinuation of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Hippokratia 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William D Renton
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of General Medicine; The Royal Children's Hospital; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology; Monash Children's Hospital; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Georgina Tiller
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of General Medicine; The Royal Children's Hospital; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology; Monash Children's Hospital; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Jane Munro
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of General Medicine; The Royal Children's Hospital; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Joachim Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of General Medicine; Queensland Children’s Hospital; Brisbane Australia
| | - Renea V Johnston
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Jodie C Avery
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute; The University of Adelaide; North Adelaide Australia
| | - Samuel L Whittle
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
- Rheumatology Unit; Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Woodville South Australia
| | - Anneliese Arno
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Health; Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
García-Rodríguez F, Gamboa-Alonso A, Jiménez-Hernández S, Ochoa-Alderete L, Barrientos-Martínez VA, Alvarez-Villalobos NA, Luna-Ruíz GA, Peláez-Ballestas I, Villarreal-Treviño AV, de la O-Cavazos ME, Rubio-Pérez N. Economic impact of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: a systematic review. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2021; 19:152. [PMID: 34627296 PMCID: PMC8502332 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-021-00641-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) requires complex care that generate elevated costs, which results in a high economic impact for the family. The aim of this systematic review was to collect and cluster the information currently available on healthcare costs associated with JIA after the introduction of biological therapies. METHODS We comprehensively searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Databases for studies from January 2000 to March 2021. Reviewers working independently and in duplicate appraised the quality and included primary studies that report total, direct and/or indirect costs related to JIA for at least one year. The costs were converted to United States dollars and an inflationary adjustment was made. RESULTS We found 18 eligible studies including data from 6,540 patients. Total costs were reported in 10 articles, ranging from $310 USD to $44,832 USD annually. Direct costs were reported in 16 articles ($193 USD to $32,446 USD), showing a proportion of 55 to 98 % of total costs. Those costs were mostly related to medications and medical appointments. Six studies reported indirect costs ($117 USD to $12,385 USD). Four studies reported costs according to JIA category observing the highest in polyarticular JIA. Total and direct costs increased up to three times after biological therapy initiation. A high risk of reporting bias and inconsistency of the methodology used were found. CONCLUSION The costs of JIA are substantial, and the highest are derived from medication and medical appointments. Indirect costs of JIA are underrepresented in costs analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando García-Rodríguez
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Madero y Gonzalitos SN, Col. Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Augusto Gamboa-Alonso
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit México), Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Sol Jiménez-Hernández
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Madero y Gonzalitos SN, Col. Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Lucero Ochoa-Alderete
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Madero y Gonzalitos SN, Col. Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Valeria Alejandra Barrientos-Martínez
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Madero y Gonzalitos SN, Col. Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Ana Victoria Villarreal-Treviño
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Madero y Gonzalitos SN, Col. Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Manuel Enrique de la O-Cavazos
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Madero y Gonzalitos SN, Col. Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Nadina Rubio-Pérez
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Madero y Gonzalitos SN, Col. Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sahin S, Acari C, Sonmez HE, Kilic FZ, Sag E, Dundar HA, Adrovic A, Demir S, Barut K, Bilginer Y, Sozeri B, Unsal E, Ozen S, Kasapcopur O. Frequency of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and associated uveitis in pediatric rheumatology clinics in Turkey: A retrospective study, JUPITER. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2021; 19:134. [PMID: 34425847 PMCID: PMC8383412 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-021-00613-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), is the most common pediatric rheumatologic disorder with unknown etiology. Currently, no population-based data are available regarding the distribution of categories and frequency of uveitis in patients with JIA in Turkey. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of JIA-associated uveitis (JIAU) and distribution of JIA categories in a Turkish JIA cohort. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 500 randomized patients in four pediatric rheumatology clinics in Turkey. RESULTS Oligoarticular JIA (oJIA) was the most common JIA disease category in this study cohort (38.8%). The frequencies of the other categories were as follows: enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), 23.2%; rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative polyarthritis, 15.6%; systemic arthritis, 12.2%; juvenile psoriatic arthritis, 5.2%; undifferentiated arthritis, 2.8%; and RF-positive polyarthritis, 2.2%. JIA-associated uveitis was observed in 6.8% of patients at a mean (Standard Deviation, SD) age of 9.1 (3.8) years over a mean JIA disease duration of 4 (1.9) years. Uveitis developed after joint disease, with a mean (SD) duration of 1.8 (1.9) years. Patients with oJIA had the highest rate of uveitis (12.9%) followed by patients with ERA (5.2%) and polyarticular RF-negative disease (3.8%). Compared with persistent oJIA, the extended oJIA category had a > 3-fold higher risk of uveitis (11.3% vs 27.7%; odds ratio, 3.38 [95% Confidence Interval, 1.09-10.4]). The most frequently administered drug after development of uveitis was tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (38.2%). Five patients (14.7%) had uveitis-related complications that required surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Turkish pediatric patients with JIA experience a lower frequency of oJIA and higher frequency of ERA than their white European counterparts; the occurrence of uveitis is also somewhat lower than expected. Geographic and ethnic factors may affect these differences and need further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sezgin Sahin
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, School of Medicine, Koca Mustafapaşa Cd. No:53, Fatih, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ceyhun Acari
- Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | - Erdal Sag
- Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Amra Adrovic
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, School of Medicine, Koca Mustafapaşa Cd. No:53, Fatih, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selcan Demir
- Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kenan Barut
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, School of Medicine, Koca Mustafapaşa Cd. No:53, Fatih, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yelda Bilginer
- Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Betul Sozeri
- Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Erbil Unsal
- Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Seza Ozen
- Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Kasapcopur
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, School of Medicine, Koca Mustafapaşa Cd. No:53, Fatih, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Update on the treatment of nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis including treatment-to-target: is (drug-free) inactive disease already possible? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2021; 32:403-413. [PMID: 32657803 DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review concerns the outcome for nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with emphasis on treatment-to-target (T2T) and treatment strategies aiming at inactive disease by giving an overview of recent articles. RECENT FINDINGS More efficacious therapies and treatment strategies/T2T with inactive disease as target, have improved the outcome for JIA significantly. Recent studies regarding treatment strategies have shown 47-68% inactive disease after 1 year. Moreover, probability of attaining inactive disease at least once in the first year seems even higher in recent cohort-studies, reaching 80%, although these studies included relatively high numbers of oligoarticular JIA patients. However, 26-76% of patients flare upon therapy withdrawal and prediction of flares is still difficult. SUMMARY Remission can be achieved and sustained in (some) JIA patients, regardless of initial treatment. Cornerstone principles in the management of nonsystemic JIA treatment are early start of DMARD therapy, striving for inactive disease and T2T by close and repeated monitoring of disease activity. T2T and tight control appear to be more important than a specific drug in JIA. Next to inactive disease, it is important that patients/parents are involved in personal targets, like reduction of pain and fatigue. Future studies should focus on predictors (based on imaging-methods or biomarkers) for sustained drug-free remission and flare.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rebane K, Aalto K, Haanpää M, Puolakka K, Virta LJ, Kautiainen H, Pohjankoski H. Initiating disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs rapidly reduces purchases of analgesic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2020; 50:28-33. [PMID: 32686548 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2020.1762923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To describe the use of analgesics 12 months before and after initiation of the first disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Method: A register-based study linked three nationwide registers in Finland: the Register on Reimbursement for Prescription Medicines, the Drug Purchase Register (both maintained by the Finnish Social Insurance Institution), and the Finnish Population Register. The study ran from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014. It included 1481 patients aged < 16 years with diagnosed JIA and 4511 matched controls. Index day was the date when reimbursement for JIA medication was approved and treatment was initiated. The study period included 12 months pre- and post-index date, and purchases of prescription drugs were assessed for 3 month periods. Results: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were purchased for 60% of the patients. Compared to controls, NSAID purchases for JIA patients were at their highest during the last 3 months before the index day [relative rate (RR) 21.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.1-26.2], and they decreased steeply over the 10-12 months post-index (RR 4.0, 95% CI 3.1-5.0). Similar trends were seen with paracetamol and opioid purchases, but only 2% of patients purchased opioids during the 12 months pre-index and 1% during the 12 months post-index. Methotrexate was the most commonly used DMARD (91.9%), biologic DMARDs were used by 2.8% and glucocorticoids by 24.8% in the 3 months after the index day. Conclusion: Initiation of DMARDs rapidly reduces the need for analgesics in patients with JIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Rebane
- Paediatric Research Center, Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Aalto
- Paediatric Research Center, Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Haanpää
- Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company , Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Puolakka
- Department of Medicine, South Karelia Central Hospital , Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - L J Virta
- Research Department, Social Insurance Institution of Finland , Turku, Finland
| | - H Kautiainen
- Department of General Practice and Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
| | - H Pohjankoski
- Department of Pediatrics, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital , Lahti, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Batthish M, Berard R, Cabral D, Bolaria R, Chédeville G, Duffy C, Gerhold K, Gerschman T, Huber A, Proulx-Gauthier JP, Rosenberg A, Rumsey D, Schmeling H, Shiff N, Soon G, Bruns A, Tucker L, Guzman J. A new Canadian inception cohort for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: The Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators Registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:2796-2805. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The aim was to describe the design, methods and initial findings of a new Canadian inception cohort of children with JIA, The Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators (CAPRI) JIA Registry.
Methods
The CAPRI JIA Registry was started in 2017 to collect information prospectively on children enrolled within 3 months of JIA diagnosis across Canada. The registry has a non-traditional modular design, with no artificially set times for registry visits to occur, streamlined multi-method data collection that requires 2–4 min per visit, and reports cumulative incidence of treatments, outcomes and adverse events calculated by Kaplan–Meier survival methods.
Results
A total of 166 patients, enrolled a median of 6 weeks after JIA diagnosis at 10 centres, were included. The median age at diagnosis was 9 years [interquartile range (IQR) 3, 13], 61% were female and 51% had oligoarticular JIA. The median three-variable clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score was 6.5 (IQR 4, 10) at enrolment, and the median time to first attainment of clinically inactive disease (CID) was 24 weeks (by 1 year, 81%). Within 1 year of diagnosis, 70% of patients had started a DMARD and 35% a biologic agent. The rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were 60 and 5.8 per 100 patient-years, respectively.
Conclusion
This streamlined and flexible registry minimizes the burden of data collection and interference with clinic operations. Initial findings suggest that treatments for newly diagnosed patients with JIA in Canada have intensified, and now 81% of patients attain CID within 1 year of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Batthish
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
| | - Roberta Berard
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario
| | - David Cabral
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Roxana Bolaria
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Gaëlle Chédeville
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Ciaran Duffy
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Kerstin Gerhold
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
| | - Tommy Gerschman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Adam Huber
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
| | | | - Alan Rosenberg
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
| | - Dax Rumsey
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Heinrike Schmeling
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Natalie Shiff
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gordon Soon
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Alessandra Bruns
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lori Tucker
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Jaime Guzman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sørensen K, Skirbekk H, Kvarstein G, Wøien H. Children's fear of needle injections: a qualitative study of training sessions for children with rheumatic diseases before home administration. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2020; 18:13. [PMID: 32033566 PMCID: PMC7007654 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-020-0406-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of rheumatic diseases in children often includes long-term needle injections, which represent a risk for refusing medication based on potential needle-fear. How nurses manage children's fear and pain during the initial educational training session of subcutaneous injections, may affect the management of the subsequent injections in the home settings. The aim of this study was to explore how children expressed fear and pain during these training sessions, and how adults' communication affected children's expressed emotions. METHODS This qualitative explorative study used video observations and short interviews during training sessions in a rheumatic hospital ward. Participants were children between five and fifteen years (n = 8), their parents (n = 11) and nurses (n = 7) in nine training sessions in total. The analysis followed descriptions of thematic analysis and interaction analysis. RESULTS The children expressed fears indirectly as cues and nonverbal signs more often than direct statements. Three children stated explicit being afraid or wanting to stop. The children worried about needle-pain, but experienced the stinging pain after the injection more bothersome. The technical instructions were detailed and comprehensive and each nurse shaped the structure of the sessions. Both nurses and parents frequently offered coping strategies unclearly without sufficient time for children to understand. We identified three main adult communication approaches (acknowledging, ambiguous and disregarding) that influenced children's expressed emotions during the training session. CONCLUSIONS Children's expression of fear was likely to be indirectly, and pain was mostly related to the injection rather than the needle stick. When adults used an acknowledging communication and offered sufficient coping strategies, children seemed to become involved in the procedure and acted with confidence. The initial educational training session may have a great impact on long-term repeated injections in a home setting by providing children with confidence at the onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Sørensen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Undergraduate Studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helge Skirbekk
- Department of Undergraduate Studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunnvald Kvarstein
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Hilde Wøien
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|