Prosthetic temporomandibular joint reconstruction in a cohort of adolescent females with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Can growing patients with end-stage TMJ pathology be successfully treated with alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction? - A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The use of alloplastic total temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR) in growing patients is controversial, mainly due to immature elements of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the use of alloplastic TMJR in growing patients, focusing on the patient's clinical presentation, surgical and medical history and efficacy of alloplastic TMJR implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature search strategy was based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study type (PICOS) framework. We searched Pubmed, Google Scholar, Dimension, Web of Science, X-mol, Semantic Scholar and Embase to January 2023, without any restriction on the type of publication reporting alloplastic TMJR in growing patients (age ≤ 18 years for boys and age ≤ 15 years for girls).

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies (case reports: 09, case series: 02, cohort studies: 04) met the inclusion criteria, documenting 73 patients of growing age from 07 countries. Thirty-eight (~ 52%) cases were female. The mean ± SD (range) age and follow-up of patients in all studies was 13.1 ± 3.2 (0-17) years and 34.3 ± 21.5 (7-96) months, respectively. A total of 22 (30%) patients were implanted with bilateral alloplastic TMJR. Over half of the studies (n = 10) were published in the last 3 years. All patients underwent multiple surgeries prior to implantation of alloplastic TMJR. In extreme cases, patients underwent a total of 17 surgeries. Different types of studies reporting inconsistent variables restricted our ability to perform quality assessment measures for evidence building.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical experience with alloplastic TMJR in growing patients is limited to cases showing poor prognosis with other types of reconstruction. Nevertheless, studies show promising results for the use of alloplastic TMJR in growing patients, highlighting the need for well-controlled prospective studies with long-term follow-up.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction Using Individual TMJ Prosthesis Combined with a Fibular Free Flap in a Pediatric Patient

The main aim of this study was to perform a complex biomechanical analysis for a custom-designed temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prosthesis in combination with a fibular free flap in a pediatric case. Numerical simulations in seven variants of loads were carried out on 3D models obtained based on CT images of a 15-year-old patient in whom it was necessary to reconstruct the temporal-mandibular joints with the use of a fibula autograft. The implant model was designed based on the patient's geometry. Experimental tests on a manufactured personalized implant were carried out on the MTS Insight testing machine. Two methods of fixing the implant to the bone were analyzed-using three or five bone screws. The greatest stress was located on the top of the head of the prosthesis. The stress on the prosthesis with the five-screw configuration was lower than in the prosthesis with the three-screw configuration. The peak load analysis shows that the samples with the five-screw configuration have a lower deviation (10.88, 0.97, and 32.80%) than the groups with the three-screw configuration (57.89 and 41.10%). However, in the group with the five-screw configuration, the fixation stiffness was relatively lower (a higher value of peak load by displacement of 171.78 and 86.46 N/mm) than in the group with the three-screw configuration (where the peak load by displacement was 52.93, 60.06, and 78.92 N/mm). Based on the experimental and numerical studies performed, it could be stated that the screw configuration is crucial for biomechanical analysis. The results obtained may be an indication for surgeons, especially during planning personalized reconstruction procedures.

Reconstruction of the TMJ and condyle in inflammatory arthritis

Inflammatory arthritis presents a unique destructive process to the temporomandibular joint. This article provides information on the proper diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgical management aimed to provide patients with improvement in pain, function, stability and facial aesthetics. Additionally, it aims to provide a detailed insight on the joint reconstruction options including alloplastic joint replacement, autogenous joint replacement, orthognathic surgery and distraction osteogenesis.

Comprehensive Management of Rheumatic Diseases Affecting the Temporomandibular Joint

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a synovial joint and thus is vulnerable to the afflictions that may affect other joints in the fields of rheumatology and orthopedics. Too often temporomandibular complaints are seen strictly as dental or orofacial concerns. Similarly, patients with known rheumatic disease may not have their TMJs included in routine screening and monitoring protocols. The purpose of this review is to highlight the rheumatic conditions likely to affect the TMJ and outline medical and surgical management in these patients with a focus on the need for continued patient reassessment and monitoring.

Index of Body Inflammation for Maxillofacial Surgery Purpose-to Make the Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor Serum Level Independent on Patient Age

Background: The serum suPAR level is affected in humans by it increases with age. Therefore it makes difficult interpretation and any comparison of age varied groups. The aim of this study is to find simple way to age independent presentation of suPAR serum level for maxillofacial surgery purpose. Methods: In generally healthy patients from 15 to 59 y.o. suPAR level was tested in serum before orthognathic or minor traumatologic procedures. Five ways to make the suPAR serum level assessment independent of age are proposed. Results: One way of making suPAR levels independent of age led to the result with the same statistical distribution as in the raw suPAR serum material and this distribution is the normal. Conclusion: The simple way for suPAR serum level analysis without its dependence on patient age is calculation of the index of body inflammation understood as square root of squared suPAR serum level divided by logarithm of patient age to base 10.