Discontinuation of biologic DMARDs in non-systemic JIA patients: a scoping review of relapse rates and associated factors

Relapses of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in adulthood: A monocentric experience

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to describe a monocentric cohort of young adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), assessing the risk of relapse after transition to adult care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study and collected clinical, serological, and demographic data of young adult patients (18-30 years old) referred to the Transition Clinic of a single Italian centre between January 2020 and March 2023. Patients with systemic-onset JIA were excluded. Primary outcome was disease relapse, defined by Wallace criteria. Risk factors were analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with age 18-30 years old were enrolled in the study and followed for a median 30 months. The median disease duration at transition was 15 years. Twenty (40%) patients were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and 38 (76%) were on biological DMARDs through adulthood. Twenty-three patients relapsed after transitioning to adult care for a median 9-month follow-up (IQR 0-46.5). Most relapses involved the knees (69.6%). The univariate analysis identified monoarthritis (HR 4.67, CI 1.069-20.41, p value = 0.041) as the main risk factor for relapse within the first 36 months of follow-up. Early onset, ANA positivity, past and ongoing treatment with csDMARDs or bDMARDs, therapeutic withdrawal, and disease activity within 12 months before transition did not significantly influence the risk of relapse.

CONCLUSION

In JIA patients, the risk of relapse after transitioning to adult care remains high, irrespective of disease subtype and treatment. The main risk factor for the early occurrence of articular activity is monoarticular involvement.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF) weaning strategy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): does duration matter?

BACKGROUND

To compare outcomes of a short and long weaning strategy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF) in our prospective juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) cohort.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

JIA patients on subcutaneous adalimumab with at least 6 months of follow-up were recruited (May 2010-Jan 2022). Once clinical remission on medication (CRM) was achieved, adalimumab was weaned according to two protocols-short (every 4-weekly for 6 months and stopped) and long (extending dosing interval by 2 weeks for three cycles until 12-weekly intervals and thereafter stopped) protocols. Outcomes assessed were flare rates, time to flare, and predictors.

RESULTS

Of 110 JIA patients, 77 (83% male, 78% Chinese; 82% enthesitis-related arthritis) underwent aTNF weaning with 53% on short and 47% on long weaning protocol. The total flare rate during and after stopping aTNF was not different between the two groups. The time to flare after stopping aTNF was not different (p = 0.639). Positive anti-nuclear antibody increased flare risk during weaning in long weaning group (OR 7.0, 95%CI: 1.2-40.8). Positive HLA-B27 (OR 6.5, 95%CI: 1.1-30.4) increased flare risks after stopping aTNF.

CONCLUSION

Duration of weaning aTNF may not minimize flare rate or delay time to flare after stopping treatment in JIA patients. Recapture rates for inactive disease at 6 months remained high for patients who flared after weaning or discontinuing medication.

Th17/1 and ex-Th17 cells are detected in patients with polyarticular juvenile arthritis and increase following treatment

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of the pathogenesis of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (polyJIA) is needed to aide in the development of data-driven approaches to guide selection between therapeutic options. One inflammatory pathway of interest is JAK-STAT signaling. STAT3 is a transcription factor critical to the differentiation of inflammatory T helper 17 cells (Th17s). Previous studies have demonstrated increased STAT3 activation in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but less is known about STAT3 activation in polyJIA. We hypothesized that Th17 cells and STAT3 activation would be increased in treatment-naïve polyJIA patients compared to pediatric controls.

METHODS

Blood from 17 patients with polyJIA was collected at initial diagnosis and again if remission was achieved (post-treatment). Pediatric healthy controls were also collected. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and CD4 + T cell subsets and STAT activation (phosphorylation) were evaluated using flow cytometry. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests.

RESULTS

Treatment-naïve polyJIA patients had increased Th17 cells (CD3 + CD4 + interleukin(IL)-17 +) compared to controls (0.15% v 0.44%, p < 0.05), but Tregs (CD3 + CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3 +) from patients did not differ from controls. Changes in STAT3 phosphorylation in CD4 + T cells following ex vivo stimulation were not significantly different in patients compared to controls. We identified dual IL-17 + and interferon (IFN)γ + expressing CD4 + T cells in patients, but not controls. Further, both Th17/1 s (CCR6 + CD161 + IFNγ + IL-17 +) and ex-Th17s (CCR6 + CD161 + IFNγ + IL-17neg) were increased in patients' post-treatment (Th17/1: 0.3% v 0.07%, p < 0.05 and ex-Th17s: 2.3% v 1.4%, p < 0.05). The patients with the highest IL-17 expressing cells post-treatment remained therapy-bound.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with polyJIA have increased baseline Th17 cells, potentially reflecting higher tonic STAT3 activation in vivo. These quantifiable immune markers may identify patients that would benefit upfront from pathway-focused biologic therapies. Our data also suggest that inflammatory CD4 + T cell subsets not detected in controls but increased in post-treatment samples should be further evaluated as a tool to stratify patients in remission on medication. Future work will explore these proposed diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

In the past two decades, the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has evolved markedly, owing to the availability of a growing number of novel, potent and relatively safe therapeutic agents and the shift of management strategies towards early achievement of disease remission. However, JIA encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases that require distinct treatment approaches. Furthermore, some old drugs, such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine and intraarticular glucocorticoids, still maintain an important therapeutic role. In the past 5 years, information on the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for JIA has been further enriched through the accomplishment of several randomized controlled trials of newer biologic and synthetic targeted DMARDs. In addition, a more rational therapeutic approach has been fostered by the promulgation of therapeutic recommendations and guidelines. A multinational collaborative effort has led to the development of the recommendations for the treat-to-target strategy in JIA. There is currently increasing interest in establishing the optimal time and modality for discontinuation of treatment in children with JIA who achieve sustained clinical remission. The aim of this Review is to summarize the current evidence and discuss the therapeutic approaches to the management of non-systemic phenotypes of JIA, including oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

Withdrawing biologics in non-systemic JIA: what matters to pediatric rheumatologists?

OBJECTIVE

Approximately one third of children with JIA receive biologic therapy, but evidence on biologic therapy withdrawal is lacking. This study aims to increase our understanding of whether and when pediatric rheumatologists postpone a decision to withdraw biologic therapy in children with clinically inactive non-systemic JIA.

METHODS

A survey containing questions about background characteristics, treatment patterns, minimum treatment time with biologic therapy, and 16 different patient vignettes, was distributed among 83 pediatric rheumatologists in Canada and the Netherlands. For each vignette, respondents were asked whether they would withdraw biologic therapy at their minimum treatment time, and if not, how long they would continue biologic therapy. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, logistic and interval regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three pediatric rheumatologists completed the survey (40% response rate). Pediatric rheumatologists are most likely to postpone the decision to withdraw biologic therapy when the child and/or parents express a preference for continuation (OR 6.3; p < 0.001), in case of a flare in the current treatment period (OR 3.9; p = 0.001), and in case of uveitis in the current treatment period (OR 3.9; p < 0.001). On average, biologic therapy withdrawal is initiated 6.7 months later when the child or parent prefer to continue treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patient's and parents' preferences were the strongest driver of a decision to postpone biologic therapy withdrawal in children with clinically inactive non-systemic JIA and prolongs treatment duration. These findings highlight the potential benefit of a tool to support pediatric rheumatologists, patients and parents in decision making, and can help inform its design.