Every woman in the world must have respectful care during childbirth: a reflection

"I have to listen to them or they might harm me" and other narratives of why women endure obstetric violence in Bihar, India

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that obstetric violence has been prevalent globally and is finally getting some attention through research. This human rights violation takes several forms and is best understood through the narratives of embodied experiences of disrespect and abuse from women and other people who give birth, which is of utmost importance to make efforts in implementing respectful maternity care for a positive birthing experience. This study focused on the drivers of obstetric violence during labor and birth in Bihar, India.

METHODS

Participatory qualitative visual arts-based method of data collection-body mapping-assisted interviews (adapted as birth mapping)-was conducted to understand women's perception of why they are denied respectful maternity care and what makes them vulnerable to obstetric violence during labor and childbirth. This study is embedded in feminist and critical theories that ensure women's narratives are at the center, which was further ensured by the feminist relational discourse analysis. Eight women participated from urban slums and rural villages in Bihar, for 2-4 interactions each, within a week. The data included transcripts, audio files, body maps, birthing stories, and body key, which were analyzed with the help of NVivo 12.

FINDINGS

Women's narratives suggested drivers that determine how they will be treated during labor and birth, or any form of sexual, reproductive, and maternal healthcare seeking presented through the four themes: (1) "I am admitted under your care, so, I will have to do what you say"-Influence of power on care during childbirth; (2) "I was blindfolded … because there were men"-Influence of gender on care during childbirth; (3) "The more money we give the more convenience we get"-Influence of structure on care during childbirth; and (4) "How could I ask him, how it will come out?"-Influence of culture on care during childbirth. How women will be treated in the society and in the obstetric environment is determined by their identity at the intersections of age, class, caste, marital status, religion, education, and many other sociodemographic factors. The issues related to each of these are intertwined and cross-cutting, which made it difficult to draw clear categorizations because the four themes influenced and overlapped with each other. Son preference, for example, is a gender-based issue that is part of certain cultures in a patriarchal structure as a result of power-based imbalance, which makes the women vulnerable to disrespect and abuse when their baby is assigned female at birth.

DISCUSSION

Sensitive unique feminist methods are important to explore and understand women's embodied experiences of trauma and are essential to understand their perspectives of what drives obstetric violence during childbirth. Sensitive methods of research are crucial for the health systems to learn from and embed women's wants, to address this structural challenge with urgency, and to ensure a positive experience of care.

The prevalence of respectful maternity care during childbirth and its determinants in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Respectful maternity care is the provision of woman-centered health care during childbirth that is friendly, abuse-free, timely, and discrimination-free. Although several epidemiological studies on the magnitude and determinants of Respectful maternity care in Ethiopia have been conducted, the results have been inconsistent and varied. This makes drawing equivocal conclusions and evidence at the national level harder. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at estimating the pooled prevalence of respectful maternity care and its determinants in Ethiopia.

METHODS

Studies conducted from 2013 to June 30, 2022, were searched by using PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Direct of Open Access Journals. Searching was carried out from May 15- June 30, 2022. In total, sixteen studies were considered in the final analysis. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using STATA 16 software. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by using Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal checklist for prevalence studies. To estimate the pooled national prevalence of respectful maternity care, a random effect model with a DerSimonian Laird method was used. To assess the heterogeneity of the included studies, the Cochrane Q test statistics and I2 tests were used. To detect the presence of publication bias, a funnel plot and Begg's and Egger's tests were used.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were eligible for this systematic review and meta-analysis with a total of 6354 study participants. The overall pooled prevalence of respectful maternity care in Ethiopia was 48.44% (95% CI: 39.02-57.87). Receiving service by CRC-trained health care providers [AOR: 4.09, 95% CI: 1.73, 6.44], having ANC visits [AOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.62, 3.06], planning status of the pregnancy [AOR = 4.43, 95% CI: 2.74, 6.12], giving birth during the daytime [AOR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.92, 3.31], and experiencing an obstetric complication[AOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.61] were identified as determinants of RMC.

CONCLUSION

As per this meta-analysis, the prevalence of respectful maternity care in Ethiopia was low. Managers in the health sector should give due emphasis to the provision of Compassionate, Respectful, and Care(CRC) training for healthcare providers, who work at maternity service delivery points. Stakeholders need to work to increase the uptake of prenatal care to improve client-provider relationships across a continuum of care. Human resource managers should assign an adequate number of health care providers to the night-shift duties to reduce the workload on obstetric providers.

A qualitative inquiry into pregnant women's perceptions of respectful maternity care during childbirth in Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria

Women’s perceptions of respectful maternity care (RMC) are critical to its definition and measurement globally. We evaluated these in relation to globally defined RMC norms. We conducted a descriptive study involving eight focus group discussions with 50 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at one primary and one secondary health facility each in the North-west and South-west local government areas of Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria. One focus group each with primigravidae and multiparas were held per facility between 21 and 25 October 2019. Shakibazadeh et al’s 12 domains of RMC served as the thematic framework for data analysis. The women’s perceptions of RMC resonated well with seven of its domains, emphasising provider-client inter-personal relationships, preserving their dignity, effective communication, and non-abandonment of care, but with mixed perceptions for two domains. However, their perceptions deviated for four domains, namely maintaining privacy and confidentiality; ensuring continuous access to family support such as birth companions; obtaining informed consent; and respecting women’s choices about mobility during labour, food and fluid intake, and birth position. The physical environment was not mentioned as contributing to an experience of RMC. Whilst the perceptions of the Nigerian women studied about RMC were similar to those accepted internationally, there were significant deviations which may be related to cultural differences and societal disparities. Different interpretations of RMC may influence women’s demand for such care in different settings and challenge strategies for promoting a universal standard of care.

Respectful Maternity Care Initiative: A Qualitative Study

AIM

To assess the available standards for respectful maternity care in a public maternity hospital by evaluation of responses to a questionnaire given to birthing women.

METHODOLOGY

Assessment was done to find out the level of respectful maternity care provided under the most sensitive and important areas, namely (1) confidentiality and privacy, (2) physical harm or ill treatment, (3) dignity and respect, (4) left without care, (5) right to information, informed consent, and choice/preferences, by obtaining the response of birthing women.

RESULTS

Confidentiality and Privacy: No birthing woman (0%) expressed her opinion that she was dissatisfied with privacy provided, at any time of her stay in the hospital. Physical harm or ill treatment: It was significant to note that no woman reported being ill-treated or physically harmed. Dignity and Respect: A response of satisfaction regarding this important aspect of maternity care was received by nearly 95% of birthing women, A very small percent of 5.1% of women were not completely satisfied. Left without care or Attention given at all times:1.9% of women felt that they were not given immediate response when they called for any need. Right to information, informed consent, and choice/preferences: The greater majority of 95.7% of women were satisfied with methods engaged by hospital staff regarding right to information, informed consent and practices.

CONCLUSION

The response from a significant majority of birthing women was that they had respectful maternity care given to them at Government hospital for Women and Children.

Observations and reports of incidents of how birthing persons are treated during childbirth in two public facilities in Argentina

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to estimate the frequency and types of mistreatment during childbirth and explore health professionals' opinions on barriers/facilitators to providing respectful childbirth care.

METHODS

This prospective mixed-methods investigation consisted of direct observations of childbirth (n = 250), at-home surveys with birthing individuals (n = 45), and qualitative in-depth health staff interviews (n = 6), conducted between January and July 2019, in two public facilities in Argentina. Frequencies of clinical practices and mistreatment and 5% confidence intervals were calculated. A logistic regression analysis was also conducted to examine associations between mistreatment and covariates of interest, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, 61/250 (24.4%, confidence interval 19.6%-30.6%) observations recorded instances of mistreatment; 20/45 surveyed participants (44.4%) reported at least one episode of mistreatment. The most frequent perpetrators were physicians (35.6%), birth companions (24.4%), midwives (22.2%), and nurses (13.3%). Participants with lower educational attainment and those racialized as non-white had higher odds of being mistreated. Health providers reported that respectful childbirth is currently widely implemented due to authorities' and communities' awareness on respectful birth´s rights.

CONCLUSION

Almost a quarter of birthing people were observed to suffer mistreatment - primarily verbal abuse - and 44.4% of surveyed individuals reported mistreatment. Future research is needed to determine how to ensure the provision of respectful childbirth care for all. A quarter of participants experienced mistreatment; mostly those with lower educational attainment and/or racialized as non-white. Further research on implementation of respectful childbirth is warranted.