A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among treatment-naïve people with HIV in state Medicaids: analysis of multi-tablet vs. single-tablet antiretroviral regimen initiators with and without concurrent mental health disorders

BACKGROUND

Research is needed to understand the impact of mental health disorders (MHD) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH).

OBJECTIVES

Examine the HCRU and cost burden among treatment-naïve PWH with and without MHD initiating single tablet antiretroviral regimens (STRs) and multi-tablet regimens (MTRs).

METHODS

A retrospective database analysis of the US Medicaid population from Anlitiks' All Payor Claims database between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2023 was conducted. Treatment-naïve MTR-initiators vs STR-initiators (the index was the first prescription fill claim date) with ≥ 12-months pre- and post-index continuous enrollment and no pre-index HIV-2 diagnosis among PWH/MHD and PWH/no-MHD during 1 January 2017-30 June 2022 were selected. Demographics, clinical characteristics, HCRU and costs between MTR-initiators vs STR-initiators among PWH/MHD and PWH/no-MHD were described using Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum or t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, as appropriate. HCRU and costs were examined using multivariable logistic and gamma-log link regression models, controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

MTR-initiators (PWH/MHD: n = 7,874, PWH/no-MHD: n = 3,612) vs. STR-initiators (PWH/MHD: 46,024, PWH/no-MHD: 23,452) were significantly younger (PWH/MHD: 43.6 vs. 47.2 years; PWH/no-MHD: 39.2 vs. 43.3 years) and more likely to be female (PWH/MHD: 46.4% vs. 35.7%; PWH/no-MHD: 42.3% vs 29.7%) in both groups (all p-values < 0.05). MTR-initiators vs. STR-initiators had significantly higher rates of inpatient (IP) hospitalizations (PWH/MHD: 28.9% vs. 27.1%; PWH/no-MHD:13.9% vs. 11.9%) and emergency department (ED) visits (PWH/MHD: 53.3% vs. 49.2%; PWH/no-MHD: 35.2% vs. 31.8%) among both those with and without MHD (all p-values < 0.05). MTR-initiators vs. STR-initiators also had significantly higher adjusted all-cause medical costs (PWH/MHD: $60,228 vs $40,634; PWH/no-MHD: $33,623 vs. $17,996) (all p-values < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among PWH/MHD and PWH/no-MHD, MTR-initiators experienced significantly higher HCRU, and 1.5 times greater costs compared to STR-initiators. In both MTR and STR-initiator groups, the PWH/MHD cohort consistently demonstrated a greater HCRU and cost burden than the PWH/no-MHD.

The Predictive Value of Lactate Dehydrogenase for Viral Suppression in Newly Diagnosed People Living With HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people living with HIV (PLWH) is crucial for achieving viral suppression and improving clinical outcomes. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels serve as a readily accessible and rapid clinical biomarker, has significant predictive potential in various viral diseases. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of LDH levels for viral suppression in the context of rapid ART initiation.

Patients and Methods

LDH levels were measured in 393 newly diagnosed PLWH who received rapid initiation of ART and were subsequently followed up. The PLWH were stratified based on tertile LDH levels and study endpoints. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to generate survival curves, and Cox regression analysis was utilized to confirm the independent prognostic factors for viral suppression.

Results

The overall viral suppression rate was 94.1%. Compared to the low LDH tertile, the middle and high LDH tertiles exhibited longer times to first viral suppression (38 vs 84 vs 88 days, respectively, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that PLWH in high LDH tertile showed the worst prognosis for viral suppression (Log rank test, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified LDH tertile as a significant predictor of viral suppression (HR = 0.714, 95% CI = 0.553-0.922, P = 0.010 for middle vs low tertile; HR = 0.575, 95% CI = 0.443-0.747, P < 0.001 for high vs low tertile).

Conclusion

LDH levels function as a prognostic indicator for predicting the timing of viral suppression in PLWH on ART. A comprehensive evaluation of LDH levels is beneficial in establishing risk stratification in the context of rapid ART initiation.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Daily Bictegravir Plus Lenacapavir From a Complex Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Regimen: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study (ARTISTRY-1)

BACKGROUND

Complex antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens, such as those requiring multiple tablets, several doses per day, or both, can negatively affect quality of life and treatment adherence among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

METHODS

ARTISTRY-1 is a phase 2/3, operationally seamless, randomized, open-label, multicenter, active-controlled study (GS-US-621-6289; NCT05502341). Phase 2 of the study enrolled adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL receiving a complex ART regimen for ≥6 months. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated after a switch to bictegravir (BIC) (75-mg) + lenacapavir (LEN) (25- or 50-mg) regimens, compared with continuing on a complex ART regimen through 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, 128 participants were assigned randomly to begin BIC 75 mg + LEN 25 mg (n = 51) or BIC 75 mg + LEN 50 mg (n = 52) or continue on their complex ART regimen (n = 25). At week 24, HIV-1 RNA was ≥50 copies/mL in 0 of 51, 1 of 52 (1.9%), and 0 of 25 participants in the 3 groups, respectively. CD4 cell counts and percentages remained stable through week 24; the median change from baseline in CD4 cell count (interquartile range) was 18 (-39 to 70), -16 (-80 to 93), and 42 (-36 to 90) cells/µL, respectively. There were no study discontinuations due to a serious adverse event through week 24. Both BIC + LEN dosing regimens were well tolerated, with similar safety profiles observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the continued evaluation of the combination of BIC and LEN to optimize treatment in people with HIV and virologic suppression who are receiving complex ART regimens.

Detectable Virological Load and Associated Factors among People Living with HIV on Antiretroviral Treatment: A Retrospective Study

The complete and prolonged suppression of viral load is the primary objective of HAART in people living with HIV. Some people may experience therapeutic failure, while others may achieve virological suppression but are unable to maintain it, developing persistent or single detection of low-level viremia. This study aims to evaluate the determinants of a detectable viral load among patients on HAART to identify and address them promptly. In this retrospective study, all patients referring to the Infectious Disease Operative Unit of the Vito Fazzi Hospital in Lecce, Puglia, older than 18 years, receiving HAART for at least 12 months as of 30 June 2022, were included. For each patient, demographic characteristics such as age, sex, educational level, stable relationship, cohabitation, employment status, and information relating to habits and lifestyles such as physical activity, use of drugs, and substances or supplements for sport, abuse of alcohol, and smoking were collected. Degree of comorbidity was quantified according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the presence of obesity and the COVID-19 infection was also considered. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between patients' characteristics and the outcome. In the multivariable logistic regression model, the odds were lower for the duration of therapy (OR: 0.96; p = 0.0397), prescriber's perception of adherence to therapy (OR: 0.50; p < 0.0001), and Nadir CD4+ T-cell count (OR: 0.85; p = 0.0329), and higher for the presence of AIDS (OR: 1.89; p = 0.0423) and COVID-19 (OR: 2.31; p = 0.0182). Our findings support the early initiation of HAART to achieve virological suppression. Additionally, measures to improve adherence to therapy should be adopted to ensure better outcomes for patients.

Assessment of swallowability and acceptability of scored darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets in HIV-1-infected children aged ≥6 to <12 years, using matching placebo tablets: A randomized study

BACKGROUND

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) was developed as a once-daily, complete antiretroviral (ARV) regimen therapy to address the need for simplified protease inhibitor-based ARV regimens. This study assessed the swallowability and acceptability for long-term use of scored placebo tablets matching the D/C/F/TAF FDC tablets in children living with HIV-1.

METHODS

This study (NCT04006704) was a Phase 1, open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study in children living with HIV-1, aged ≥6 to <12 years and weighing ≥25 to <40 kg, on a stable ARV regimen for ≥3 months. Participants were asked to swallow whole (size, 21 × 11 × 7 mm) and split matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets. Swallowability of the matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets (primary endpoint) was assessed by observers. Acceptability of taking matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets and current ARVs was evaluated by participants using a 3-point questionnaire. Participants rated the acceptability for long-term daily use of the placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets, and observers assessed how easily caregivers could split a scored tablet by hand, using 3-point questionnaires.

RESULTS

Among the 24 participants who enrolled and completed the study, 95.8% (23/24) were able to swallow the whole and split matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets after 1 or 2 attempts. Most participants (>70%) rated the acceptability of tablets for long-term daily use as acceptable or good to take. Breaking the tablets was considered easy or OK by 79.2% (19/24) of caregivers.

CONCLUSION

Scored D/C/F/TAF FDC tablets are swallowable - with whole favoured over split - and considered at least acceptable for long-term daily intake in children living with HIV-1 aged ≥6 to <12 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04006704.

Antiretroviral Treatment Gaps and Adherence Among People with HIV in the U.S. Medicare Program

Approximately one-quarter of people with HIV (PWH) in the U.S. receive coverage through the Medicare program; however, no prior real-world study has examined antiretroviral therapy (ART) gaps and adherence and associated factors in this population. This retrospective cohort analysis used 2013-2018 national Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all PWH initiated on a new ART regimen including protease inhibitors [PI], non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs], or integrase strand transfer inhibitors [INSTIs] between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2017. Study outcomes included ART adherence (based on proportion of days covered [PDC]), continuous treatment gaps ranging from 1 to 6 days to ≥ 180 days, and discontinuation (continuous gap ≥ 90 days) in the 12-month follow-up period. Multivariable regressions were used to assess factors associated with ART adherence and discontinuation. The final sample included 48,627 PWH (mean age: 54.5 years, 74.4% male, 47.5% White, 89.8% disabled). Approximately 53.0% of PWH had a PDC ≥ 0.95, 30.2% had a PDC between 0.70 and < 0.95, and 16.8% had PDC < 0.70. Treatment gaps of at least ≥ 7-days (55.2%) and ≥ 30-days (26.2%) were common and 10.1% PWH discontinued treatment. Younger age, female sex, Black race, higher comorbidity score, mental health conditions, and substance use disorder were associated with higher odds of lower adherence and discontinuation (all p-values < 0.05). In conclusion, suboptimal adherence and treatment gaps in ART use were commonly observed among PWH in Medicare. Interventions and policies to mitigate barriers to adherence are urgently needed in this population to both improve their survival and increase the potential for ending the HIV epidemic in the US.

Real-world effectiveness of WHO recommended first-line antiretroviral therapies: a cohort study from a middle-income country

We estimate the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART) among individuals receiving HIV care in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Adults (18y+) initiating ART between Jan/2008 and Dec/2018 (follow-up through Dec/2020) were included. First-line ART (two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus one antiretroviral from another class) was categorized into four categories: non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor/NNRTI-based, protease inhibitor/PI-based, integrase strand transfer inhibitor/INSTI-based, and single-tablet regimen (STR, Tenofovir 300mg + Lamivudine 300mg + Efavirenz 600mg). Effectiveness (viral load ≤50 copies/µL) was evaluated at 6(3-9) and 12(9-15) months from ART initiation. Bayesian logistic regression models were used to quantify the association between exposure and outcomes while accounting for missing data. Overall, 1863(57%), 652(19.9%), 412(12.6%), and 342(10.5%) individuals used, respectively, NNRTI-based, PI-based, INSTI-based regimens, and STR. Compared to NNRTIs, the odds of viral suppression with INSTI-based regimens was 76% higher (adjusted OR:1.76, 95%CI:1.23-2.51) at six months but no higher at 12 months. Older age, higher education, CD4 count ≥500 cells/mm3 and viral load <100,000 copies/µL at ART initiation increased the odds of viral suppression. Viral suppression at six months was the strongest predictor of viral suppression at 12 months. These results highlight population groups that could benefit from close monitoring during the first year of ART.

Bioequivalence of a Pediatric Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Compared With Coadministration of the Separate Agents in Healthy Adults: An Open-Label, Randomized, Replicate Crossover Study

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg is a fixed-dose combination (FDC) for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults and adolescents weighing 40 kg or greater. This Phase 1, randomized, open-label, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, 4-period replicate crossover study (NCT04661397) evaluated the pivotal bioequivalence of a pediatric D/C/F/TAF 675/150/200/10-mg FDC compared with coadministration of the separate commercially available formulations in healthy adults under fed conditions. During each period, participants received either a single oral dose of D/C/F/TAF 675/150/200/10-mg FDC (test) or a single oral dose of darunavir 600 and 75 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, and emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide 200/10-mg FDC (reference). Thirty-seven participants were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatment sequence groups: test-reference-reference-test or reference-test-test-reference, with 7 days or more washout between periods. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity for darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide fell within conventional bioequivalence limits (80%-125%). No Grade 3/4 adverse events, serious adverse events, or deaths occurred. In conclusion, administration of D/C/F/TAF 675/150/200/10-mg FDC was bioequivalent to coadministration of the separate commercially available formulations.

Real-Life Experience With Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Turkey

INTRODUCTION

Single-tablet regimens (STRs) can increase treatment success and even improve the quality of life of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. In this study, we aim to analyze the real-life efficacy and tolerability data of people living with HIV (PLWH) initiated on or switched to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (BIC/FTC/TAF) as first-line treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed in HIV-1-positive patients who were initiated BIC/FTC/TAF in the HIV clinic between June 2020 and June 2022. Patients who received BIC/FTC/TAF for at least 12 months were included in this study. Virological suppression, laboratory parameters, side effects, and immunological response were analyzed at one, three, six, nine, and 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients, 66 (56.9%) treatment-experienced and 50 (43.1%) naive, were evaluated within the scope of the study. In the naive patient group, baseline HIV-RNA, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts, CD4/CD8 ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were significantly different in different follow-up months. The number of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels below 50 copies/mL was 55.9% in the first month, 73.7% in the third month, 90.2% in the sixth month, and 100% in the ninth and 12th months.

CONCLUSION

In our real-life observational study, BIC/FTC/TAF treatment achieved rapid viral suppression, maintained viral suppression in virally suppressed patients, and was effective for immunological recovery in both treatment-experienced and naive HIV patients. No serious side effects were observed. Our study has proved the potential of BIC/FTC/TAF as an important option in the treatment of HIV patients.

Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 and hepatitis B coinfection (ALLIANCE): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

For most adults with HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection, initial recommended treatment is a tenofovir-containing antiretroviral regimen, but no randomised studies have compared tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with tenofovir alafenamide. We aimed to investigate whether bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is non-inferior to dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for viral suppression in individuals with HIV-1 and HBV coinfection at 48 and 96 weeks.

METHODS

We did this randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial at 46 outpatient centres in China, Dominican Republic, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, and the USA. Eligible participants were treatment-naive adults (aged ≥18 years) with plasma HIV-1 RNA of at least 500 copies per mL and plasma HBV DNA of at least 2000 IU/mL. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive daily oral bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg, or dolutegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, each with corresponding matching placebo. Randomisation was stratified by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status (positive vs negative), HBV DNA (<8 vs ≥8 log10 IU/mL), and CD4 count (<50 vs ≥50 cells per μL) at screening. All investigators, participants, and staff providing treatment, assessing outcomes, and collecting data were masked to study treatment for 96 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL (defined by the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) and plasma HBV DNA less than 29 IU/mL (using the missing-equals-failure approach) at week 48, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -12%. Coprimary endpoints were assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline HIV-1 RNA or HBV DNA result while on study drug. Safety endpoints were assessed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03547908.

FINDINGS

Between May 30, 2018 and March 16, 2021, 381 participants were screened, of whom 243 initiated treatment (121 in the receive bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 122 in the dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). At week 48, both endpoints met the criteria for non-inferiority: 113 (95%) of 119 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 111 (91%) of 122 participants in the dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group had HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL (difference 4·1, 95% CI -2·5 to 10·8; p=0·21), and 75 (63%) of 119 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group versus 53 (43%) of 122 participants in the dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group had HBV DNA suppression (difference 16·6, 5·9 to 27·3; nominal p=0·0023). Drug-related adverse events up to week 96 occurred in 35 (29%) of 121 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 34 (28%) of 122 participants in the dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group. One (1%) of 121 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group reported a serious adverse event (cryptococcal meningitis attributed to immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome) that was deemed to be treatment-related.

INTERPRETATION

Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is an effective therapy for adults with HIV-1 and HBV coinfection starting antiviral therapy.

FUNDING

Gilead Sciences.

HIV infection

The AIDS epidemic has been a global public health issue for more than 40 years and has resulted in ~40 million deaths. AIDS is caused by the retrovirus, HIV-1, which is transmitted via body fluids and secretions. After infection, the virus invades host cells by attaching to CD4 receptors and thereafter one of two major chemokine coreceptors, CCR5 or CXCR4, destroying the host cell, most often a T lymphocyte, as it replicates. If unchecked this can lead to an immune-deficient state and demise over a period of ~2-10 years. The discovery and global roll-out of rapid diagnostics and effective antiretroviral therapy led to a large reduction in mortality and morbidity and to an expanding group of individuals requiring lifelong viral suppressive therapy. Viral suppression eliminates sexual transmission of the virus and greatly improves health outcomes. HIV infection, although still stigmatized, is now a chronic and manageable condition. Ultimate epidemic control will require prevention and treatment to be made available, affordable and accessible for all. Furthermore, the focus should be heavily oriented towards long-term well-being, care for multimorbidity and good quality of life. Intense research efforts continue for therapeutic and/or preventive vaccines, novel immunotherapies and a cure.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of dispersible and immediate-release abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine tablets in children with HIV (IMPAACT 2019): week 24 results of an open-label, multicentre, phase 1-2 dose-confirmation study

BACKGROUND

Child-friendly fixed-dose combination (FDC) antiretroviral therapy (ART) options are limited. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of dispersible and immediate-release FDC abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine taken once per day in children younger than 12 years with HIV.

METHODS

IMPAACT 2019 was an international, phase 1-2, multisite, open-label, non-comparative dose-confirmation study of abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine in children younger than 12 years. Participants were enrolled across five weight bands: those weighing 6 kg to less than 25 kg received abacavir (60 mg), dolutegravir (5 mg), and lamivudine (30 mg) dispersible tablets (three to six tablets depending on body weight), and those weighing 25 kg to less than 40 kg received abacavir (600 mg), dolutegravir (50 mg), and lamivudine (300 mg) in an immediate-release tablet. At entry, participants were ART naive or ART experienced and virologically suppressed on stable ART for 6 months or more. Dose confirmation was based on pharmacokinetic and safety criteria in the first five to seven participants in each weight band to week 4; all participants were followed up to week 48. We present the results for the primary objectives to assess pharmacokinetics, confirm dosing, and evaluate safety through 24 weeks across all weight bands. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03760458).

FINDINGS

57 children were enrolled and initiated study drug (26 [46%] female and 31 [54%] male; 37 [65%] Black, 18 [32%] Asian, and 1 [2%] had race reported as unknown). Within each weight band, 6 kg to less than 10 kg, 10 kg to less than 14 kg, 14 kg to less than 20 kg, 20 kg to less than 25 kg, and 25 kg or higher: the geometric mean dolutegravir area under the concentration time curve over the 24 h dosing interval (AUC0-24 h) was 75·9 h·μg/mL (33·7%), 91·0 h·μg/mL (36·5%), 71·4 h·μg/mL (23·5%), 84·4 h·μg/mL (26·3%), and 71·8 h·μg/mL (13·9%); dolutegravir concentrations 24 h after dosage (C24 h) were 0·91 μg/mL (67·6%), 1·22 μg/mL (77·5%), 0·79 μg/mL (44·2%), 1·35 μg/mL (95·5%), and 0·98 μg/mL (27·9%); abacavir AUC0-24 h was 17·7 h·μg/mL (38·8%), 19·8 h·μg/mL (50·6%), 15·1 h·μg/mL (40·3%), 17·4 h·μg/mL (19·4%), and 25·7 h·μg/mL (14·6%); lamivudine AUC0-24 h was 10·7 h·μg/mL (46·0%), 14·2 h·μg/mL (23·9%), 13·0 h·μg/mL (15·6%), 14·5 h·μg/mL (16·6%), and 21·7 h·μg/mL (26·2%), respectively. Pharmacokinetic targets and safety criteria were met within each weight band, and thus dosing of abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine was confirmed at the originally selected doses. 54 (95%) of participants were treatment experienced and all who continued taking the study drug remained virologically suppressed (<200 copies per mL) through week 24. Virological suppression was achieved in two of three participants who were ART naive by week 24. There were no grade 3 or higher adverse events related to abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine and no discontinuations because of toxicity to week 24. Both formulations were well tolerated.

INTERPRETATION

Dosing of abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine was confirmed in children weighing 6 kg to less than 40 kg, and both FDC formulations were safe, well tolerated, and efficacious through 24 weeks of treatment. These findings support global efforts to expand the availability of FDC abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine to children with HIV.

FUNDING

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute of Mental Health, ViiV Healthcare, and GlaxoSmithKline.

A four-drug combination oral tablet of darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults

INTRODUCTION

Darunavir (DRV)/cobicistat (COBI)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is the only protease inhibitor-based single-tablet regimen (STR) approved for the treatment of HIV infection of adults and pediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg. DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF has demonstrated to be an effective regimen, to have a high genetic barrier to resistance, and to be well tolerated.

AREAS COVERED

The authors summarize the chemistry and pharmacology of DRV, COBI, FTC, and TAF and discuss trials conducted on antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and -experienced people living with HIV designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the STR. This work also reports studies comparing DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF with competitive agents in real-world settings.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the availability of newer antiretroviral drugs and strategies in the management of HIV infection, including long-acting therapies, DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF is still considered an alternative regimen for the treatment of ART-naïve adults. DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF is an effective, well-tolerated, and safe antiretroviral regimen and represents a valid option for people who need to switch therapy due to tolerability issues, such as the onset of neuropsychiatric effects related to integrase strand transfer inhibitors, or virological failure.

Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews

Background

As the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment landscape continues to evolve, the prolonged life expectancy and long-term exposure to antiretroviral drugs have modified the burden associated with living with HIV.

Objective

To better understand the current treatment and comorbidity burden in people living with HIV (PLWH).

Methods

Peer-reviewed systematic literature reviews (SLRs) between 2017 and 2020 that included US studies and examined drug adherence/pill burden, resistance burden, or comorbidities in PLWH were identified. Methods and findings were extracted for the overall studies and examined in the subset of US studies.

Results

Among 665 publications identified, 47 met the inclusion criteria (drug adherence/pill burden: 5; resistance: 3; comorbidities: 40). While antiretroviral drug adherence levels varied across SLRs, single-tablet regimens (STR) were associated with higher adherence versus multiple-tablet regimens. STRs were also associated with lower risk of treatment discontinuation, higher cost-effectiveness, and lower risk of hospitalization. Longer survival resulted in a high comorbidity burden, with non-AIDS causes accounting for 47% of deaths among PLWH in the US. HIV doubled the risk of cardiovascular disease and was associated with other health problems, including bone and muscle diseases, depression, and cancers. Several antiretroviral regimens were associated with chronic diseases, including cardiometabolic conditions. Lifetime HIV costs are substantially increasing, driven by antiretroviral, adverse event, and comorbidity treatment costs cumulated due to longer survival times.

Conclusions

There is a considerable burden associated with HIV and antiretroviral treatment, highlighting the benefits of less complex and safer regimens, and the unmet need for effective preventative interventions.

Adherence and clinical outcomes of HIV patients switching to a fixed-dose combination regimen

Background

The efficacy of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is monitored using clinical markers such as viral load (VL) and CD4 counts. Adherence to ART has been associated with viral suppression and improved clinical outcomes.

Objectives

To determine the relationship between adherence status with multiple-tablet regimens (MTR) and fixed-dose combination (FDC) regimens, to weight, CD4 count and VL of patients living with HIV.

Method

An observational, descriptive study was conducted on a closed cohort of patients living with HIV and attending a primary health care clinic in Northern Cape in South Africa between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2015. Patients were on an MTR and changed to an FDC regimen. Adherence was measured using the medicine possession ratio (MPR).

Results

Statistically significant differences exist between the mean MPR of the 30-day (p = 0.0308) and 28-day supply (p < 0.0001) of the MTR when compared to FDC regimen. No statistically significant differences could be found between adherence and clinical outcomes such as weight, CD4 count and VL for either MTR or FDC regimens. The suppressed VL values measured for MTR were n = 299 (89.25%) and n = 415 (93.05%) for FDC regimen.

Conclusion

Adherence improved when patients were switched to FDC, but no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes measured as weight, CD4 count and VL between adherence status and regimen type could be found.

Contribution

This study contributes to much-needed information about ART adherence and clinical outcomes (such as weight, CD4 count and VL) of adult HIV-positive patients in a public healthcare clinic in the Northern Cape, South Africa.

The transformation of HIV therapy: One pill once a day

A co-formulated, one pill once a day antiretroviral regimen (single-tablet regimen), containing efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate ( Atripla), revolutionized the antiretroviral therapy landscape. Single-tablet regimens provide not only dosing convenience but help optimize adherence and persistence with antiretroviral therapy to achieve durably suppressed viremia with both individual and societal benefits. Given the many excellent options available now, single-tablet regimens are the preferred choice for initiating antiretroviral therapy in almost all patients with rare exceptions for drug interactions and pregnancy, and for simplification of more complex antiretroviral therapy to a single-tablet regimen. In this special commemorative article, we celebrate this astounding advancement in antiretroviral therapy, championed by John C. Martin while CEO of Gilead Sciences, and its transformative impact on HIV care nationally and globally.

HIV: the changing paradigm

The past four decades have seen enormous progress in the diagnosis and management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. There have been significant advances spanning the approval of the first antiretroviral agents, the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy to single tablet regimens with minimal toxicity. Although these remarkable developments have on the surface led to the 'end of AIDS', there are still key populations being left behind. This clinical update will describe the diagnosis and management of HIV, and the changing paradigms that have seen HIV transform from a life-limiting condition to a manageable chronic disease over a few decades.

Body mass index increase and weight gain among people living with HIV-1 initiated on single-tablet darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in the United States

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated body mass index (BMI) and weight changes in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1; PLWH) initiated on single-tablet darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DRV/c/FTC/TAF) or bictegravir/FTC/TAF (BIC/FTC/TAF).

METHODS

Electronic medical record (EMR) data for treatment-naïve or virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 who initiated treatment with DRV/c/FTC/TAF or BIC/FTC/TAF (index date) were obtained from Decision Resources Group's EMRs (17 July 2017-1 March 2020). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics between the two cohorts. BMI and weight changes from pre-index to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months following the index date were compared using weighted mean differences (MDs). The time until an increase in BMI or weight ≥5% or ≥10% was compared using weighted hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

The weighted DRV/c/FTC/TAF and BIC/FTC/TAF cohorts comprised 1116 and 1134 PLWH, respectively (mean age = ∼49 years, females: ∼28%). Larger increases in BMI and weight from pre-index to each post-index time point were observed in PLWH initiating BIC/FTC/TAF vs DRV/c/FTC/TAF (12 months: MD in BMI = 1.23 kg/m², p < .001; MD in weight = 2.84 kg [6.26 lbs], p = .008). PLWH receiving BIC/FTC/TAF were significantly more likely to experience weight gain ≥5% (HR = 1.76, p = .004) and ≥10% (HR = 2.01, p = .020), and BMI increase ≥5% (HR = 1.77, p = .004) and ≥10% (HR = 1.76, p = .044) than those receiving DRV/c/FTC/TAF.

CONCLUSIONS

BIC/FTC/TAF was associated with greater BMI and weight increases compared to DRV/c/FTC/TAF. Weight gain and its sequelae may add to the clinical burden of PLWH and should be considered among other factors when selecting antiretroviral single-tablet regimens.

Virological Outcomes After Switching to Abacavir/Lamivudine/Dolutegravir Combined with Adherence Support in People Living with HIV with Poor Adherence: A Phase IV, Multicentre Randomized Prospective Open Label Study (TriiADD-CTN 286)

BACKGROUND

Many people living with HIV struggle to consistently adhere to antiretroviral therapy, fail to achieve long-term virologic control and remain at risk for HIV-related disease progression, development of resistance and may transmit HIV infection to others.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if switching from current multi-tablet (curART) to single-tablet antiretroviral therapy (abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir; ABC/3TC/DTG), both combined with individualized adherence support, would improve HIV suppression in non-adherent vulnerable populations.

METHODS

TriiADD was an investigator-initiated randomized, multicentre, open label study. HIV+ adults with documented non-adherence on curART were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to immediately switch to ABC/3TC/DTG or to continue curART. Both arms received adherence support. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in each arm with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL 24 weeks after randomization.

RESULTS

In total, 50 people were screened and 27 randomized from 11 sites across Canada before the trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment. Participants were predominantly from ethnocultural communities, Indigenous people and/or had a history of injection drug use. The proportion achieving HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 24 was 4/12 (33%) in the curART arm vs 7/13 (54%) in the ABC/3TC/DTG arm; median Bayesian risk difference, 5% (95% CrI, -17 to 28%) higher for those randomized to ABC/3TC/DTG. We encountered difficulties with recruitment of participants without prior drug resistance, retention despite intensive support, reliably measuring adherence and in overcoming entrenched adherence barriers.

CONCLUSION

Results of our trial are consistent with a slight improvement in viral suppression in a vulnerable population when a single tablet regimen is combined with patient-level adherence support. Beyond treatment simplicity and tolerability, tailored interventions addressing stigma and social determinants of health are still needed. The numerous challenges we encountered illustrate how randomised trials may not be the best approach for assessing adherence interventions in vulnerable populations.

Patient Satisfaction with Once-Daily Single-Tablet Darunavir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide (DRV/c/FTC/TAF): A Real-World Study of Patient Self-Reported Outcomes in HIV-1-Diagnosed Adults

PURPOSE

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection remains a concern. As patient adherence to antiretroviral therapy is essential to avoid drug resistance and virologic failure, greater understanding of patient treatment satisfaction may help facilitate ongoing medication use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An online survey was conducted through the Carenity US HIV platform (04/07/2020-05/26/2020). Eligible respondents were adults with HIV-1 registered on the platform who were receiving darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DRV/c/FTC/TAF) and living in the United States. This descriptive study assessed patient satisfaction with DRV/c/FTC/TAF and HIV-related symptoms at baseline and follow-up (4-6 weeks). Two HIV patient-reported outcomes tools were completed at both time points: the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQs; range: 0-60 points [higher score indicates greater satisfaction]) and the HIV Symptom Distress Module (HIV-SDM; range: 0-80 points [lower score indicates lower distress]).

RESULTS

Of 100 respondents from across the United States who completed the survey at baseline, mean age was 39 years, 69 were male, 48 were Caucasian, 76 were HIV treatment-experienced, and 24 were HIV treatment-naïve. Of baseline respondents, 46 completed the follow-up survey. In the overall population, treatment discontinuation between baseline and follow-up was low (6.5%: 3/46 respondents at follow-up). Mean total HIVTSQs score at baseline was 50.2 with the highest proportion of respondents satisfied regarding their willingness to continue DRV/c/FTC/TAF (79%) and to recommend DRV/c/FTC/TAF to other patients (76%). Among all baseline respondents, mean total HIV-SDM score was 23.5. On average, respondents experienced 10.7 overall symptoms (grades 1-4) and 3.8 bothersome symptoms (grades 3-4). Both satisfaction rate and occurrence of symptoms with DRV/c/FTC/TAF were stable between baseline and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

DRV/c/FTC/TAF therapy was associated with high patient satisfaction and patients taking DRV/c/FTC/TAF had a moderate HIV symptom burden. Patient experience and health-related quality of life during HIV therapy are important metrics that may help healthcare providers increase patient adherence.

Implementation of an electronic patient-reported measure of barriers to antiretroviral therapy adherence with the Opal patient portal: Protocol for a mixed method type 3 hybrid pilot study at a large Montreal HIV clinic

BACKGROUND

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains problematic. Regular monitoring of its barriers is clinically recommended, however, patient-provider communication around adherence is often inadequate. Our team thus decided to develop a new electronically administered patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of barriers to ART adherence (the I-Score) to systematically capture this data for physician consideration in routine HIV care. To prepare for a controlled definitive trial to test the I-Score intervention, a pilot study was designed. Its primary objectives are to evaluate patient and physician perceptions of the I-Score intervention and its implementation strategy.

METHODS

This one-arm, 6-month study will adopt a mixed method type 3 implementation-effectiveness hybrid design and be conducted at the Chronic Viral Illness Service of the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Canada). Four HIV physicians and 32 of their HIV patients with known or suspected adherence problems will participate. The intervention will involve having patients complete the I-Score through a smartphone application (Opal), before meeting with their physician. Both patients and physicians will have access to the I-Score results, for consideration during the clinic visits at Times 1, 2 (3 months), and 3 (6 months). The implementation strategy will focus on stakeholder involvement, education, and training; promoting the intervention's adaptability; and hiring an Application Manager to facilitate implementation. Implementation, patient, and service outcomes will be collected (Times 1-2-3). The primary outcome is the intervention's acceptability to patients and physicians. Qualitative data obtained, in part, through physician focus groups (Times 2-3) and patient interviews (Times 2-3) will help evaluate the implementation strategy and inform any methodological adaptations.

DISCUSSION

This study will help plan a definitive trial to test the efficacy of the I-Score intervention. It will generate needed data on electronic PROM interventions in routine HIV care that will help improve understanding of conditions for their successful implementation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04702412; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

The burden of neuropsychiatric disorders in patients living with HIV-1 treated with antiretroviral therapies-A perspective from US Medicaid data

BACKGROUND

People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 face challenges with treatment adherence for various reasons, including consideration of neuropsychiatric disorders and neuropsychiatric adverse reactions associated with antiretroviral therapy (ART).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan^® Multi-State Medicaid Database (1/1/2014-12/31/2017). Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with HIV-1 and newly initiated on antiretroviral therapy with continuous health plan enrollment were included. Primary outcome was the 6-month period prevalence of neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) of interest after ART initiation.

RESULTS

Among 1971 newly treated patients included in the study, mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 38.5 (12.7) years, and 41.4% were female. During the 6 months after ART initiation, 51.4% of patients had a claim for ≥1 NPE versus 30.3% of matched patients without HIV. Among newly treated patients, the most common (≥10%) NPE claims were for depression (42.2%), anxiety (15.8%), headache (11.9%), and bipolar/manic depression (10.1%). Also in this group, the mean (SD) total all-cause healthcare cost during the 6-month post-ART initiation was $16,632 ($33,928), of which $2914 ($18,233) was NPE-related.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, in this Medicaid study of people newly initiated on ART, there was a high prevalence of NPEs, and incremental NPE-associated costs were considerable.

Use of long-acting injectable antiretroviral agents for human immunodeficiency Virus: A review

The development of potent antiretroviral drugs has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection, however, the effectiveness of these medications depends upon consistent daily oral intake. Non-adherence can lead to the emergence of resistance, treatment failure and disease progression. This has necessitated the development of long-acting antiretroviral formulations administrable via an infrequent dosing regimen. Long-acting injectable forms of cabotegravir and rilpivirine have reached various stages in clinical trials both for the treatment and prevention of HIV. Other long-acting agents are at various stages of development. This review evaluates the current research on the development of long-acting injectable antiretroviral agents for the treatment and prevention of HIV.

Redefining therapeutic success in HIV patients: an expert view

Thanks to advances in the field over the years, HIV/AIDS has now become a manageable chronic condition. Nevertheless, a new set of HIV-associated complications has emerged, related in part to the accelerated ageing observed in people living with HIV/AIDS, the cumulative toxicities from exposure to antiretroviral drugs over decades and emerging comorbidities. As a result, HIV/AIDS can still have a negative impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). In this scenario, it is reasonable to believe that the concept of therapeutic success, traditionally associated with CD4 cell count restoration and HIV RNA plasma viral load suppression and the absence of drug resistances, needs to be redefined to include other factors that reach beyond antiretroviral efficacy. With this in mind, a group of experts initiated and coordinated the RET Project, and this group, using the available evidence and their clinical experience in the field, has proposed new criteria to redefine treatment success in HIV, arranged into five main concepts: rapid initiation, efficacy, simplicity, safety, and QoL. An extensive review of the literature was performed for each category, and results were discussed by a total of 32 clinicians with experience in HIV/AIDS (4 coordinators + 28 additional experts). This article summarizes the conclusions of these experts and presents the most updated overview on the five topics, along with a discussion of the experts' main concerns, conclusions and/or recommendations on the most controversial issues.

Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in a Rapid-Initiation Model of Care for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection: Primary Analysis of the DIAMOND Study

Background

Most guidelines recommend rapid treatment initiation for patients with newly diagnosed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, but prospective US data are limited. The DIAMOND (NCT03227861) study using darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg is a phase 3 prospective study evaluating efficacy/safety of a single-tablet regimen in a rapid-initiation model of care.

Methods

Adults aged ≥18 years began D/C/F/TAF ≤14 days from diagnosis without screening/baseline results; as results became available, participants not meeting predefined safety/resistance stopping rules continued. Primary endpoint was virologic response (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL; intent-to-treat; US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] snapshot) at week 48; participant satisfaction was measured via the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (HIVTSQs).

Results

Of 109 participants, 87% were male, 32% black/African American, median (range) age was 28 (range, 19–66) years, 25% of participants had HIV-1 RNA ≥100 000 copies/mL, 21% had CD4⁺ cell count <200 cells/µL, and 31% enrolled ≤48 hours from diagnosis. At week 48, 97 (89%) participants completed the study and 92 (84%) achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (FDA snapshot). There were no protocol-defined virologic failures; incidences of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (33%) were low, no serious AEs were study drug related, and 1 (<1%) participant discontinued due to study drug related AE(s). The overall HIVTSQs score at week 48 was 58 (maximum: 60).

Conclusions

At week 48, a high proportion of participants starting D/C/F/TAF achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and very few discontinued therapy. D/C/F/TAF was well tolerated, no participants discontinued due to baseline resistance stopping criteria, and high treatment satisfaction among participants was recorded.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT03227861.

The LAIs Are Coming! Implementation Science Considerations for Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy in the United States: A Scoping Review

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) is one of the latest advancements in HIV control with the potential to overcome oral ART barriers to adherence. The objective of this article is to anticipate and examine implementation considerations for LAI-ART using components of the PRISM model, a Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model for integrating research findings into practice. We conducted a scoping review from January to August 2020 of the growing literature on LAI-ART implementation and other fields using LAI therapies. Key considerations regarding LAI-ART were parsed from the searches and entered into the PRISM implementation science framework. The PRISM framework posed multiple questions for consideration in the development of an optimal implementation strategy for LAI-ART in the United States. These questions revealed the necessity for more data, including acceptability of LAI-ART among many different subgroups of people living with HIV (PLWH), cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes, as well as more detailed information related to the external environment for optimal LAI-ART implementation. Ethical considerations of LAI-ART will also need to be considered. The anticipation of, and excitement for, LAI-ART represent the hope for a new direction for HIV treatment that reduces adherence barriers and improves prognoses for PLWH. We have a unique window of opportunity to anticipate implementation considerations for LAI-ART, so this new therapy can be used to its fullest potential. Outstanding questions remain, however, that need to be addressed to help achieve HIV suppression goals in diverse populations.

Clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infected patients switched from complex multi-tablet regimens to tenofovir alafenamide based single-tablet regimens plus a boosted protease inhibitor in a real-world setting

Background

Multi-tablet regimens (MTRs) are associated with increased adverse events and non-adherence. Single tablet regimens (STRs) plus boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) are a simplification option for MTR-treated patients; however, data is needed to validate this therapeutic strategy.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included all HIV-1 infected patients seen at a single center from March 2016 to December 2017 who were switched from twice-daily (BID) regimens or regimens containing ​≥ ​3 pills daily to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) plus darunavir (DRV) or rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (RPV/F/TAF) plus DRV boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat (DRV/r-c). Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA<200 copies/mL and were followed for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HIV-1 RNA≥50 copies/mL at Week 48. Adherence and safety data were recorded throughout the study.

Results

Of 61 patients included, median age was 53 years, the median number of pills taken daily (range) was 5 (3–9), 80% were taking BID regimens, 97% had baseline HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL, 56 (92%) were switched to E/C/F/TAF plus DRV and 5 (8%) to RPV/F/TAF plus DRV/r-c. At Week 48, 2 patients (3%) had HIV-1 RNA≥ 50 copies/mL, both were treated with E/C/F/TAF plus DRV and neither had evidence of treatment-emergent resistance. Fifty-nine (97%) had an HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 3/61 (5%) (all Grade 2) leading to 3/61 (5%) ADR-related discontinuations.

Conclusion

In this real-world cohort of MTR-treated patients, switching to a TAF-based STR plus boosted PI maintained virologic control in 97% and was well-tolerated, supporting potential use of this strategy for regimen simplification.

The Costs of Drugs in Infectious Diseases: Branded, Generics, and Why We Should Care

While health care providers have largely turned a blind eye, the cost of health care in the US has been skyrocketing, in part as a result of rising drug prices. Patent protections and market exclusivity, while serving to incentivize targeted new drug development, have exacerbated inequitable outcomes and reduced access, sometimes fueling national epidemics. Branded drug manufacturers face few barriers to exorbitant pricing of drugs with exclusivity-as in the cases of Sovaldi, Zyvox, and Truvada. Furthermore, albendazole, pyrimethamine, and penicillin demonstrate that generic medications without patent exclusivity are not guaranteed to have durably low costs, especially where manufacturer competition is lacking. There is a way forward: through education and awareness, cost-conscious guideline development, government regulation, and market-level incentives, health care providers can collaborate to contain drug prices, curbing expenditures overall while expanding health care access to patients.

Overview of systematic reviews on strategies to improve treatment initiation, adherence to antiretroviral therapy and retention in care for people living with HIV: part 1

OBJECTIVES

We sought to map the evidence and identify interventions that increase initiation of antiretroviral therapy, adherence to antiretroviral therapy and retention in care for people living with HIV at high risk for poor engagement in care.

METHODS

We conducted an overview of systematic reviews and sought for evidence on vulnerable populations (men who have sex with men (MSM), African, Caribbean and Black (ACB) people, sex workers (SWs), people who inject drugs (PWID) and indigenous people). We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library in November 2018. We screened, extracted data and assessed methodological quality in duplicate and present a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We identified 2420 records of which only 98 systematic reviews were eligible. Overall, 65/98 (66.3%) were at low risk of bias. Systematic reviews focused on ACB (66/98; 67.3%), MSM (32/98; 32.7%), PWID (6/98; 6.1%), SWs and prisoners (both 4/98; 4.1%). Interventions were: mixed (37/98; 37.8%), digital (22/98; 22.4%), behavioural or educational (9/98; 9.2%), peer or community based (8/98; 8.2%), health system (7/98; 7.1%), medication modification (6/98; 6.1%), economic (4/98; 4.1%), pharmacy based (3/98; 3.1%) or task-shifting (2/98; 2.0%). Most of the reviews concluded that the interventions effective (69/98; 70.4%), 17.3% (17/98) were neutral or were indeterminate 12.2% (12/98). Knowledge gaps were the types of participants included in primary studies (vulnerable populations not included), poor research quality of primary studies and poorly tailored interventions (not designed for vulnerable populations). Digital, mixed and peer/community-based interventions were reported to be effective across the continuum of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions along the care cascade are mostly focused on adherence and do not sufficiently address all vulnerable populations.

Clinical outcomes of once-daily darunavir in treatment-experienced patients with darunavir resistance-associated mutations through 48 weeks of treatment

Darunavir (DRV) is approved for once-daily use in patients with no DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and twice-daily use in those with DRV RAMs. Several studies suggest that once-daily DRV retains efficacy in the setting of 1-2 DRV RAMs whereas three or more DRV RAMs are needed for DRV resistance. There are few data to support the long-term use of once-daily DRV in patients with DRV RAMs. This observational study evaluated 48-week clinical outcomes of 22 treatment-experienced patients with ≥1 DRV RAMs switched to once-daily DRV between 2014 and 2017. The primary endpoint was HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at week 48. Safety parameters were analyzed throughout the study. The median age of the sample was 53 years, 18 (82%) had baseline HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml, and the median number of historical DRV RAMs was 2. At week 48, 20 (91%) had HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml, and 2 (9%) had HIV-1 RNA of 82 and 59,637 copies/ml and reported non-adherence. No adverse drug reactions were observed through week 48. Once-daily DRV maintained virologic control in patients with ≥1 historical DRV RAMs and was safe and well-tolerated. Further data are needed to validate this as a viable treatment option in this population.

Satisfaction and knowledge among patients with HIV after switching from tenofovir to tenofovir alafenamide in regimens containing emtricitabine and rilpivirine

Introducción.

La satisfacción y el conocimiento del cambio de tenofovir por tenofovir- alafenamida en pacientes con HIV no se han estudiado aún. Estos dos parámetros se relacionan con mejores resultados en salud y, por lo tanto, es importante medirlos durante la práctica clínica habitual.

Objetivo.

Evaluar el grado de conocimiento y satisfacción de los pacientes positivos para HIV ante el cambio de tratamiento antirretroviral con rilpivirina, emtricitabina y tenofovir (RPV-FTC-TDF) por rilpivirina, emtricitabina y tenofovir-alafenamida (RPV-FTC-TAF).

Materiales y métodos.

Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo en un hospital de tercer nivel entre los meses de septiembre y noviembre de 2018. Se incluyeron pacientes previamente tratados con RPV-FTC-TDF que acudían por segunda vez a consulta para recibir el tratamiento con RPV-FTC-TAF. La satisfacción y el grado de conocimiento se analizaron mediante nueve preguntas, usando una escala de tipo Likert de 5 puntos para evaluar el grado de acuerdo.

Resultados.

Se incluyeron 116 pacientes en el estudio. El 75 % de ellos se mostró satisfecho con el cambio y se consideró que el 64 % conocía lo que implicaba. Los pacientes jóvenes se mostraron menos satisfechos con el modo en que se les explicó el cambio (p=0,0487). Los pacientes estaban mejor informados sobre las ventajas renales (85 % de conocimiento) y óseas (82 %) de la nueva medicación, que sobre sus inconvenientes para el perfil lipídico (40 %).

Conclusiones.

En general, los pacientes se mostraron satisfechos con el cambio de medicación y conocían la posología del medicamento y las ventajas de la tenofovir- alafenamida frente al tenofovir, pero no sus posibles efectos adversos.

Fixed dose drug combinations - are they pharmacoeconomically sound? Findings and implications especially for lower- and middle-income countries

Introduction: There are positive aspects regarding the prescribing of fixed dose combinations (FDCs) versus prescribing the medicines separately. However, these have to be balanced against concerns including increased costs and their irrationality in some cases. Consequently, there is a need to review their value among lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) which have the greatest prevalence of both infectious and noninfectious diseases and issues of affordability.Areas covered: Review of potential advantages, disadvantages, cost-effectiveness, and availability of FDCs in high priority disease areas in LMICs and possible initiatives to enhance the prescribing of valued FDCs and limit their use where there are concerns with their value.Expert commentary: FDCs are valued across LMICs. Advantages include potentially improved response rates, reduced adverse reactions, increased adherence rates, and reduced costs. Concerns include increased chances of drug:drug interactions, reduced effectiveness, potential for imprecise diagnoses and higher unjustified prices. Overall certain FDCs including those for malaria, tuberculosis, and hypertension are valued and listed in the country's essential medicine lists, with initiatives needed to enhance their prescribing where currently low prescribing rates. Proposed initiatives include robust clinical and economic data to address the current paucity of pharmacoeconomic data. Irrational FDCs persists in some countries which are being addressed.

Real-world adherence and persistence for newly-prescribed HIV treatment: single versus multiple tablet regimen comparison among US medicaid beneficiaries

Background

Once-daily, single-tablet regimens (STRs) have been associated with improved patient outcomes compared to multi-tablet regimens (MTRs). This study evaluated real world adherence and persistence of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART), comparing STRs and MTRs.

Methods

Adult Medicaid beneficiaries (aged ≥ 18 years) initiating ART with ≥ 2 ART claims during the identification period (January 1, 2015–December 31, 2016) and continuous health plan enrollment for a 12-month baseline period were included. For STRs, the first ART claim date was defined as the index date; for MTRs, the prescription fill claim date for the last drug in the regimen was defined as the index date, and prescription fills were required to occur within a 5-day window. Adherence was assessed in 30-day intervals over a 6-month period, with adherence defined as having less than a 5-day gap between fills. Persistence was evaluated as median number of days on therapy and percent persistence at 12 months. Cox Proportional Hazard models were used to evaluate risk of discontinuation, controlling for baseline and clinical characteristics.

Results

A total of 1,744 (STR = 1290; MTR = 454) and 2409 (STR = 1782; MTR = 627) patients newly prescribed ART had available data concerning adherence and persistence, respectively. Average age ranged 40–42 years. The patient population was predominantly male. Adherence assessments showed 22.7% of STR initiators were adherent to their index regimens over a 6-month period compared to 11.7% of MTR initiators. Unadjusted persistence analysis showed 36.3% of STR initiators discontinued first-line therapy compared to 48.8% for MTR initiators over the 2-year study period. Controlling for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, MTR initiators had a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6, p < 0.0001). Among STRs, compared to the referent elvitegravir(EVG)/cobicistat(COBI)/emtricitabine(FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide(TAF), risk of discontinuation was higher for efavirenz(EFV)/FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) (HR = 3.6, p < 0.0001), EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF (HR = 2.8, p < 0.0001), and abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC)/dolutegravir (DTG) (HR = 1.8, p = 0.004). Among backbones, FTC/TAF was associated with lower risk of discontinuation than FTC/TDF (HR = 4.4, p < 0.0001) and ABC/3TC (HR = 2.2, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Among patients newly prescribed ART, STR initiators were significantly less likely to discontinue therapy and had greater adherence and persistence compared to MTR initiators. Regimens containing FTC/TAF as a backbone had higher persistence than those consisting of other backbones.

Adverse events in women switching from olaparib capsules to tablets: retrospective observational study of US claims data

Aim: Describe rates of prespecified adverse events in patients who switched from olaparib capsules to tablets. Patients & methods: Retrospective, observational cohort analysis using self-controlled, pre-post design. Data on patients with ovarian cancer who switched from olaparib capsules to tablets between January 2015 and February 2019 were obtained from a US claims database. Results: Among all patients (n = 48), proportion with any prespecified adverse event was 45.8% (95% confidence interval: 31.4-60.8) during initial 90 days' capsule use and 35.4% (22.2-50.5) during initial 90 days' tablets use; difference -10.4% (-28.8-9.0). Conclusion: Switching from olaparib capsules to tablets was manageable with no evidence of increased toxicity. This real-world study supports the manageable tolerability of olaparib in women with ovarian cancer.

Does the Polypill Improve Patient Adherence Compared to Its Individual Formulations? A Systematic Review

Many patients, especially those with a high pill burden and multiple chronic illnesses, are less adherent to medication. In medication treatments utilizing polypills, this problem might be diminished since multiple drugs are fused into one formulation and, therefore, the therapy regimen is simplified. This systematic review summarized evidence to assess the effect of polypills on medication adherence. The following databases were searched for articles published between 1 January 2000, and 14 May 2019: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Medication adherence was the only outcome assessed, regardless of the method of measuring it. Sixty-seven original peer-reviewed articles were selected. Adherence to polypill regimens was significantly higher in 56 articles (84%) compared to multiple pill regimens. This finding was also supported by the results of 13 out of 17 selected previously published systematic reviews and meta-analyses dealing with this topic. Adherence can be improved through the formulation of polypills, which is probably why the interest in researching them is growing. There are many polypills on the market, but the adherence studies so far focused mainly on a small range of medical conditions.

The management of treatment-experienced HIV patients (including virologic failure and switches)

Significant advances in the potency and tolerability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) have led to very high rates of virologic success for most who remain adherent to therapy. As a result, the life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLWH) has increased significantly. PLWH do, however, continue to experience a significantly higher risk of noninfectious comorbidities and chronic age-related complications, including cardiovascular disease and malignancies, which are now the biggest drivers of this excess morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in addition to virologic failure, the management of the treatment-experienced patient increasingly requires optimization of ART to enhance tolerability, avoid drug-drug interactions, and mitigate non-AIDS complications and comorbid conditions. This article will present principles of the management of virologic failure, poor immunologic recovery, and strategies for optimizing ART in the setting of virologic suppression.

Treatment Patterns and Predictors of Adherence in HIV Patients Receiving Single- or Multiple-Tablet Darunavir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide

PURPOSE

Darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide can be used as a single-tablet regimen (STR, DRV/c/FTC/TAF) or multiple-tablet regimen (MTR, DRV/c+FTC/TAF) to treat patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This study described treatment patterns and predictors of adherence among patients with HIV initiated on DRV/c/FTC/TAF or DRV/c+FTC/TAF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted using linked claims and electronic medical records from Decision Resources Group's Real World Data Repository (7/17/2017-6/1/2019). Treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 prescribed DRV/c/FTC/TAF or DRV/c+FTC/TAF (index date) were included. Six-month persistence (no treatment gaps >60 and >90 days) and adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) to the index regimen were evaluated among patients with ≥6 months of observation post-index. Predictors of low adherence (PDC<80%) were evaluated using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Among 2633 eligible patients (49.5 years old, 29% female, 37% African American/Black), 12% were treatment-naïve pre-index and 88% switched from a previous antiretroviral therapy; 84% initiated DRV/c/FTC/TAF and 16% initiated DRV/c+FTC/TAF. Among 822 DRV/c/FTC/TAF patients with ≥6 months of observation post-index, 80% and 86% had no >60- and >90-day gaps in DRV/c/FTC/TAF coverage, respectively, while among 204 DRV/c+FTC/TAF patients with ≥6 months of observation post-index, 69% and 75% had no >60- and >90-day gaps in DRV/c+FTC/TAF coverage, respectively. Mean (median) PDC for the index regimen was 81% (93%) for patients treated with DRV/c/FTC/TAF and 73% (83%) for patients treated with DRV/c+FTC/TAF. Predictors of low adherence included younger age (odds ratio [OR]=2.36, p=0.017), higher Quan-Charlson comorbidity index (OR=1.32, p=0.012), use of MTR regimen at index (OR=1.69, p=0.022), and prior low adherence (OR=2.56, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients initiating a DRV/c-based regimen, those initiating STR had higher 6-month adherence/persistence than those initiating MTR, highlighting the potential benefits of the STR formulation, particularly among younger patients with multiple comorbidities and prior low adherence.

Beyond one pill, once daily: current challenges of antiretroviral therapy management in the United States

Introduction: Modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) has revolutionized HIV treatment. ART regimens are now highly efficacious, well-tolerated, safe, often with one multi-drug pill, once-daily regimens available. However, clinical challenges persist in managing ART in persons with HIV (PWH), such as drug-drug interactions, side effects, pregnancy, co-morbidities, and adherence.Areas Covered: In this review, we discuss the ongoing challenges of ART for adults in the United States. We review the difficulties of initiating ART and maintaining therapy throughout adulthood and discuss new agents and strategies under investigation to address these issues. A PubMed search was utilized to identify relevant publications and guidelines through July 2019.Expert Opinion: Challenges persist in initiation and maintenance of ART. An individual's coexisting medical, social and personal factors must be considered in selecting and continuing ART to ensure safety, tolerability, and efficacy throughout adulthood. Continued development of new therapeutics and novel approaches to ART, such as long acting drugs or dual therapy, are needed to respond to many of these challenges. In addition, future research must address therapeutic disparities for populations historically underrepresented in clinical trials, including women, people aging with HIV, and those with complex comorbidities.

Considerations on nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: it is time to update?

AIMS

The prognosis and the clinical manifestations of HIV infection have changed with the introduction of the potent combination antiretroviral therapy (cART); however, up to 50% of patients meet research criteria for "HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders" (HAND) according with current nosology. The majority of patients affected by HAND, especially in cohorts with suppressed plasma viremia, showed an Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment (ANI), without any functional impairment. After more than 10 years from the introduction of the current so-called "Frascati criteria", this mini-review aimed to address the emerging limitations in current diagnosis procedures.

METHODS

We discussed the most relevant literature on HAND prevalence, etiology, and diagnosis.

RESULTS

We addressed three main emerging issues: (1) the unclear clinical relevance of ANI entity; (2) the evidences that Frascati criteria could produce a significant overestimation of HAND; (3) the need to better identify patients with a higher risk to develop HAND requiring routine neuropsychological examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Frascati criteria should be updated to better respond to the present characteristics of HIV + cohorts and to help clinicians in their cognitive and global management.

Efficacy and safety of the switch of Triumeq® to generic (abacavir + lamivudine) + Tivicay®: data at 48 weeks

Introduction: Generic drugs are helpful to enhance the efficiency of the sanitary system. A generic coformulation of abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) is available since 2016 in Spain. A report of our experience with its use is exposed. Methods: Patients between February 2017 and June 2017 who were taking Triumeq^® were switched to the generic ABC + 3TC plus DTG. Efficacy, safety, reasons for discontinuation and costs savings were evaluated at 48 weeks. Results: Switch was made in 93 patients, with a median age of 47 years and a mean time of 12.33 years with HIV infection. Six patients (6.5%) discontinued the new ART, being toxicity of the central nervous system the most frequent reason. The effective saving derived from the change after 1 year of treatment was 151.127 €. Conclusions: The change from Triumeq^® to a generic regimen of ABC + 3TC and another pill of DTG seems to be safe and efficient at 48 weeks.

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naïve patients with HIV-1: subgroup analyses of the phase 3 AMBER study

Background: The once-daily, single-tablet regimen darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg is approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The 48-week efficacy and safety of D/C/F/TAF versus darunavir/cobicistat + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (control) in treatment-naïve adults were demonstrated in the phase 3 AMBER study. Objective: To describe AMBER outcomes across patient subgroups based on demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. Methods: AMBER patients had viral load (VL) ≥1000 copies/mL, CD4⁺ cell count >50 cells/µL, and genotypic susceptibility to darunavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with virologic response (VL <50 copies/mL; FDA snapshot). Safety was assessed by adverse events, estimated glomerular filtration rate (cystatin C; eGFR_cystC), and bone mineral density. Outcomes were assessed by age (≤/>50 years), gender, race (black/non-black), baseline VL (≤/>100,000 copies/mL), baseline CD4⁺ cell count (</≥200 cells/µL), and baseline WHO clinical stage of HIV infection (1/2). Results: For the 725 AMBER patients (D/C/F/TAF: 362; control: 363), virologic response rates at week 48 were similar with D/C/F/TAF (91%) and control (88%), and this was consistent across all subgroups. Adverse event rates were similar in both arms, although numerically higher among patients >50 years and women, relative to their comparator groups, regardless of treatment arm (notably, sample sizes were small for patients >50 years and women). Improvements in eGFR_cystC and stable bone mineral density were observed with D/C/F/TAF overall, and results were generally consistent across subgroups. Conclusions: For treatment-naïve patients in AMBER, initiating therapy with the D/C/F/TAF single-tablet regimen was an effective and well-tolerated option, regardless of demographic or clinical characteristics.