Opponent familiarity and contest experience jointly influence contest decisions in Kryptolebias marmoratus

Male Pagurus minutus hermit crabs use multiple types of information in decisions to give up male-male contests

Organisms use information to make adaptive decisions in various contexts, including aggression. Potentially weaker, but better-informed, contestants should give up earlier to reduce fighting costs by using information related to their own lower success such as their size relative to their opponent and past contest outcomes to make this choice. Here, we examined whether intruders of the hermit crab Pagurus minutus could use information about their (1) smaller size, (2) past contest defeats, (3) opponent's past wins, or (4) relationship in the dominance hierarchy to their opponent when making a decision to give up during male-male contests for a female. In all trials, we randomly matched a smaller intruder with a larger opponent that was guarding a female. Our analyses suggest that P. minutus intruders can use all four types of information to decide whether to give up a contest without escalation or decrease its duration after escalation; it is the first species of Pagurus reported to do so, and the second reported to be able to distinguish familiar opponents from others in the context of male-male contests. These findings demonstrate the importance of cognitive abilities in minimizing costs when competing for vital resources.

Sexual dimorphism in ritualized agonistic behaviour, fighting ability and contest costs of Sus scrofa

Background

Sexual selection has driven sexual dimorphism in agonistic behaviour in many species. Agonistic behaviour is fundamentally altered by domestication and captivity, but it is unclear whether ancestral sex differences remain. We aimed to evaluate the effect of sex on agonistic behaviour, fighting ability and contest costs. We studied this in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) where aggression compromises welfare, and sexual dimorphism in aggression has been inconclusively demonstrated. Behaviour and physiology of 827 male and female juvenile pigs were studied during resident-intruder tests and dyadic contests at various ages, while accounting for the relative body weight difference between the opponents.

Results

Males won in 79% of contests against females, even when at a large weight disadvantage. The effect of sex increased with age, with males having a 138 times higher likelihood of winning than females when 13 weeks old. In dyadic contests, males invested more time in non-damaging agonistic display behaviour and took longer before escalating into damaging aggression. Males showed ritualized display that included foaming from the mouth and piloerection of the neck hair, which was nearly always absent in females. Contest costs in terms of contest duration, blood lactate and skin lesions where higher for males, especially when fighting another male.

Conclusions

Profound sex differences were present for agonistic behaviour, fighting ability and contest costs, and became more pronounced as animals got older. Males invested more in ritualized display before escalating into costly fights, whereas females attacked sooner but also terminated contests more rapidly and with fewer costs. The sexual dimorphism in agonistic behaviour in juvenile domestic pigs is in line with the evolutionary relevance for females’ maternal defence and males’ competition for females.

Do weaponless males of the hermit crab Pagurus minutus give up contests without escalation? Behavior of intruders that lack their major cheliped in male-male contests

In dyadic contests, theoretical studies have predicted that weaker contestants are less likely to engage in fights to minimize the cost of aggression. Since the major cheliped of decapod crustaceans is critically important as a weapon, contestants without a major cheliped should be more likely to give up the contests. We therefore examined whether loss of the major cheliped by the hermit crab Pagurus minutus would affect their decision to escalate male–male contests over guarded females. Intruders without a major cheliped showed no difference in the frequency of escalation compared with intact intruders, and the decision to give up was affected by the body size difference between the contestants. After escalation, compared with intact intruders, intruders without a major cheliped had significantly decreased success of takeover of a female from opponents, suggesting a strong disadvantage of losing their major cheliped. Although the decision of weaponless intruders to escalate seems irrational, several factors, such as poor accuracy of resource holding potential assessment, the influence of body size, and a high benefit to cost ratio of male–male contests, may have affected their behavior.