Selective neural stimulation methods improve cycling exercise performance after spinal cord injury: a case series

Anatomical Registration of Implanted Sensors Improves Accuracy of Trunk Tilt Estimates with a Networked Neuroprosthesis

For individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) above the midthoracic level, a common complication is the partial or complete loss of trunk stability in the seated position. Functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) can restore seated posture and other motor functions after paralysis by applying small electrical currents to the peripheral motor nerves. In particular, the Networked Neuroprosthesis (NNP) is a fully implanted, modular FNS system that is also capable of capturing information from embedded accelerometers for measuring trunk tilt for feedback control of stimulation. The NNP modules containing the accelerometers are located in the body based on surgical constraints. As such, their exact orientations are generally unknown and cannot be easily assessed. In this study, a method for estimating trunk tilt that employed the Gram-Schmidt method to reorient acceleration signals to the anatomical axes of the body was developed and deployed in individuals with SCI using the implanted NNP system. An anatomically realistic model of a human trunk and five accelerometer sensors was developed to verify the accuracy of the reorientation algorithm. Correlation coefficients and root mean square errors (RMSEs) were calculated to compare target trunk tilt estimates and tilt estimates derived from simulated accelerometer signals under a variety of conditions. Simulated trunk tilt estimates with correlation coefficients above 0.92 and RMSEs below 5° were achieved. The algorithm was then applied to accelerometer signals from implanted sensors installed in three NNP recipients. Error analysis was performed by comparing the correlation coefficients and RMSEs derived from trunk tilt estimates calculated from implanted sensor signals to those calculated via motion capture data, which served as the gold standard. NNP-derived trunk tilt estimates exhibited correlation coefficients between 0.80 and 0.95 and RMSEs below 13° for both pitch and roll in most cases. These findings suggest that the algorithm is effective at estimating trunk tilt with the implanted sensors of the NNP system, which implies that the method may be appropriate for extracting feedback signals for control systems for seated stability with NNP technology for individuals who have reduced control of their trunk due to paralysis.

Trunk Posture from Randomly Oriented Accelerometers

Feedback control of functional neuromuscular stimulation has the potential to improve daily function for individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) by enhancing seated stability. Our fully implanted networked neuroprosthesis (NNP) can provide real-time feedback signals for controlling the trunk through accelerometers embedded in modules distributed throughout the trunk. Typically, inertial sensors are aligned with the relevant body segment. However, NNP implanted modules are placed according to surgical constraints and their precise locations and orientations are generally unknown. We have developed a method for calibrating multiple randomly oriented accelerometers and fusing their signals into a measure of trunk orientation. Six accelerometers were externally attached in random orientations to the trunks of six individuals with SCI. Calibration with an optical motion capture system resulted in RMSE below 5° and correlation coefficients above 0.97. Calibration with a handheld goniometer resulted in RMSE of 7° and correlation coefficients above 0.93. Our method can obtain trunk orientation from a network of sensors without a priori knowledge of their relationships to the body anatomical axes. The results of this study will be invaluable in the design of feedback control systems for stabilizing the trunk of individuals with SCI in combination with the NNP implanted technology.

Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis

Background

Stimulation-driven exercise is often limited by rapid fatigue of the activated muscles. Selective neural stimulation patterns that decrease activated fiber overlap and/or duty cycle improve cycling exercise duration and intensity. However, unequal outputs from independently activated fiber populations may cause large discrepancies in power production and crank angle velocity among pedal revolutions. Enforcing a constant cadence through feedback control of stimulus levels may address this issue and further improve endurance by targeting a submaximal but higher than steady-state exercise intensity.

Methods

Seven participants with paralysis cycled using standard cadence-controlled stimulation (S-Cont). Four of those participants also cycled with a low duty cycle (carousel) cadence-controlled stimulation scheme (C-Cont). S-Cont and C-Cont patterns were compared with conventional maximal stimulation (S-Max). Outcome measures include total work (W), end power (P_end), power fluctuation (PFI), charge accumulation (Q) and efficiency (η). Physiological measurements of muscle oxygenation (SmO₂) and heart rate were also collected with select participants.

Results

At least one cadence-controlled stimulation pattern (S-Cont or C-Cont) improved P_end over S-Max in all participants and increased W in three participants. Both controlled patterns increased Q and η and reduced PFI compared with S-Max and prior open-loop studies. S-Cont stimulation also delayed declines in SmO2 and increased heart rate in one participant compared with S-Max.

Conclusions

Cadence-controlled selective stimulation improves cycling endurance and increases efficiency over conventional stimulation by incorporating fiber groups only as needed to maintain a desired exercise intensity. Closed-loop carousel stimulation also successfully reduces power fluctuations relative to previous open-loop efforts, which will enable neuroprosthesis recipients to better take advantage of duty cycle reducing patterns.