Efficacy of virtual reality training on motor performance, activity of daily living, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: an umbrella review comprising meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy of virtual reality exercise in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effects of virtual reality (VR) exercise compared to traditional rehabilitation on pain, function, and muscle strength in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Additionally, the study explores the mechanisms by which VR exercise contributes to the rehabilitation of KOA patients.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PEDro according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search spanned from the library construction to 24 May 2024, focusing on randomized controlled trials Primary outcomes included pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and muscle strength. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan (version 5.4) and Stata (version 14.0). The bias risk of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, while the quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

This meta-analysis and systematic review included nine studies involving 456 KOA patients. The results indicated that VR exercise significantly improved pain scores (SMD, -1.53; 95% CI: -2.50 to -0.55; p = 0.002), WOMAC total score (MD, -14.79; 95% CI: -28.26 to -1.33; p = 0.03), WOMAC pain score (MD, -0.93; 95% CI: -1.52 to -0.34; p = 0.002), knee extensor strength (SMD, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.87; p = 0.006), and knee flexor strength (SMD, 0.65; 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.01; p = 0.0005), but not significantly for WOMAC stiffness (MD, -0.01; 95% CI: -1.21 to 1.19; p = 0.99) and physical function (MD, -0.35; 95% CI: -0.79 to -0.09; p = 0.12).

Conclusion

VR exercise significantly alleviates pain, enhances muscle strength and WOMAC total score in KOA patients, but improvements in joint stiffness and physical function are not significant. However, the current number of studies is limited, necessitating further research to expand on the present findings.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024540061, identifier CRD42024540061.

Research progress on the application of anti-gravity treadmill in the rehabilitation of Parkinson's disease patients: a mini review

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. It is the second most common chronic progressive neurodegenerative disease. PD still lacks a known cure or prophylactic medication. Current treatments primarily address symptoms without halting the progression of PD, and the side effects of dopaminergic therapy become more apparent over time. In contrast, physical therapy, with its lower risk of side effects and potential cardiovascular benefits, may provide greater benefits to patients. The Anti-Gravity Treadmill is an emerging rehabilitation therapy device with high safety, which minimizes patients' fear and allows them to focus more on a normal, correct gait, and has a promising clinical application. Based on this premise, this study aims to summarize and analyze the relevant studies on the application of the anti-gravity treadmill in PD patients, providing a reference for PD rehabilitation practice and establishing a theoretical basis for future research in this area.

Efficacy of virtual reality technology interventions for cognitive and mental outcomes in older people with cognitive disorders: An umbrella review comprising meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

We conducted an umbrella review of virtual reality (VR) technology interventions and cognitive improvement in older adults with cognitive disorders to establish a hierarchy of evidence. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases from database creation to February 2023. We included meta-analyses relevant to our study objectives for the overall review. We assessed the methodological quality according to AMSTAR2, and we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) method to assess the credibility of the evidence. This overall review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023423063). We identified six meta-analyses that included 12 cognitive outcomes, but only memory (Standardized Mean Difference(SMD) = 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04 to 0.49), depression (SMD = -1.26, 95% CI: -1.8 to -0.72), and global cognition (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.66) improved through the VR technology intervention. Using the 95% prediction interval (PI) results, we found that VR technology did not significantly affect the cognitive abilities of people with cognitive decline despite increasing the subject size. We conclude that the VR technology intervention improved only specific cognitive abilities.