Opposing CSF hydrodynamic trends found in the cerebral aqueduct and prepontine cistern following shunt treatment in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus

Can Shunt Response in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Be Predicted from Preoperative Brain Imaging? A Retrospective Study of the Diagnostic Use of the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale in 119 Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale is a combined scoring of 7 different structural imaging markers on preoperative brain CT or MR imaging in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: callosal angle, Evans Index, Sylvian fissure dilation, apical sulcal narrowing, mean temporal horn diameter, periventricular WM lesions, and focal sulcal dilation. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the performance of the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale in distinguishing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus shunt responders from nonresponders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The preoperative MR imaging and CT scans of 119 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus were scored using the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale. A summary shunt-response score assessed within 6 months from ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, combining the effect on cognition, gait, and urinary incontinence, was used as a reference. The difference between the mean Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale for responders and nonresponders was tested using the Student t test. The area under the curve was calculated for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale to assess shunt response. To ascertain reproducibility, we assessed the interobserver agreement between the 2 independent observers as intraclass correlation coefficients for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale for 74 MR imaging scans and 19 CT scans.

RESULTS

Ninety-four (79%) of 119 patients were shunt responders. The mean Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale score for shunt responders was 8.35 (SD, 1.53), and for nonresponders, 7.48 (SD, 1.53) (P = .02). The area under the curve for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale was 0.66 (range, 0.54-0.78). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale was 0.86 for MR imaging and 0.82 for CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Radscale showed moderate discrimination for shunt response but cannot, on its own, be used for selecting patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus for shunt surgery.

Role of DESH, callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign in prediction of gait responsiveness after shunting in iNPH patients

Primary endpoint of this single-centre, prospective consecutive cohort study was to evaluate DESH score, CA, CSS and Evans index of suspected iNPH patients against the reference standard of lumbar infusion test (LIT) and external lumbar drainage (ELD) in prediction of gait response after VP shunt implantation in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Patients were assigned to NPH and non-NPH groups based on LIT and ELD results. Age-matched controls were added for group comparison. 32 NPH, 46 non-NPH and 15 control subjects were enrolled in the study. There were significant differences in mean preoperative DESH scores of NPH, non-NPH and control groups (6.3 ± 2.3 ([±SD]) (range 2-10) vs 4.5 ± 2.4 (range 0-10) vs 1.0 ± 1.2 (range 0-4)). Differences in mean CA and Evans index were not significant between NPH and non-NPH groups. CSS showed 62.5% sensitivity, 60.87% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 70% NPV for differentiation of NPH and non-NPH groups. A CA of 68 degrees had 48.49% sensitivity, 76.09% specificity, 59.26% PPV 67.31% NPV and DESH score of 4 had 93.75% sensitivity, 41.30% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 90.48% NPV for differentiation between NPH and non-NPH groups. The groups of probable iNPH patients with gait impairment diagnosed by high DESH score or positive functional testing did not overlap and DESH score did not correlate with gait improvement after ELD. DESH score should not be used as a simple diagnostic or prognostic marker of iNPH and we could not confirm the benefit of measurement of callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign.

Predicting the Aqueductal Cerebrospinal Fluid Pulse: A Statistical Approach

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pulse in the Aqueduct of Sylvius (aCSF pulse) is often used to evaluate structural changes in the brain. Here we present a novel application of the general linear model (GLM) to predict the motion of the aCSF pulse. MR venography was performed on 13 healthy adults (9 female and 4 males—mean age = 33.2 years). Flow data was acquired from the arterial, venous and CSF vessels in the neck (C2/C3 level) and from the AoS. Regression analysis was undertaken to predict the motion of the aCSF pulse using the cervical flow rates as predictor variables. The relative contribution of these variables to predicting aCSF flow rate was assessed using a relative weights method, coupled with an ANOVA. Analysis revealed that the aCSF pulse could be accurately predicted (mean (SD) adjusted r2 = 0.794 (0.184)) using the GLM (p < 0.01). Venous flow rate in the neck was the strongest predictor of aCSF pulse (p = 0.001). In healthy individuals, the motion of the aCSF pulse can be predicted using the GLM. This indicates that the intracranial fluidic system has broadly linear characteristics. Venous flow in the neck is the strongest predictor of the aCSF pulse.