Short report: Performance evaluation of the Idylla™ KRAS and EGFR mutation tests on paraffin-embedded cytological NSCLC samples

Comparison and Validation of Rapid Molecular Testing Methods for Theranostic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Alterations in Lung Cancer: Idylla versus Digital Droplet PCR

Targeting EGFR alterations, particularly the L858R (Exon 21) mutation and Exon 19 deletion (del19), has significantly improved the survival of lung cancer patients. From now on, the issue is to shorten the time to treatment. Here, we challenge two well-known rapid strategies for EGFR testing: the cartridge-based platform Idylla™ (Biocartis) and a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) approach (ID_Solution). To thoroughly investigate each testing performance, we selected a highly comprehensive cohort of 39 unique del19 (in comparison, the cbioportal contains 40 unique del19), and 9 samples bearing unique polymorphisms in exon 19. Additional L858R (N = 24), L861Q (N = 1), del19 (N = 63), and WT samples (N = 34) were used to determine clear technical and biological cutoffs. A total of 122 DNA samples extracted from formaldehyde-fixed samples was used as input. No false positive results were reported for either of the technologies, as long as careful droplet selection (ddPCR) was ensured for two polymorphisms. ddPCR demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting unique del19 (92.3%, 36/39) compared to Idylla (67.7%, 21/31). However, considering the prevalence of del19 and L858R in the lung cancer population, the adjusted theranostic values were similar (96.51% and 95.26%, respectively). ddPCR performs better for small specimens and low tumoral content, but in other situations, Idylla is an alternative (especially if a molecular platform is absent).

Assessing and Evaluating the Scope and Constraints of Idylla Molecular Assays by Using Different Source Materials in Routine Diagnostic Settings

For cancer treatment, diagnostics concerning tumor type and determination of molecular markers in short TAT is critical. The fully automated, real-time PCR-based molecular diagnostic Idylla assays are well established in many laboratories for qualitative detection, short TAT and routine screening of clinically relevant oncogenic mutations. According to the manufacturer, all IVD assays are recommended for use only with FFPE tissue samples of 5–10 µM dissections with at least 10% tumor content. In this study, we tested the performance and accuracy of the IVD assays along with the gene fusion assay (RUO) with different tissue/source materials like isolated DNA/RNA, cryomaterial, etc. The study also included testing archival FFPE tissue sections dating back from 20 years and a performance check for different pan-cancer samples individually. All the assays tested with FFPE sections and gDNA/RNA input showed above 96% accuracy and sensitivity, individually with 100% specificity. The Idylla assays also performed exceptionally well on the archival FFPE tissues, and the use of assays for other solid tumors was also remarkable. The performance test and accuracy of Idylla assays showed high efficiency with certain limitations. For the use of Idylla assays, both qualitative and quantitative applicability of different tumor source materials could produce efficient results in different diagnostic settings within a short TAT.