Reconstruction of facial defects with local flaps--a training model for medical students?

Application of supraclavicular island flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction

Several surgical modalities are available for maxillofacial reconstruction as locoregional or microvascular free flaps.

PURPOSE

(a) Evaluate the reliability of the supraclavicular flap in cervico-orofacial region; (b) investigate the role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in predicting the post-operative viability of the flap; (c) assess the speech, feeding, and esthetics after reconstruction using this flap.

METHODS

Eleven patients included in this study underwent either conventional or delayed harvesting of the supraclavicular flap (SCF). All the patients had diagnostic computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the supraclavicular flap before the surgery.

RESULTS

The mean harvesting time of the flap was 45.45 ± 4.16 min. The average length of the flap was 22.64 ± 1.12 cm, whereas the mean width of the flap was 6.14 ± 1.14 cm. The flap survived in 9 patients, while two patients had complete flap loss. After the surgery, three patients complained of speech difficulties. Two patients had swallowing problems. After the surgery, three patients complained of speech difficulties. Two patients had swallowing problems. Only two patients complained of weakness in the donor site. None of the patients reported that the weakness or pain at the donor site affected their daily activities or quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The pedicled SCF represents a safe and feasible option that can be used to reconstruct a wide array of maxillofacial oncologic defects. However, a study with a larger sample size is recommended to achieve more reliable clinical results for the modified delayed technique modification in terms of their effect on the survival of the supraclavicular flap.

Utility of Cadaveric Porcine Heads for Teaching Oral Surgical Procedures in an Australian Dental School: A Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: Cadaveric models have traditionally been a mainstay of dental and medical education worldwide since their inception. In Australia, educators at dental schools were among the first to use cadaveric porcine heads in formal teaching in oral surgery. This practice has since fallen out of favour in most modern dental curricula. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the utility of cadaveric porcine models for oral surgery training from a student perspective (Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia). Methods: Thirty participants who were all third-year dental students attended a two-hour session comprising a 30 min lecture followed by a 90 min practical workshop. The lecture outlined the steps and supervision of students during the practical and was provided by a consultant maxillofacial surgeon. At the conclusion of the workshop, participants were asked to anonymously complete a printed questionnaire with eight questions related to their experience. Results: Prior to the workshop, two-thirds (61%) of participants felt that they had been taught the surgical procedure for raising mucoperiosteal flaps adequately in their dental school curriculum during their third year, although only 43% of students had assisted specialty residents in raising a mucoperiosteal flap and 14% reported having performed the procedure themselves. Almost all students (96%) agreed that the porcine model was useful for their dental education and that they would practice the exercise using the model again if provided with the opportunity. The questionnaire had a 93.33% completion rate. Conclusions: This pilot study indicates that porcine heads present a useful, low-cost adjunct in the learning of basic oral surgical procedures.

An ex vivo model for education and training of bilateral cleft lip surgery

BACKGROUND

Bilateral cleft lip surgery is very challenging and requires a high level of skill, knowledge and experience. Existing high-fidelity simulation models that can be used by novice cleft surgeons to gain experience and expand their knowledge are rare and expensive. In this study, we developed a bilateral cleft lip model using porcine snout discs, which are available anywhere and inexpensive.

METHODS

Anatomic reference points of a patient with a bilateral cleft lip were superimposed with landmarks of the porcine snout disc on a foil template. The template was used to construct an ex vivo bilateral cleft lip model. Surgery was performed on the model according to Millard and the surgical steps were photodocumented analogous to two clinical cases of bilateral cleft lip surgery. The suitability of the model was further tested by twelve participants and evaluated using self-assessment questionnaires.

RESULTS

The bilateral cleft lip ex vivo model made of a porcine snout disc proved to be a suitable model with very low cost and ease of fabrication, as the template is reusable on any snout disc. The Millard procedure was successfully performed and the surgical steps of the lip plasty were simulated close to the clinical situation. Regarding the nasal reconstruction, the model lacks three-dimensionality. As a training model, it enhanced the participants comprehension of cleft surgery as well as their surgical skills. All participants rated the model as valuable for teaching and training.

CONCLUSIONS

The porcine snout discs can be used as a useful ex vivo model for bilateral cleft lip surgery with limitations in the construction of the nose, which cannot be realistically performed with the model due to anatomical differences with humans. Benefits include a realistic tissue feel, the simulation of a multi-layered lip construction, a wide and rapid availability and low cost. This allows the model to be used by novice surgeons also in low-income countries. It is therefore useful as a training model for gaining experience, but also as a model for refining, testing and evaluating surgical techniques for bilateral lip plasty.

Advancing Surgical Education: A Comprehensive Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Novel Approach to Training Models for Local Skin Advancement Flaps

Performing local skin flaps is a challenging task that requires cognitive and technical skills to design flaps with proper orientation to avoid distorting normal anatomy. Junior trainees need adequate exposure to gain confidence and expertise in such procedures. This article systematically reviews the literature's different local skin advancement flap training models and describes a new, easy-to-use training model. A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from their inception until August 2022 for articles about local skin advancement flap training models. The meta-analysis results were pooled across the studies using a random-effects model and presented as a weighted mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Out of 773 reviewed articles, 18 were included in the systematic review, and four reported enough data to be included in the meta-analysis. Rhomboid and Z-plasty flaps were the most commonly taught flaps by training models. The most commonly used training models were synthetic-based, followed by animal-based models. The training models significantly increased the trainees' confidence and expertise regarding local skin flap procedures (p<0.00001) for both domains. Training models, per our reported data, significantly improve the trainees' confidence and expertise in performing local skin advancement flap procedures; continuous efforts in developing and establishing new, simple-to-use, and effective training models are strongly encouraged to further improvement of surgical education and enhance the trainees' surgical skills.

Simulation models for learning local skin flap design and execution: A systematic review of the literature

Introduction

Early exposure to practical skills in surgical training is essential in order to master technically demanding procedures such as the design and execution of local skin flaps. Changes in working patterns, increasing subspecializations, centralization of surgical services, and the publication of surgeon-specific outcomes have all made hands-on-training in a clinical environment increasingly difficult to achieve for the junior surgeon. This has been further compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. This necessitates alternative methods of surgical skills training. To date, there are no standardized or ideal simulation models for local skin flap teaching.

Aim

This systematic review aims to summarize and evaluate local skin flap simulation and teaching models published in the literature.

Materials and Methods

A systematic review protocol was developed and undertaken in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Key search terms encompassed both “local skin flaps” and “models” or “surgical simulation”. These were combined using Boolean logic and used to search Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were collected and screened according to the inclusion criteria. The final included articles were graded for their level of evidence and recommendation based on a modified educational Oxford Center for evidence-based medicine classification system and assessed according to the CRe-DEPTH tool for articles describing training interventions in healthcare professionals.

Results

A total of 549 articles were identified, resulting in the inclusion of 16 full-text papers. Four articles used 3D simulators for local flap teaching and training, while two articles described computer simulation as an alternative method for local flap practicing. Four models were silicone based, while gelatin, Allevyn dressings, foam rubber, and ethylene-vinyl acetate-based local flap simulators were also described. Animal models such as pigs head, porcine skin, chicken leg, and rat, as well as a training model based on fresh human skin excised from body-contouring procedures, were described. Each simulation and teaching method was assessed by a group of candidates via a questionnaire or evaluation survey grading system. Most of the studies were graded as level of evidence 3 or 4.

Conclusion

Many methods of simulation for the design and execution of local skin flaps have been described. However, most of these have been assessed only in small cohort numbers, and, therefore, larger candidate sizes and a standardized method for assessment are required. Moreover, some proposed simulators, although promising, are in a very preliminary stage of development. Further development and evaluation of promising high-fidelity models is required in order to improve training in such a complex area of surgery.