1
|
Roy BD, Li J, Lally C, Akerman SC, Sullivan MA, Fratantonio J, Flanders WD, Wenten M. Prescription opioid dispensing patterns among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:244. [PMID: 38566055 PMCID: PMC10986122 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05676-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) or bipolar disorder (BD) may have increased risk of complications from prescribed opioids, including opioid-induced respiratory depression. We compared prescription opioid pain medication dispensing for patients with SZ or BD versus controls over 5 years to assess dispensing trends. METHODS This retrospective, observational study analysed US claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid databases for individuals aged 18-64 years with prevalent SZ or BD for years 2015-2019 compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and medication use were assessed. Proportions of individuals dispensed prescription opioids chronically (ie, ≥70 days over a 90-day period or ≥ 6 prescriptions annually) or nonchronically (≥1 prescription, chronic definition not met) were assessed. RESULTS In 2019, the Commercial and Medicaid databases contained records for 4773 and 30,179 patients with SZ and 52,780 and 63,455 patients with BD, respectively. Patients with SZ or BD had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, including pain, versus controls in each analysis year. From 2015 to 2019, among commercially insured patients with SZ, chronic opioid-dispensing proportions decreased from 6.1% (controls: 2.7%) to 2.3% (controls: 1.2%) and, for patients with BD, from 11.4% (controls: 2.7%) to 6.4% (controls: 1.6%). Chronic opioid dispensing declined in Medicaid-covered patients with SZ from 15.0% (controls: 14.7%) to 6.7% (controls: 6.0%) and, for patients with BD, from 27.4% (controls: 12.0%) to 12.4% (controls: 4.7%). Among commercially insured patients with SZ, nonchronic opioid dispensing decreased from 15.5% (controls: 16.4%) to 10.7% (controls: 11.0%) and, for patients with BD, from 26.1% (controls: 17.5%) to 20.0% (controls: 12.2%). In Medicaid-covered patients with SZ, nonchronic opioid dispensing declined from 22.5% (controls: 24.4%) to 15.1% (controls: 12.7%) and, for patients with BD, from 32.3% (controls: 25.9%) to 24.6% (controls: 13.6%). CONCLUSIONS The proportions of individuals dispensed chronic or nonchronic opioid medications each year were similar between commercially and Medicaid-insured patients with SZ versus controls and were higher for patients with BD versus controls. From 2015 to 2019, the proportions of individuals who were dispensed prescription opioids chronically or nonchronically decreased for patients with SZ or BD and controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jianheng Li
- Epidemiologic Research & Methods, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cathy Lally
- Epidemiologic Research & Methods, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sedney CL, Okakpu U, Dekeseredy P, Pollini RA, Rosenow JM, Haggerty T. Back Pain in the Era of Opioid Restriction and Implications for Neurosurgeons Based on Qualitative Findings From a Rural State. Cureus 2024; 16:e57389. [PMID: 38694664 PMCID: PMC11061822 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Historically, back pain has been an inciting complaint for the initiation of opioids. Aggressive marketing of opioids to treat back pain coupled with the initiation of pain being treated as "the fifth vital sign" contributed to the emerging opioid crisis in the USA. West Virginia (WV) has long been considered the epicenter of the crisis. In 2018, the WV legislature passed a bill that placed prescribing limits on opioids. Our group set out to investigate the impacts of opioid prescribing restrictions through a sequential, mixed methods study evaluating prescription trends and stakeholder experiences. These stakeholder experiences generated emergent themes regarding the evolution of the opioid crisis up to and beyond the implementation of the bill, which is of relevance to neurosurgeons and back pain treatment. This study explores those findings for a neurosurgical audience. This study consisted of open-ended, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 50 physicians, pharmacists, and patients in WV. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was utilized as the methodological orientation. Five theoretical domains relevant to the treatment of back pain emerged, describing the prevalence of opioid use, barriers to access care, the importance of opioids for function in resource-poor rural areas, disconnected and siloed care, and patient views on the impacts of pain care gaps and solutions. Spinal pain care in rural WV is complex due to identified challenges. Care siloing factors in suboptimal spinal pain care. Future work should define, implement, and assess the real-world effectiveness of treatment paradigms for the full spectrum of surgical and non-surgical back pain complaints. Neurosurgeons should be present in this arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara L Sedney
- Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | | | | | - Robin A Pollini
- Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | - Joshua M Rosenow
- Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Treah Haggerty
- Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sedney CL, Dekeseredy P, Anderson P, Haggerty T. "They either leave you or they get involved in it": Familial factors influencing drug use amongst Appalachian people. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38389396 DOI: 10.1080/15332640.2024.2316650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
West Virginia, the only state entirely in Appalachia, is considered the epicenter of the opioid crisis. Children raised in families affected by opioid use disorder can develop their own substance use disorder later in life. The continuing opioid crisis coupled with social and health disparities suggest families in West Virginia are vulnerable to generational cycles of substance misuse. This qualitative study uses content analysis to present emergent themes discerned from participant interviews on the opioid epidemic and impacts of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia. Participants in this study described how using opioids has impacted their lives, their family, and community. They recognized drug use was embedded along familial groups and influenced by significant others such as partners or peers. Parents described how children were a strong motivator for recovery and how they felt remorse for exposing their children to their drug use. This study highlights the importance of community engagement, parental support, and early identification of vulnerable young people to lessen the intergenerational continuance of substance use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara L Sedney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Patricia Dekeseredy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Parker Anderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Treah Haggerty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allen LD, Pollini RA, Vaglienti R, Powell D. Opioid Prescribing Patterns After Imposition of Setting-Specific Limits on Prescription Duration. JAMA HEALTH FORUM 2024; 5:e234731. [PMID: 38241057 PMCID: PMC10799257 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Despite their widespread adoption across the US, policies imposing one-size-fits-all limits on the duration of prescriptions for opioids have shown modest and mixed implications for prescribing. Objective To assess whether a prescription duration limit policy tailored to different clinical settings was associated with shorter opioid prescription lengths. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study examined changes in opioid prescribing patterns for opioid-naive Medicaid enrollees aged 12 to 64 years before and after implementation of a statewide prescription duration limit policy in West Virginia in June 2018. Patients with cancer or Medicare coverage were excluded. The policy assigned a 7-day duration limit to opioid prescriptions for adults treated in outpatient hospital- or office-based practices, a 4-day limit for adults treated in emergency departments, and a 3-day limit for pediatric patients younger than 18 years regardless of clinical setting. Data were examined from January 1, 2017, through September 30, 2019, and data were analyzed from June 12 to October 30, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Whether a patient's initial opioid prescription was longer in days than the June 2018 policy limit for a given care setting before and after policy implementation. Interrupted time series models were used to calculate the association between the policy's implementation and outcomes. Results The analytic sample included 44 703 Medicaid enrollees (27 957 patients [62.5%] before policy implementation and 16 746 patients [37.5%] after policy implementation; mean [SD] age, 33.9 [13.4] years; 27 461 females [61.4%]). Among adults treated in outpatient hospital- or office-based settings, the duration limit policy was associated with a decrease of 8.83 (95% CI, -10.43 to -7.23) percentage points (P < .001), or a 56.8% relative reduction, in the proportion of prescriptions exceeding the 7-day limit. In the emergency department setting, the policy was associated with a decrease of 7.03 (95% CI, -10.38 to -3.68) percentage points (P < .001), a 37.5% relative reduction, in the proportion of prescriptions exceeding the 4-day limit. The proportion of pediatric opioid prescriptions longer than the 3-day limit decreased by 12.80 (95% CI, -17.31 to -8.37) percentage points (P < .001), a 26.5% relative reduction, after the policy's implementation. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that opioid prescription duration limits tailored to different clinical settings are associated with reduced length of prescriptions for opioid-naive patients. Additional research is needed to evaluate whether these limits are associated with reductions in the incidence of opioid use disorder or with unintended consequences, such as shifts to illicit opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay D. Allen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robin A. Pollini
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Richard Vaglienti
- Center for Integrative Pain Management, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lundstrom EW, Dai Z, Groth CP, Hendricks B, Winstanley EL, Abate M, Smith GS. Comparing the effects of decreasing prescription opioid shipments and the release of an abuse deterrent OxyContin formulation on opioid overdose fatalities in WV: an interrupted time series study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2024; 19:4. [PMID: 38178238 PMCID: PMC10768117 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00587-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2010 release of an abuse deterrent formulation (ADF) of OxyContin, a brand name prescription opioid, has been cited as a major driver for the reduction in prescription drug misuse and the associated increasing illicit opioid use and overdose rates. However, studies of this topic often do not account for changes in supplies of other prescription opioids that were widely prescribed before and after the ADF OxyContin release, including generic oxycodone formulations and hydrocodone. We therefore sought to compare the impact of the ADF OxyContin release to that of decreasing prescription opioid supplies in West Virginia (WV). METHODS Opioid tablet shipment and overdose data were extracted from The Washington Post ARCOS (2006-2014) and the WV Forensic Drug Database (2005-2020), respectively. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) was used to estimate the point when shipments of prescription opioids to WV began decreasing, measured via dosage units and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to compare the impact LOESS-identified prescription supply changes and the ADF OxyContin release had on prescription (oxycodone and hydrocodone) and illicit (heroin, fentanyl, and fentanyl analogues) opioid overdose deaths in WV. Model fit was compared using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). RESULTS The majority of opioid tablets shipped to WV from 2006 to 2014 were generic oxycodone or hydrocodone, not OxyContin. After accounting for a 6-month lag from ITSA models using the LOESS-identified change in prescription opioid shipments measured via dosage units (2011 Q3) resulted in the lowest AIC for both prescription (AIC = -188.6) and illicit opioid-involved overdoses (AIC = -189.4), indicating this intervention start date resulted in the preferred model. The second lowest AIC was for models using the ADF OxyContin release as an intervention start date. DISCUSSION We found that illicit opioid overdoses in WV began increasing closer to when prescription opioid shipments to the state began decreasing, not when the ADF OxyContin release occurred. Similarly, the majority of opioid tablets shipped to the state for 2006-2014 were generic oxycodone or hydrocodone. This may indicate that diminishing prescription supplies had a larger impact on opioid overdose patterns than the ADF OxyContin release in WV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W Lundstrom
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Dr, P.O. Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, US.
| | - Zheng Dai
- Health Affairs Institute, Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, 405 Capitol Street, Suite 514, Charleston, WV, 25301, US
| | - Caroline P Groth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Dr, P.O. Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, US
| | - Brian Hendricks
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Dr, P.O. Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, US
| | - Erin L Winstanley
- Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, 930 Chestnut Ridge Rd, Morgantown, WV, 26505, US
| | - Marie Abate
- School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9500, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9500, US
| | - Gordon S Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Dr, P.O. Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, US
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sullivan KJ, Gabella B, Ziegler K, Tolle H, Giano Z, Hoppe J. Impact of Statewide Statute Limiting Days' Supply to Opioid-Naive Patients. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:112-118. [PMID: 37604303 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To address the ongoing opioid crisis, states use policy enactment to restrict prescribing by licensed healthcare providers and mandate the use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs. There have been mixed results regarding the effectiveness of such state policies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of Colorado Senate Bill 18-022, which limits opioid prescriptions to ≤7-day supply among patients without an opioid prescription in the previous year (i.e., are opioid naive). METHODS This is a retrospective interrupted time-series analysis of opioid prescribing to evaluate the weekly percentage of opioid prescriptions consistent with statutory limits for ≤7-day supply among opioid-naive patients before and after enactment using Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs data from May 21, 2017 to May 25, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed in 2021-2022. RESULTS The weekly percentage of opioid prescriptions ≤7-day supply increased by an average of 0.12% per week (p<0.0001) from 79.7% to 87.4% in the week before enactment. The week after enactment, the average increased by 0.2% (p=0.67). The year after enactment, the average weekly percentage change was 0.07% per week, a 0.05% decrease (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Statutory limits on days' supply among opioid-naive patients had little impact on opioid prescribing in Colorado. Legislating limits on opioid prescribing should be evaluated using Prescription Drug Monitoring Program data and considered for deimplementation when not impactful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Gabella
- Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE), Denver, Colorado
| | - Katherine Ziegler
- Avera Research Institute - Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Department of Pediatrics, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota; Department of Internal Medicine, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota
| | - Heather Tolle
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Zachary Giano
- School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jason Hoppe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sedney CL, Dekeseredy P, Davis M, Haggerty T. A qualitative study of chronic pain and opioid use: The impact of restrictive prescribing. J Opioid Manag 2023; 19:95-102. [PMID: 37879664 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2023.0803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the continuum of pain and addiction for patients with chronic pain (CP) who used opioids during a time of restrictive opioid prescribing in West Virginia. DESIGN This qualitative descriptive study used a content analysis of semistructured interviews. Themes were identified through a reflective, iterative coding process. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines were followed. SETTING West Virginia. PARTICIPANTS Twenty people who used opioids to treat a CP condition, 10 pharmacists, 10 primary care providers, and 10 specialists. INTERVENTION Semistructured interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE To better understand the impact of restrictive prescribing measures on people who used opioids for CP. RESULTS Patients initiated opioids for acute, painful conditions and described how long-term use led to physical dependence and, for some, opioid use disorder. Restrictive opioid prescribing laws led to care interruptions and decreased access and availability of prescribed opioid pain medication, driving some patients to seek illicit drugs. Economic considerations influenced drug use as the price of purchasing prescription opioids on the street went up, making heroin a cheaper alternative. Patients who transitioned to buprenorphine/naloxone as a treatment for pain or opioid use disorder viewed it as a positive change and a "life saver." CONCLUSIONS Opioid use for CP is complex and multifaceted. The continuum of pain and opioid use disorder can begin with a prescription for acute pain and continue for the treatment of CP. Patients described how continued opioid use was not to "get high" but for pain control to improve their quality of life, continue to work, and be productive. For those who experience physical dependence on opioids, access to treatment is vital to recovery and pain management. KEY MESSAGE Without individualized managed care, people confronted with a sudden interruption in prescription opioids may turn to illicit drugs to mitigate symptoms of opioid withdrawal and physical dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara L Sedney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Patricia Dekeseredy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Mor-gantown, West Virginia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-5358
| | - Marissa Davis
- School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Treah Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dekeseredy P, Brownstein H, Haggerty T, Sedney CL. Using Medical Cannabis for Chronic Pain: A Social-Ecological Framework. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2023. [PMID: 37155681 DOI: 10.1089/can.2023.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Early studies suggest medical cannabis (MC) has the potential to benefit people who suffer from chronic pain by offering a less addictive alternative to opioids; however, most investigators agree more research is indicated. Today, in 2023, cannabis remains a Schedule I drug and is an illegal substance in the United States under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Despite this designation, as of February 2022, 37 states, three territories, and the District of Columbia allowed using cannabis products to treat certain painful medical conditions. The contradictory status of federal and state legislation regarding cannabis use has resulted in delays and restrictions on relevant research. As a result, an inadequate foundation of knowledge exists needed to inform policy, program, and practice decisions concerning MC to treat pain. Implementing and controlling access to MC is influenced by overlapping individual, interpersonal, community, and organizational influences that all fall under the umbrella of federal and state policies. Increasingly, the legalization and expanded access to MC necessitates the integration of evidence, policy, and social-ecological reality. To adequately delineate these complex factors to anticipate and plan future interventions at multiple levels, we propose a social-ecological framework (SEF) for using MC to treat pain. This SEF assumes the transactional relationship between the individual and the environment and that no single factor can predict behavior or health outcomes. Our framework illustrates five dynamic levels of analysis that interact between dimensions. Key elements and intersections are discussed at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Dekeseredy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Henry Brownstein
- Sociology and Anthropology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Treah Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Cara L Sedney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ramdin C, Bikkina R, Nelson L, Mazer-Amirshahi M. Trends in amphetamine prescriptions given at discharge in emergency departments: A national analysis (2012-2019). Am J Emerg Med 2023; 66:91-97. [PMID: 36738570 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In parallel with the opioid epidemic, there has been a resurgence in abuse, medical complications, and deaths related to amphetamines. The opioid epidemic began with increasing rates of prescription products that evolved overtime to include heroin and more recently, fentanyl analogues. Current trends in amphetamine prescriptions are less well described. We sought to determine if there has been a change in amphetamine prescriptions given at discharge in U.S. emergency departments (EDs) in recent years. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of data provided by the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2012 to 2019. We computed total number of visits that were given amphetamine prescriptions (amphetamine salts, methylphenidate derivatives, and dexmethylphenidate) at discharge for each year. We computed the total number and rate of visits (of all ED visits) that had both amphetamines and opioids prescribed at discharge over the years. We computed data normality using Shapiro Wilke's test and used descriptive statistics such as mean to describe the data distribution as applicable. We used spearman's rho (SR) or pearson's correlation (PC) as applicable to describe trends in data. All p-values were one-tailed and were reported at a 0.05 significance level. All analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS version 28. RESULTS/FINDINGS From 2012 to 2019, there were an estimated 817,895 ED visits where an amphetamine prescription was given at discharge, with an overall strong increase in rate over time (SR = 0.71, p = 0.02). At the beginning of the study period (2012) there were 83,503 (0.06%) visits and in 2019 there were 186,539 (0.12%) visits (123% absolute increase). On average, there were 102,237 (SD: 52,725) visits with discharge amphetamine prescriptions per year. There was a strong, linear increase in number of visits that involved a discharge amphetamine salt prescription (PC = 0.92, p = 0.001). In 2012, there were a total of 23,676 visits and in 2019, a total of 124,773 visits (427% increase). There was no trend in visits where both an amphetamine and opioid were prescribed (PC: 0.61, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION There have been increases in discharge prescriptions for amphetamines in the ED over time. This was largely driven by prescriptions for amphetamine salts. Future research initiatives should continue to monitor this trend and in prescriptions and associated abuse in the setting of rising amphetamine abuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Ramdin
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, United States of America.
| | - Rama Bikkina
- Georgetown University, School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Lewis Nelson
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, United States of America
| | - Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi
- Georgetown University, School of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bodnar RJ. Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2021. Peptides 2023; 164:171004. [PMID: 36990387 DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2023.171004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
This paper is the forty-fourth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2021 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonizts and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bodnar
- Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology Doctoral Sub-Program, Queens College, City University of New York, CUNY, 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY 11367, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haggerty T, Sedney CL, Dekeseredy P, Capehart KD, Pollini RA. "You didn't have a choice, but to be on your train. The train was moving": West Virginia pharmacists' perspectives on opioid dispensing during the evolution of the opioid crisis. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:863-872. [PMID: 36870937 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND West Virginia (WV) has been at the forefront of the opioid crisis in the United States, with the highest rate of opioid overdose mortality involving prescription opioids in the country. To curb the crisis, the state government implemented a restrictive opioid prescribing law in March 2018, Senate Bill 273 (SB273), to decrease opioid prescribing. However, sweeping changes in opioid policy can have downstream effects on stakeholders such as pharmacists. This study is part of a sequential mixed methods investigation of the impact of SB273 in WV in which we interviewed various stakeholders-including pharmacists-about the impact of the law. OBJECTIVES This paper aims to explore how pharmacy practice during the opioid crisis impacted the need for restrictive legislation and how SB273 impacted subsequent pharmacy practice in WV. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 pharmacists who were practicing in counties that had been designated as high-prescribing counties based upon county-level prescribing/dispensing data from state records. Analysis of the interviews was informed by the methodological orientation of content analysis to identify emerging themes. RESULTS Participants described confronting questionable opioid prescriptions, treatment costs, and insurance coverage driving opioids as a first-line choice for pain management, as well as the influence of corporate policies and the immense responsibility of being the "last line of defense" in the opioid crisis. A central impediment to the care of patients was the inability of the pharmacists to effectively communicate their concerns to prescribers, making improved prescriber-dispenser communication an essential next step in minimizing opioid care gaps. CONCLUSION This is one of few qualitative studies that have explored pharmacists' experiences, perceptions, and role in the opioid crisis leading up to and during the enactment of a restrictive opioid prescribing law. In light of the difficulties they faced, a restrictive opioid prescribing law was viewed positively by pharmacists.
Collapse
|
12
|
Callison K, Karletsos D, Walker B. Opioid prescribing restrictions and opioid use among the Louisiana Medicaid population. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 107:103770. [PMID: 35780564 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most states in the U.S. have enacted prescription opioid quantity limits to curb long-term opioid dependency. While several studies of these policies find reductions in subsequent prescriptions, others find mixed results in reducing overall opioid prescriptions and prescription length. Our objective was to examine three opioid restriction policies implemented in Louisiana Medicaid: (1) a 15-day quantity limit for opioid-naïve acute pain patients, (2) a subsequent further reduction to a 7-day quantity limit and a Morphine Milligram Equivalent Dosing (MME) limit of 120mg per day, and (3) a final reduction in daily MMEs to 90mg per day. METHODS Using interrupted time series (ITS) models with Medicaid pharmacy claims data, we estimated changes in trends of opioid prescription fills associated with opioid restriction policies in Louisiana Medicaid. Outcomes of interest included average opioid prescription length, average MMEs per day, and the likelihood that an opioid-naïve beneficiary who received their first opioid prescription filled a second prescription within 30 or 60 days of their initial fill. RESULTS 15-day and 7-day opioid prescription quantity limits were associated with a 0.720 and a 0.401 day reduction in average opioid prescription lengths. 7-day limits were associated with a 2.7 and a 3.0 percentage point reduction in the likelihood of a second opioid prescription fill within 30 or 60 days of the initial fill. The 120mg per day MME limit was associated with a 0.80 MMEs per day reduction in average daily MMEs. Further restricting daily MMEs to 90mg per day had no statistically significant association with average daily MMEs. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that efforts to limit opioid exposure through the implementation of prescription quantity limits and MME restrictions in Louisiana's Medicaid program were successful and are likely to be associated with a reduction in future opioid dependency among the state's Medicaid population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Callison
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
| | - Dimitris Karletsos
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States; Parexel International, Newton, MA, United States
| | - Brigham Walker
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States; ConcertAI, Cambridge, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gardner WT, Pitts SE, Patterson CT, Richards J, Neilly D, Smitham P, Stevenson I, Aitken SA. Geographic variation in the frequency and potency of postoperative opioid prescriptions for extremity fracture surgery. A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2022; 30:101921. [PMID: 35755931 PMCID: PMC9218827 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is increasing evidence that the prescription opioid crisis is spreading internationally. However, there is scarce literature comparing contemporary prescribing practices between units in different countries, particularly in the context of this evolving international problem. We sought to determine the patterns of postoperative opioid prescribing in three hospitals from geographically distinct regions. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study involving patients from three hospitals: XXX, Maine, USA; XXX, Scotland; and XXX, Australia. The health records, surgical details, and frequency and potency of discharge prescriptions were analyzed for 350 patients receiving surgery for isolated wrist or ankle fractures. Regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of prescription opioid provision. RESULTS Following ankle fracture surgery, Aberdeen patients (OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.0-11.5) and Adelaide patients (11.8, 95% CI 4.1-39.6) were significantly more likely to receive a prescription for opioids than those in Augusta (p < 0.001). For distal radius fractures, this was also the case (Aberdeen OR 21.2, 95% CI 7.2-79.3, Adelaide OR 21.6, 95% CI 7.3-81.3). For both fracture groups, the potency of prescription provided (measured in morphine milligram equivalents) was not significantly different. When opioids were included in the discharge prescription, Adelaide prescribers favored strong opioids, Aberdeen prescribers selected weak opioids, and prescribers in Augusta chose an even distribution of both types (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the odds of receiving prescription opioids were significantly influenced by geographic location and decreased by advancing patient age. CONCLUSIONS Geographic location is a key factor influencing the provision of postoperative opioids. We found no association with fracture type, patient demographic factors or intra-operative practices. Prescriber culture is likely an influential determinant of postoperative opioid provision. Emphasis on patient and prescriber education regarding the risks of prescription opioids and their potential long-term sequelae is key if we wish to change modifiable prescriber behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David Neilly
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK,Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - Stuart A. Aitken
- MaineGeneral Orthopedics, Augusta, ME, USA,Corresponding author. MaineGeneral Orthopedics, 15 Enterprise Drive, Augusta, ME, 04330, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sedney CL, Haggerty T, Dekeseredy P, Nwafor D, Caretta MA, Brownstein HH, Pollini RA. "The DEA would come in and destroy you": a qualitative study of fear and unintended consequences among opioid prescribers in WV. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:19. [PMID: 35272687 PMCID: PMC8908632 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00447-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background West Virginia has one of the highest rates of opioid overdose related deaths and is known as the epicenter of the opioid crisis in the United States. In an effort to reduce opioid-related harms, SB 273 was signed in 2018, and aimed to restrict opioid prescribing in West Virginia. SB 273 was enacted during a time when physician arrests and convictions had been increasing for years and were becoming more prevalent and more publicized. This study aims to better understand the impact of the legislation on patients and providers. Methods Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with opioid-prescribing primary care physicians and specialists practicing throughout West Virginia. Results Four themes emerged, 1. Fear of disciplinary action, 2. Exacerbation of opioid prescribing fear due to restrictive legislation, 3. Care shifts and treatment gaps, and 4. Conversion to illicit substances. The clinicians recognized the harms of inappropriate prescribing and how this could affect their patients. Decreases in opioid prescribing were already occurring prior to the law implementation. Disciplinary actions against opioid prescribers resulted in prescriber fear, which was then exacerbated by SB 273 and contributed to shifts in care that led to forced tapering and opioid under-prescribing. Providers felt that taking on patients who legitimately required opioids could jeopardize their career. Conclusion A holistic and patient-centered approach should be taken by legislative and disciplinary bodies to ensure patients are not abandoned when disciplinary actions are taken against prescribers or new legislation is passed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara L Sedney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, PO Box 9183, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
| | - Treah Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Patricia Dekeseredy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, PO Box 9183, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Divine Nwafor
- Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | | | - Henry H Brownstein
- Sociology and Anthropology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Robin A Pollini
- Departments of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haggerty T, Khodaverdi M, Dekeseredy P, Wood N, Hendricks B, Peklinsky J, Sedney CL. Assessing the impact of social distancing measures implemented during COVID-19 pandemic on medications for opioid use disorder in West Virginia. J Subst Abuse Treat 2021; 136:108687. [PMID: 34903397 PMCID: PMC8651495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Introduction This study evaluates if social distancing measures instituted during the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic were associated with a reduction in Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) prescribing in West Virginia. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the quick implementation of public health interventions such as social distancing. This led to the use of telemedicine in the clinical setting however implementing telemedicine involves system level and infrastructure level changes within a healthcare environment. This could cause a barrier to MOUD delivery as it is often provided concomitantly with other face to face substance use and mental health services. The purpose of this study is to determine whether social distancing was associated with a reduction in MOUD prescribing in West Virginia, with the goal of adding to the knowledge of how COVID-19 and COVID-19-related mitigation strategies have impacted patients with OUD. Methods Prescription monitoring data were requested from the West Virginia Board of Pharmacy. We applied interrupted time series modeling to investigate MOUD prescribing practices before and after social distancing took effect. Gabapentin prescriptions were utilized as a control for comparison. Results Our study assessed state-wide buprenorphine and Suboxone prescriptions as compared to a control medication and found an increase in dosage of both medications and an increase in number of buprenorphine prescriptions, but a small decrease in buprenorphine/naloxone prescription number related to the dates of implementation of social distancing. Taken together, overall this indicates an increase in prescription number of MOUD prescriptions as well as an increase in dosage. Conclusion This study suggests that social distancing measures were associated with an increase in both the number of MOUD prescriptions and the number of doses in each prescription. Significant alterations to MOUD delivery in the clinical setting were implemented in a short timeframe with the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the implementation of clinical measures to accommodate social distancing measures may provide benefit to transformation of future delivery of MOUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Treah Haggerty
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America.
| | - Maryam Khodaverdi
- West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America
| | - Patricia Dekeseredy
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America
| | - Nathan Wood
- West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, 2310 Kanawha Blvd, Charleston, WV 25311, United States of America
| | - Brian Hendricks
- West Virginia University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America
| | - Jason Peklinsky
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America
| | - Cara L Sedney
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|