A cost benefit analysis of a virtual overdose monitoring service/mobile overdose response service: the national overdose response service

Accessibility gaps of physical supervised consumption sites in Canada motivating the use of overdose response technology/phone based virtual overdose response services: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Overdose response technology or virtual overdose response services are an evolving complementary harm reduction intervention which may overcome certain accessibility barriers of physical supervised consumption sites (SCS) and overdose prevention sites (OPS). We sought to characterize SCS/OPS accessibility barriers among clients accessing a nationwide overdose response phone-based hotline in Canada.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using anonymized call logs of the National Overdose Response Service (NORS) between December 2020 to July 2023. De-identified caller locations were cross-referenced with the locations, policies and operational hours of existing physical SCS/OPS. The primary outcome was accessibility of physical SCS/OPS defined hierarchically according to alignment with caller postal code, substance use routes reported, and calling times.

Findings

Our cohort comprised 4501 calls from 331 unique clients. Despite always having nearby SCS/OPS open and supporting substance use routes of choice, 100 clients (30.2%) preferentially utilized NORS. Among 191 clients (57.7%) who never had access to physical SCS/OPS at time of calling, 92 (27.8%) lacked a nearby site, 58 (17.5%) called outside of operational hours, and 41 (12.4%) would not be permitted to smoke on premises. Secondary analyses identified correlations between accessibility and the urbanicity and geographical region of callers within Canada.

Interpretation

Overdose response technology or virtual overdose response services are a novel complementary harm reduction strategy both for clients with access barriers to physical SCS/OPS and those who prefer virtual services. System-level correlates of client location urbanicity and inter-provincial variation indicate actionable targets for expanding harm reduction services both physical and virtual to better engage with people who use drugs.

Funding

Health Canada Substance Use and Addictions Program, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Grenfell Ministries.

Implementing Canada's first national virtual phone based overdose prevention service: lessons learned from creating the National Overdose Response Service (NORS)

The opioid epidemic remains one of the largest public health crises in North America to date. While there have been many diverse strategies developed to reduce the harms associated with substance use, these are primarily concentrated within a few large urban centers. As a result, there have been increased calls for equitable access to harm reduction services for those who cannot or choose not to access in-person harm reduction services. In December 2020, Canada's National Overdose Response Service (NORS) a telephone based overdose response hotline and virtual supervised consumption service, was established in collaboration with various agencies and people with lived and living experience of substance use (PWLLE) across Canada to expand access to harm reduction services using novel Opioid Response Technology. In this manuscript we explore the lessons learned from the establishment and continued operation of the service exploring topics related to the initial establishment of the service, securing a phone line, routing technology, EMS dispatch solutions, peer and volunteer recruitment, legal and ethical support, policy and procedure development, securing funding, and marketing. Furthermore, we detail how this service has grown and changed in response to the various needs of service users.

Preference for hotline versus mobile application/countdown-based mobile overdose response services: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

In response to the exacerbated rates of morbidity and mortality associated with the overlapping overdose and COVID-19 epidemics, novel strategies have been developed, implemented, operationalized and scaled to reduce the harms resulting from this crisis. Since the emergence of mobile overdose response services (MORS), two strategies have aimed to help reduce the mortality associated with acute overdose including staffed hotline-based services and unstaffed timer-based services. In this article, we aim to gather the perspectives of various key interest groups on these technologies to determine which might best support service users.

METHODS

Forty-seven participants from various interested groups including people who use substances who have and have not used MORS, healthcare workers, family members, harm reduction employees and MORS operators participated in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Four major themes emerged regarding participant perspectives on the differences between services, namely differences in connection, perceived safety, privacy and accessibility, alongside features that are recommended for MORS in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, participants noted that individuals who use substances vary in their desire for connection during a substance use session offered by hotline and timer-based service modalities. Participants perceived hotline-based approaches to be more reliable and thus potentially safer than their timer-based counterparts but noted that access to technology is a limitation of both approaches.

Virtual overdose monitoring services/mobile overdose response services: estimated number of potentially averted drug poisoning fatality events by various telephone and digital-based overdose prevention/harm reduction services in North America

Background

Virtual overdose monitoring services or Mobile Overdose Response Services (MORS) are novel virtual harm reduction tools which have gained popularity as an adjunct public health intervention especially for those who cannot access harm reduction resources through traditional means. At this time, relatively little is known about their ability to reach their goals of reducing overdose mortality. Our study aims to summarize the potential effectiveness of various MORS collectively to avoid potential mortality from a drug poisoning event/drug overdose.

Methods

Utilizing publicly available data from various MORS alongside some usage data provided by these services for this study, we model the impact of these services on fatal drug poisoning/overdose. In order to calculate the number of deaths averted, a Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence for fatal drug poisonings/drug overdose potentially averted through the utilization of various MORS.

Results

From the earliest mention of MORS in current literature (2019), a total of 299 drug poisoning/overdose events occurred across these services. Noting the broad range of mortality statistics available in current literature, these technologies have potentially prevented between 33 to 243 deaths. Our Monte Carlo estimates 135 potentially fatal drug poisonings/overdose were overall averted by the various MORS.

Conclusions

While there is yet to be a robust data set proving the effectiveness of these services, conservative estimates show that MORS can reduce mortality associated with substance use and therefore should be considered as a viable harm-reduction strategy but as an adjunct to more established harm reduction services such as supervised consumption sites and supervised injection facilities. While more research is needed, clinicians and practitioners should consider the suggestion of these tools for patients who use drugs.