1
|
Yang Y, Gao Y, An R, Wan Q. Barriers and facilitators to exercise adherence in community-dwelling older adults: A mixed-methods systematic review using the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 157:104808. [PMID: 38823146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the health benefits of exercise for older adults are widely recognized, physical inactivity is still common among older adults. Further clarification of the factors affecting exercise adherence is needed to develop more effective exercise interventions in community-dwelling older adults. OBJECTIVE The purposes of this study were to identify (1) barriers and facilitators of exercise adherence in community-dwelling older adults and (2) behavior change techniques (BCTs) and implementation strategies that are potentially effective in improving adherence. METHODS A total of eight databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, and Scopus. Studies published from database inception to April 2023 were searched. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivations, Behavior (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) were used to identify potential barriers and facilitators. The BCTs were used to identify potential intervention implementation strategies. RESULTS A total of 64 studies were included, including 30 qualitative studies, 12 randomized controlled trials, 12 mixed methods studies, 6 quantitative descriptive studies, and 5 non-randomized trials. 54 factors influencing adherence and 38 potentially effective BCTs were identified from the included studies. The 38 BCTs were further categorized into 8 areas of implementation strategies (tailored exercise program, appropriate exercise environment, multidimensional social support, monitoring and feedback, managing emotional experiences and issues, participants education, enhancing self-efficacy, and exerting participants' autonomy). CONCLUSION This study identified 54 influential factors affecting exercise adherence and identified 8 areas of intervention strategies (containing 38 BCTs). Further refinement, evaluation, and validation of these factors and strategies are needed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Yang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yajing Gao
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ran An
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiaoqin Wan
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khok XW, Ng WHD, Lee AY, Yoon HJ, Devi MK, Johnston B, Ang WHD. Journey towards resiliency: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of cancer patients' experiences. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 71:102640. [PMID: 38917641 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-synthesis seeks to explore cancer patients' journey towards resiliency. The secondary aim of this review is to identify unique resilience protective factors among cancer patients. METHODS A thorough search was conducted in eight electronic databases and the grey literature for published or unpublished qualitative and mixed methods studies. Studies that explored resilience among cancer patients were included. The studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme Checklist. The overall certainty of evidence was further evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation's Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research. Themes identified were synthesized using Sandelowski and Barroso's meta-synthesis method. RESULTS A total of 34 studies comprising 987 cancer patients were included in this review. Three themes and nine subthemes were generated from the meta-synthesis. The themes were: (1) Confronting the cancer diagnosis, (2) personal adaptations to cancer, and (3) drawing strength from others. The findings highlighted how individuals overcame cancer adversities through resilience, which is influenced by various factors, including life experiences, social-cultural stigmas, spirituality, social support networks, coping strategies, motivation, acceptance of illness, positive mindset, and engagement with healthcare facilities. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the role of resilience in a cancer patient's journey. It emphasizes on the importance of building resilience in both cancer patients and survivors to effectively overcome the challenges of their cancer diagnosis. These insights are essential for developing interventions that promote resilience and improve existing psychosocial oncology services. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to better understand how resilience evolves and pinpoint factors that can further influence one's resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiu Wen Khok
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Wai Hung Daniel Ng
- Department of Nursing, National Cancer Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore.
| | - Ang Yun Lee
- Division of Oncology Nursing, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.
| | - Hyo Jin Yoon
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - M Kamala Devi
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - Bridget Johnston
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - Wei How Darryl Ang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan WL, Sambhi SK, Shorey S. Experiences of paediatric terminal oncology patients and their parents in palliative care: A qualitative systematic review. J Pediatr Nurs 2024:S0882-5963(24)00267-7. [PMID: 39025711 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
PROBLEM The terminal phase of childhood cancer poses profound physical and mental challenges for children, simultaneously influencing parents and rendering them particularly susceptible to psychosocial issues. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA This review included studies exploring the experiences of either: (1) paediatric terminal oncology patients aged under 18 years, (2) parents with a child facing terminal cancer undergoing palliative care, or (3) parents with a child who had undergone palliative care and died. English language, qualitative journal studies or grey literature of any care settings, geographical locations and publication years were included. Studies exploring the experiences of (1) paediatric terminal oncology not receiving palliative care from qualified healthcare professionals, and (3) non-biological parents or non-parental family members, were excluded. SAMPLE A total of 22 studies were included, published between January 2000 and December 2023. Seventy-two children (aged between 5 and 18 years old) and 236 parents (aged between 24 and 57 years old) participated across all studies. Palliative care settings mostly comprised oncology centres, hospitals and homes. RESULTS Two themes were identified from the 22 included studies: (1) Navigating rough waters and enduring hardships, and (2) Preparing for end-of-life amidst the looming threat of death. CONCLUSIONS This review underscored the importance of integrating palliative childhood cancer care in a holistic, age-specific, family-centred, person-centred and timely manner. IMPLICATIONS Paediatric oncology nurses should attend to physical and psychosocial needs of children and parents, fostering familial and social ties while recognising cultural and spiritual needs. Future research could recruit participants of varying ages, genders, and cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Ling Tan
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sharan Kaur Sambhi
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shefaly Shorey
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Holistic Initiatives for Learning and Development (CHILD), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Siostrom K, Snowdon D, Sriamareswaran RK, Law YM, Jolliffe L, Moran C. Experiences of healthcare staff caring for hospitalised people with delirium: a qualitative systematic review. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae159. [PMID: 39078153 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inpatient delirium is common and associated with poor outcomes. Although most organisations have evidence-based guidelines to improve delirium prevention and management, delirium rates and outcomes have remained relatively unchanged over time. A lack of understanding of healthcare providers' experience of caring for people with delirium and its integration into existing guidance may explain some of the slow progress in improving delirium care. OBJECTIVE To review and synthesise existing qualitative evidence on healthcare providers' experience of caring for inpatients with delirium within and across disciplines. METHODS We systematically searched OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, PsychINFO, AMED and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 1990 and November 2022. Article inclusion and study quality were assessed by two independent reviewers. Both thematic synthesis and content analysis were then conducted to synthesise findings from included studies. RESULTS Within the 25 included studies, the experience of nurses was the most commonly studied perspective, followed by medical and allied health. Nursing, medical and allied health staff all reported that their experience of caring for people with delirium was challenging, highlighting difficulties in delirium recognition and that they felt unsupported at organisational and local levels. Attitudes towards older people and the importance of delirium influenced identification and prioritisation. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare providers often find caring for hospitalised patients with delirium challenging and complex. Although good communication within multidisciplinary teams was deemed helpful, more work is required to understand how to achieve this, recognising the unique perspectives of individual disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy Siostrom
- Geriatric Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Snowdon
- Geriatric Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Yu Mei Law
- Geriatric Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Jolliffe
- Geriatric Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chris Moran
- Geriatric Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Health of Older People, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Broomfield K, Harrop D, Jones GL, Sage K, Judge S. A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 19:1802-1816. [PMID: 36026563 PMCID: PMC9612935 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper presents a review of the existing qualitative research literature concerning people's experience of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The aims of conducting this review were to find out more about the values and outcomes that are important to people about the AAC they use to support their communication. This review was conducted to provide a deeper understanding of these experiences to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS A qualitative evidence synthesis of existing qualitative research literature was undertaken to explore and appraise current knowledge about the experiences of people who use AAC. RESULTS From 115 qualitative research reports 19 papers were identified that responded directly to the research question and aims of the review. Data were identified that could be organized within an a priori framework consisting of the constructs of values, outcomes, and context. CONCLUSION The review has resulted in a deeper, analytical understanding of the experiences of people who require AAC. The results indicate a set of concepts that can be used to inform the development of a PROM. A PROM can be used to assist clinicians and researchers to better understand the perspectives of people who require AAC and evaluate interventions. The results also encourage professionals to reconsider the terminology and methods used when working alongside people who require AAC and to reflect on the multidimensional factors that influence people's experience of communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Broomfield
- Department of Adult Speech and Language Therapy, Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
- Department of Nursing, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Deborah Harrop
- Centre for Health and Social Care, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Karen Sage
- Department of Nursing, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Judge
- Barnsley Assistive Technology Team, Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sarafoglou A, Hoogeveen S, van den Bergh D, Aczel B, Albers CJ, Althoff T, Botvinik-Nezer R, Busch NA, Cataldo AM, Devezer B, van Dongen NNN, Dreber A, Fried EI, Hoekstra R, Hoffman S, Holzmeister F, Huber J, Huntington-Klein N, Ioannidis J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Loken E, Mangin JF, Matzke D, Menkveld AJ, Nilsonne G, van Ravenzwaaij D, Schweinsberg M, Schulz-Kuempel H, Shanks DR, Simons DJ, Spellman BA, Stoevenbelt AH, Szaszi B, Trübutschek D, Tuerlinckx F, Uhlmann EL, Vanpaemel W, Wicherts J, Wagenmakers EJ. Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2024; 11:240125. [PMID: 39050728 PMCID: PMC11265885 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Many-analysts studies explore how well an empirical claim withstands plausible alternative analyses of the same dataset by multiple, independent analysis teams. Conclusions from these studies typically rely on a single outcome metric (e.g. effect size) provided by each analysis team. Although informative about the range of plausible effects in a dataset, a single effect size from each team does not provide a complete, nuanced understanding of how analysis choices are related to the outcome. We used the Delphi consensus technique with input from 37 experts to develop an 18-item subjective evidence evaluation survey (SEES) to evaluate how each analysis team views the methodological appropriateness of the research design and the strength of evidence for the hypothesis. We illustrate the usefulness of the SEES in providing richer evidence assessment with pilot data from a previous many-analysts study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Don van den Bergh
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Balazs Aczel
- Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Lorénd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Casper J. Albers
- Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Althoff
- Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Niko A. Busch
- Institute for Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Andrea M. Cataldo
- Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Berna Devezer
- Department of Business, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | | | - Anna Dreber
- Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
- University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
| | - Eiko I. Fried
- Department of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rink Hoekstra
- Nieuwenhuis Institute for Educational Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Hoffman
- Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Huber
- University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
| | | | - John Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) and Departments of Medicine, of Epidemiology and of Population Health, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Eric Loken
- University of Conneticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Jan-Francois Mangin
- University Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Neurospin CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette, Île-de-France, France
| | - Dora Matzke
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Don van Ravenzwaaij
- Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hannah Schulz-Kuempel
- Department of Statistics and The Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
- The Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| | - David R. Shanks
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK
| | | | - Barbara A. Spellman
- School of Law, University of Virginia, 580 Massie Road, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Andrea H. Stoevenbelt
- Nieuwenhuis Institute for Educational Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Barnabas Szaszi
- Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Lorénd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | - Jelte Wicherts
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yi M, Hui Y, Hu L, Zhang W, Wang Z. The Experiences and Perceptions of Older Adults with Multimorbidity Toward E-Health Care: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Telemed J E Health 2024. [PMID: 38920002 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Given the growing population of older adults globally, e-Health plays an indispensable role in the chronic disease management of multimorbidity. However, qualitative evidence that synthesizes the experiences of older adults with multimorbidity using e-Health service is currently lacking. The objective was to explore the experiences and perceptions of e-Health care in community-based settings among the older adults with multimorbidity. Methods: Seven electronic databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese BioMedical Literature were searched, and the search was limited to studies from inception to September 1, 2023. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers. Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis methodology was applied to synthesize the original themes. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and the confidence of synthesized themes was evaluated by the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approaches. Results: Ten studies with moderate methodological quality met eligibility criteria and were included finally. Studies were conducted in four countries with 235 participants who were living with multiple chronic conditions. Among the 10 included studies, 37 credible findings were extracted and interpreted into 3 synthesized themes and 12 subthemes: (1) advantages and benefits perceived during e-Health service, (2) multidimensional challenges and negative experience posed by e-Health service, and (3) preferences, suggestions, and expectations for future e-Health improvement. The confidence in the majority of the three final synthesized themes was rated between "low" and "moderate" scales. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide new insights into implementing tailored e-Health care for older adults with multimorbidity. Further research should emphasize on realizing the potential value of e-Health service based on users' needs and perspectives to promote age-friendliness in geriatric practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mo Yi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuwen Hui
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Litian Hu
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenmin Zhang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiwen Wang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Peking University Health Science Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sekhon M, de Thurah A, Fragoulis GE, Schoones J, Stamm TA, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Esbensen BA, Lempp H, Bearne L, Kouloumas M, Pchelnikova P, Swinnen TW, Blunt C, Ferreira RJO, Carmona L, Nikiphorou E. Synthesis of guidance available for assessing methodological quality and grading of evidence from qualitative research to inform clinical recommendations: a systematic literature review. RMD Open 2024; 10:e004032. [PMID: 38886002 PMCID: PMC11184179 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand (1) what guidance exists to assess the methodological quality of qualitative research; (2) what methods exist to grade levels of evidence from qualitative research to inform recommendations within European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). METHODS A systematic literature review was performed in multiple databases including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE and PsycINFO, from inception to 23 October 2020. Eligible studies included primary articles and guideline documents available in English, describing the: (1) development; (2) application of validated tools (eg, checklists); (3) guidance on assessing methodological quality of qualitative research and (4) guidance on grading levels of qualitative evidence. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify key similarities between included studies. RESULTS Of 9073 records retrieved, 51 went through to full-manuscript review, with 15 selected for inclusion. Six articles described methodological tools to assess the quality of qualitative research. The tools evaluated research design, recruitment, ethical rigour, data collection and analysis. Seven articles described one approach, focusing on four key components to determine how much confidence to place in findings from systematic reviews of qualitative research. Two articles focused on grading levels of clinical recommendations based on qualitative evidence; one described a qualitative evidence hierarchy, and another a research pyramid. CONCLUSION There is a lack of consensus on the use of tools, checklists and approaches suitable for appraising the methodological quality of qualitative research and the grading of qualitative evidence to inform clinical practice. This work is expected to facilitate the inclusion of qualitative evidence in the process of developing recommendations at EULAR level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep Sekhon
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jan Schoones
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Directorate of research Policy, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland
- Dept of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Bente Appel Esbensen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (Copecare), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Bearne
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Thijs Willem Swinnen
- Division of Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Blunt
- London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Ricardo J O Ferreira
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li N, Shen C, Yang X, Wang R, Gu LQ, Zhao W, Chu ZP. The Real Experience of Lay Responders Performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence. Public Health Rev 2024; 45:1606650. [PMID: 38903868 PMCID: PMC11188311 DOI: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To synthesize qualitative evidence on the experience of lay responders performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods Qualitative evidence synthesis was performed using the Thomas and Harden method. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, and WanFang databases were systematically searched. The quality of the research was assessed by the Critical Assessment Skills Program Tool (CASP). Results A total of 5,610 studies were identified, and 9 studies were included in the analysis. Four analytical themes were generated: emotional ambivalence before CPR, psychological tolerance during CPR, perceived experience after CPR, and enhancing psychological resilience. Conclusion Lay responders face complicated psychological experience during CPR, which may be susceptible to psychological effects such as "loss aversion," "bystander effects" and "knowledge curse." In addition to the timely retraining of CPR, lay responders should be instructed to manage psychological distress and improve psychological resilience. More importantly, the psychological sequelae may be long-lasting, requiring ongoing psychological intervention and follow-up based on valuing transdisciplinarity across endeavours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Li
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chen Shen
- Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xin Yang
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Rao Wang
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lian Qi Gu
- Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wei Zhao
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi Ping Chu
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Crites S, Neto K, Lee M, Louie K, Boone S, Fitzpatrick B, Silva D, Carvalho do Nascimento P, Bakaa N, Macedo L. Experiences and perceptions of adults pre- and/or post-lumbar spine surgery: a meta-ethnography. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:2477-2495. [PMID: 37475154 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2233895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Qualitative meta-ethnography. Pre-registered with OSF:10.17605/OSF.IO/UTZE6. PURPOSE To understand the patient experience pre- and/or post-lumbar spine surgery. METHODS Literature search: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, EmCare and CINAHL from inception to October 17, 2022. Study selection criteria: Peer-reviewed qualitative or mixed-method studies of English text investigating the beliefs, perceptions, or experiences of adults (≥18 years old) pre- and/or post-lumbar spine surgery for degenerative, non-traumatic or non-infectious concerns. Data synthesis: The eMERGE meta-ethnography reporting guidelines were followed to create themes and subthemes from the original themes of the included studies. A quality appraisal was performed using the McMaster Quality Appraisal tool. RESULTS We included 18 studies and identified five themes that were separated into pre- and post-operative categories. The two pre-operative themes included [1]: the influence of physiotherapy interventions on patients' experiences, and [2] the importance of education/the power of communication, and the three post-operative themes included [1]: psychosocial coping [2], redefining oneself post-operatively, and [3] experience with the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS These findings emphasize the complexity of the peri-operative experience for individuals undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Future research should focus on addressing psychosocial factors that may optimize patient experiences and recovery following LSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Crites
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kajal Neto
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meaghan Lee
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristen Louie
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Boone
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barrett Fitzpatrick
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diego Silva
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nora Bakaa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luciana Macedo
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hinwood NS, Casey MB, Doody C, Blake C, Fullen BM, O’Donoghue G, Dunlevy CG, Birney S, Fildes F, Smart KM. The experiences of people living with obesity and chronic pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) protocol. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302051. [PMID: 38787812 PMCID: PMC11125549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a substantial and progressive association between chronic pain (CP) and living with overweight or obesity. The relationship between obesity and CP is intricate and complex, with obesity being associated with increased pain-related disability, pain intensity, reduction in physical functioning and poorer psychological well-being. A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) provides an opportunity to better understand and reveal key areas within the patient experience of these complex interactions to inform best practice and future intervention design. AIMS The aim of this QES is to methodically and systematically review and synthesise the qualitative literature reporting on the personal experiences of people who are both living with obesity (PwO) and chronic pain. METHODS The phenomenon of interest of this QES is the lived experiences of PwO and CP. The following research question was developed using a modified Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Study type (PICOS) framework: "What are the lived experiences of people living with obesity and chronic pain?". One review author will conduct a systematic search based on keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms for finding relevant articles in five peer-review databases, from inception to the date of searching. Two review authors will independently apply inclusion and exclusion criteria and screen articles in a two-stage process. The methodological quality of included studies will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool and data will be extracted using a customised template. We will undertake a thematic synthesis of qualitative data from included studies and report our findings narratively. Confidence in the findings will be assessed based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CER-Qual) approach. FINDINGS AND DISSEMINATION This study will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidelines. It is anticipated that the findings of the review will facilitate a deep and broad understanding of the complex interactions between CP and obesity and will help inform best practice and future intervention design. Findings will be disseminated through journals that undergo peer review, presentations at conferences, engagement with public and patient advocacy groups, and social media. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required to conduct this review. TRAIL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023361391.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha S. Hinwood
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Translational Pain Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maire-Brid Casey
- TCD Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Catherine Doody
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Translational Pain Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Catherine Blake
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Translational Pain Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brona M. Fullen
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Translational Pain Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gráinne O’Donoghue
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colin G. Dunlevy
- Centre for Obesity Management, St. Columcille’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susie Birney
- Irish Coalition for People Living with Obesity (ICPO), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fionnuala Fildes
- Independent Patient Insight Partner, St. Vincent’s Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Keith M. Smart
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Translational Pain Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Physiotherapy Department, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vidal R, Rivera-Navarro J, Gravina L, Díez J, Franco M. Correlates of eating behaviors in adolescence: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Nutr Rev 2024; 82:749-776. [PMID: 37432794 DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Nutrition plays a critical role in adolescence. Adolescents are vulnerable to the impact of different factors that distance them from healthy habits, increasing their risk of chronic diseases in adulthood. Qualitative methodologies allow for a better understanding of these factors. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to consolidate qualitative research evidence from the past 10 years to analyze the facilitators and barriers influencing adolescents' eating behaviors. DATA SOURCES Databases searched for relevant studies were Scopus, Medline/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. DATA EXTRACTION A total of 4176 records were identified. The authors used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) quality-assessment tool. RESULTS Fifty articles with qualitative or mixed methodologies were finally included. The most applied techniques were focus groups and semi-structured interviews. The factors influencing adolescents' diets were classified into 4 dimensions: individual, social, community, and macrosystem factors. The most influential were the following-(1) at the individual level: gender (facilitator or barrier), taste and appearance of food (barrier), and lack of time (barrier); (2) at the social level: parents' and caregivers' influence (facilitator or barrier), peer group influence (barrier), and socioeconomic position (barrier); (3) at the community level: school food environment (facilitator or barrier), neighborhood food environment (barrier), household food environment (facilitator or barrier), food insecurity (barrier), and availability and affordability of ultra-processed foods (barrier); and (4) at the macrosystem level: digital tools (facilitator or barrier). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review identified several facilitators and barriers influencing eating behaviors among adolescents. Qualitative research provides a rich source of knowledge to inform interventions aimed at improving adolescents' diets. Qualitative research is very useful for collecting researches that help to implement intervention programs that improve adolescent nutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Vidal
- Sociology and Communication Department, Social Sciences Faculty, Salamanca University, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesús Rivera-Navarro
- Sociology and Communication Department, Social Sciences Faculty, Salamanca University, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Leyre Gravina
- Nursing I Department, Nursing and Medicine Faculty, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
- Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Julia Díez
- Public Health and Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Franco
- Public Health and Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shankar M, Hazfiarini A, Zahroh RI, Vogel JP, McDougall ARA, Condron P, Goudar SS, Pujar YV, Somannavar MS, Charantimath U, Ammerdorffer A, Rushwan S, Gülmezoglu AM, Bohren MA. Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004405. [PMID: 38814991 PMCID: PMC11139290 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor representation of pregnant and lactating women and people in clinical trials has marginalised their health concerns and denied the maternal-fetal/infant dyad benefits of innovation in therapeutic research and development. This mixed-methods systematic review synthesised factors affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials, across all levels of the research ecosystem. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched 8 databases from inception to 14 February 2024 to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that described factors affecting participation of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine and therapeutic clinical trials in any setting. We used thematic synthesis to analyse the qualitative literature and assessed confidence in each qualitative review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We compared quantitative data against the thematic synthesis findings to assess areas of convergence or divergence. We mapped review findings to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to inform future development of behaviour change strategies. We included 60 papers from 27 countries. We grouped 24 review findings under 5 overarching themes: (a) interplay between perceived risks and benefits of participation in women's decision-making; (b) engagement between women and the medical and research ecosystems; (c) gender norms and decision-making autonomy; (d) factors affecting clinical trial recruitment; and (e) upstream factors in the research ecosystem. Women's willingness to participate in trials was affected by: perceived risk of the health condition weighed against an intervention's risks and benefits, therapeutic optimism, intervention acceptability, expectations of receiving higher quality care in a trial, altruistic motivations, intimate relationship dynamics, and power and trust in medicine and research. Health workers supported women's participation in trials when they perceived clinical equipoise, had hope for novel therapeutic applications, and were convinced an intervention was safe. For research staff, developing reciprocal relationships with health workers, having access to resources for trial implementation, ensuring the trial was visible to potential participants and health workers, implementing a woman-centred approach when communicating with potential participants, and emotional orientations towards the trial were factors perceived to affect recruitment. For study investigators and ethics committees, the complexities and subjectivities in risk assessments and trial design, and limited funding of such trials contributed to their reluctance in leading and approving such trials. All included studies focused on factors affecting participation of cisgender pregnant women in clinical trials; future research should consider other pregnancy-capable populations, including transgender and nonbinary people. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights diverse factors across multiple levels and stakeholders affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials. By linking identified factors to frameworks of behaviour change, we have developed theoretically informed strategies that can help optimise pregnant and lactating women's engagement, participation, and trust in such trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mridula Shankar
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alya Hazfiarini
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rana Islamiah Zahroh
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua P. Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annie R. A. McDougall
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick Condron
- University Library, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shivaprasad S. Goudar
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Yeshita V. Pujar
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Manjunath S. Somannavar
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Umesh Charantimath
- Women’s and Children’s Health Research Unit, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Sara Rushwan
- Concept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland/Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Meghan A. Bohren
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Al Duhailib Z, Granholm A, Alhazzani W, Oczkowski S, Belley-Cote E, Møller MH. GRADE pearls and pitfalls-Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2024; 68:584-592. [PMID: 38351600 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is used to assess the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. METHODS We describe how the GRADE approach is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including key points and examples. This overview is aimed at clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analyses using GRADE. RESULTS We outline how the certainty of evidence is assessed, how the evidence is summarized using GRADE evidence profiles or summary of findings tables, how the results are communicated, and we discuss challenges, advantages, and disadvantages with using GRADE. CONCLUSIONS This overview aims to provide an overview of how GRADE is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and may be used by systematic review developers, methodologists, and evidence end-users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zainab Al Duhailib
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Guidelines in Intensive Care Medicine, Development and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Anders Granholm
- Guidelines in Intensive Care Medicine, Development and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Guidelines in Intensive Care Medicine, Development and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Critical Care, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simon Oczkowski
- Guidelines in Intensive Care Medicine, Development and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emilie Belley-Cote
- Guidelines in Intensive Care Medicine, Development and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Public Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Morten Hylander Møller
- Guidelines in Intensive Care Medicine, Development and Evaluation (GUIDE) Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Southern C, Tutton E, Dainty KN, Seers K, Pearson NA, Couper K, Ellard DR, Perkins GD, Haywood KL. The experiences of cardiac arrest survivors and their key supporters following cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Resuscitation 2024; 198:110188. [PMID: 38548009 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
AIM To review qualitative studies on the experience of sudden cardiac arrest survival from the perspective of both survivors and their key supporters, including family/close friends. METHODS A seven-step meta-ethnography and synthesis of qualitative evidence was undertaken, informed by the Meta-Ethnography Reporting Guidelines (eMERGe). Four major databases were searched (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO; January 1995-January 2022, updated July 2023) for qualitative studies exploring survivors' and/or key supporters' experiences of cardiac arrest survival. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) were applied to evaluate the overall confidence in research findings. Constructs were identified from each paper, informing theme and sub-theme development. RESULTS From 15,917 unique titles/abstracts and 196 full-text articles, 32 met the inclusion criteria. Three themes captured the survivors' experiences: 1) Making sense of my cardiac arrest; 2) Learning to trust my body and mind; and 3) Re-evaluating my life. A further three themes reflected key supporters' experiences: 1) Emotional turmoil; 2) Becoming a carer: same person but different me; and 3) Engaging with a new and unknown world. However, limited data and some methodological weaknesses in included studies reduced confidence in several themes. The findings were conceived within the overarching concept of 'negotiating a new normal'. CONCLUSIONS The enduring psychosocial and physical sequelae of cardiac arrest survival substantially impacts the lives of survivors and their key supporters, requiring negotiation of their 'new normality'. The need for sense-making, physical and psychological recovery, and the new roles for key supporters should be strong considerations in the development of future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Southern
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, England
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, England; Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma Research and Emergency Care, NDORMS, Oxford University, UK; Major Trauma Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford UK
| | - Katie N Dainty
- Office of Research & Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto Ontario Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Kate Seers
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, England
| | - Nathan A Pearson
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, England
| | - Keith Couper
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, England; Critical Care Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - David R Ellard
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, England; University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Gavin D Perkins
- Critical Care Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kirstie L Haywood
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, England.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Borthwick C, Penlington C, Robinson L. Partners' Experiences of Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2024:10.1007/s10880-024-10012-w. [PMID: 38615080 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-024-10012-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
This systematic review of qualitative studies synthesised evidence on the experience chronic pain from the perspective of romantic partners. Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, APA PsycInfo via Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies exploring the impact of chronic pain from partners' perspectives using qualitative data collection methods were eligible for inclusion. Thematic synthesis was conducted, and confidence in the review findings was assessed using GRADE CERQual criteria. A total of 198 participants were represented from 15 primary studies. Four interconnected analytical themes were developed: 'life is different', 'internal conflict between two worlds', 'togetherness vs separateness', and 'coping in the longer term'. Out of 27 review findings, 9 were assessed as high confidence, 12 as moderate confidence, 4 as low confidence, and 2 as very low confidence. Socially isolated partners, those in strained relationships, and partners who continually sacrificed their own needs were more likely to experience distressing emotions. Greater recognition of partners' needs is needed within pain management services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Borthwick
- School of Psychology, Newcastle University, 4th Floor, Dame Margaret Barbour Building, Wallace Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4DR, UK.
| | - Chris Penlington
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lucy Robinson
- School of Psychology, Newcastle University, 4th Floor, Dame Margaret Barbour Building, Wallace Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4DR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ye M, Qiu L, Jin Y, Huang Y. Stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of male breast cancer:A qualitative evidence synthesis. Breast 2024; 74:103694. [PMID: 38417232 PMCID: PMC10904996 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The experiences, physical and mental health and needs of women with breast cancer have been studied in some detail, but there is a lack of discussion of the experiences of stakeholder groups such as men with breast cancer, partners and carers and healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to explore and understand the experiences and perceptions of male breast cancer stakeholders from diagnosis through to survivorship. METHODS We conducted a thematic review of qualitative studies included in a large published scoping review on male breast cancer (reported under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews extension). To be included in a qualitative evidence review, studies had to use qualitative methods for data collection and analysis to capture the perspectives of men with breast cancer, partners or caregivers, and healthcare workers. Key characteristics and findings were extracted and a conceptual coding framework was summarized using thematic analysis. RESULTS Out of a total of 310 studies in the research literature (published research articles and gray literature), 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported on the experiences of men with breast cancer, partners or caregivers, and healthcare workers, with participant numbers ranging from 2 to 31. A total of 17 descriptive themes (study outcomes) were identified. From these, four high-level analytic themes emerged: (1) Predicament; (2) Emotion; (3) Support; (4) Coping. CONCLUSIONS The gender stigma that exists at the patient, healthcare system, and family-society levels largely influences the experiences of the male breast cancer stakeholder population. To address gender inequalities in breast cancer care, healthcare organizations and society at large should remain equally attentive to the needs of male and female breast cancer patients. These needs include reducing healthcare and social stigma, providing gender-specific information and emotional support, and access to support groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maodie Ye
- Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| | - Lin Qiu
- Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200137, China
| | - Yongmei Jin
- Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200137, China.
| | - Yingying Huang
- Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Taylor M, Medley N, van Wyk SS, Oliver S. Community views on active case finding for tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 3:CD014756. [PMID: 38511668 PMCID: PMC10955804 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014756.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active case finding (ACF) refers to the systematic identification of people with tuberculosis in communities and amongst populations who do not present to health facilities, through approaches such as door-to-door screening or contact tracing. ACF may improve access to tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment for the poor and for people remote from diagnostic and treatment facilities. As a result, ACF may also reduce onward transmission. However, there is a need to understand how these programmes are experienced by communities in order to design appropriate services. OBJECTIVES To synthesize community views on tuberculosis active case finding (ACF) programmes in low- and middle-income countries. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and eight other databases up to 22 June 2023, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We did not include grey literature. SELECTION CRITERIA This review synthesized qualitative research and mixed-methods studies with separate qualitative data. Eligible studies explored community experiences, perceptions, or attitudes towards ACF programmes for tuberculosis in any endemic low- or middle-income country, with no time restrictions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Due to the large volume of studies identified, we chose to sample studies that had 'thick' description and that investigated key subgroups of children and refugees. We followed standard Cochrane methods for study description and appraisal of methodological limitations. We conducted thematic synthesis and developed codes inductively using ATLAS.ti software. We examined codes for underlying ideas, connections, and interpretations and, from this, generated analytical themes. We assessed the confidence in the findings using the GRADE-CERQual approach, and produced a conceptual model to display how the different findings interact. MAIN RESULTS We included 45 studies in this synthesis, and sampled 20. The studies covered a broad range of World Health Organization (WHO) regions (Africa, South-East Asia, Eastern Mediterranean, and the Americas) and explored the views and experiences of community members, community health workers, and clinical staff in low- and middle-income countries endemic for tuberculosis. The following five themes emerged. • ACF improves access to diagnosis for many, but does little to help communities on the edge. Tuberculosis ACF and contact tracing improve access to health services for people with worse health and fewer resources (High confidence). ACF helps to find this population, exposed to deprived living conditions, but is not sensitive to additional dimensions of their plight (High confidence) and out-of-pocket costs necessary to continue care (High confidence). Finally, migration and difficult geography further reduce communities' access to ACF (High confidence). • People are afraid of diagnosis and its impact. Some community members find screening frightening. It exposes them to discrimination along distinct pathways (isolation from their families and wider community, lost employment and housing). HIV stigma compounds tuberculosis stigma and heightens vulnerability to discrimination along these same pathways (High confidence). Consequently, community members may refuse to participate in screening, contact tracing, and treatment (High confidence). In addition, people with tuberculosis reported their emotional turmoil upon diagnosis, as they anticipated intense treatment regimens and the prospect of living with a serious illness (High confidence). • Screening is undermined by weak health infrastructure. In many settings, a lack of resources results in weak services in competition with other disease control programmes (Moderate confidence). In this context of low investment, people face repeated tests and clinic visits, wasted time, and fraught social interaction with health providers (Moderate confidence). ACF can create expectations for follow-up health care that it cannot deliver (High confidence). Finally, community education improves awareness of tuberculosis in some settings, but lack of full information impacts community members, parents, and health workers, and sometimes leads to harm for children (High confidence). • Health workers are an undervalued but important part of ACF. ACF can feel difficult for health workers in the context of a poorly resourced health system and with people who may not wish to be identified. In addition, the evidence suggests health workers are poorly protected against tuberculosis and fear they or their families might become infected (Moderate confidence). However, they appear to be central to programme success, as the humanity they offer often acts as a driving force for retaining people with tuberculosis in care (Moderate confidence). • Local leadership is necessary but not sufficient for ensuring appropriate programmes. Local leadership creates an intrinsic motivation for communities to value health services (High confidence). However, local leadership cannot guarantee the success of ACF and contact tracing programmes. It is important to balance professional authority with local knowledge and rapport (High confidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Tuberculosis active case finding (ACF) and contact tracing bring a diagnostic service to people who may otherwise not receive it, such as those who are well or without symptoms and those who are sick but who have fewer resources and live further from health facilities. However, capturing these 'missing cases' may in itself be insufficient without appropriate health system strengthening to retain people in care. People who receive a tuberculosis diagnosis must contend with a complex and unsustainable cascade of care, and this affects their perception of ACF and their decision to engage with it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Taylor
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nancy Medley
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Susanna S van Wyk
- Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sandy Oliver
- EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
- Faculty of the Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steiro A, Hestevik CH, Muller AE. Patient's and healthcare provider's experiences with Opioid Maintenance Treatment (OMT): a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:333. [PMID: 38481254 PMCID: PMC10938774 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10778-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid Maintenance Treatment (OMT) is the gold standard for people with opioid dependence. However, drop-out rates are high, and many patients do not reach desired outcomes. Understanding patients' and healthcare providers' experiences with the treatment can provide valuable information to improve the quality of OMT and to increase acceptability and accessibility of services. The aim of this systematic review is to explore and synthesise the experiences of OMT among persons with opioid dependence and health care providers, to inform policy makers and practitioners on how to improve OMT outcomes. METHODS We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis. We systematically searched in electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and nordic databases) and searched for grey literature. As we identified many studies that met our inclusion criteria, we purposively sampled a manageable number of studies to include in this review. Two researchers independently extracted and coded data from the included studies and used the Andersen's healthcare utilization model to organize and develop codes. We assessed the methodological limitations of the studies, and our confidence in the findings using GRADE CERQual. RESULTS We retrieved 56 relevant studies and purposively sampled 24 qualitative studies of patients' and healthcare providers' experiences with OMT. Our analyses resulted in six main themes: (1) External stigma prevents engagement and retention in treatment, (2) Being identified as in OMT contributed to an increased experience of stigma (3) Inadequate knowledge and expertise among healthcare providers affected patients' treatment experiences, (4) Quality of communication between personnel and patients impacts patients' engagement with treatment and treatment outcomes, (5) Patients wanted help with many aspects of their lives not just medication, and (6) Balancing positive expectations of OMT with treatment stigma. We found that stigma was an overarching theme across these themes. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that OMT could be more beneficial for patients if treatment programs prioritize efforts to diminish societal and OMT provider stigma and find strategies to better address patient needs. Initiatives should focus on improving treatment knowledge among providers, encouraging the use of client perspectives, considering the context of family members, and establishing a more holistic and flexible treatment environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asbjørn Steiro
- Department of Health Services Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Pb 222, 0213, Skoyen, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Christine Hillestad Hestevik
- Department of Health Services Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Pb 222, 0213, Skoyen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ashley Elizabeth Muller
- Department of Health Services Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Pb 222, 0213, Skoyen, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bao L, Soh KG, Mohd Nasiruddin NJ, Xie H, Zhang J. Unveiling the Impact of Metacognition on Academic Achievement in Physical Education and Activity Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Qualitative Insights. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2024; 17:973-987. [PMID: 38476350 PMCID: PMC10929567 DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s444631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to unveil the impact of metacognition on academic achievement in physical education and activity settings by conducting a comprehensive systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of qualitative findings. Patients and Methods Systematic searches identified English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles reporting the results of qualitative or mixed-methods studies of the emerging themes of metacognition on academic achievement in sports. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to June 2023. Results Data from 20 studies were included in the review. Thematic meta-analysis identified descriptive themes: 1) Metacognitive performance during the learning process in different sports disciplines; 2) Domains of metacognitive skills related to academic performance; 3) Self-regulation strategies related to academic performance; 4) Influencing factors of metacognition; 5) Metacognitive interventions on motor learning and academic performance. Generate an analytical theme based on five descriptive themes. Conclusion In-depth descriptions of the emerging themes related to metacognition and academic performance during motor learning were provided by different students and athletes. The conclusions reported in the study align with the theoretical models of metacognition. The research findings will provide strategies for physical education teachers, coaches, and trainers to enhance both physical and academic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixia Bao
- Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
- Physical Education Department of Yuncheng University, Shanxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kim Geok Soh
- Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | | | - Huijuan Xie
- Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Junlong Zhang
- Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Berardi C, Antonini M, Jordan Z, Wechtler H, Paolucci F, Hinwood M. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:243. [PMID: 38408938 PMCID: PMC10898174 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10536-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the potential for improved population mental health and wellbeing, the integration of mental health digital interventions has been difficult to achieve. In this qualitative systematic review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental healthcare systems, and map these to an implementation framework to inform policy development. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for primary research articles published between January 2010 and 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they reported barriers and/or facilitators to the integration of any digital mental healthcare technologies. Data were extracted using EPPI-Reviewer Web and analysed thematically via inductive and deductive cycles. RESULTS Of 12,525 references identified initially, 81 studies were included in the final analysis. Barriers and facilitators were grouped within an implementation (evidence-practice gap) framework across six domains, organised by four levels of mental healthcare systems. Broadly, implementation was hindered by the perception of digital technologies as impersonal tools that add additional burden of care onto both providers and patients, and change relational power asymmetries; an absence of resources; and regulatory complexities that impede access to universal coverage. Facilitators included person-cantered approaches that consider patients' intersectional features e.g., gender, class, disability, illness severity; evidence-based training for providers; collaboration among colleagues; appropriate investment in human and financial resources; and policy reforms that tackle universal access to digital health. CONCLUSION It is important to consider the complex and interrelated nature of barriers across different domains and levels of the mental health system. To facilitate the equitable, sustainable, and long-term digital transition of mental health systems, policymakers should consider a systemic approach to collaboration between public and private sectors to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen mental health systems. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021276838.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Berardi
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
| | - Marcello Antonini
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Zephanie Jordan
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Heidi Wechtler
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Francesco Paolucci
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Madeleine Hinwood
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mann J, Cox V, Gorman S, Calissi P. Barriers to and Facilitators of Delabelling of Antimicrobial Allergies: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis. Can J Hosp Pharm 2024; 77:e3490. [PMID: 38357298 PMCID: PMC10846797 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Background Patients who report penicillin allergies may receive alternative antibiotics. Such substitution contributes to antimicrobial resistance, lower treatment efficacy, increased frequency of adverse events, and increased costs. Approximately 90% of individuals who report a penicillin allergy can tolerate a penicillin. Objective To identify the barriers to and facilitators of removal by health care workers of inaccurate antimicrobial allergies from patient records, known as delabelling. Data Sources The MEDLINE database was searched from inception to December 29, 2020. Study Selection and Data Extraction Qualitative studies evaluating health care professionals' perceptions of barriers to and/or facilitators of the act of delabelling a patient's antimicrobial allergies were included in the meta-synthesis. Data Synthesis The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to code and group individual utterances from the included studies, which were mapped to the Behaviour Change Wheel and corresponding intervention function and policy categories. Results Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight themes were identified as representing barriers to delabelling: delabelling skills, patient education skills, knowledge, electronic health records (EHRs), communication frameworks, time, fear about allergic reactions, and professional roles. Behaviour change interventions that may overcome these barriers include education, training, algorithms and toolkits, changes to EHRs, use of dedicated personnel, policies, incentivization of correct labelling, and an audit system. Conclusions Eight themes were identified as barriers to delabelling of antimicrobial allergies. Future behaviour change interventions to address these barriers were proposed. Confidence in the findings of this study was judged to be moderate, according to the GRADE CERQual approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Mann
- , BSc(Pharm), ACPR, is a Clinical Pharmacist with the East Kootenay Regional Hospital, Cranbrook, British Columbia
| | - Victoria Cox
- , BSc(Pharm), ACPR, PharmD, is a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Infectious Diseases, Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, British Columbia
| | - Sean Gorman
- , BSc(Pharm), PharmD, is Pharmacy Director, East and South Interior Health Pharmacy Services, Kelowna, British Columbia
| | - Piera Calissi
- , BSc(Pharm), PharmD, FSCHP, is Coordinator, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Interior Health, Kelowna, British Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sacks E, Brizuela V, Javadi D, Kim Y, Elmi N, Finlayson K, Crossland N, Langlois EV, Ziegler D, Parmar SM, Bonet M. Immigrant women's and families' views and experiences of routine postnatal care: findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 8:e014075. [PMID: 38351019 PMCID: PMC10897958 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake of postnatal care (PNC) is low and inequitable in many countries, and immigrant women may experience additional challenges to access and effective use. As part of a larger study examining the views of women, partners, and families on routine PNC, we analysed a subset of data on the specific experiences of immigrant women and families. METHODS This is a subanalysis of a larger qualitative evidence synthesis. We searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, EBM-Reviews and grey literature for studies published until December 2019 with extractable qualitative data with no language restrictions. For this analysis, we focused on papers related to immigrant women and families. Two reviewers screened each study independently; inclusion was agreed by consensus. Data abstraction and quality assessment were carried out using a study-specific extraction form and established quality assessment tools. Study findings were identified using thematic analysis. Findings are presented by confidence in the finding, applying the GRADE-CERQual approach. FINDINGS We included 44 papers, out of 602 full-texts, representing 11 countries where women and families sought PNC after immigrating. All but one included immigrants to high-income countries. Four themes were identified: resources and access, differences from home country, support needs, and experiences of care. High confidence study findings included: language and communication challenges; uncertainty about navigating system supports including transportation; high mental health, emotional, and informational needs; the impact of personal resources and social support; and the quality of interaction with healthcare providers. These findings highlight the importance of care experiences beyond clinical care. More research is also needed on the experiences of families migrating between low-income countries. CONCLUSIONS Immigrant families experience many challenges in getting routine PNC, especially related to language, culture, and communication. Some challenges may be mitigated by improving comprehensive and accessible information on available services, as well as holistic social support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019139183.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vanessa Brizuela
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dena Javadi
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yoona Kim
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nika Elmi
- School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Finlayson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Nicola Crossland
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Etienne V Langlois
- Partnership for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Ziegler
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Mercedes Bonet
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wood L, Foster NE, Dean SG, Booth V, Hayden JA, Booth A. Contexts, behavioural mechanisms and outcomes to optimise therapeutic exercise prescription for persistent low back pain: a realist review. Br J Sports Med 2024; 58:222-230. [PMID: 38176852 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Therapeutic exercises are a core treatment for low back pain (LBP), but it is uncertain how rehabilitative exercise facilitates change in outcomes. Realist reviews explore how the context (C) of certain settings or populations and underlying mechanisms (M) create intended or unintended outcomes (O). Our objective was to explore and understand the behavioural mechanisms by which therapeutic exercise creates change in outcomes of adherence, engagement and clinical outcomes for patients with LBP. METHODS This was a realist review reported following the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards guidance. We developed initial programme theories, modified with input from a steering group (experts, n=5), stakeholder group (patients and clinicians, n=10) and a scoping search of the published literature (n=37). Subsequently, an information specialist designed and undertook an iterative search strategy, and we refined and tested CMO configurations. RESULTS Of 522 initial papers identified, 75 papers were included to modify and test CMO configurations. We found that the patient-clinician therapeutic consultation builds a foundation of trust and was associated with improved adherence, engagement and clinical outcomes, and that individualised exercise prescription increases motivation to adhere to exercise and thus also impacts clinical outcomes. Provision of support such as timely follow-up and supervision can further facilitate motivation and confidence to improve adherence to therapeutic exercises for LBP. CONCLUSIONS Engagement in and adherence to therapeutic exercises for LBP, as well as clinical outcomes, may be optimised using mechanisms of trust, motivation and confidence. These CMO configurations provide a deeper understanding of ways to optimise exercise prescription for patients with LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Wood
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Vicky Booth
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jill A Hayden
- Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Andrew Booth
- Information Resources Group, University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kpokiri EE, McDonald K, Abraha YG, Osorio L, Nath TC, Talavera-Urdanivia VA, Akinwale OP, Manabe YC, Castelnuovo B, Tang W, Yilma D, Mihut M, Ezechi O, Iwelunmor J, Kaba M, Abdissa A, Tucker JD. Health research mentorship in low-income and middle-income countries: a global qualitative evidence synthesis of data from a crowdsourcing open call and scoping review. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e011166. [PMID: 38184299 PMCID: PMC10773352 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research mentorship is critical for advancing science, but there are few practical strategies for cultivating mentorship in health research resource-limited settings. WHO/TDR Global commissioned a group to develop a practical guide on research mentorship. This global qualitative evidence synthesis included data from a crowdsourcing open call and scoping review to identify and propose strategies to enhance research mentorship in low/middle-income country (LMIC) institutions. METHODS The crowdsourcing open call used methods recommended by WHO/TDR and solicited descriptions of strategies to enhance research mentorship in LMICs. The scoping review used the Cochrane Handbook and predefined the approach in a protocol. We extracted studies focused on enhancing health research mentorship in LMICs. Textual data describing research mentorship strategies from the open call and studies from the scoping review were coded into themes. The quality of evidence supporting themes was assessed using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach. RESULTS The open call solicited 46 practical strategies and the scoping review identified 77 studies. We identified the following strategies to enhance research mentorship: recognising mentorship as an institutional responsibility that should be provided and expected from all team members (8 strategies, 15 studies; moderate confidence); leveraging existing research and training resources to enhance research mentorship (15 strategies, 49 studies; moderate confidence); digital tools to match mentors and mentees and sustain mentorship relations over time (14 strategies, 11 studies; low confidence); nurturing a culture of generosity so that people who receive mentorship then become mentors to others (7 strategies, 7 studies; low confidence); peer mentorship defined as informal and formal support from one researcher to another who is at a similar career stage (16 strategies, 12 studies; low confidence). INTERPRETATION Research mentorship is a collective institutional responsibility, and it can be strengthened in resource-limited institutions by leveraging already existing resources. The evidence from the crowdsourcing open call and scoping review informed a WHO/TDR practical guide. There is a need for more formal research mentorship programmes in LMIC institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eneyi E Kpokiri
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London, UK
| | - Kamryn McDonald
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Lyda Osorio
- School of Public Health, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - Tilak Chandra Nath
- Department of Parasitology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea (the Republic of)
- Department of Parasitology, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
| | | | | | - Yukari Carol Manabe
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Barbara Castelnuovo
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Weiming Tang
- School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel Yilma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Michael Mihut
- TDR, The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases co-sponsored by UNICEF, UNDP, the World Bank and WHO, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Ezechi
- Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Juliet Iwelunmor
- Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mirgissa Kaba
- School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Alemseged Abdissa
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Joseph D Tucker
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Luo M, Yue Y, Du N, Xiao Y, Chen C, Huan Z. Needs for mobile and internet-based psychological intervention in patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:26. [PMID: 38178028 PMCID: PMC10768375 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05477-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, mobile psychological interventions have proven effective in reducing self-injury and suicide-related behaviors. Therefore, it is essential to continually enhance the user experience and address patients' needs to facilitate the development of mobile mental health interventions. Identifying patients with mobile mental health needs can be challenging for mental health professionals. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of qualitative research to synthesize the needs of patients engaged in self-injury and suicide-related behaviors for mobile and internet-based psychological interventions. METHODS This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA) and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research statement (ENTREQ). We explored 11 databases and synthesized the results using thematic analysis. RESULTS Sixteen qualitative and mixed-method studies were included. The study found that the needs of patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors for mobile psychological intervention included therapy, technology, culture, privacy, communication, emotional support, personalization, and self-management. Consistent with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the needs of patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors are influenced by the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of the mobile intervention. However, the findings also highlight the importance and unmet needs of peer support, communication, self-management, and empowerment in using mobile psychological interventions for patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors. CONCLUSIONS Studies in this area have shown that the needs of patients with self-harm and suicide-related behaviors cover multiple stages, including basic therapeutic and technical needs and advanced emotional needs. This complexity makes it challenging to address the needs of patients engaged in self-injury and suicide-related behaviors through digital interventions. In the future, mental health professionals should be encouraged to participate in multidisciplinary collaborations to expand the use of digital interventions, enhancing remote self-management for patients and providing new strategies for the ongoing care of psychiatric patients. We registered the review protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42022324958).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meiqi Luo
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuchuan Yue
- The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Hospital Office, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
| | - Na Du
- Psychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610036, China.
- Clinical Psychology Department, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
| | - Yu Xiao
- Psychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610036, China
- Clinical Psychology Department, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
| | - Chunyan Chen
- College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Zongsu Huan
- College of Nursing, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lewin S, Langlois EV, Tunçalp Ö, Portela A. Assessing unConventional Evidence (ACE) tool: development and content of a tool to assess the strengths and limitations of 'unconventional' source materials. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:2. [PMID: 38167048 PMCID: PMC10759469 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01080-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When deciding whether to implement an intervention, decision-makers typically have questions on feasibility and acceptability and on factors affecting implementation. Descriptions of programme implementation and of policies and systems are rich sources of information for these questions. However, this information is often not based on empirical data collected using explicit methods. To use the information in unconventional source materials in syntheses or other decision support products, we need methods of assessing their strengths and limitations. This paper describes the development and content of the Assessing unConventional Evidence (ACE) tool, a new tool to assess the strengths and limitations of these sources. METHODS We developed the ACE tool in four stages: first, we examined existing tools to identify potentially relevant assessment criteria. Second, we drew on these criteria and team discussions to create a first draft of the tool. Third, we obtained feedback on the draft from potential users and methodologists, and through piloting the tool in evidence syntheses. Finally, we used this feedback to iteratively refine the assessment criteria and to improve our guidance for undertaking the assessment. RESULTS The tool is made up of 11 criteria including the purpose and context of the source; the completeness of the information presented; and the extent to which evidence is provided to support the findings made. Users are asked to indicate whether each of the criteria have been addressed. On the basis of their judgements for each criterion, users then make an overall assessment of the limitations of the source, ranging from no or very minor concerns to serious concerns. These assessments can then facilitate appropriate use of the evidence in decision support products. CONCLUSIONS Through focussing on unconventional source materials, the ACE tool fills an important gap in the range of tools for assessing the strengths and limitations of policy-relevant evidence and supporting evidence-informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lewin
- Department of Health Sciences Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway.
- Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research (CEIR), Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Etienne V Langlois
- Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anayda Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Atkinson-Graham M, Brunton G, Cancelliere C, Corso M, de Zoete A, Rubinstein SM, Murnaghan K, Mior S. Care at a distance: Understanding lived experiences of people with MSK disorders receiving non-pharmacological interventions delivered through synchronous telehealth: A systematic rapid review. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241236573. [PMID: 38495858 PMCID: PMC10943750 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241236573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about lived experience of synchronous telehealth in patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders. Objective We conducted a rapid systematic review to answer: (1) what are the lived experiences and/or perspectives of people with MSK disorders receiving non-pharmacological interventions delivered through synchronous telehealth; and (2) what clinical implications can be inferred from qualitative studies focusing on lived experiences for how telehealth is delivered in the management of MSK disorders? Data sources A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and Google Scholar from June 2010 to July 2023. Eligible qualitative and mixed methods studies capturing lived experiences of adults with MSK disorders receiving non-pharmacological interventions via synchronous telehealth were included. Study methods Systematic rapid review conducted according to WHO guidelines. Titles and abstracts screened by reviewers independently, eligible studies critically appraised, and data was extracted. Themes summarized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) used to assess confidence in synthesis findings. Results We identified 9782 references, screened 8029, and critically appraised 22, and included 17 studies. There is evidence to suggest that the experience of telehealth prior to and during the pandemic was shaped by (1) patient perception of telehealth, (2) existing relationships with practitioners, (3) availability and accessibility of telehealth technologies, and (4) perceptions about the importance of the role of the physical exam in assessing and treating MSK disorders. Conclusion The five identified implications could be used to inform future research, policy, and strategy development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Atkinson-Graham
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto ON, Canada
| | - Ginny Brunton
- Faculty of Health Sciences, and Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Carol Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, and Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa Corso
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Annemarie de Zoete
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sidney M Rubinstein
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kent Murnaghan
- Library Sciences, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto ON, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pincha Baduge MSDS, Garth B, Boyd L, Ward K, Joseph K, Proimos J, Teede HJ. Barriers to advancing women nurses in healthcare leadership: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 67:102354. [PMID: 38314055 PMCID: PMC10837541 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Women comprise the majority of the nursing profession, yet nurses are underrepresented in healthcare leadership. We aimed to explore barriers for women nurses to advance in healthcare leadership to inform organisational interventions for career advancement. Methods In this systematic review and meta-synthesis, studies examining advancing women nurses and midwives in leadership within healthcare and academia in the international literature were included. Six databases (MEDLINE, EMCARE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and CINAHL PLUS) were searched for studies published in English between January 1 2000 and October 17 2023. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tools (GRADE) was followed to assess confidence in the findings. Retrieved full texts were assessed for methodological rigour using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme Qualitative Studies checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute Cross-sectional and Prevalence Studies checklists. Reported barriers for women nurses' leadership attainment were identified and generated themes were mapped to the Abilities, Motivation, and Opportunities (AMO) framework. Findings There were 32 eligible studies; 18 qualitative, 11 quantitative, and 3 mixed-methods. Studies included high-income countries (n = 20), middle-income countries (n = 7) and across countries (n = 3) with two unspecified. Samples included registered nurses, nurse academics, executives, and leaders. The key barriers highlighted were related to: role modelling and leadership development (ability); multiple complex and interacting factors, including gender stereotyping, perception of professionalism, human relations policies, and gender bias (motivation); and systemic issues, such as organisational setting, structure, and support (opportunity). Interpretation The prevailing belief in the literature is that caregiving is a feminine occupation and along with societal expectations of women's subordinate position, these present substantial obstacles that limit women nurses from advancing into healthcare leadership. Ultimately, these factors restrict women nurses in career advancement and need to be addressed at a systems and organisational level. Funding The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Belinda Garth
- Monash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Kylie Ward
- Australian College of Nursing, Australia
| | - Kathryn Joseph
- Monash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jenny Proimos
- Monash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helena J Teede
- Monash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Endocrine and Diabetes Units, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
BaHammam FA, Akhil J, Stewart M, Abdulmohsen B, Durham J, McCracken GI, Wassall R. Establishing an empirical conceptual model of oral health in dependent adults: Systematic review. SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY 2024; 44:57-74. [PMID: 36862036 DOI: 10.1111/scd.12842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
AIM This qualitative evidence synthesis was performed to establish a conceptual model of oral health in dependent adults that defines the construct of oral health and describes its interrelationships based on dependent adults' and their caregivers' experiences and views. METHODS Six bibliographic databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, OATD, and OpenGrey. Citations and reference lists were manually searched. A quality assessment of included studies was conducted independently by two reviewers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The 'best fit' framework synthesis method was applied. Data were coded against an a priori framework and data not captured by this framework were thematically analyzed. To assess the confidence of the findings from this review, the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) approach was used. RESULTS Twenty-seven eligible studies were included from 6126 retrieved studies. Four themes were generated to further understand oral health in dependent adults: oral health status, oral health impact, oral care, and oral health value. CONCLUSION This synthesis and conceptual model offer a better understanding of oral health in dependent adults and subsequently provide a starting point to guide establishment of person-centred oral care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad A BaHammam
- School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jamal Akhil
- College of Dentistry, Al Asmarya University, Zliten, Libya
| | - Margaret Stewart
- Patient and Public Involvement Researcher, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bana Abdulmohsen
- School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Justin Durham
- School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Giles I McCracken
- School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rebecca Wassall
- School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rose C, Law GU, Howard RA. The psychosocial experiences of adults diagnosed with coeliac disease: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1-16. [PMID: 37516676 PMCID: PMC10784387 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03483-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coeliac disease is a chronic autoimmune condition associated with intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms. Coeliac Disease is managed through strict adherence to a gluten-free diet, which, though usually effective, is challenging to maintain. This review synthesised qualitative research on the psychosocial experiences of adults living with coeliac disease. METHODS Keyword searches were conducted of the academic databases CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, SCOPUS and Web of Science for articles published (2005-2021), followed by forward and backward searches. Thematic synthesis of included articles was carried out on sections reporting findings or results, discussion, conclusions, and supporting data. The inductive thematic synthesis identified descriptive and analytical themes from the included studies. RESULTS Of 1284 records identified, 17 articles from 15 original studies were included in the thematic synthesis. The majority of studies were from Europe (76%), with the remainder from North America and Australia. Data represented 371 adults with coeliac disease (72% female; 17-85 years old, diagnosed < 1-42 years ago) across eight countries. Findings identified six analytical themes relating to the psychosocial experience of coeliac disease: 'Living with ongoing risk'; 'Losing more than gluten'; 'A changed identity'; 'A changed relationship with food'; 'The gluten-free diet creates a multifaceted burden'; and 'Learning how to live well with Coeliac Disease'. CONCLUSIONS Coeliac disease changes adults' psychosocial experiences. Adaptation involves ongoing learning, and development of psychological acceptance facilitates adjustment. Increased public education about coeliac disease may reduce stigma and risk. Psychosocial assessment and support could improve quality of life post-diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharine Rose
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Gary U Law
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruth A Howard
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kolaski K, Logan LR, Ioannidis JPA. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Br J Pharmacol 2024; 181:180-210. [PMID: 37282770 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely or consistently apply these updated methods. In addition, guideline developers, peer reviewers, and journal editors often disregard current methodological standards. Although extensively acknowledged and explored in the methodological literature, most clinicians seem unaware of these issues and may automatically accept evidence syntheses (and clinical practice guidelines based on their conclusions) as trustworthy. A plethora of methods and tools are recommended for the development and evaluation of evidence syntheses. It is important to understand what these are intended to do (and cannot do) and how they can be utilized. Our objective is to distill this sprawling information into a format that is understandable and readily accessible to authors, peer reviewers, and editors. In doing so, we aim to promote appreciation and understanding of the demanding science of evidence synthesis among stakeholders. We focus on well-documented deficiencies in key components of evidence syntheses to elucidate the rationale for current standards. The constructs underlying the tools developed to assess reporting, risk of bias, and methodological quality of evidence syntheses are distinguished from those involved in determining overall certainty of a body of evidence. Another important distinction is made between those tools used by authors to develop their syntheses as opposed to those used to ultimately judge their work. Exemplar methods and research practices are described, complemented by novel pragmatic strategies to improve evidence syntheses. The latter include preferred terminology and a scheme to characterize types of research evidence. We organize best practice resources in a Concise Guide that can be widely adopted and adapted for routine implementation by authors and journals. Appropriate, informed use of these is encouraged, but we caution against their superficial application and emphasize their endorsement does not substitute for in-depth methodological training. By highlighting best practices with their rationale, we hope this guidance will inspire further evolution of methods and tools that can advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kat Kolaski
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pediatrics, and Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lynne Romeiser Logan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Departments of Medicine, of Epidemiology and Population Health, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Webb R, Ford E, Shakespeare J, Easter A, Alderdice F, Holly J, Coates R, Hogg S, Cheyne H, McMullen S, Gilbody S, Salmon D, Ayers S. Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-187. [PMID: 38317290 DOI: 10.3310/kqfe0107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Background Perinatal mental health difficulties can occur during pregnancy or after birth and mental illness is a leading cause of maternal death. It is therefore important to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing and accessing perinatal mental health care. Objectives Our research objective was to develop a conceptual framework of barriers and facilitators to perinatal mental health care (defined as identification, assessment, care and treatment) to inform perinatal mental health services. Methods Two systematic reviews were conducted to synthesise the evidence on: Review 1 barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care; and Review 2 barriers to women accessing perinatal mental health care. Results were used to develop a conceptual framework which was then refined through consultations with stakeholders. Data sources Pre-planned searches were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo and CINAHL. Review 2 also included Scopus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Review methods In Review 1, studies were included if they examined barriers or facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care. In Review 2, systematic reviews were included if they examined barriers and facilitators to women seeking help, accessing help and engaging in perinatal mental health care; and they used systematic search strategies. Only qualitative papers were identified from the searches. Results were analysed using thematic synthesis and themes were mapped on to a theoretically informed multi-level model then grouped to reflect different stages of the care pathway. Results Review 1 included 46 studies. Most were carried out in higher income countries and evaluated as good quality with low risk of bias. Review 2 included 32 systematic reviews. Most were carried out in higher income countries and evaluated as having low confidence in the results. Barriers and facilitators to perinatal mental health care were identified at seven levels: Individual (e.g. beliefs about mental illness); Health professional (e.g. confidence addressing perinatal mental illness); Interpersonal (e.g. relationship between women and health professionals); Organisational (e.g. continuity of carer); Commissioner (e.g. referral pathways); Political (e.g. women's economic status); and Societal (e.g. stigma). These factors impacted on perinatal mental health care at different stages of the care pathway. Results from reviews were synthesised to develop two MATRIx conceptual frameworks of the (1) barriers and (2) facilitators to perinatal mental health care. These provide pictorial representations of 66 barriers and 39 facilitators that intersect across the care pathway and at different levels. Limitations In Review 1 only 10% of abstracts were double screened and 10% of included papers methodologically appraised by two reviewers. The majority of reviews included in Review 2 were evaluated as having low (n = 14) or critically low (n = 5) confidence in their results. Both reviews only included papers published in academic journals and written in English. Conclusions The MATRIx frameworks highlight the complex interplay of individual and system level factors across different stages of the care pathway that influence women accessing perinatal mental health care and effective implementation of perinatal mental health services. Recommendations for health policy and practice These include using the conceptual frameworks to inform comprehensive, strategic and evidence-based approaches to perinatal mental health care; ensuring care is easy to access and flexible; providing culturally sensitive care; adequate funding of services; and quality training for health professionals with protected time to do it. Future work Further research is needed to examine access to perinatal mental health care for specific groups, such as fathers, immigrants or those in lower income countries. Trial registration This trial is registered as PROSPERO: (R1) CRD42019142854; (R2) CRD42020193107. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR 128068) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 2. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Webb
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Ford
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Falmer, UK
| | | | - Abigail Easter
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fiona Alderdice
- Oxford Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Rose Coates
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sally Hogg
- The Parent-Infant Foundation, London, UK
| | - Helen Cheyne
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, University of York, York, UK
| | - Debra Salmon
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Susan Ayers
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cormick G, Moraa H, Zahroh RI, Allotey J, Rocha T, Peña-Rosas JP, Qureshi ZP, Hofmeyr GJ, Mistry H, Smits L, Vogel JP, Palacios A, Gwako GN, Abalos E, Larbi KK, Carroli G, Riley R, Snell KI, Thorson A, Young T, Betran AP, Thangaratinam S, Bohren MA. Factors affecting the implementation of calcium supplementation strategies during pregnancy to prevent pre-eclampsia: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070677. [PMID: 38135336 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Daily calcium supplements are recommended for pregnant women from 20 weeks' gestation to prevent pre-eclampsia in populations with low dietary calcium intake. We aimed to improve understanding of barriers and facilitators for calcium supplement intake during pregnancy to prevent pre-eclampsia. DESIGN Mixed-method systematic review, with confidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and EMBASE (via Ovid), CINAHL and Global Health (via EBSCO) and grey literature databases were searched up to 17 September 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included primary qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies reporting implementation or use of calcium supplements during pregnancy, excluding calcium fortification and non-primary studies. No restrictions were imposed on settings, language or publication date. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We analysed the qualitative data using thematic synthesis, and quantitative findings were thematically mapped to qualitative findings. We then mapped the results to behavioural change frameworks to identify barriers and facilitators. RESULTS Eighteen reports from nine studies were included in this review. Women reported barriers to consuming calcium supplements included limited knowledge about calcium supplements and pre-eclampsia, fears and experiences of side effects, varying preferences for tablets, dosing, working schedules, being away from home and taking other supplements. Receiving information regarding pre-eclampsia and safety of calcium supplement use from reliable sources, alternative dosing options, supplement reminders, early antenatal care, free supplements and support from families and communities were reported as facilitators. Healthcare providers felt that consistent messaging about benefits and risks of calcium, training, and ensuring adequate staffing and calcium supply is available would be able to help them in promoting calcium. CONCLUSION Relevant stakeholders should consider the identified barriers and facilitators when formulating interventions and policies on calcium supplement use. These review findings can inform implementation to ensure effective and equitable provision and scale-up of calcium interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021239143.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Cormick
- Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas- CONICET), Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, San Justo, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Rana Islamiah Zahroh
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Allotey
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Thaís Rocha
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - G Justus Hofmeyr
- Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand Faculty of Health Sciences, East London, Eastern Cape, South Africa
- University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Hema Mistry
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Luc Smits
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Joshua Peter Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alfredo Palacios
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Edgardo Abalos
- Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Guillermo Carroli
- Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales (CREP), Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Richard Riley
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Anna Thorson
- Human Reproduction Program/World Health Organization (Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Taryn Young
- Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dept. of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ana Pilar Betran
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mantina NM, Nakayima Miiro F, Smith J, McClelland DJ, Magrath PA, Madhivanan P. Perspectives of HPV vaccination among young adults: a qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076234. [PMID: 38072486 PMCID: PMC10729288 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of nearly all cervical cancers. Despite the proven safety and efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing HPV-related cancers, the global vaccine coverage rate is estimated to only be 15%. HPV vaccine coverage rates are more actively tracked and reported for adolescents 17 years and younger but there is still a critical window of opportunity to intervene and promote HPV vaccination among young adults aged 18-26 years who are still eligible to be vaccinated. This protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis aims to review perspectives of HPV vaccination among young adults (18-26 years) and identify facilitators and barriers that influence HPV vaccination uptake and decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Seven databases will be searched from 1 January 2006 to the date of final search. For inclusion, studies must report HPV vaccination perspectives of young adults aged 18-26 years and use qualitative study methods or analysis techniques. Studies will be screened in a two-stage process guided by the eligibility criteria. Final included studies will be evaluated for methodological strengths and limitations using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality assessment tool for qualitative studies. After data extraction, framework analysis will be used to analyse the data applying the socioecological model. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research will be applied to evaluate the confidence in synthesised qualitative findings. The methodology of this review follows the Cochrane Handbook guidelines on qualitative evidence syntheses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Formal ethical approval is not required for this study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and professional networks. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023417052.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namoonga M Mantina
- The University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Flavia Nakayima Miiro
- The University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Jonathan Smith
- The University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Priscilla Anne Magrath
- The University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Purnima Madhivanan
- Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kelly Y, O'Rourke N, Flynn R, O'Connor L, Hegarty J. Factors that influence the implementation of (inter)nationally endorsed health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary. BMJ Qual Saf 2023; 32:750-762. [PMID: 37290917 PMCID: PMC10803983 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health and social care standards have been widely adopted as a quality improvement intervention. Standards are typically made up of evidence-based statements that describe safe, high-quality, person-centred care as an outcome or process of care delivery. They involve stakeholders at multiple levels and multiple activities across diverse services. As such, challenges exist with their implementation. Existing literature relating to standards has focused on accreditation and regulation programmes and there is limited evidence to inform implementation strategies specifically tailored to support the implementation of standards. This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the most frequently reported enablers and barriers to implementing (inter)nationally endorsed standards, in order to inform the selection of strategies that can optimise their implementation. METHODS Database searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), SocINDEX, Google Scholar, OpenGrey and GreyNet International, complemented by manual searches of standard-setting bodies' websites and hand searching references of included studies. Primary qualitative, quantitative descriptive and mixed methods studies that reported enablers and barriers to implementing nationally or internationally endorsed standards were included. Two researchers independently screened search outcomes and conducted data extraction, methodological appraisal and CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) assessments. An inductive analysis was conducted using Sandelowski's meta-summary and measured frequency effect sizes (FES) for enablers and barriers. RESULTS 4072 papers were retrieved initially with 35 studies ultimately included. Twenty-two thematic statements describing enablers were created from 322 descriptive findings and grouped under six themes. Twenty-four thematic statements describing barriers were created from 376 descriptive findings and grouped under six themes. The most prevalent enablers with CERQual assessments graded as high included: available support tools at local level (FES 55%); training courses to increase awareness and knowledge of the standards (FES 52%) and knowledge sharing and interprofessional collaborations (FES 45%). The most prevalent barriers with CERQual assessments graded as high included: a lack of knowledge of what standards are (FES 63%), staffing constraints (FES 46%), insufficient funds (FES 43%). CONCLUSIONS The most frequently reported enablers related to available support tools, education and shared learning. The most frequently reported barriers related to a lack of knowledge of standards, staffing issues and insufficient funds. Incorporating these findings into the selection of implementation strategies will enhance the likelihood of effective implementation of standards and subsequently, improve safe, quality care for people using health and social care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Kelly
- Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Cork, Ireland
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery and School of Public Health (SPHeRE programme), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Niamh O'Rourke
- Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rachel Flynn
- Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Cork, Ireland
| | - Laura O'Connor
- Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Cork, Ireland
| | - Josephine Hegarty
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Akter S, Forbes G, Vazquez Corona M, Miller S, Althabe F, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID, Oladapo OT, Vogel JP, Lorencatto F, Bohren MA. Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 11:CD013795. [PMID: 38009552 PMCID: PMC10680124 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013795.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), defined as blood loss of 500 mL or more after childbirth, is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. It is possible to prevent complications of PPH with timely and appropriate detection and management. However, implementing the best methods of PPH prevention, detection and management can be challenging, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVES Our overall objective was to explore the perceptions and experiences of women, community members, lay health workers, and skilled healthcare providers who have experience with PPH or with preventing, detecting, and managing PPH, in community or health facility settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and grey literature on 13 November 2022 with no language restrictions. We then performed reference checking and forward citation searching of the included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with an identifiable qualitative component. We included studies that explored perceptions and experiences of PPH prevention, detection, and management among women, community members, traditional birth attendants, healthcare providers, and managers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used three-stage maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in terms of relevance of the study to the review objectives, richness of data, and coverage of critical contextual elements: setting (region, country income level), perspective (type of participant), and topic (prevention, detection, management). We extracted data using a data extraction form designed for this review. We used thematic synthesis to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and we used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each finding. To identify factors that may influence intervention implementation, we mapped each review finding to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Motivation, and Opportunity model of Behaviour change (COM-B). We used the Behaviour Change Wheel to explore implications for practice. MAIN RESULTS We included 67 studies and sampled 43 studies for our analysis. Most were from low- or middle-income countries (33 studies), and most included the perspectives of women and health workers. We downgraded our confidence in several findings from high confidence to moderate, low, or very-low confidence, mainly due to concerns about how the studies were conducted (methodological limitations) or concerns about missing important perspectives from some types of participants or in some settings (relevance). In many communities, bleeding during and after childbirth is considered "normal" and necessary to expel "impurities" and restore and cleanse the woman's body after pregnancy and birth (moderate confidence). In some communities, people have misconceptions about causes of PPH or believe that PPH is caused by supernatural powers or evil spirits that punish women for ignoring or disobeying social rules or for past mistakes (high confidence). For women who give birth at home or in the community, female family members or traditional birth attendants are the first to recognise excess bleeding after birth (high confidence). Family members typically take the decision of whether and when to seek care if PPH is suspected, and these family members are often influenced by trusted traditional birth attendants or community midwives (high confidence). If PPH is identified for women birthing at home or in the community, decision-making about the subsequent referral and care pathway can be multifaceted and complex (high confidence). First responders to PPH are not always skilled or trained healthcare providers (high confidence). In health facilities, midwives may consider it easy to implement visual estimation of blood loss with a kidney dish or under-pad, but difficult to accurately interpret the amount of blood loss (very low confidence). Quantifying (rather than estimating) blood loss may be a complex and contentious change of practice for health workers (low confidence). Women who gave birth in health facilities and experienced PPH described it as painful, embarrassing, and traumatic. Partners or other family members also found the experience stressful. While some women were dissatisfied with their level of involvement in decision-making for PPH management, others felt health workers were best placed to make decisions (moderate confidence). Inconsistent availability of resources (drugs, medical supplies, blood) causes delays in the timely management of PPH (high confidence). There is limited availability of misoprostol in the community owing to stockouts, poor supply systems, and the difficulty of navigating misoprostol procurement for community health workers (moderate confidence). Health workers described working on the maternity ward as stressful and intense due to short staffing, long shifts, and the unpredictability of emergencies. Exhausted and overwhelmed staff may be unable to appropriately monitor all women, particularly when multiple women are giving birth simultaneously or on the floor of the health facility; this could lead to delays in detecting PPH (moderate confidence). Inadequate staffing, high turnover of skilled health workers, and appointment of lower-level cadres of health workers are key challenges to the provision of quality PPH care (high confidence). Through team-based simulation training, health workers of different cadres (doctors, midwives, lay health workers) can develop a shared mental model to help them work quickly, efficiently, and amicably as a team when managing women with PPH (moderate confidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight how improving PPH prevention, detection, and management is underpinned by a complex system of interacting roles and behaviours (community, women, health workers of different types and with different experiences). Multiple individual, sociocultural, and environmental factors influence the decisions and behaviours of women, families, communities, health workers, and managers. It is crucial to consider the broader health and social systems when designing and implementing PPH interventions to change or influence these behaviours. We have developed a set of prompts that may help programme managers, policymakers, researchers, and other key stakeholders to identify and address factors that affect implementation and scale-up of interventions to improve PPH prevention, detection, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahinoor Akter
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gillian Forbes
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martha Vazquez Corona
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Suellen Miller
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, and Safe Motherhood Program, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health and Policy, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Fernando Althabe
- Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ioannis D Gallos
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olufemi T Oladapo
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- Maternal and Child Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Douma MJ, Myhre C, Ali S, Graham TAD, Ruether K, Brindley PG, Dainty KN, Smith KE, Montgomery CL, Dennet L, Picard C, Frazer K, Kroll T. What Are the Care Needs of Families Experiencing Sudden Cardiac Arrest? A Survivor- and Family-Performed Systematic Review, Qualitative Meta-Synthesis, and Clinical Practice Recommendations. J Emerg Nurs 2023; 49:912-950. [PMID: 37737785 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiac arrest care systems are being designed and implemented to address patients', family members', and survivors' care needs. We conducted a systematic review and a meta-synthesis to understand family experiences and care needs during cardiac arrest care to create treatment recommendations. METHODS We searched eight electronic databases to identify articles. Study findings were extracted, coded and synthesized. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance, and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual methods. RESULTS In total 4181 studies were screened, and 39 met our inclusion criteria; these studies enrolled 215 survivors and 418 family participants-which includes both co-survivors and bereaved family members. From these studies findings and participant data we identified 5 major analytical themes: (1) When the crisis begins we must respond; (2) Anguish from uncertainty, we need to understand; (3) Partnering in care, we have much to offer; (4) The crisis surrounding the victim, ignore us, the family, no longer; (5) Our family's emergency is not over, now is when we need help the most. Confidence in the evidence statements are provided along with our review findings. DISCUSSION The family experience of cardiac arrest care is often chaotic, distressing, complex and the aftereffects are long-lasting. Patient and family experiences could be improved for many people. High certainty family care needs identified in this review include rapid recognition and response, improved information sharing, more effective communication, supported presence and participation, or supported absence, and psychological aftercare.
Collapse
|
39
|
Müller A, Laskowski NM, Thomas TA, Antons S, Tahmassebi N, Steins-Loeber S, Brand M, Georgiadou E. Update on treatment studies for compulsive buying-shopping disorder: A systematic review. J Behav Addict 2023; 12:631-651. [PMID: 37450373 PMCID: PMC10562810 DOI: 10.1556/2006.2023.00033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Compulsive buying-shopping disorder (CBSD) is mentioned as an example of other specified impulse control disorders in the ICD-11 coding tool, highlighting its clinical relevance and need for treatment. The aim of the present work was to provide a systematic update on treatment studies for CBSD, with a particular focus on online CBSD. Method The preregistered systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42021257379) was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases. Original research published between January 2000 and December 2022 was included. Risk of reporting bias was evaluated with the CONSORT guideline for randomized controlled trials. Effect sizes for primary CBSD outcomes were calculated. Results Thirteen studies were included (psychotherapy: 2 open, 4 waitlist control design; medication: 2 open, 3 placebo-controlled, 2 open-label phase followed by a double-blind discontinuation phase; participants treatment/control 349/149). None of the studies addressed online CBSD. Psychotherapy studies suggest that group cognitive-behavioral therapy is effective in reducing CBSD symptoms. Pharmacological studies with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors or topiramate did not indicate superiority over placebo. Predictors of treatment outcome were rarely examined, mechanisms of change were not studied at all. Risk of reporting bias was high in most studies. Discussion Poor methodological and low quality of reporting of included studies reduce the reliability of conclusions. There is a lack of studies targeting online CBSD. More high-quality treatment research is needed with more emphasis on the CBSD subtype and mechanisms of change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Müller
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nora M. Laskowski
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Ruhr-University Bochum, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Campus East-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Tobias A. Thomas
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephanie Antons
- General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | | | - Sabine Steins-Loeber
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bamberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Brand
- General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Essen, Germany
| | - Ekaterini Georgiadou
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kolaski K, Logan LR, Ioannidis JPA. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2023; 67:1148-1177. [PMID: 37288997 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely or consistently apply these updated methods. In addition, guideline developers, peer reviewers, and journal editors often disregard current methodological standards. Although extensively acknowledged and explored in the methodological literature, most clinicians seem unaware of these issues and may automatically accept evidence syntheses (and clinical practice guidelines based on their conclusions) as trustworthy. A plethora of methods and tools are recommended for the development and evaluation of evidence syntheses. It is important to understand what these are intended to do (and cannot do) and how they can be utilized. Our objective is to distill this sprawling information into a format that is understandable and readily accessible to authors, peer reviewers, and editors. In doing so, we aim to promote appreciation and understanding of the demanding science of evidence synthesis among stakeholders. We focus on well-documented deficiencies in key components of evidence syntheses to elucidate the rationale for current standards. The constructs underlying the tools developed to assess reporting, risk of bias, and methodological quality of evidence syntheses are distinguished from those involved in determining overall certainty of a body of evidence. Another important distinction is made between those tools used by authors to develop their syntheses as opposed to those used to ultimately judge their work. Exemplar methods and research practices are described, complemented by novel pragmatic strategies to improve evidence syntheses. The latter include preferred terminology and a scheme to characterize types of research evidence. We organize best practice resources in a Concise Guide that can be widely adopted and adapted for routine implementation by authors and journals. Appropriate, informed use of these is encouraged, but we caution against their superficial application and emphasize their endorsement does not substitute for in-depth methodological training. By highlighting best practices with their rationale, we hope this guidance will inspire further evolution of methods and tools that can advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kat Kolaski
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pediatrics, and Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lynne Romeiser Logan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Departments of Medicine, of Epidemiology and Population Health, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ballard M, Olaniran A, Iberico MM, Rogers A, Thapa A, Cook J, Aranda Z, French M, Olsen HE, Haughton J, Lassala D, Carpenter Westgate C, Malitoni B, Juma M, Perry HB. Labour conditions in dual-cadre community health worker programmes: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health 2023; 11:e1598-e1608. [PMID: 37734803 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00357-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care delivered by community health workers reduces morbidity and mortality while providing a considerable return on investment. Despite growing consensus that community health workers, a predominantly female workforce, should receive a salary, many community health worker programmes take the form of dual-cadre systems, where a salaried cadre of community health workers works alongside a cadre of unsalaried community health workers. We aimed to determine the presence, prevalence, and magnitude of exploitation in national dual-cadre programmes. METHODS We did a systematic review of available evidence from peer-reviewed databases and grey literature from database inception to Aug 2, 2021, for studies on unsalaried community health worker cadres in dual-cadre systems. Editorials, protocols, guidelines, or conference reports were excluded in addition to studies about single-tier community health worker programmes and those reporting on only salaried cadres of community health workers in a dual-cadre system. We extracted data on remuneration, workload, task complexity, and self-reported experiences of community health workers. Three models were created: a minimum model with the shortest time and frequency per task documented in the literature, a maximum model with the longest time, and a median model. Labour exploitation was defined as being engaged in work below the country's minimum wage together with excessive work hours or complex tasks. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021271500. FINDINGS We included 117 reports from 112 studies describing community health workers in dual-cadre programmes across 19 countries. The majority of community health workers were female. 13 (59%) of 22 unsalaried community health worker cadres and one (10%) of ten salaried cadres experienced labour exploitation. Three (17%) of 18 unsalaried community health workers would need to work more than 40 h per week to fulfil their assigned responsibilities. Unsalaried community health worker cadres frequently reported non-payment, inadequate or inconsistent payment of incentives, and an overburdensome workload. INTERPRETATION Unsalaried community health workers in dual-cadre programmes often face labour exploitation, potentially leading to inadequate health-care provision. Labour laws must be upheld and the creation of professional community health worker cadres with fair contracts prioritised, international funding allocated to programmes that rely on unsalaried workers should be transparently reported, the workloads of community health workers should be modelled a priori and actual time use routinely assessed, community health workers should have input in policies that affect them, and volunteers should not be responsible for the delivery of essential health services. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Ballard
- Community Health Impact Coalition, London, UK; Department of Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - M Matías Iberico
- Partners in Health Mexico, Ángel Albino Corzo, México; Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Ash Rogers
- Lwala Community Alliance, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Zeus Aranda
- Partners in Health Mexico, Ángel Albino Corzo, México; El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de las Casas, México
| | | | | | - Jessica Haughton
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cénat JM, Dromer É, Darius WP, Dalexis RD, Furyk SE, Poisson H, Mansoub Bekarkhanech F, Diao DG, Gedeon AP, Shah MS, Labelle PR, Bernheim E, Kogan CS. Incidence, Racial Disparities and Factors Related to Psychosis among Black Individuals in Canada: A Scoping Review. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2023; 68:713-731. [PMID: 37269120 PMCID: PMC10517652 DOI: 10.1177/07067437231178957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Black communities are increasingly concerned about psychosis, a worry echoed by provincial health-care systems across Canada. Responding to the lack of evidence on psychosis in Black communities, this scoping review examined the incidence and prevalence of psychosis, access to care (pathways to care, coercive referrals, interventions, etc.), treatments received, and stigma faced by individuals with psychosis. METHOD To identify studies, a comprehensive search strategy was developed and executed in December 2021 across 10 databases, including APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Subject headings and keywords relating to Black communities, psychosis, health inequalities, Canada and its provinces and territories were used and combined. The scoping review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) reporting standard. RESULTS A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, all of them conducted in Ontario and Quebec. Results highlight different disparities in psychosis among Black communities. Compared to other Canadian ethnic groups, Black individuals are more likely to be diagnosed with psychosis. Black individuals with psychosis are more likely to have their first contact with health-care settings through emergency departments, to be referred by police and ambulance services, and to experience coercive referrals and interventions, and involuntary admission. Black individuals experience a lower quality of care and are the ethnic group most likely to disengage from treatment. CONCLUSION This scoping review reveals many gaps in research, prevention, promotion and intervention on psychosis in Black individuals in Canada. Future studies should explore factors related to age, gender, social and economic factors, interpersonal, institutional and systemic racism, and psychosis-related stigma. Efforts should be directed toward developing trainings for health-care professionals and promotion and prevention programs within Black communities. Culturally adapted interventions, racially disaggregated data, and increased research funding are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jude Mary Cénat
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Black Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa Research Chair on Black Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Élisabeth Dromer
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wina Paul Darius
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rose Darly Dalexis
- Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Hannah Poisson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Muhammad S. Shah
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Emmanuelle Bernheim
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Black Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Law, Civil Law Section, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Canada Research Chair on Mental Health and Access to Justice, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cary S. Kogan
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Black Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
McMahon K, Clark IN, Stensæth K, Wosch T, Odell Miller H, Bukowska A, Baker FA. A qualitative systematic review of the experiences of sharing music for people living with dementia and their family care partners: the thread of connection. Arts Health 2023; 15:229-256. [PMID: 36224535 DOI: 10.1080/17533015.2022.2128381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a global need for interventions that support the wellbeing of people living with dementia and their family care partners. Studies show that shared musical activities may achieve this. Our systematic review aimed to synthesise existing research exploring dyads' experiences of shared musical activities across a range of contexts. METHOD From 31 October 2020 we searched PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL Complete, EMBASE, RILM, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses for studies published up to 14 April 2021, and hand searched five music therapy journals plus citation lists. Thirteen qualitative studies reporting on dyads' experiences and perspectives of shared musical activities across a range of settings were included. Studies with mixed populations or mixed modality interventions were excluded. We analysed the final studies using thematic synthesis, engaging in reflective discussions and reflexivity throughout. The quality of included studies was assessed using the CASP qualitative checklist. This study is registered on PROSPERO: CRD42020169360. RESULTS Six themes were identified from 13 studies: 1) shared musical activities support wellbeing for people living with dementia, 2) music groups become ecological systems, 3) shared musical activities are experienced differently over time, 4) shared musical activities are experienced by me and as we, 5) music is a supportive structure, and 6) the thread of connection (an overarching theme). A GRADE-CERQual assessment found moderate to high confidence in these findings. Findings informed the development of the Contextual Connection Model of Health Musicking. CONCLUSION Shared musical activities foster experiences of connection for people living with dementia and their family care partners. Experiences of connection are supported through professional facilitation and the structural aspects of music, and are influenced by the setting and changes over time. These experiences of connection play a central role in supporting dyadic and individual wellbeing. These findings are largely relevant to a western cultural context; future research should seek to include more diverse cultural experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate McMahon
- Faculty of Fine Arts & Music University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Imogen N Clark
- Faculty of Fine Arts & Music University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karette Stensæth
- Centre for Music and Health Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Wosch
- Institute for Applied Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Helen Odell Miller
- Cambridge Institute for Music Therapy Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anna Bukowska
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University School of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland
| | - Felicity A Baker
- Centre for Research in Music and Health, Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Laursen SH, Rasmussen HL, Seidelin D, Pedersen PH, Chræmmer TM. Psychosocial patient perspectives following major lower-limb amputation due to vascular aetiology: a protocol for a systematic meta-aggregation study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076794. [PMID: 37734884 PMCID: PMC10514670 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistent psychosocial problems in people with lower-limb amputation due to vascular aetiology indicate a great need for long-lasting holistic rehabilitation. An in-depth understanding of the psychosocial problems is essential for the guidance of health professionals in meeting and normalising patients' experiences and emotions. Furthermore, identifying the psychological problems may help develop effective rehabilitation and counselling programmes. This meta-aggregation study aims to explore the psychosocial perspectives of individuals who have undergone a major lower-limb amputation due to vascular aetiology during the post-discharge rehabilitation phase. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic meta-aggregation study will be performed to identify full-text, peer-reviewed journal articles reporting on patients' psychosocial perspectives on major lower-limb amputation due to vascular aetiology from post-discharge to several years afterward. The databases Embase, CINAHL Ultimate, APA PsycInfo, PubMed and Scopus will be searched with no limitations regarding the publication year. Studies that satisfy the eligibility criteria will be critically appraised using an acknowledged checklist and synthesised using the Joanna Briggs Institute three-phase approach for the synthesis of meta-aggregation studies. The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation- Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) tool will be used to determine the level of confidence in the qualitative evidence, and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) reporting guidelines will be followed throughout the review process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required for the study, as the review is built on pre-existing available data in the literature. Findings from the review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-review journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022377114.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisse Heiden Laursen
- Department of Nursing, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
- Clinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Dinnie Seidelin
- Department of Nursing, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Data continue to accumulate indicating that many systematic reviews are methodologically flawed, biased, redundant, or uninformative. Some improvements have occurred in recent years based on empirical methods research and standardization of appraisal tools; however, many authors do not routinely or consistently apply these updated methods. In addition, guideline developers, peer reviewers, and journal editors often disregard current methodological standards. Although extensively acknowledged and explored in the methodological literature, most clinicians seem unaware of these issues and may automatically accept evidence syntheses (and clinical practice guidelines based on their conclusions) as trustworthy. A plethora of methods and tools are recommended for the development and evaluation of evidence syntheses. It is important to understand what these are intended to do (and cannot do) and how they can be utilized. Our objective is to distill this sprawling information into a format that is understandable and readily accessible to authors, peer reviewers, and editors. In doing so, we aim to promote appreciation and understanding of the demanding science of evidence synthesis among stakeholders. We focus on well-documented deficiencies in key components of evidence syntheses to elucidate the rationale for current standards. The constructs underlying the tools developed to assess reporting, risk of bias, and methodological quality of evidence syntheses are distinguished from those involved in determining overall certainty of a body of evidence. Another important distinction is made between those tools used by authors to develop their syntheses as opposed to those used to ultimately judge their work. Exemplar methods and research practices are described, complemented by novel pragmatic strategies to improve evidence syntheses. The latter include preferred terminology and a scheme to characterize types of research evidence. We organize best practice resources in a Concise Guide that can be widely adopted and adapted for routine implementation by authors and journals. Appropriate, informed use of these is encouraged, but we caution against their superficial application and emphasize their endorsement does not substitute for in-depth methodological training. By highlighting best practices with their rationale, we hope this guidance will inspire further evolution of methods and tools that can advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kat Kolaski
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pediatrics, and Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Lynne Romeiser Logan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - John P.A. Ioannidis
- Departments of Medicine, of Epidemiology and Population Health, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rhodes EC, Nyhan K, Okoli N, O’Connor Duffany K, Rodriguez ME, Perkins B, Ross D, Pérez-Escamilla R. Client experience of food assistance programs among adults in the United States: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1193451. [PMID: 37719734 PMCID: PMC10501444 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Policymakers, health practitioners, and other key partners are increasingly focused on ensuring that clients of food assistance programs have positive experiences, a key aspect of high-quality programming. The objectives of this review are to describe the experiences of clients participating in food assistance programs in the United States (US) and to identify ways that these programs promote or hinder positive experiences. Methods and analysis We will conduct a qualitative evidence synthesis with partners from food security organizations and community members. Peer-reviewed literature will be systematically searched in Scopus, CINAHL, and AGRICOLA. To identify grey literature, we will use Google's programmable search engine. This review will consider sources that present results of primary qualitative studies that focus on at least one food assistance program in the US and explore the perspectives of adult clients. Only sources published in English or Spanish from 2007 onward will be included. Multiple reviewers will screen articles for inclusion and extract data from articles that meet the inclusion criteria, using a structured data extraction tool. Thematic synthesis or meta-ethnography may be appropriate approaches for synthesizing the extracted data. The final selection of synthesis method will be determined once the set of primary qualitative studies to be included in the review is complete and the type of data presented in these studies is known. We will assess the methodological quality of the included studies using the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) tool for qualitative studies and assess the confidence in the review findings using the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach. Discussion The findings of this review will inform the development of measures to assess client experience and quality improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Rhodes
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Kate Nyhan
- Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Ngozi Okoli
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kathleen O’Connor Duffany
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | | | - Daniel Ross
- DAISA Enterprises, LLC, South Hadley, MA, United States
| | - Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Harvey CM, Smith H, Portela A, Movsisyan A. Stakeholder's perspectives of postnatal discharge: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e011766. [PMID: 37553175 PMCID: PMC10414110 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Discharge preparation prior to leaving a health facility after childbirth offers a critical window of opportunity for women, parents and newborns to receive support for the transition to care at home. However, research suggests that the quality of discharge preparation following childbirth is variable. This review synthesises qualitative evidence on stakeholder perspectives of postnatal discharge. METHODS We conducted a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies included in a larger published scoping review on discharge preparedness and readiness (reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews). For inclusion, in the qualitative evidence synthesis, studies had to have used qualitative methods for data collection and analysis to capture the perspectives of women, parents and health workers. Key characteristics and findings were extracted, and thematic analysis was used to inductively develop a conceptual coding framework. RESULTS Of a total of 130 research documents (published research articles and grey literature), six studies met the inclusion criteria; five were conducted in high-income countries, five were published in English and one was published in Swedish. Studies reported on the experiences of women, fathers and midwives with the number of participants ranging from 12 to 324. Nine descriptive themes (findings) were identified. From these, three high-level analytical themes were generated: (1) health workers need support to optimise the postnatal discharge process; (2) the allocated time for, and timing of, discharge is rushed; (3) overlooking women's and fathers'/partners' needs leads to feelings of exclusion. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest an overall feeling of dissatisfaction among women, parents and midwives with the current provision of discharge preparation. In particular, women and midwives expressed frustration at the lack of time and resources available for ensuring adequate quality of care prior to discharge. The perspectives of included stakeholders indicate a demand for increased focus on the emotional and social needs of women and families during discharge preparation as well as better engagement of fathers and other family members. The qualitative evidence available indicates the likely positive impact of adequate discharge preparation if the identified service and system barriers can be overcome. As the updated WHO recommendations on postnatal care become embedded in country health systems and policies, there may be renewed interest on values, preferences and perspectives at system, service and end-user level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Smith
- International Health Consulting Services Ltd, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anayda Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ani Movsisyan
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munchen, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Warner BE, Lound A, Grailey K, Vindrola-Padros C, Wells M, Brett SJ. Perspectives of healthcare professionals and older patients on shared decision-making for treatment escalation planning in the acute hospital setting: a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 62:102144. [PMID: 37588625 PMCID: PMC10425683 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Shared Decision-Making (SDM) between patients and clinicians is increasingly considered important. Treament Escalation Plans (TEP) are individualised documents outlining life-saving interventions to be considered in the event of clinical deterioration. SDM can inform subjective goals of care in TEP but it remains unclear how much it is considered beneficial by patients and clinicians. We aimed to synthesise the existing knowledge of clinician and older patient (generally aged ≥65 years) perspectives on patient involvement in TEP in the acute setting. Methods Systematic database search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo and CINAHL databases as well as grey literature from database inception to June 8, 2023, using the Sample (older patients, clinicians, acute setting; studies relating to patients whose main diagnosis was cancer or single organ failure were excluded as these conditions may have specific TEP considerations), Phenomenon of Interest (Treatment Escalation Planning), Design (any including interview, observational, survey), Evaluation (Shared Decision-Making), Research type (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods) tool. Primary data (published participant quotations, field notes, survey results) and descriptive author comments were extracted and qualitative thematic synthesis was performed to generate analytic themes. Quality assessment was made using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tools. The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach was used to assess overall confidence in each thematic finding according to methodology, coherence, adequacy and relevance of the contributing studies. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022361593. Findings Following duplicate exclusion there were 1916 studies screened and ultimately 13 studies were included, all from European and North American settings. Clinician-orientated themes were: treatment escalation is a medical decision (high confidence); clinicians want the best for their patients amidst uncertainty (high confidence); involving patients and families in decisions is not always meaningful and can involve conflict (high confidence); treatment escalation planning exists within the clinical environment, organisation and society (moderate confidence). Patient-orientated themes were: patients' relationships with Treatment Escalation Planning are complex (low confidence); interactions with doctors are important but communication is not always easy (moderate confidence); patients are highly aware of their families when considering TEP (moderate confidence). Interpretation Based on current evidence, TEP decisions appear dominated by clinicians' perspectives, motivated by achieving the best for patients and challenged by complex decisions, communication and environmental factors; older patients' perspectives have seldom been explored, but their input on decisions may be modest. Presenting the context and challenge of SDM during professional education may allow reflection and a more nuanced approach. Future research should seek to understand what approach to TEP decision-making patients and clinicians consider to be optimum in the acute setting so that a mutually acceptable standard can be defined in policy. Funding HCA International and the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronwen E. Warner
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Management and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Adam Lound
- Patient Experience Research Centre, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Grailey
- Centre for Health Policy, Institute for Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | | | - Mary Wells
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen J. Brett
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Management and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Meredith SJ, Cox NJ, Ibrahim K, Higson J, McNiff J, Mitchell S, Rutherford M, Wijayendran A, Shenkin SD, Kilgour AHM, Lim SER. Factors that influence older adults' participation in physical activity: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad145. [PMID: 37595070 PMCID: PMC10438214 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the advantages of physical activity (PA), older adults are often insufficiently active to maximise health. Understanding factors that influence PA engagement will support well-designed interventions for older people. Our aim was to review the qualitative evidence exploring the factors affecting older adults' engagement in PA. METHODS We searched six electronic databases for studies of community-dwelling older adults (≥70 years) including qualitative methods. We excluded studies of a single-disease group, individuals with cognitive impairment and care home residents. Methodological rigour was assessed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, and framework synthesis was applied using the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model, which hypothesises that behaviour is influenced by three factors: capability, opportunity and motivation. RESULTS Twenty-five studies were included in the review (N = 4,978; mean 79 years) and 32 themes were identified. Older adults' capability was influenced by functional capacity (e.g. strength) and perceived risk of injury from PA (e.g. falls). Opportunity was impacted by the environment 'fit' (e.g. neighbourhood safety), the availability of social interaction and socio-cultural ageing stereotypes. PA was motivated by identifying as an 'exerciser', health gains and experiencing positive emotions (e.g. enjoyment), whereas negative sensations (e.g. pain) reduced motivation. CONCLUSIONS The qualitative synthesis showcased a complex web of interacting factors influencing PA between the sub-domains of COM-B, pinpointing directions for intervention, including a focus on whole systems approaches. There was a lack of research exploring PA influences in the oldest old and in low-income countries. Future research should seek to involve under-served groups, including a wider diversity of older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha J Meredith
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton, UK
- NIHR ARC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Natalie J Cox
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Kinda Ibrahim
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton, UK
- NIHR ARC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan D Shenkin
- NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alixe H M Kilgour
- NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Stephen E R Lim
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton, UK
- NIHR ARC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wainwright M, Zahroh RI, Tunçalp Ö, Booth A, Bohren MA, Noyes J, Cheng W, Munthe-Kaas H, Lewin S. The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:77. [PMID: 37491226 PMCID: PMC10369711 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) is a methodological approach to systematically and transparently assess how much confidence decision makers can place in individual review findings from qualitative evidence syntheses. The number of reviews applying GRADE-CERQual is rapidly expanding in guideline and other decision-making contexts. The objectives of this evaluation were, firstly, to describe the uptake of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis by review authors and, secondly, to assess both reporting of and fidelity to the approach. METHODS The evaluation had two parts. Part 1 was a citation analysis and descriptive overview of the literature citing GRADE-CERQual. Authors worked together to code and chart the citations, first by title and abstract and second by full text. Part 2 was an assessment and analysis of fidelity to, and reporting of, the GRADE-CERQual approach in included reviews. We developed fidelity and reporting questions and answers based on the most recent guidance for GRADE-CERQual and then used NVivo12 to document assessments in a spreadsheet and code full-text PDF articles for any concerns that had been identified. Our assessments were exported to Excel and we applied count formulae to explore patterns in the data. We employed a qualitative content analysis approach in NVivo12 to sub-coding all the data illustrating concerns for each reporting and fidelity criteria. RESULTS 233 studies have applied the GRADE-CERQual approach, with most (n = 225, 96.5%) in the field of health research. Many studies (n = 97/233, 41.6%) were excluded from full fidelity and reporting assessment because they demonstrated a serious misapplication of GRADE-CERQual, for example interpreting it as a quality appraisal tool for primary studies or reviews. For the remaining studies that applied GRADE-CERQual to assess confidence in review findings, the main areas of reporting concern involved terminology, labelling and completeness. Fidelity concerns were identified in more than half of all studies assessed. CONCLUSIONS GRADE-CERQual is being used widely within qualitative evidence syntheses and there are common reporting and fidelity issues. Most of these are avoidable and we highlight these as gaps in knowledge and guidance for applying the GRADE-CERQual approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Wainwright
- Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health, Durham University, South Road, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Rana Islamiah Zahroh
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Equity, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC Australia
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Booth
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Meghan A. Bohren
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Equity, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC Australia
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales United Kingdom
| | - Weilong Cheng
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC Australia
| | - Heather Munthe-Kaas
- The Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Simon Lewin
- Division of Health Services and Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research (CEIR), Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Health Sciences Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Ålesund, Norway
| |
Collapse
|