Superior sulcus non small cell lung carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 42 patients

Clinical outcomes of pancoast tumors treated with trimodality therapy

Background

Superior sulcus tumors, or Pancoast tumors, are challenging thoracic malignancies to treat due to their anatomical location posing difficult surgical access and potential involvement of adjacent vital structures. The current standard of care is trimodality treatment, which consists of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgical resection. This study aims to report the clinical outcomes of trimodality approach in British Columbia, Canada.

Methods

Patients with Pancoast tumors who underwent trimodality treatment between 2000–2015 were included in this provincial multi-center retrospective study. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-related data were collected, and treatment outcomes were recorded.

Results

We identified 32 patients who underwent induction chemoradiotherapy and subsequent surgical resection. Mean age was 59 (43–75 years) with median follow-up of 43 months (5–216 months). Complete resection was achieved in 31 patients (97%). Fourteen patients (44%) had pathological complete response after induction chemoradiotherapy. Thirteen (41%) showed minimal microscopic (>90% tumor necrosis) and 5 (16%) macroscopic residual disease (<90% tumor necrosis). Fourteen patients (44%) developed recurrence, which was distant in 9 cases. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 67.9%, 50.1%, 31.8% and the 2-, 5-, and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 65.1%, 47.1% and 28.2% respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival or disease-free survival rates with or without pathological complete response.

Conclusions

Complete surgical resection with negative margins can be achieved after induction chemoradiotherapy, and curative-intent trimodality treatment can lead to long-term survival in some patients. This study did not demonstrate any prognostic value of pathological complete response, likely due to small sample size.

The Favorable Prognostic Factors for Superior Sulcus Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Superior sulcus tumor is a rare non-small cell lung cancer with poor prognosis. Exploring the potential prognostic factors of patients with superior sulcus tumor and adopting individualized treatment for patients with different prognostic factors are of great significance for the prolongation of patients' lives. To figure out the prognostic factors of upper sulcus tumors, a meta-analysis was conducted.

Method: We searched all the articles published until January 2020 in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and the search strategy included the following terms, combining superior sulcus tumor and prognosis. Hazard ratio (HR) with associated confidential interval (CI) was evaluated for the purpose of investigating prognostic factors for superior sulcus tumor. STATA 16.0 was used for analysis of extracted data and assessment of publication bias.

Result: Fifteen eligible studies, which had 1,009 patients with superior sulcus tumor, were included in this meta-analysis. The studies were published between 1994 and 2018, and the patient recruitment periods ranged from 1974 to 2016. The median follow-up time ranged from 18 to 95 months. The meta-analysis indicated that lower T stage (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.35–1.97), lower N stage (HR, 3.08; 95% CI: 2.37–3.99), negative surgical margin (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17–0.38), and pathologic complete response (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39–0.77) were favorable prognostic factors.

Conclusion: We found that T stage, N stage, surgical margin, and pathologic complete response are prognostic factors for superior sulcus tumor. To reach a better long-term survival, patients with these negative prognostic factors may need a more aggressive treatment, while more studies should be conducted to further validate these results and explore a more effective treatment.

Treatment of clinical T4 stage superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

Purpose/Objective(s): Treatments for superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancer (SS-NSCLC) have evolved, but adequate treatments of T4 disease have not been found. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and optimal treatment strategy for patients with T4 SS-NSCLC. Materials/Methods: We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973–2015) to identify patients diagnosed with T4 stage SS-NSCLC (according to the 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system) from 2004 to 2015; those with M1 disease were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) with Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards’ models was performed to estimate prognosis. Results: A total of 384 patients were included. The majority was male (59.4%) at stage IIIB (56.6%), with N2 accounting for 45.3%. A total of 47 patients underwent cancer-directed surgery, while radiotherapy alone was received by 60.2% of patients. Median overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were 12 and 17 months, respectively, and the 5-year OS and LCSS rates were 15.8 and 25.4%, respectively. In the matched population, the median survival outcomes were better following surgery (OS: 25 compared with 9.0 months, P<0.001; LCSS: not available (NA) compared with 11.0 months, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that ages ≥ 66 years (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.639, P=0.001), unmarried status (HR = 1.356, P=0.034), and tumor size ≥ 6.0 cm (HR = 1.694, P<0.001) were associated with inferior OS. Cancer-directed surgery (HR = 0.537, P=0.009) and radiotherapy (HR = 0.644, P=0.006) were independent prognostic factors for patients with T4 SS-NSCLC. Conversely, in the subgroup analysis, favorable impacts of radiotherapy were observed for nonsurgical patients (OS: HR = 0.58, P<0.001; LCSS: HR = 0.55, P<0.001). Conclusion: Our study showed that T4 stage SS-NSCLC patients had a poor prognosis. Surgical resection remains the best option for those with resectable disease. For nonsurgical T4 SS-NSCLC patients, radiotherapy should be actively considered.

Superior sulcus non-small cell lung carcinoma: A comparison of IMRT and 3D-RT dosimetry

AIM

A dosimetric study comparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by TomoTherapy to conformational 3D radiotherapy (3D-RT) in patients with superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND

IMRT became the main technique in modern radiotherapy. However it was not currently used for lung cancers. Because of the need to increase the dose to control lung cancers but because of the critical organs surrounding the tumors, the gains obtainable with IMRT is not still demonstrated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A dosimetric comparison of the planned target and organs at risk parameters between IMRT and 3D-RT in eight patients who received preoperative or curative intent irradiation.

RESULTS

In the patients who received at least 66 Gy, the mean V95% was significantly better with IMRT than 3D-RT (p = 0.043). IMRT delivered a lower D2% compared to 3D-RT (p = 0.043). The IH was significantly better with IMRT (p = 0.043). The lung V 5 Gy and V 13 Gy were significantly higher in IMRT than 3D-RT (p = 0.043), while the maximal dose (D max) to the spinal cord was significantly lower in IMRT (p = 0.043). The brachial plexus D max was significantly lower in IMRT than 3D-RT (p = 0.048). For patients treated with 46 Gy, no significant differences were found.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that IMRT is relevant for SS-NSCLC. In patients treated with a curative dose, it led to a reduction of the exposure of critical organs, allowing a better dose distribution in the tumor. For the patients treated with a preoperative schedule, our results provide a basis for future controlled trials to improve the histological complete response by increasing the radiation dose.