Rules of parotid gland dose variations and shift during intensity modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Current state, challenges, and future perspective of adaptive radiotherapy: A narrative review of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma often experience weight loss and tumor regression during the course of radiotherapy that lasts for up to 6-7 weeks. Adaptive radiotherapy is a systematic feedback control approach based on image-guided technology that adjusts these changes and optimizes the radiotherapy plans according to new imaging findings during treatment. There is growing evidence that adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects, improve the quality of life, and enhance disease control. However, the routine application of adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal remains relatively limited. This review discusses the necessity, clinical benefits, and limitations of adaptive radiotherapy, and presents the current state, challenges, and future perspective of adaptive radiotherapy strategies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Anatomical changes and dosimetric analysis of the neck region based on FBCT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients during radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate anatomical changes in the neck region and evaluate their impact on dose distribution in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Additionally, the study sought to determine the optimal time for replanning during the course of treatment.

METHODS

Twenty patients diagnosed with NPC underwent IMRT, with weekly pretreatment kV fan beam computed tomography (FBCT) scans in the treatment room. Metastasized lymph nodes in the neck region and organs at risk (OARs) were redelineation using the images from the FBCT scans. Subsequently, the original treatment plan (PLAN0) was replicated to each FBCT scan to generate new plans labeled as PLAN 1-6. The dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the new plans and the original plan were compared. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was utilized to establish threshold(s) at various time points. The presence of such threshold(s) would signify significant change(s), suggesting the need for replanning.

RESULTS

Progressive volume reductions were observed over time in the neck region, the gross target volume for metastatic lymph nodes (GTVnd), as well as the submandibular glands and parotids. Compared to PLAN0, the mean dose (Dmean) of GTVnd-L significantly increased in PLAN5, while the minimum dose covering 95% of the volume (D95%) of PGTVnd-L showed a significant decrease from PLAN3 to PLAN6. Similarly, the Dmean of GTVnd-R significantly increased from PLAN4 to PLAN6, whereas the D95% of PGTVnd-R exhibited a significant decrease during the same period. Furthermore, the dose of bilateral parotid glands, bilateral submandibular glands, brainstem and spinal cord was gradually increased in the middle and late period of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Significant anatomical and dosimetric changes were noted in both the target volumes and OARs. Considering the thresholds identified, it is imperative to undertake replanning at approximately 20 fractions. This measure ensures the delivery of adequate doses to target volumes while mitigating the risk of overdosing on OARs.

Effect of Body Size Change on Off-Center Cervical Point and Face Doses in Patients Undergoing Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a clinically multiple malignant tumor. At present, with the increase in the infection rate of Epstein-Barr virus, the incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is also increasing day by day. To explore the effect of body size change on off-center cervical point and face doses in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing radiotherapy, in total, 100 patients with NPC from January 2019 to May 2020 in our hospital were selected for retrospective analysis, and they all received intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Bodyweight, horizontal longitudinal diameter of the odontoid process, longitudinal diameter of the third cervical spine, maximum radiation dose, and average radiation dose of normal organs in the first and last treatments were assessed, and the correlation between normal organ irradiation dose and body size was analyzed. Bodyweight, horizontal longitudinal diameter of the odontoid process, and longitudinal diameter of the third cervical spine in the last treatment were lower than those in the first treatment, with a statistically significant difference. There was no statistically significant difference in the maximum normal organ irradiation dose to the left eyeball, right eyeball, left crystalline lens, right crystalline lens, and maximum irradiation dose to optic nerve between the last treatment and the first treatment. In the last treatment, the maximum dose to the left parotid gland, right parotid gland, spinal cord, and brain stem was higher than that in the first treatment. The average irradiation dose to the left eye bulb, right eye bulb, left lens, right lens, optic nerve in the last treatment, and that in the first treatment showed no significant difference. The average dose to the left parotid gland, right parotid gland, spinal cord, and brain stem in the last treatment was higher than that in the first treatment. The irradiation dose to the left parotid gland, right parotid gland, spinal cord, and brain stem was significantly negatively correlated with body weight, horizontal longitudinal diameter of the odontoid process, and longitudinal diameter of the third cervical spine. After NPC radiotherapy, the body size of patients can change, which can have different effects on irradiation doses. Therefore, the target area and dose should be corrected during treatment to ensure the efficacy and safety of the treatment.

Dosimetric comparisons of craniospinal axis irradiation using helical tomotherapy, volume-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for medulloblastoma

Background

To evaluate the potential dosimetric gains of helical tomotherapy (HT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) of medulloblastoma.

Methods

A total of 36 treatment plans were calculated retrospectively for 12 patients with medulloblastoma receiving CSI using HT with TomoTherapy Hi-Art Software (Version 2.0.7) (Accuray, Madison, WI, USA). For each case, the other two different delivery techniques were re-planned with IMRT/VMAT optimized with Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) (Version 11.0.31). Homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) sparing were analyzed. Differences in plans were evaluated using paired-samples t-test for various dosimetric parameters.

Results

HT yielded the highest CI in all PTV coverage including PTV of gross tumor volume (PGTV) (HT: 0.7163; VMAT: 0.6688; IMRT: 0.6096), PTVbrain (HT: 0.8490; VMAT: 0.8384; IMRT: 0.7815) and PTVspine (HT: 0.5904; VMAT: 0.5862; IMRT: 0.5797). Meanwhile, HT yielded better HI in PGTV (HT: 0.0543; VMAT: 0.0759; IMRT: 0.0736), PTVbrain (HT: 0.5525; VMAT: 0.5619; IMRT: 0.5554) and PTVspine (HT: 0.0700; VMAT: 0.0782; IMRT: 0.0877). As for OARs, HT demonstrated marked superiority in critical organs including maximal/mean doses of brainstem PRV, optical chiasm and optic nerves.

Conclusions

For CSI of medulloblastoma, HT offers superior outcomes in terms of PTV conformity, PTV homogeneity and critical OAR sparing as compared with IMRT/VMAT.

Analyzing human decisions in IGRT of head-and-neck cancer patients to teach image registration algorithms what experts know

Background

In IGRT of deformable head-and-neck anatomy, patient setup corrections are derived by rigid registration methods. In practice, experienced radiation therapists often correct the resulting vectors, thus indicating a different prioritization of alignment of local structures. Purpose of this study is to transfer the knowledge experts apply when correcting the automatically generated result (pre-match) to automated registration.

Methods

Datasets of 25 head-and-neck-cancer patients with daily CBCTs and corresponding approved setup correction vectors were analyzed. Local similarity measures were evaluated to identify the criteria for human corrections with regard to alignment quality, analogous to the radiomics approach. Clustering of similarity improvement patterns is applied to reveal priorities in the alignment quality.

Results

The radiation therapists prioritized to align the spinal cord closest to the high-dose area. Both target volumes followed with second and third highest priority. The bony pre-match influenced the human correction along the crania-caudal axis. Based on the extracted priorities, a new rigid registration procedure is constructed which is capable of reproducing the corrections of experts.

Conclusions

The proposed approach extracts knowledge of experts performing IGRT corrections to enable new rigid registration methods that are capable of mimicking human decisions. In the future, the deduction of knowledge-based corrections for different cohorts can be established automating such supervised learning approaches.