Infections after fiducial marker implantation for prostate radiotherapy: are we underestimating the risks?

Transperineal versus transrectal prostate fiducial insertion in radiation treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To provide more accurate and definitive conclusions regarding the clinical and technical complications associated with the transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR) approaches, a comprehensive review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials was conducted. This systematic review covered all eligible studies to facilitate a thorough comparison of complications linked to the two fiducial marker insertion methods, TP and TR.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted, encompassing databases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, up to July 7, 2023. The relative risk and 95% confidence interval were utilized to evaluate the diagnosis and complication rates.

RESULTS

The final selection for the methodological quality analysis included 13 observational studies that utilized TP and TR gold fiducial insertion approaches. The meta-analysis revealed significantly lower risks of urinary tract infections (UTI) and rectal bleeding with the TP approach.

CONCLUSION

The use of both TP and TR techniques for placing gold seed fiducial markers has proven to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated method for image-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients. A significant benefit of the TP technique is its ability to avoid rectal puncture, thereby reducing the risk of UTIs. Although the incidence of UTIs and rectal bleeding associated with the TR method is relatively low, these complications can disrupt patient wellbeing and potentially cause delays in treatment.

The role of a radiopaque peri-rectal hydrogel spacer in aiding accurate daily image-guidance for prostate stereotactic radiotherapy

Introduction

Precise patient positioning with image guidance (IGRT) is essential for safe prostate radiotherapy. We present the first report of utilizing a CT-visible hydrogel spacer, used to decrease rectal radiation dose, as a surrogate fiducial marker to aid in daily IGRT with cone-beam CT (CBCT) in stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) for prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

Prior to CT simulation, patients underwent placement of three intraprostatic gold fiducial markers and radiopaque hydrogel spacer per standard practice. At treatment, after initial setup, a CBCT was acquired and fused to the planning CT based on 3-dimensional matching of the spacer. A second alignment was then performed based on the fiducial markers. The six directional shifts (three linear and three rotational) were recorded, and the differences compared.

Results

140 individual fractions across 41 consecutive patients were evaluated. Mean/median differences between hydrogel spacer-based and fiducial-based alignment in linear (vertical, longitudinal, lateral) and rotational (rotation, pitch, roll) shifts were 0.9/0.6mm, 0.8/0.5mm, and 0.6/0.4mm, and 0.38/0, 0.62/0, and 0.35/0 degrees, respectively. No difference was observed in 9.9%, 22.9%, and 22.14% of linear shifts, and 65.7%, 65%, and 66.4% rotational shifts, respectively. Significantly smaller differences were observed in the latter 70 fractions vs. the former, and results were consistent across evaluators.

Conclusions

For precise daily IGRT with CBCT for prostate SABR, alignment using a radiopaque hydrogel spacer was highly comparable to intraprostatic fiducial markers. This represents the first report supporting an additional indication of IGRT for a CT-visible hydrogel spacer, to further enhance treatment accuracy and potentially obviate the need for the additional fiducial marker procedure.

Optimal planning target margin for prostate radiotherapy based on interfractional and intrafractional variability assessment during 1.5T MRI-guided radiotherapy

Introduction

We analyzed daily pre-treatment- (PRE) and real-time motion monitoring- (MM) MRI scans of patients receiving definitive prostate radiotherapy (RT) with 1.5 T MRI guidance to assess interfractional and intrafractional variability of the prostate and suggest optimal planning target volume (PTV) margin.

Materials and methods

Rigid registration between PRE-MRI and planning CT images based on the pelvic bone and prostate anatomy were performed. Interfractional setup margin (SM) and interobserver variability (IO) were assessed by comparing the centroid values of prostate contours delineated on PRE-MRIs. MM-MRIs were used for internal margin (IM) assessment, and PTV margin was calculated using the van Herk formula.

Results

We delineated 400 prostate contours on PRE-MRI images. SM was 0.57 ± 0.42, 2.45 ± 1.98, and 2.28 ± 2.08 mm in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions, respectively, after bone localization and 0.76 ± 0.57, 1.89 ± 1.60, and 2.02 ± 1.79 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively, after prostate localization. IO was 1.06 ± 0.58, 2.32 ± 1.08, and 3.30 ± 1.85 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively, after bone localization and 1.11 ± 0.55, 2.13 ± 1.07, and 3.53 ± 1.65 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively, after prostate localization. Average IM was 2.12 ± 0.86, 2.24 ± 1.07, and 2.84 ± 0.88 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. Calculated PTV margin was 2.21, 5.16, and 5.40 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively.

Conclusions

Movements in the SI direction were the largest source of variability in definitive prostate RT, and interobserver variability was a non-negligible source of margin. The optimal PTV margin should also consider the internal margin.

CT-guided Transgluteal Prostate Fiducial Marker Insertion for Localized Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

To Evaluate the safety and technical success of transgluteal CT-guided fiducial marker implantation into the prostate as an alternative method to transperineal and transrectal approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients who had undergone CT-guided transgluteal fiducial marker insertion between 2020 and 2022. Four patients with confirmed prostate cancer were identified. One radiologist performed all procedures via a bilateral transgluteal approach under the guidance of real-time CT-fluoroscopy. Twenty cm long pre-waxed 18G guiding needles, preloaded with smooth gold fiducial markers, were used to implant markers. Technical success was defined as the successful placement of the fiducial markers into the planned positions.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 70 years. The mean procedure time was 19.25 (SD: 6.75) min, and the mean total dose length product (DLP) was 801.75 (SD: 291.17) mGycm, which is compatible with the 12 mSv estimated effective dose. All procedures were technically successful (100%). All patients tolerated the procedure and did not require any analgesia for pain, and there were no requests to stop or pause the procedure. Only one patient reported hematuria one day after the procedure, which required no treatment.

CONCLUSION

Transgluteal CT-guided fiducial marker implantation into the prostate is an alternative method to transperineal and transrectal approaches. In this technique, the risk of septic complications is minor, and general anesthesia is not required. Thus, transgluteal CT-guided marker insertion is a feasible and well-tolerated method for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in patients with prostate cancer.

Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes. Many studies reported low to moderate rates of complications following FM implantation. In the current study, we present our five years' experience regarding the insertion technique, technical success, and rates of complication and migration of intraprostatic insertion of FM gold marker.

METHODS

From January 2018 to January 2023, 795 patients with prostate cancer candidate for IGRT (with or without a history of radical prostatectomy) enrolled in this study. We used three fiducial markers (3*0.6 mm) inserted through an 18-gauge Chiba needle under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance. The patients were observed for complications up to seven days after the procedure. Besides, the rate of marker migration was recorded.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed successfully, and all patients tolerated the procedure well with minimal discomfort. The rate of sepsis after the procedure was 1%, and transient urinary obstruction was 1.6%. Only two patients experienced marker migration shortly after insertion, and no fiducial migration was reported throughout radiotherapy. No other major complication was recorded.

DISCUSSION

TRUS-guided intraprostatic FM implantation is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in most patients. The FM migration can seldom occur, with negligible effects. This study can provide convincing evidence that TRUS-guided intra-prostatic FM insertion is an appropriate choice for IGRT.

Infection after prostatic transrectal fiducial marker implantation for image guided radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the risk of infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2020, 829 patients scheduled for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer had an intraprostatic fiducial marker transrectal implantation under ultrasound guidance by radiation-oncologists specialized in brachytherapy. Patients received standard oral prophylactic antibiotic with quinolone. If Gram negative bacteria resistant to quinolone were detected at the time of the prostate cancer biopsies, the antibioprophylaxis regimen was modified accordingly. The resistance to quinolone screening test was not repeated before fiducial marker insertion. Infectious complications were assessed with questionnaires at the time of CT-planning and medical record reviewed. Toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

The median time between fiducial marker implantation and evaluation was 10 days (range: 0-165 days). Four patients (0.48%) developed urinary tract infection related to the procedure, mostly with Gram-negative bacteria resistant to quinolone (75%). Three had a grade 2 infection, and one patient experienced a grade 3 urosepsis. The quinolone-resistance status was known for two patients (one positive and one negative) and was unknown for the other two patients prior to fiducial marker implantation.

CONCLUSION

Intraprostatic transrectal fiducial marker implantation for image-guided radiotherapy is well tolerated with a low rate of infection. With such a low rate of infection, there is no need to repeat the search of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to quinolone before fiducial marker implantation if it was done at the time of prostate biopsies. Optimal antibioprophylaxis should be adapted to the known status of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to quinolone.

Injectable Fiducial Marker for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy Based on Gold Nanoparticles and a Body Temperature-Activated Gel-Forming System

Injectable fiducial markers are crucial in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) due to their minimally invasive operations and improved patient compliance. This study presents the development of a ready-to-use injectable fiducial marker utilizing alginate stabilized-gold nanoparticles (alg-Au NPs) and a body temperature-activated in situ gel-forming system. Gram-scale alg-Au NPs were prepared in an hour by a green microwave-induced plasma-in-liquid process (MWPLP). Sodium alginate was introduced in this process to avoid aggregation between Au NPs, which ensured their stability and injectability. The gelation behavior of alginate with divalent cations and a temperature-dependent release of calcium source (glucono-delta-lactone (GDL) and CaCO3) served as the foundation of the body temperature-activated in situ gel-forming system. The injectable fiducial marker GDL/CaCO3/alg-Au NPs could maintain a liquid state at a low temperature for a higher injectability. After injection, on the other hand, Ca2+ would be released due to the body temperature-activated hydrolysis of GDL and the subsequent reaction with CaCO3, which would initiate the gelation of alginate. The injectable fiducial marker can be therefore delivered via injection and form gel at target site to avoid marker movement or Au NPs leakage after injection. Rheological measurements demonstrate the stability and gelation behavior of GDL/CaCO3/alg-Au NPs at different temperatures. Furthermore, the injectability and imaging ability of GDL/CaCO3/alg-Au NPs were also examined. In summary, ready-to-use injectable fiducial marker GDL/CaCO3/alg-Au NPs were developed via a green and facile method for IGRT.

Preparation of Biopex-Supported Gold Nanoparticles as Potential Fiducial Markers for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has emerged as a promising technique for cancer treatment to improve radiation precision and accuracy, thereby reducing the treatment toxicity and optimizing therapeutic efficacy. In IGRT, fiducial markers are required to be inserted near the tumor to get the spatial information of the tumor. Currently used metal fiducial markers with large sizes would be highly invasive; therefore, it is critical to develop minimally invasive alternatives to these markers. In this work, an injectable marker based on Biopex-supported Au NPs with adequate radio-opacity for X-ray visualization was developed. Biopex can function as a substrate for the growth of Au NPs and avoid excessive reaction-induced aggregation and precipitation. The self-curing property of Biopex prevents the leakage and elimination of isolated Au NPs, enabling long-term X-ray observation and radiotherapy. The effect of Biopex amount, gold precursor concentration, and reaction time were evaluated. The visibility of samples prepared by the optimized formula was also examined. The developed Biopex-Au NPs could be injected through a 21 G needle and exhibit great visibility in the X-ray visualization test, showing great potential as a fiducial marker for image-guided radiation therapy.

Automatic localization of the prostatic urethra for image guided radiation therapy

•

Prostatic urethra can be used for image guided radiation for prostate cancer.

•

Computer “finds” the urethra by digital subtraction of scans with / without contrast.

•

Urethra segmentation used to setup the patient and position prostate as in simulation.

•

A catheter with continuous aerated gel flow is used to detect the urethra under US.

Treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy (RT) requires image guided RT (IGRT) to focus the radiation on the target volumes while minimizing doses to organs at risk. Here we describe a urinary catheter that allows imaging of the prostatic urethra and uses it for automatic localization of the prostate for IGRT. The catheter has a contrast lumen that can be empty or full with contrast. Computerized tomography is performed twice, with contrast lumen empty and full, allowing urethral autosegmentation using digital subtraction. Under ultrasound, continuous urethral visualization is possible by pumping aerated gel in- and out of the contrast lumen.

Feasibility of transrectal and transperineal fiducial marker placement for prostate cancer before proton therapy

BACKGROUND

To compare the feasibility of transrectal and transperineal fiducial marker placement for prostate cancer before proton therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2013 to 2015, the first 40 prostate cancer patients that were scheduled for proton therapy underwent transrectal fiducial marker placement, and the next 40 patients underwent transperineal fiducial marker placement (the first series). Technical and clinical success and pain scores were evaluated. In the second series (n = 280), the transrectal or transperineal approach was selected depending on the presence/absence of comorbidities, such as blood coagulation abnormalities. Seven patients refused to undergo the procedure. Thus, the total number of patients across both series was 353 (262 and 91 underwent the transrectal and transperineal approach, respectively). Technical and clinical success, complications, marker migration and the distance between the two markers were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the first series, the technical and clinical success rates were 100% in both groups. The transrectal group exhibited lower pain scores than the transperineal group. The overall technical success rates of the transrectal and transperineal groups were 100% (262/262) and 99% (90/91), respectively (P > 0.05). The overall clinical success rate was 100% in both groups, and there were no major complications in either group. The migration rates of the two groups did not differ significantly. The mean distance between the two markers was 25.6 ± 7.1 mm (mean ± standard deviation) in the transrectal group and 31.9 ± 5.2 mm in the transperineal group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the transrectal and transperineal fiducial marker placement methods are feasible and safe.

Multiparametric prostate MRI-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy guided by prostatic calcifications

OBJECTIVES

The optimal technique to administer image-guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer remains poorly defined. This study assessed outcomes after multiparametric prostate MRI-based planning was delivered with image-guided radiation therapy using prostatic calculi observed on cone beam CT (CBCT).

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2017, 94 consecutive patients were treated with CBCT-based image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) without fiducial markers. MRI was routinely incorporated for target delineation and intraprostatic tumor nodules were boosted to allow reduced doses to normal appearing prostate. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of prostatic calcifications while toxicity and biochemical control were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 39.7 months with 82% NCCN intermediate to very high risk. Intraprostatic calculi were noted in 68% of patients. The 3-year biochemical control, late grade ≥2 rectal toxicity and late grade ≥2 urinary toxicity rates were 96%, 3 and 7%, respectively. Biochemical control and toxicity were not significantly impacted by the presence of prostatic calculi.

CONCLUSION

Prostatic calcifications can serve as natural fiducial markers to allow for non-invasive IGRT for prostate cancer with promising early disease control and toxicity outcomes.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Prostate calcification-guided IGRT is technically feasible.

Cost-Effectiveness of the Use of Gold Anchor™ Markers in Prostate Cancer

Introduction

A common treatment for prostate cancer is external beam radiation therapy. A way to target the radiation is to use implantable gold fiducial markers (GFMs). The GFMs serve as reference points enabling tumor localization during treatment. Today, there are several GFMs available on the market but no clinical guidelines as to which one to use. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of Gold Anchor GFMs (Naslund Medical AB, Huddinge, Sweden) implanted with a 22G needle, compared to other GFMs implanted with a 17-18G needle, in the prostate gland of patients with prostate cancer.

Methods

Costs, life years, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated over a lifelong time horizon for each treatment strategy using a decision-analytic model. Data used in the model were obtained from published literature or were estimated by an expert elicitation technique. The primary outcome measure was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Results

Gold Anchor GFM was found to be a dominant alternative with both lower costs [-8.7 US Dollars (USD)] and a gain in QALYs (0.015) when compared with other GFMs. The lower cost was achieved by fewer visits for imaging in treatment planning, and by reduced risk of infections and sepsis. The QALY gain was driven by a reduced risk of sepsis.

Conclusion

The use of Gold Anchor GFMs as reference points to target radiation is a cost-effective alternative when compared to other GFMs. However, this analysis is based on expert elicitation regarding some crucial parameters, and further clinical studies of the use of GFMs are needed.

Multimodal soft tissue markers for bridging high-resolution diagnostic imaging with therapeutic intervention

Diagnostic imaging often outperforms the surgeon's ability to identify small structures during therapeutic procedures. Smart soft tissue markers that translate the sensitivity of diagnostic imaging into optimal therapeutic intervention are therefore highly warranted. This paper presents a unique adaptable liquid soft tissue marker system based on functionalized carbohydrates (Carbo-gel). The liquid state of these markers allows for high-precision placement under image guidance using thin needles. Based on step-by-step modifications, the image features and mechanical properties of markers can be optimized to bridge diagnostic imaging and specific therapeutic interventions. The performance of Carbo-gel is demonstrated for markers that (i) have radiographic, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound visibility; (ii) are palpable and visible; and (iii) are localizable by near-infrared fluorescence and radio guidance. The study demonstrates encouraging proof of concept for the liquid marker system as a well-tolerated multimodal imaging marker that can improve image-guided radiotherapy and surgical interventions, including robotic surgery.

Improving 3D ultrasound prostate localisation in radiotherapy through increased automation of interfraction matching

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Daily image guidance is standard care for prostate radiotherapy. Innovations which improve the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasound guidance are needed, particularly with respect to reducing interobserver variation. This study explores automation tools for this purpose, demonstrated on the Elekta Clarity Autoscan®. The study was conducted as part of the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ultrasound scan volumes were collected from 32 patients. Prostate matches were performed using two proposed workflows and the results compared with Clarity's proprietary software. Gold standard matches derived from manually localised landmarks provided a reference. The two workflows incorporated a custom 3D image registration algorithm, which was benchmarked against a third-party application (Elastix).

RESULTS

Significant reductions in match errors were reported from both workflows compared to standard protocol. Median (IQR) absolute errors in the left-right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes were lowest for the Manually Initiated workflow: 0.7(1.0) mm, 0.7(0.9) mm, 0.6(0.9) mm compared to 1.0(1.7) mm, 0.9(1.4) mm, 0.9(1.2) mm for Clarity. Median interobserver variation was ≪0.01 mm in all axes for both workflows compared to 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, 1.5 mm for Clarity in left-right, anteroposterior and craniocaudal axes. Mean matching times was also reduced to 43 s from 152 s for Clarity. Inexperienced users of the proposed workflows attained better match precision than experienced users on Clarity.

CONCLUSION

Automated image registration with effective input and verification steps should increase the efficacy of interfraction ultrasound guidance compared to the current commercially available tools.

Observer uncertainties of soft tissue-based patient positioning in IGRT

Purpose

There remain uncertainties due to inter‐ and intraobserver variability in soft‐tissue‐based patient positioning even with the use of image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT). This study aimed to reveal observer uncertainties of soft‐tissue‐based patient positioning on cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images for prostate cancer IGRT.

Methods

Twenty‐six patients (7–8 fractions/patient, total number of 204 fractions) who underwent IGRT for prostate cancer were selected. Six radiation therapists retrospectively measured prostate cancer location errors (PCLEs) of soft‐tissue‐based patient positioning between planning CT (pCT) and pretreatment CBCT (pre‐CBCT) images after automatic bone‐based registration. Observer uncertainties were evaluated based on residual errors, which denoted the differences between soft‐tissue and reference positioning errors. Reference positioning errors were obtained as PCLEs of contour‐based patient positioning between pCT and pre‐CBCT images. Intraobserver variations were obtained from the difference between the first and second soft‐tissue‐based patient positioning repeated by the same observer for each fraction. Systematic and random errors of inter‐ and intraobserver variations were calculated in anterior–posterior (AP), superior–inferior (SI), and left–right (LR) directions. Finally, clinical target volume (CTV)‐to‐planning target volume (PTV) margins were obtained from systematic and random errors of inter‐ and intraobserver variations in AP, SI, and LR directions.

Results

Interobserver variations in AP, SI, and LR directions were 0.9, 0.9, and 0.5 mm, respectively, for the systematic error, and 1.8, 2.2, and 1.1 mm, respectively, for random error. Intraobserver variations were <0.2 mm in all directions. CTV‐to‐PTV margins in AP, SI, and LR directions were 3.5, 3.8, and 2.1 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

Intraobserver variability was sufficiently small and would be negligible. However, uncertainties due to interobserver variability for soft‐tissue‐based patient positioning using CBCT images should be considered in CTV‐to‐PTV margins.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy with optional focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer: Topical review and multicenter consensus

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining interest by the recent publication of the first phase III trials on prostate SBRT and the promising results of many other phase II trials. Before long term results became available, the major concern for implementing SBRT in PCa in daily clinical practice was the potential risk of late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. A number of recently published trials, including late outcome and toxicity data, contributed to the growing evidence for implementation of SBRT for PCa in daily clinical practice. However, there exists substantial variability in delivering SBRT for PCa. The aim of this topical review is to present a number of prospective trials and retrospective analyses of SBRT in the treatment of PCa. We focus on the treatment strategies and techniques used in these trials. In addition, recent literature on a simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor lesion, which could create an additional value in the SBRT treatment of PCa, was described. Furthermore, we discuss the multicenter consensus of the FLAME consortium on SBRT for PCa with a focal boost to the macroscopic intraprostatic tumor nodule(s).

The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

We evaluated the setup accuracy of a three‐degree‐of‐freedom fiducial marker (3DOF‐FM)‐based setup compared to a soft tissue (ST)‐based setup in hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed the setup accuracy for 17 consecutive prostate cancer patients with three implanted FMs who underwent hypofractionated IMRT. The 3DOF‐ST‐based setup using cone‐beam computed tomography (CT) was performed after a six DOF‐bony structure (BS)‐based setup using an ExacTrac x‐ray system. The 3DOF‐FM‐based matching using the ExacTrac x‐ray system was done during the BS‐ and ST‐based setups. We determined the mean absolute differences and the correlation between the FM‐ and ST‐based translational shifts relative to the BS‐based setup position. The rotational mean shifts detected by the ExacTrac x‐ray system were also evaluated.

Results

The mean differences in the anterior‐posterior (AP), superior‐inferior (SI), and left‐right (LR) dimensions were 0.69, 0.0, and 0.30 mm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients for both shifts were 0.92 for AP, 0.91 for SI, and 0.68 for LR. The percentages of shift agreements within 2 mm were 85% for AP, 93% for SI, and 99% for LR. The absolute values of rotational shifts were 0.1° for AP, 0.3°, and 1.2° for LR.

Conclusions

The setup accuracy of the 3DOF‐FM‐based setup has the potential to be interchangeable with a ST‐based setup. Our data are likely to be useful in clinical practice along with the popularization of the hypofractionated IMRT in prostate cancer.

The Utility of Penile Bulb Contouring to Localise the Prostate Apex as Compared to Urethrography

PURPOSE

High-precision radiotherapy relies on accurate anatomic localisation. Urethrography is often used to localise the prostatic apex. However, urethrography is an invasive localisation procedure and may introduce a systemic error. The penile bulb (PB) is contoured to minimise the risk of erectile dysfunction. The purpose of this study is to assess the value of using the PB, as an alternative to urethrography, to localise the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The PB was localised on 10 patients treated with simplified intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy at computed tomography simulation during treatment weeks 1 and 7. All patients underwent placement of fiducial markers. Urethrography was used only at simulation. Distances from the superior PB contour to the inferior prostate contour, the apex fiducial marker, and to the inferior prostate contour were obtained as well. The PB was contoured by two observers independently. Agreement coefficients and analysis of variance were used to assess reliability between rates and consistency of measurements over time.

RESULTS

The PB-apex distance was greater than or equal to the urethrogram-apex distance in 24/30 (80%) measurements, and the median difference was 3 mm and was consistent between raters. The greatest variation in PB-IM distance between weeks was 6 mm, the median was 3 mm, and the agreements of measurements between weeks for raters 1 and 2 were 0.79 and 0.69, respectively. These differences were not statistically different and were consistent with the computed tomography slice thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

The PB can be used to identify the prostate apex and can be reliably contoured between observers. Measurements are consistent between patients and through the duration of treatment. The PB distance measurements support studies indicating that urethrography causes a shift of the prostate superiorly. The distance from the PB to prostate apex remains stable during treatment for individual patients but varies between patients.

Low Infection Rate After Transrectal Implantation of Gold Anchor ™ Fiducial Markers in Prostate Cancer Patients After Non-broad-spectrum Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Background In 621 consecutive prostate cancer patients, the frequency of urinary tract infections (UTI) and marker loss was evaluated. They prophylactically received a single dose of non-broad-spectrum antibiotics and transrectal implantation of three thin needle fiducial markers, Gold Anchor ™ (GA). Methods The occurrence of UTIs, sepsis, hospitalization due to infection, and marker loss after implantation was assessed from the medical records containing notes from physicians and nurses from the day of implantation to the end of 29 fractions. Results UTIs occurred in two (0.3%) of the 621 patients. Neither sepsis nor hospitalization was noted. Loss/drop-out of three markers was noted among 1,863 markers implanted. Conclusion The use of thin needles for the implantation of fiducials appears to reduce the rate of infection despite the use of a single dose of non-broad-spectrum antibiotics as prophylaxis. The marker construct appears to provide stability in the tissues.

Fiducial markers implantation for prostate image-guided radiotherapy: a report on the transperineal approach

INTRODUCTION

In the external beam prostate cancer radiation therapy, daily gland displacement could lead to a target missing. The use of intra-prostatic gold fiducial markers for daily prostate position verification and correction before and during treatment delivery (image-guided radiotherapy, IGRT) is widely used in the radiation therapy centers to accurately target the prostate. Usually, the fiducial markers are implanted through the rectum, with complications such as infections and rectal bleeding. We report our experience in prostate fiducial markers implantation through a transperineal approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2011 and January 2018 at our center, 101 patients underwent gold seed fiducial marker transperineal ultrasound-guided implantation for prostate IGRT. We retrospectively reviewed their features and outcome. Twenty-two (21.8%) patients had previously been subjected to a transurethral prostate resection (TURP) for obstructive urinary symptoms because of benign prostatic hypertrophy. No antibiotic prophylaxis was used.

RESULTS

The procedure was well tolerated. In one patient, a single episode of self-limiting urinary bleeding occurred just after it. No other complication was recorded. All the patients, at the evaluation before discharge, reported no pain or dysuria. No rectal bleeding, hematospermia, urinary obstruction or infection were reported in the next days. No markers lost or migration occurred.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

According to our experience, prostate fiducial markers implantation through a transperineal approach is safe and should be recommended to limit the use of antibiotic therapy and patients morbidity. A previous TURP was not related to a higher risk of loss of seeds.

Characterization of a novel liquid fiducial marker for multimodal image guidance in stereotactic body radiotherapy of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Liquid fiducial markers have shown to be a promising alternative to solid gold markers in terms of imaging artifact reduction, patient comfort, and compatibility with different imaging modalities. This study aims to investigate the performance of the novel BioXmark^® liquid marker for state-of-the-art multimodal imaging used in prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy, encompassing kV CT/CBCT, multiparametric MRI, and kV x-ray imaging. In addition, automatic detection of the liquid markers in x-ray imaging for prostate motion monitoring during treatment was investigated.

METHODS

A total of eight BioXmark^® liquid markers with varying volumes (range 5-300 μL) were casted on a square grid into a gelatin phantom insert. A cylindrical gold marker (QLRAD, length = 7 mm, Ø = 1 mm) was inserted for reference. Liquid marker visibility and streaking artifacts in CT/CBCT imaging were evaluated by placing the gelatin phantom into a CIRS anthropomorphic phantom. Relevant MRI characteristics such as the T2 and T1 relaxation times, the ADC value, and the relative proton density (ρH) were quantified by placing the gelatin phantom insert next to a T1MES mapping phantom and a water-filled syringe for reference. Ex vivo multiparametric MRI images were acquired by placing the gelatin phantom next to a resected prostate specimen. Anterior-posterior x-ray projection images were obtained by placing the gelatin phantom insert on top of an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom with internal pelvic bony structures and were acquired for five positions relative to the bony anatomy and 24 clinically relevant x-ray exposure settings. To quantify individual automatic marker detection, single markers were artificially isolated in the x-ray images using postprocessing.

RESULTS

Markers of all sizes were clearly visible on CT and CBCT images with only the largest marker volumes (100-300 μL) displaying artifacts similar in size to the gold fiducial marker. Artifact size increased with increasing liquid marker volume. Liquid markers displayed good contrast in ex vivo T1-weighted and ρH-weighted images. The markers were not visible in the ex vivo T2-weighted image. The liquid markers induced a chemical shift artifact in the obtained ADC-map. Automated detection in x-ray imaging was feasible with high detection success (four of five positions) for marker volumes in the range of 25-200 μL. None of the liquid markers were detected successfully when superimposed on a bony edge, independent of their size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to show the compatibility of BioXmark^® liquid markers with multimodal image-guided radiotherapy for PCa. Compared to a solid gold marker, they had favorable results in both visibility and induced imaging artifacts. Liquid marker visibility in MRI imaging of the prostate does not solely depend on the low ρH value (not visible on T2-weighted image) but is also influenced by its relaxation times. Automated marker detection in x-ray images was feasible but better adapted marker detection algorithms are necessary for marker localization in the presence of bony edges. Hence, the liquid marker provides a minimally invasive (fine needles) and highly applicable alternative to current solid gold markers for multimodal image-guided prostate radiotherapy treatments.

The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in the External Beam Radiotherapy Workflow of Prostate Cancer Patients

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is one of the curative treatment options for prostate cancer patients. The aim of this treatment option is to irradiate tumor tissue, while sparing normal tissue as much as possible. Frequent imaging during the course of the treatment (image guided radiotherapy) allows for determination of the location and shape of the prostate (target) and of the organs at risk. This information is used to increase accuracy in radiation dose delivery resulting in better tumor control and lower toxicity. Ultrasound imaging is harmless for the patient, it is cost-effective, and it allows for real-time volumetric organ tracking. For these reasons, it is an ideal technique for image guidance during EBRT workflows. Review papers have been published in which the use of ultrasound imaging in EBRT workflows for different cancer sites (prostate, breast, etc.) was extensively covered. This new review paper aims at providing the readers with an update on the current status for prostate cancer ultrasound guided EBRT treatments.

Linear EBUS-guided fiducial marker placement to guide radiotherapy for endobronchial, radiographically occult synchronous primary squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

Radiation therapy has emerged as a useful alternative therapy for patients with early-stage, non-resectable lung cancer. In patients whose malignancies are difficult to localize on computed tomography imaging, such therapy becomes difficult. Fiducial markers are frequently placed in peripheral pulmonary lesions to assist radiation therapy. Although placement of markers under linear endobronchial ultrasonography within mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes has been reported, no strategy has been described to assist radiotherapy of purely endobronchial tumors. We present a case of bilateral, unresectable, radiographically occult endobronchial squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy guided by fiducial markers placed under linear endobronchial ultrasonographic guidance. The patient subsequently underwent intensity-modified radiation therapy to both lesions with pathologic complete response. Linear endobronchial ultrasound is a promising tool for placement of markers to guide radiation therapy of these difficult-to-treat lesions.

Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review

Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential tool in the accurate delivery of modern radiotherapy techniques. Prostate radiotherapy positioned using skin marks or bony anatomy may be adequate for delivering a relatively homogeneous whole-pelvic radiotherapy dose, but these surrogates are not reliable when using reduced margins, dose escalation or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Fiducial markers (FMs) for prostate IGRT have been in use since the 1990s. They require surgical implantation and provide a surrogate for the position of the prostate gland. A variety of FMs are available and they can be used in a number of ways. This review aimed to establish the evidence for using prostate FMs in terms of feasibility, implantation procedures, types of FMs used, FM migration, imaging modalities used and the clinical impact of FMs. A search strategy was defined and a literature search was carried out in Medline. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, which resulted in 50 articles being included in this review. The evidence demonstrates that FMs provide a more accurate surrogate for the position of the prostate than either external skin marks or bony anatomy. A combination of FM alignment and soft-tissue analysis is currently the most effective and widely available approach to ensuring accuracy in prostate IGRT. FM implantation is safe and well tolerated. FM migration is possible but minimal. Standardization of all techniques and procedures in relation to the use of prostate FMs is required. Finally, a clinical trial investigating a non-surgical alternative to prostate FMs is introduced.

Conventionally Fractionationed Volumetric Arc Therapy versus Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Quality of Life, Side Effects, and Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics in Localized Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To compare conventionally fractionationed volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) modalities in terms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients received radical radiotherapy as either 33.5 Gy/5 fr for SBRT or 75.6 Gy/35 fr for VMAT. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Prostate Cancer Module (QLQ-PR25) forms were used to assess QOL.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients (28 in SBRT and 20 in VMAT) included in the study, 40 (20 in SBRT and 20 in VMAT) were evaluated for QOL status. PSA control rate was 100% and PSA nadir value was 0.5 ng/dl in both arms during the median follow-up period of 23 months. The magnitude of PSA bounce was higher in the SBRT arm than in the VMAT arm (P = 0.01). The PSA decline rate in the VMAT arm was higher than in the SBRT arm (P = 0.028). Three (10.7%) patients treated with SBRT who had a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) experienced grade 3 urinary toxicity. No significant difference was observed concerning sexual activity and sexual functioning scores, whereas scores at 10.5 and 13.5 months were decreased in both arms. The SBRT and VMAT arms had similar urinary incontinence, bowel symptoms, and IPSS obstruction scores. The magnitude of increase in IPSS scores at treatment completion was higher in the VMAT arm than in the SBRT arm (P = 0.046). The decrease in hormonal symptom scores at 4.5, 10.5, and 13.5 months was higher in the VMAT arm than in the SBRT arm (P = 0.007, 0.027, and 0.021, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatment modalities had similar effectiveness and provided acceptable outcomes in terms of toxicity and QOL. Grade 3 urinary toxicities might be eliminated with careful patient selection for SBRT.

Extreme hypofractionation for early prostate cancer: Biology meets technology

The aim of this review is to present the available radiobiological, technical and clinical data about extreme hypofractionation in primary prostate cancer radiotherapy. The interest in this technique is based on the favourable radiobiological characteristics of prostate cancer and supported by advantageous logistic aspects deriving from short overall treatment time. The clinical validity of short-term treatment schedule is proven by a body of non-randomised studies, using both isocentric (LINAC-based) or non-isocentric (CyberKnife^®-based) stereotactic body irradiation techniques. Twenty clinical studies, each enrolling more than 40 patients for a total of 1874 treated patients, were revised in terms of technological setting, toxicity, outcome and quality of life assessment. The implemented strategies for the tracking of the prostate and the sparing of the rectal wall have been investigated with particular attention. The urinary toxicity after prostate stereotactic body irradiation seems slightly more pronounced as compared to rectal adverse events, and this is more evident for late occurring events, but no worse as respect to conventional fractionation schemes. As far as the rate of severe acute toxicity is concerned, in all the available studies the treatment was globally well tolerated. While awaiting long-term data on efficacy and toxicity, the analysed studies suggest that the outcome profile of this approach, alongside the patient convenience and reduced costs, is promising. Forty-eight ongoing clinical trials are also presented as a preview of the expectation from the near future.

Bacterial Urinary Tract Infection after Transrectal Placement of Fiducial Markers prior to Proton Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of a bacterial urinary tract infection (UTI) necessitating hospitalization after transrectal placement of fiducial markers prior to proton radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six hundred sixty six patients returning for follow up after proton RT consented to participate in this institutional review board (IRB) approved study. Patients were queried whether they required hospitalization within 1 month of transrectal placement of fiducial markers. Patients were treated with proton RT between August 2006 and December 2014. Median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 7. Sixty four patients (9.6%) had diabetes, 9 patients (1.4%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 6 patients (0.9%) had prior bladder surgery, 7 patients (1.1%) had a transurethral prostatectomy within 3 months, and 549 patients (82.4%) had a course of antibiotics within 6 months. Fifty five patients (8.3%) were taking tamsulosin, 16 patients (2.4%) were taking finasteride, and 62 patients (9.3%) were taking saw palmetto. The interval between the most recent prostate biopsy prior to fiducial placement and fiducial marker placement was less than 6 months in 609 patients (91.4%). No patient had a prior recent rectal culture.

RESULTS

Ten patients (1.5%) developed a bacterial UTI necessitating hospitalization after transrectal placement of fiducial markers. A bacterial UTI occurred in 3 (0.7%) of 440 patients treated from 2006 to 2012 and in 7 (3.1%) of 226 patients treated from 2013 to 2014. Univariate analysis of potential association of a bacterial UTI with the following parameters revealed: IPSS less than or greater than the median (p=0.3400), diabetes (p=0.6099), tamsulosin (p=0.9999), saw palmetto (p=0.0093), interval between prostate biopsy and placement of fiducials (p=0.9999), year of treatment (p=0.0363), and antibiotics within 6 months (p=0.2233). A bacterial UTI was observed in 4 (6.5%) of 62 patients who were taking saw palmetto versus 6 (1.0%) of 604 patients who were not taking this medication. The incidence of a bacterial UTI between 2006 and 2012 was 3 (0.7%) of 440 patients and from 2013 to 2014 was 7 (3.1%) of 226 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the likelihood of a bacterial UTI was increased in patients taking saw palmetto (p=0.0044) and those treated in 2013-2014 (p=0.0303).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of a bacterial UTI requiring hospitalization after transrectal placement of fiducial markers prior to proton RT was 1.5% and was impacted by taking saw palmetto and year of treatment. Patients treated during 2013 and 2014 had a significantly higher risk of a bacterial UTI requiring hospitalization.