Increased survival with the combination of stereotactic radiosurgery and gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis patients: a nationwide study in Taiwan

Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the decision making of patients in undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery

Purpose

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GK) is a commonly used approach for the treatment of intracranial lesions. Its radiation response is typically not immediate, but delayed. In this study, we analyzed cases from a prospectively collected database to assess the influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the decision making in patients treated by gamma knife radiosurgery.

Methods

From January 2019 to August 2021, 540 cases of intracranial lesions were treated by GK with 207 cases before COVID-19 pandemic as a control. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 333 cases were similarly treated on patients with or without the COVID-19 vaccination. All the GK treated parameters as well as time profile in the decision making were analyzed. The parameters included age, sex, characteristic of lesion, targeted volume, peripheral radiation dose, neurological status, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), time interval from MRI diagnosis to consultation, time interval from the approval to treatment, frequency of outpatient department (OPD) visit, and frequency of imaging follow-up.

Results

Longer time intervals from diagnosis to GK consultation and treatment were found in the pandemic group (36.8 ± 25.5/54.5 ± 27.6 days) compared with the pre-COVID control (17.1 ± 22.4/45.0 ± 28.0 days) or vaccination group (12.2 ± 7.1/29.6 ± 10.9 days) (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The fewer OPD visits and MRI examinations also showed the same trends. High proportion of neurological deficits were found in the pandemic group (65.4%) compared with the control (45.4%) or vaccination group (58.1%) (p < 0.001). The Charlson comorbidity in the pandemic group was 3.9 ± 3.3, the control group was 4.6 ± 3.2, and the vaccination group was 3.1 ± 3.1. There were similar inter-group difference (p < 0.001). In multiple variant analyses, longer time intervals from the diagnosis to consultation or treatment, OPD frequency and MRI examination were likely influenced by the status of the COVID-19 pandemic as they were alleviated by the vaccination.

Conclusions

The decision making in patients requiring gamma knife treatment was most likely influenced by the status of the COVID-19 pandemic, while vaccination appeared to attenuate their hesitant behaviors. Patients with pre-treatment neurological deficits and high co-morbidity undergoing the gamma knife treatment were less affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-022-00859-w.

Tumor Primary Site and Histology Subtypes Role in Radiotherapeutic Management of Brain Metastases

Randomized controlled trials have failed to report any survival advantage for WBRT combined with SRS in the management of brain metastases, despite the enhanced local and distant control in comparison to each treatment alone. Literature review have revealed important role of primary histology of the tumor when dealing with brain metastases. NSCLC responds better to combined approach even when there was only single brain metastasis present while breast cancer has registered better survival with SRS alone probably due to better response of primary tumor to advancement in surgical and chemotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, mutation status (EGFR/ALK) in lung cancer and receptor status (ER/PR/HER2) in breast cancer also exhibit diversity in their response to radiotherapy. Radioresistant tumors like renal cell carcinoma and melanoma brain metastases have achieved better results when treated with SRS alone. Secondly, single brain metastasis may benefit from local and distant brain control achieved with combined treatment. These diverse outcomes suggest a primary histology-based analysis of the radiotherapy regimens (WBRT, SRS, or their combination) would more ideally establish the role of radiotherapy in the management of brain metastases. Molecularly targeted therapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents have revealed synergism with radiation therapy particularly SRS in treating cancer patients with brain metastases. Clinical updates in this regard have also been reviewed.

Whole Brain Radiation Therapy Plus Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brain Metastases Leading to Improved Survival in Patients With Favorable Prognostic Factors

Background: Significantly better local control is achieved with combination of whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. However, no survival benefit was reported from this advantage in local control. Objective: The objective of this study was to review the available evidence whether better local control achieved with whole brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery leads to any benefit in survival in patients with favorable prognostic factors. Methods and Materials: Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library) were searched until Oct 2018 to identify studies published in English that compared efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery vs. whole brain radiotherapy alone or stereotactic radiosurgery alone in patients with brain metastases stratified on prognostic indices (Recursive Partitioning Analysis and Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment). Primary outcome was survival. Results: Five studies (n = 2728) were identified, 3 secondary analyses of the previously published RCTs and 2 retrospective studies, meeting the inclusion criteria. whole brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery showed improved survival in brain metastatic cancer patients with better prognostic factors particularly when compared to whole brain radiotherapy only. Its survival advantage over stereotactic radiosurgery only was limited to non-small cell lung cancer primary tumor histology. Conclusions: Whole brain radiotherapy in combination with stereotactic radiosurgery may improve survival and could be recommended selectively in patients with favorable prognostic factors particularly in comparison to whole brain radiotherapy only.

Role of Recursive Partitioning Analysis and Graded Prognostic Assessment on Identifying Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases Who May Benefit from Postradiation Systemic Therapy

Background

The role of postradiation systemic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM) was controversial. Thus, we explored the role of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) and graded prognostic assessment (GPA) in identifying population who may benefit from postradiation systemic therapy.

Methods

The clinical data of NSCLC patients with documented BM from August 2007 to April 2015 of two hospitals were studied retrospectively. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Survival of patients with or without postradiation systemic therapy was compared in subgroups stratified according to RTOG-RPA or GPA.

Results

Of 216 included patients, 67.1% received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 24.1% received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and 8.8% received both. After radiotherapy, systemic therapy was administered in 58.3% of patients. Multivariate analysis found that postradiation systemic therapy (yes vs. no) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.361, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.202-0.648, P = 0.001), radiation technique (SRS vs. WBRT) (HR = 0.462, 95% CI = 0.238-0.849, P = 0.022), extracranial metastasis (yes vs. no) (HR = 3.970, 95% CI = 1.757-8.970, P = 0.001), and Karnofsky performance status (<70 vs. ≥70) (HR = 5.338, 95% CI = 2.829-10.072, P < 0.001) were independent factors for survival. Further analysis found that subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy could significantly reduce the risk of mortality of patients in RTOG-RPA Class II (HR = 0.411, 95% CI = 0.183-0.923, P = 0.031) or with a GPA score of 1.5-2.5 (HR = 0.420, 95% CI = 0.182-0.968, P = 0.042). However, none of the subgroups stratified according to RTOG-RPA or GPA benefited from the additional conventional chemotherapy.

Conclusion

RTOG-RPA and GPA may be useful to identify beneficial populations in NSCLC patients with BM if TKIs were chosen as postradiation systemic therapy.

The Road Less Traveled: Should We Omit Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer?

New randomized data from Japan have raised questions regarding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer but without detectable brain metastases on magnetic resonance imaging. In the present focused review, we examine the general role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the management of small-cell lung cancer and present relevant controversies from both sides of the discussion. Future directions for clinical investigation and research are also highlighted. Strategies for neurocognitive protection, including memantine use and hippocampal sparing using modulated radiotherapy techniques, are also presented.

Commentary: Treatment Considerations for Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Brain metastasis is a serious complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) affecting up to 40% of NSCLC patients. A subset of NSCLC tumors has mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, and determination of tumor EGFR mutation status is essential in guiding treatment decisions, as it directly affects the treatment approach. Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC have a higher cumulative incidence of brain metastases, and are especially sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients with newly diagnosed EGFR-mutated lung cancer presenting to a neurosurgeon with a new diagnosis of brain metastases now have a variety of treatment options available, including whole brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surgical resection, chemotherapy, and targeted therapeutics such as the EGFR TKIs. In this review, we discuss the impact of EGFR mutation status on brain and leptomeningeal metastasis treatment considerations. Additionally, we present clinical cases of patients treated with EGFR TKIs alone and in combination with other therapies to highlight treatment alternatives.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with central nervous system metastases: Two case reports and a review of the literature

RATIONALE

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are rarely seen in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

PATIENT CONCERNS

Two NPC patients developed CNS metastases were collected in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The medical records were reviewed to document patients' characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. In addition, we also provide an overview of the literature concerning this scenario.

DIAGNOSES

Both patients were staged T4N1M0 with pathologically confirmed CNS metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

After the completion of initial chemoradiotherapy, metastases to CNS including brain and/or spine occurred during follow-up. Surgical resection combined with palliative chemoradiation was offered to alleviate the symptoms.

OUTCOMES

Although multiple treatment modalities were given, both patients succumbed to disease progression.

LESSONS

The mechanism for CNS metastases is postulated through hematogenous route or cerebral spinal fluid spread. Good symptoms amelioration can be achieved with aggressive treatments such as surgery followed by palliative chemoradiation, but prognoses are ominous due to systematic disease dissemination.

The risk of cataractogenesis after gamma knife radiosurgery: a nationwide population based case-control study

Background

Medical radiation is considered a factor responsible for cataractogenesis. However, the incidence of this ophthalmologic complication resulting from gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has not yet been reported. The present study aimed to determine the risk of cataractogenesis associated with radiation exposure from GKRS.

Methods

This study used information from a random sample of one million persons enrolled in the nationally representative Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The GK group consisted of patients who underwent GKRS between 2000 and 2009. The non-GK group was composed of subjects who had never undergone GKRS, but who were matched with the case group for time of enrollment, age, sex, history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, and diabetes.

Results

There were 277 patients in the GK group and 2770 matched subjects in the non-GK group. The GK group had a higher overall incidence of cataracts (10.11% vs. 7.26%; crude hazard ratio [cHR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07–2.36; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.82–1.90) than the non-GK group. Patients who had undergone computed tomography and/or cerebral angiography (CT/angio) studies had a higher risk of developing cataracts than those who did not (10.82% vs. 6.64%; cHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.31–2.30; aHR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.22–2.23). The age group between 30 and 50 years had the highest risk of cataractogenesis in both the GK and CT/angio groups (cHR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.58–7.72; aHR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.02–5.81; cHR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.47–5.99; aHR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.05–4.93, respectively).

Conclusions

Radiation exposure due to GKRS and CT/angio study may be independently associated with increased risk of cataractogenesis. We suggest routine dosimetry measurement of eye lens and proper protection for patients with benign lesions during GKRS. Regular follow-up imaging studies should avoid the use of CT/angio, and particular care should be taken in the 30–50-year-old age group, due to their significantly increased risk of cataract formation.

Melanoma brain metastases: correlation of imaging features with genomic markers and patient survival

Purpose To identify MR imaging features of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) that correlate with genetic profile of melanoma and patient survival. Materials and methods Patients with newly diagnosed melanoma metastases were identified from institutional database A retrospective review of brain MRI was performed focusing on lesion number, size, T1-, T2- and diffusion-weighted signal characteristics, hemorrhage, necrosis, enhancement pattern and edema. Genomic (BRAF status), treatment and survival data was collected. Results 98 patients were included in final analysis. A strong correlation was found between size of the largest lesion and the percent of lesions with T1-weighted hyperintense signal (R = 0.49), percent of lesions with size >1 cm (0.55), and the lesions that are clearly hemorrhagic (0.43). The analyzed imaging parameters were found to be independent of BRAF mutation status. The median survival of subjects with single lesion (9.1 months) was significantly higher than the median survival of subjects with more than 1 lesion (4.9 months) (p = 0.002). Patients with 2-18 lesions had significantly longer survival (5.6 months) than with >18 lesions (2 months) (p < 0.001). Other imaging parameters such as lesion size, T1-weighted hyperintensity, number of lesions with edema and hemorrhage were not found to be significantly related to survival. BRAF inhibitor treatment was found to be the most significant prognostic factor (p = 0.002) among patients with multiple lesions. Conclusion There is a statistically significant correlation between number of brain metastases and survival. In patients with multiple lesions, BRAF inhibitor treatment was the most significant prognostic factor.

Icotinib combined whole brain radiotherapy for patients with brain metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

BACKGROUND

The brain is a metastatic organ that is most prone to lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). However, the prognosis of patients with brain metastasis remains very poor. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of icotinib plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for treating patients with brain metastasis from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated LAC.

METHODS

All patients received standard WBRT administered to the whole brain in 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions. Each patient was also instructed to take 125 mg icotinib thrice per day beginning from the first day of the WBRT. After completing the WBRT, maintenance icotinib was administered until the disease progressed or intolerable adverse effects were observed. Cranial progression-free survival (CPFS) and overall survival (OS) times were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were enrolled in this study. Two patients (4.7%) presented a complete response (CR), whereas 20 patients (46.5%) presented a partial response (PR). The median CPFS and OS times were 11.0 and 15.0 months, respectively. The one-year CPFS rate was 40.0% for the patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion and 16.7% for the patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R (P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent administration of icotinib and WBRT exhibited favorable effects on the patients with brain metastasis. EGFR exon 19 deletion was predictive of a long CPFS following icotinib plus WBRT.

Role of gefitinib in the targeted treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in Chinese patients

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. Conventional treatment options have limited efficacy because most cases are in the advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. In recent years, gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown its good antitumor activities in treating NSCLC in a number of studies. This paper reviews its role in the targeted treatment of NSCLC in Chinese patients.