To gate or not to gate - dosimetric evaluation comparing Gated vs. ITV-based methodologies in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) treatment of lung cancer

Endobronchially Implanted Real-Time Electromagnetic Transponder Beacon-Guided, Respiratory-Gated SABR for Moving Lung Tumors: A Prospective Phase 1/2 Cohort Study

Purpose

Endobronchial electromagnetic transponder beacons (EMT) provide real-time, precise positional data of moving lung tumors. We report results of a phase 1/2, prospective, single-arm cohort study evaluating the treatment planning effects of EMT-guided SABR for moving lung tumors.

Methods and Materials

Eligible patients were adults, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 to 2, with T1-T2N0 non-small cell lung cancer or pulmonary metastasis ≤4 cm with motion amplitude ≥5 mm. Three EMTs were endobronchially implanted using navigational bronchoscopy. Four-dimensional free-breathing computed tomography simulation scans were obtained, and end-exhalation phases were used to define the gating window internal target volume. A 3-mm expansion of gating window internal target volume defined the planning target volume (PTV). EMT-guided, respiratory-gated (RG) SABR was delivered (54 Gy/3 fractions or 48 Gy/4 fractions) using volumetric modulated arc therapy. For each RG-SABR plan, a 10-phase image-guided SABR plan was generated for dosimetric comparison. PTV/organ-at-risk (OAR) metrics were tabulated and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank pair test. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours; version 1.1).

Results

Of 41 patients screened, 17 were enrolled and 2 withdrew from the study. Median age was 73 years, with 7 women. Sixty percent had T1/T2 non-small cell lung cancer and 40% had M1 disease. Median tumor diameter was 1.9 cm with 73% of targets located peripherally. Mean respiratory tumor motion was 1.25 cm (range, 0.53-4.04 cm). Thirteen tumors were treated with EMT-guided SABR and 47% of patients received 48 Gy in 4 fractions while 53% received 54 Gy in 3 fractions. RG-SABR yielded an average PTV reduction of 46.9% (P < .005). Lung V5, V10, V20, and mean lung dose had mean relative reductions of 11.3%, 20.3%, 31.1%, and 20.3%, respectively (P < .005). Dose to OARs was significantly reduced (P < .05) except for spinal cord. At 6 months, mean radiographic tumor volume reduction was 53.5% (P < .005).

Conclusions

EMT-guided RG-SABR significantly reduced PTVs of moving lung tumors compared with image-guided SABR. EMT-guided RG-SABR should be considered for tumors with large respiratory motion amplitudes or those located in close proximity to OARs.

Adoption of respiratory motion management in radiation therapy

Background and Purpose

A survey on the patterns of practice of respiratory motion management (MM) was distributed to 111 radiation therapy facilities to inform the development of an end-to-end dosimetry audit including respiratory motion.

Materials and methods

The survey (distributed via REDCap) asked facilities to provide information specific to the combinations of MM techniques (breath-hold gating – BHG, internal target volume – ITV, free-breathing gating – FBG, mid-ventilation – MidV, tumour tracking – TT), sites treated (thorax, upper abdomen, lower abdomen), and fractionation regimes (conventional, stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy – SABR) used in their clinic.

Results

The survey was completed by 78% of facilities, with 98% of respondents indicating that they used at least one form of MM. The ITV approach was common to all MM-users, used for thoracic treatments by 89% of respondents, and upper and lower abdominal treatments by 38%. BHG was the next most prevalent (41% of MM users), with applications in upper abdominal and thoracic treatment sites (28% vs 25% respectively), but minimal use in the lower abdomen (9%). FBG and TT were utilised sparingly (17%, 7% respectively), and MidV was not selected at all.

Conclusions

Two distinct treatment workflows (including use of motion limitation, imaging used for motion assessment, dose calculation, and image guidance procedures) were identified for the ITV and BHG MM techniques, to form the basis of the initial audit. Thoracic SABR with the ITV approach was common to nearly all respondents, while upper abdominal SABR using BHG stood out as more technically challenging. Other MM techniques were sparsely used, but may be considered for future audit development.

Application of real-time MRI-guided linear accelerator in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: one step forward to precise targeting

PURPOSE

Tumor motion is a major challenge in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), causing excessive irradiation to compensate for this motion. Real-time tumor tracking with a magnetic resonance imaging-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) could address this problem. This study aimed to assess the effects and advantages of MR-Linac in SABR for the treatment of lung tumors.

METHODS

Overall, 41 patients with NSCLC treated with SABR using MR-Linac between March 2019 and December 2021 were included. For comparison, 40 patients treated with SABR using computed tomography-based modalities were also enrolled. The SABR dose ranged from 48 to 60 Gy in 3-5 fractions. The primary endpoint was a lower radiation volume compared to CT-based SABR. The secondary endpoint was the local control rate of SABR using the MR-Linac.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 3-105 months). There was no significant difference in the gross tumor volume between the MR and CT groups (7.1 ± 9.3 cm³ vs 8.0 ± 6.8 cm³, p = 0.643), but the planning target volume was significantly smaller in the MR group (20.8 ± 18.8 cm³ vs 34.1 ± 22.9 cm³, p = 0.005). The 1-year local control rates for the MR and CT groups were 92.1 and 75.4%, respectively (p = 0.07), and the 1-year overall survival rates were 87.4 and 87.0%, respectively (p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Lung SABR with MR-Linac can reduce the radiation field without compromising the local control rate. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effects.

Special stereotactic radiotherapy techniques: procedures and equipment for treatment simulation and dose delivery

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is a multi-step procedure with each step requiring extreme accuracy. Physician-dependent accuracy includes appropriate disease staging, multi-disciplinary discussion with shared decision-making, choice of morphological and functional imaging methods to identify and delineate the tumor target and organs at risk, an image-guided patient set-up, active or passive management of intra-fraction movement, clinical and instrumental follow-up. Medical physicist-dependent accuracy includes use of advanced software for treatment planning and more advanced Quality Assurance procedures than required for conventional radiotherapy. Consequently, all the professionals require appropriate training in skills for high-quality SRT.

Thanks to the technological advances, SRT has moved from a “frame-based” technique, i.e. the use of stereotactic coordinates which are identified by means of rigid localization frames, to the modern “frame-less” SRT which localizes the target volume directly, or by means of anatomical surrogates or fiducial markers that have previously been placed within or near the target. This review describes all the SRT steps in depth, from target simulation and delineation procedures to treatment delivery and image-guided radiation therapy. Target movement assessment and management are also described.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung oligometastases

30–60% of cancer patients develop lung metastases, mostly from primary tumors in the colon-rectum, lung, head and neck area, breast and kidney. Nowadays, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is considered the ideal modality for treating pulmonary metastases.

When lung metastases are suspected, complete disease staging includes a total body computed tomography (CT ) and/or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET -CT ) scan. PET -CT has higher specificity and sensitivity than a CT scan when investigating mediastinal lymph nodes, diagnosing a solitary lung lesion and detecting distant metastases. For treatment planning, a multi-detector planning CT scan of the entire chest is usually performed, with or without intravenous contrast media or esophageal lumen opacification, especially when central lesions have to be irradiated. Respiratory management is recommended in lung SRT, taking the breath cycle into account in planning and delivery. For contouring, co-registration and/or matching planning CT and diagnostic images (as provided by contrast enhanced CT or PET-CT ) are useful, particularly for central tumors. Doses and fractionation schedules are heterogeneous, ranging from 33 to 60 Gy in 3–6 fractions. Independently of fractionation schedule, a BED₁₀ > 100 Gy is recommended for high local control rates. Single fraction SRT (ranges 15–30 Gy) is occasionally administered, particularly for small lesions. SRT provides tumor control rates of up to 91% at 3 years, with limited toxicities.

The present overview focuses on technical and clinical aspects related to treatment planning, dose constraints, outcome and toxicity of SRT for lung metastases.

Potential Morbidity Reduction for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Respiratory Gating

Simple Summary

Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for early-stage lung cancer and oligometastases. For SBRT, motion has to be considered to avoid misdosage. Respiratory phase gating, meaning to irradiate the target volume only in a predefined gating motion phase window, can be applied to mitigate motion-induced effects. The aim of this study was to exploit the clinical benefit of gating for lung SBRT. For the majority of 14 lung tumor patients and various gating windows, we could prove a reduced dose to normal tissue by gating simulation. A normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model analysis revealed a major reduction of normal tissue toxicity for moderate gating window sizes. The most beneficial effect of gating was found for those patients with the highest prior toxicity risk. The presented results are useful for personalized risk assessment prior to treatment and may help to select patients and optimal gating windows.

Abstract

We investigated the potential of respiratory gating to mitigate the motion-caused misdosage in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). For fourteen patients with lung tumors, we investigated treatment plans for a gating window (GW) including three breathing phases around the maximum exhalation phase, GW40–60. For a subset of six patients, we also assessed a preceding three-phase GW20–40 and six-phase GW20–70. We analyzed the target volume, lung, esophagus, and heart doses. Using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, we estimated radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis risks. Compared to plans without gating, GW40–60 significantly reduced doses to organs at risk without impairing the tumor doses. On average, the mean lung dose decreased by 0.6 Gy (p < 0.001), treated lung V20Gy by 2.4% (p = 0.003), esophageal dose to 5cc by 2.0 Gy (p = 0.003), and maximum heart dose by 3.2 Gy (p = 0.009). The model-estimated mean risks of 11% for pneumonitis and 12% for esophagitis without gating decreased upon GW40–60 to 7% and 9%, respectively. For the highest-risk patient, gating reduced the pneumonitis risk from 43% to 32%. Gating is most beneficial for patients with high-toxicity risks. Pre-treatment toxicity risk assessment may help optimize patient selection for gating, as well as GW selection for individual patients.

Dosimetric benefits of dynamic conformal arc therapy-combined with active breath-hold in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

To test the hypothesis that dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) in Monaco, compared with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), maintains plan quality with higher delivery efficiency for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and to investigate dosimetric benefits of DCAT with active breath-hold (DCAT+ABH), compared with free-breathing (DCAT+FB) for varying tumor sizes and motions. Fifty DCAT plans were used for lung SBRT. Randomly selected 17 DCAT plans were evaluated with respect to the retrospectively generated volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. The maximum dose at 2 cm from planning target volume (PTV) in any direction (D2cm/Rx), the ratio of 50% prescription isodose volume to the PTV (R50%), conformity index (CI), the lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V20), and monitor unit (MU) were evaluated. A t-test was used to evaluate the difference of plan quality between DCAT and VMAT. Internal target volume (ITV)/integrated-gross target volume (GTV) attributed by intra-fraction motion and lung V20 were stratified for DCAT+ABH and DCAT+FB across varying GTVs. DCAT maintained plan quality (p = 0.154 for D2cm/Rx, p = 0.089 for R50%, p = 0.064 for CI, and p = 0.780 for lung V20) while reducing MUs up to 30% (p <0.001) from 2748 MU (VMAT) to 1868 MU (DCAT). DCAT+ABH, compared to DCAT+FB, reduced tumor motion, resulting in 19% volume reduction of PTV and 60% reduction in lung V20, on average. The difference in lung V20 between DCAT+ABH and DCAT+FB increased as the target size increased. The DCAT is a favorable approach compared with VMAT. These results support the utility of DCAT as a routine planning platform for lung SBRT, especially when utilized with respiratory motion management using the ABH.

Patient individual phase gating for stereotactic radiation therapy of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) applies high doses and requires advanced techniques to spare surrounding tissue in the presence of organ motion. In this work patient individual phase gating is investigated. We studied peripheral and central primary lung tumors. The internal target volume (ITV) was defined including different numbers of phases picked from a 4D Computed tomography (CT) defining the gating window (gw). Planning target volume (PTV) reductions depending on the gw were analyzed. A treatment plan was calculated on a reference phase CT (rCT) and the dose for each breathing phase was calculated and accumulated on the rCT. We compared the dosimetric results with the dose calculated when all breathing phases were included for ITV definition. GWs including 1 to 10 breathing phases were analyzed. We found PTV reductions up to 38.4%. The mean reduction of the lung volume receiving 20 Gy due to gating was found to be 25.7% for peripheral tumors and 16.7% for central tumors. Gating considerably reduced esophageal doses. However, we found that simple reduction of the gw does not necessarily influence the dose in a clinically relevant range. Thus, we suggest a patient individual definition of the breathing phases included within the gw.

4D CT analysis of organs at risk (OARs) in stereotactic radiotherapy

Internal organs at risk volumes (IRV) represent the propagation of organs at risk (OARs) in 4DCT. Sixty consecutive patients that underwent 4DCT for thoracic stereotactic radiotherapy were analyzed and IRVs for heart, trachea, esophagus, bronchial tree, great vessels, and spinal cord were calculated. IRVs were then tested for the respect of dose constraints. IRVs were significantly bigger than standard OARs (p-value <0.001 for all the IRVs). IRVs that did not respect the dose constraints were, respectively, 7/60 (11.7%) for Heart IRV, 6/60 (10%) for Esophagus IRV, 11/60 (18.3%) for Trachea IRV, 16/60 (26.6%) for Bronchial Tree and 0/60 (0%) for great vessel and spinal cord IRV. In the subset of central targets, the percentage of plans that can be unacceptable taking into consideration OARs motion reaches 42%. The correlation of IRVs with clinical parameters and toxicity deserves future investigations in prospective trials.

Differences in the Patterns of Failure Between IROC Lung and Spine Phantom Irradiations

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to investigate and classify the reasons why institutions fail the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) spine and moving lung phantoms, which are used to credential institutions for clinical trial participation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All IROC moving lung and SBRT spine phantom irradiation failures recorded from January 2012 to December 2018 were evaluated in this study. A failure was a case where the institution did not meet the established IROC criteria for agreement between planned and delivered dose. We analyzed the reports for all failing irradiations, including point dose disagreement, dose profiles, and gamma analyses. Classes of failure patterns were created and used to categorize each instance.

RESULTS

There were 158 failing cases analyzed: 116 of 1052 total lung irradiations and 42 of 263 total spine irradiations. Seven categories were required to describe the lung phantom failures, whereas 4 were required for the spine. Types of errors present in both phantom groups included systematic dose and localization errors. Fifty percent of lung failures were due to a superior-inferior localization error, that is, error in the direction of major motion. Systematic dose errors, however, contributed to only 22% of lung failures. In contrast, the majority (60%) of spine phantom failures were due to systematic dose errors, with localization errors (in any direction) accounting for only 14% of failures.

CONCLUSIONS

There were 2 distinct patterns of failure between the IROC moving lung and SBRT spine phantoms. The majority of the lung phantom failures were due to localization errors, whereas the spine phantom failures were largely attributed to systematic dose errors. Both of these errors are clinically relevant and could manifest as errors in patient cases. These findings highlight the value of independent end-to-end dosimetry audits and can help guide the community in improving the quality of radiation therapy by focusing attention on where errors manifest in the community.

Accounting for respiratory motion in small serial structures during radiotherapy planning: proof of concept in virtual bronchoscopy-guided lung functional avoidance radiotherapy

Respiratory motion management techniques in radiotherapy (RT) planning are primarily focused on maintaining tumor target coverage. An inadequately addressed need is accounting for motion in dosimetric estimations in smaller serial structures. Accurate dose estimations in such structures are more sensitive to motion because respiration can cause them to move completely in or out of a high dose-gradient field. In this work, we study three motion management strategies (m1-m3) to find an accurate method to estimate the dosimetry in airways. To validate these methods, we generated a 'ground truth' digital breathing model based on a 4DCT scan from a lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) patient. We simulated 225 breathing cycles with  ±10% perturbations in amplitude, respiratory period, and time per respiratory phase. A high-resolution breath-hold CT (BHCT) was also acquired and used with a research virtual bronchoscopy software to autosegment 239 airways. Contours for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were defined on the maximum intensity projection of the 4DCT (CT_MIP) and transferred to the average of the 10 4DCT phases (CT_AVG). To design the motion management methods, the RT plan was recreated using different images and structure definitions. Methods m1 and m2 recreated the plan using the CT_AVG image. In method m1, airways were deformed to the CT_AVG. In m2, airways were deformed to each of the 4DCT phases, and union structures were transferred onto the CT_AVG. In m3, the RT plan was recreated on each of the 10 phases, and the dose distribution from each phase was deformed to the BHCT and summed. Dose errors (mean [min, max]) in airways were: m1: 21% (0.001%, 93%); m2: 45% (0.1%, 179%); and m3: 4% (0.006%, 14%). Our work suggests that accurate dose estimation in moving small serial structures requires customized motion management techniques (like m3 in this work) rather than current clinical and investigational approaches.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy. How to better protect normal tissues?]

The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has increased rapidly over the past decade. Optimal preservation of normal tissues is a major issue because of their high sensitivity to high doses per session. Extreme hypofractionation can convert random errors into systematic errors. Optimal preservation of organs at risk requires first of all a rigorous implementation of this technique according to published guidelines. The robustness of the imaging modalities used for planning, and training medical and paramedical staff are an integral part of these guidelines too. The choice of SBRT indications, dose fractionation, dose heterogeneity, ballistics, are also means of optimizing the protection of normal tissues. Non-coplanarity and tracking of moving targets allow dosimetric improvement in some clinical settings. Automatic planning could also improve normal tissue protection. Adaptive SBRT, with new image guided radiotherapy modalities such as MRI, could further reduce the risk of toxicity.

Optimal Gating Window for Respiratory-Gated Radiotherapy with Real-Time Position Management and Respiration Guiding System for Liver Cancer Treatment

Respiratory-gated radiotherapy is one of the most effective approaches to minimise radiation dose delivery to normal tissue and maximise delivery to tumours under patient's motion caused by respiration. We propose a respiration guiding system based on real-time position management with suitable gating window for respiratory-gated radiotherapy applied to liver cancer. Between August 2016 and February 2018, 52 patients with liver cancer received training in real-time position management and respiration guiding. Respiration signals were statistically analysed during unguided respiration and when applying the respiration guiding system. Phases of 30-60% and 30-70% retrieved the lowest respiration variability among patients, and 47 patients exhibited significant differences in terms of respiration reproducibility between unguided and guided respiration. The results suggest that either of these phases can establish suitable windows for gated radiotherapy applied to liver cancer, especially regarding respiration reproducibility.

Tracking, gating, free-breathing, which technique to use for lung stereotactic treatments? A dosimetric comparison

BACKGROUND

The management of breath-induced tumor motion is a major challenge for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Three techniques are currently available for these treatments: tracking (T), gating (G) and free-breathing (FB).

AIM

To evaluate the dosimetric differences between these three treatment techniques for lung SBRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pretreatment 4DCT data were acquired for 10 patients and sorted into 10 phases of a breathing cycle, such as 0% and 50% phases defined respectively as the inhalation and exhalation maximum. GTVph, PTVph (=GTVph + 3 mm) and the ipsilateral lung were contoured on each phase.For the tracking technique, 9 fixed fields were adjusted to each PTVph for the 10 phases. The gating technique was studied with 3 exhalation phases (40%, 50% and 60%). For the free-breathing technique, ITVFB was created from a sum of all GTVph and a 3 mm margin was added to define a PTVFB. Fields were adjusted to PTVFB and dose distributions were calculated on the average intensity projection (AIP) CT. Then, the beam arrangement with the same monitor units was planned on each CT phase.The 3 modalities were evaluated using DVHs of each GTVph, the homogeneity index and the volume of the ipsilateral lung receiving 20 Gy (V 20Gy).

RESULTS

The FB system improved the target coverage by increasing D mean (75.87(T)-76.08(G)-77.49(FB)Gy). Target coverage was slightly more homogeneous, too (HI: 0.17(T and G)-0.15(FB)). But the lung was better protected with the tracking system (V 20Gy: 3.82(T)-4.96(G)-6.34(FB)%).

CONCLUSIONS

Every technique provides plans with a good target coverage and lung protection. While irradiation with free-breathing increases doses to GTV, irradiation with the tracking technique spares better the lung but can dramatically increase the treatment complexity.

Influence of respiratory motion management technique on radiation pneumonitis risk with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

For lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), real-time tumor tracking (RTT) allows for less radiation to normal lung compared to the internal target volume (ITV) method of respiratory motion management. To quantify the advantage of RTT, we examined the difference in radiation pneumonitis risk between these two techniques using a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model.

MATERIALS/METHOD

20 lung SBRT treatment plans using RTT were replanned with the ITV method using respiratory motion information from a 4D-CT image acquired at the original simulation. Risk of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was calculated for both plans using a previously derived NTCP model. Features available before treatment planning that identified significant increase in NTCP with ITV versus RTT plans were identified.

RESULTS

Prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) ranged from 22 to 60 Gy in 1-5 fractions. The median tumor diameter was 3.5 cm (range 2.1-5.5 cm) with a median volume of 14.5 mL (range 3.6-59.9 mL). The median increase in PTV volume from RTT to ITV plans was 17.1 mL (range 3.5-72.4 mL), and the median increase in PTV/lung volume ratio was 0.46% (range 0.13-1.98%). Mean lung dose and percentage dose-volumes were significantly higher in ITV plans at all levels tested. The median NTCP was 5.1% for RTT plans and 8.9% for ITV plans, with a median difference of 1.9% (range 0.4-25.5%, pairwise P < 0.001). Increases in NTCP between plans were best predicted by increases in PTV volume and PTV/lung volume ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of RTT decreased the risk of radiation pneumonitis in all plans. However, for most patients the risk reduction was minimal. Differences in plan PTV volume and PTV/lung volume ratio may identify patients who would benefit from RTT technique before completing treatment planning.

Initial clinical observations of intra- and interfractional motion variation in MR-guided lung SBRT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate variations in intra- and interfractional tumour motion, and the effect on internal target volume (ITV) contour accuracy, using deformable image registration of real-time two-dimensional-sagittal cine-mode MRI acquired during lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments.

METHODS

Five lung tumour patients underwent free-breathing SBRT treatments on the ViewRay system, with dose prescribed to a planning target volume (defined as a 3-6 mm expansion of the 4DCT-ITV). Sagittal slice cine-MR images (3.5 × 3.5 mm² pixels) were acquired through the centre of the tumour at 4 frames per second throughout the treatments (3-4 fractions of 21-32 min). Tumour gross tumour volumes (GTVs) were contoured on the first frame of the MR cine and tracked for the first 20 min of each treatment using offline optical-flow based deformable registration implemented on a GPU cluster. A ground truth ITV (MR-ITV_20 min) was formed by taking the union of tracked GTV contours. Pseudo-ITVs were generated from unions of the GTV contours tracked over 10 s segments of image data (MR-ITV_10 s).

RESULTS

Differences were observed in the magnitude of median tumour displacement between days of treatments. MR-ITV_10 s areas were as small as 46% of the MR-ITV_20 min.

CONCLUSION

An ITV offers a "snapshot" of breathing motion for the brief period of time the tumour is imaged on a specific day. Real-time MRI over prolonged periods of time and over multiple treatment fractions shows that ITV size varies. Further work is required to investigate the dosimetric effect of these results. Advances in knowledge: Five lung tumour patients underwent free-breathing MRI-guided SBRT treatments, and their tumours tracked using deformable registration of cine-mode MRI. The results indicate that variability of both intra- and interfractional breathing amplitude should be taken into account during planning of lung radiotherapy.

Dosimetric Comparison of Real-Time MRI-Guided Tri-Cobalt-60 Versus Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Lung Cancer Plans

Purpose:

Magnetic resonance imaging–guided radiation therapy has entered clinical practice at several major treatment centers. Treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy is one potential application of this modality, as some form of respiratory motion management is important to address. We hypothesize that magnetic resonance imaging–guided tri-cobalt-60 radiation therapy can be used to generate clinically acceptable stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans. Here, we report on a dosimetric comparison between magnetic resonance imaging–guided radiation therapy plans and internal target volume–based plans utilizing volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Materials and Methods:

Ten patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who underwent radiation therapy planning and treatment were studied. Following 4-dimensional computed tomography, patient images were used to generate clinically deliverable plans. For volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans, the planning tumor volume was defined as an internal target volume + 0.5 cm. For magnetic resonance imaging–guided plans, a single mid-inspiratory cycle was used to define a gross tumor volume, then expanded 0.3 cm to the planning tumor volume. Treatment plan parameters were compared.

Results:

Planning tumor volumes trended larger for volumetric-modulated arc therapy–based plans, with a mean planning tumor volume of 47.4 mL versus 24.8 mL for magnetic resonance imaging–guided plans (P = .08). Clinically acceptable plans were achievable via both methods, with bilateral lung V20, 3.9% versus 4.8% (P = .62). The volume of chest wall receiving greater than 30 Gy was also similar, 22.1 versus 19.8 mL (P = .78), as were all other parameters commonly used for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. The ratio of the 50% isodose volume to planning tumor volume was lower in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans, 4.19 versus 10.0 (P < .001). Heterogeneity index was comparable between plans, 1.25 versus 1.25 (P = .98).

Conclusion:

Magnetic resonance imaging–guided tri-cobalt-60 radiation therapy is capable of delivering lung high-quality stereotactic body radiation therapy plans that are clinically acceptable as compared to volumetric-modulated arc therapy–based plans. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging provides the unique capacity to directly observe tumor motion during treatment for purposes of motion management.