1
|
Mutsaers A, Akingbade A, Louie AV, Id Said B, Zhang L, Poon I, Smoragiewicz M, Eskander A, Karam I. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Extracranial Oligometastatic Disease from Head and Neck Primary Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:851. [PMID: 38473213 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat disease in the oligometastatic (OM) setting due to mounting evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Given the low population representation in prospective studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of HNC patients with extracranial OM disease treated with SBRT. METHODS A systematic review was conducted with Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases queried from inception to August 2022 for studies with extracranial OM HNC treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Polymetastatic patients (>five lesions), mixed-primary cohorts failing to report HNC separately, lack of treatment to all lesions, nonquantitative endpoints, and other definitive treatments (surgery, conventional radiotherapy, and radioablation) were excluded. The meta-analysis examined the pooled effects of 12- and 24-month local control (LC) per lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Weighted random-effects were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity evaluated using the I2 statistic and Cochran Qtest. Forest plots were generated for each endpoint. RESULTS Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (639 patients, 831 lesions), with twelve eligible for quantitative synthesis with common endpoints and sufficient reporting. Fourteen studies were retrospective, with a single prospective trial. Studies were small, with a median of 32 patients (range: 6-81) and 63 lesions (range: 6-126). The OM definition varied, with a maximum of two to five metastases, mixed synchronous and metachronous lesions, and a few studies including oligoprogressive lesions. The most common site of metastasis was the lung. Radiation was delivered in 1-10 fractions (20-70 Gy). The one-year LC (LC1), reported in 12 studies, was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.3-91.9%). LC2 was 77.9% (95% CI: 66.4-86.3%), with heterogeneity across studies. PFS was reported in five studies, with a PFS1 of 43.0% (95% CI: 35.0-51.4%) and PFS2 of 23.9% (95% CI: 17.8-31.2%), with homogeneity across studies. OS was analyzed in nine studies, demonstrating an OS1 of 80.1% (95% CI: 74.2-85.0%) and OS2 of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3-69.4%). Treatment was well tolerated with no reported grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicity rates were uniformly below 5% when reported. CONCLUSIONS SBRT offers excellent LC and promising OS, with acceptable toxicities in OM HNC. Durable PFS remains rare, highlighting the need for effective local or systemic therapies in this population. Further investigations on concurrent and adjuvant therapies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mutsaers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences, Western University, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Aquila Akingbade
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences, Western University, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Badr Id Said
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Martin Smoragiewicz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu MX, Carvalho C, Milan-Chhatrisha B, Gadi N. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Management of Pulmonary Oligometastases in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Perspective. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:402-410. [PMID: 37748936 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
In pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer (POM-CRC), metastasectomy is the primarily recommended treatment. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as a viable alternative therapy. SBRT efficacy for POM-CRC is poorly delineated compared to selected non-CRC primaries. This perspective article aims to critically summarize the existing evidence regarding efficacy of SBRT in terms of overall survival (OS) and local control (LC), and factors modulating this, in the treatment of POM-CRC. Overall, reasonable LC and OS rates were observed. The wide range of expansions in planning target volume margins introduced variation in pretreatment protocols. Dose-fractionation schedules varied according to patient and tumor characteristics, though leverage of BED10 in select studies enabled standardization. An association between SBRT dose and improved OS and LC was observed across multiple studies. Prognostic factors that were associated with improved LC included: fewer oligometastases, absence of extra-pulmonary metastases, primary tumor histology, and smaller gross tumor volume. Differences in SBRT modality and techniques over time further confounded results. Many studies included patients receiving additional systemic therapies; preprotocol and adjuvant chemotherapies were identified as prognostic factors for LC. SBRT compared with metastasectomy showed no differences in short-term OS and LC outcomes. In conclusion, SBRT is an efficacious treatment for POM-CRC, in terms of OS and LC. Heterogeneity in study design, particularly pertaining to dose protocols, patient selection, and additional therapies should be controlled for future randomized studies to further validate SBRT efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael X Fu
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Catarina Carvalho
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bella Milan-Chhatrisha
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nishita Gadi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vorbach SM, Mangesius J, Dejaco D, Seppi T, Santer M, Zur Nedden S, Sarcletti MP, Pointner MJ, Hart TJ, Riechelmann H, Ganswindt U, Nevinny-Stickel M. Survival, Treatment Outcome, and Safety of Multiple and Repeated Courses of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5253. [PMID: 37958426 PMCID: PMC10647772 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Current literature regarding survival and treatment outcome of SBRT in patients with pulmonary oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is limited. Additionally, most of the published studies include metastatic lesions deriving also from primaries with histologies other than SCC when investigating the outcome of SBRT. The aim of the present retrospective study is to explore local control (LC) of treated metastases, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of exclusively pulmonary oligometastatic HNSCC-patients treated with SBRT. Between 2006 and 2021, a total of 46 patients were treated with SBRT for a maximum of four pulmonary oligometastases (PM) concurrently (mean PM per patient = 2.0; range 1 to 6 PM, total of 92). Of these, 17 patients (37.0%) developed new pulmonary metastases after their first SBRT. Repeated courses of SBRT were required once in 15 patients (88.2%) and twice in 2 patients (11.8%). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 0-109 months). One year after completion of SBRT, LC rate, PFS, and OS were 98.7%, 37.9%, and 79.5%, respectively. After two years, LC rate, PFS, and OS were 98.7%, 28.7%, and 54.9%; as well as 98.7%, 16.7%, and 31.0% after five years. Radiochemotherapy (HR 2.72, p < 0.001) or radiotherapy as primary treatment (HR 8.60; p = 0.003), as well as reduced patient performance status (HR 48.30, p = 0.002), were associated with lower PFS. Inferior OS correlated with poor performance status (HR 198.51, p < 0.001) and surgery followed by radiochemotherapy (HR 4.18, p = 0.032) as primary treatment, as well as radiotherapy alone (HR 7.11, p = 0.020). Treatment of more than one PM is an independent predictor of impaired OS (HR 3.30, p = 0.016). SBRT of HNSCC-derived PMs results in excellent LC rates and encouraging OS rates of 54.9% at two years along with good tolerability (no more than grade 2 toxicities). Favourable outcome and low toxicity also apply to repeated courses of SBRT of newly emerging PMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Moritz Vorbach
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Daniel Dejaco
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (D.D.); (M.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Thomas Seppi
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Matthias Santer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (D.D.); (M.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Stephanie Zur Nedden
- CCB-Biocenter, Institute of Neurobiochemistry, Medial University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Manuel Paolo Sarcletti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Martin Josef Pointner
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Tilmann Jakob Hart
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Herbert Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (D.D.); (M.S.); (H.R.)
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| | - Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (S.M.V.); (T.S.); (M.P.S.); (M.J.P.); (T.J.H.); (U.G.); (M.N.-S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Id Said B, Mutsaers A, Chen H, Husain ZA, Biswas T, Dagan R, Erler D, Foote M, Louie AV, Redmond K, Ricardi U, Sahgal A, Poon I. Outcomes for oligometastatic head and neck cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results from an international multi-institutional consortium. Head Neck 2023; 45:2627-2637. [PMID: 37602655 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT. METHODS Patients with OMD HNC (≤5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2016 at six institutions were included. Treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multivariable analysis (MVA). RESULTS Forty-two patients with 84 HNC oligometastases were analyzed. The TMC rate at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 66%, with a median time to recurrence of 10.1 months. The median PFS and OS were 4.7 and 23.3 months. MVA identified a PTV point maximum (BED)10 > 100 Gy as a predictor of improved TMC (HR = 0.31, p = 0.034), and a cumulative PTV > 48 cc as having worse PFS (HR = 2.99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Favorable TMC and OS was observed in OMD HNCs treated with SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Badr Id Said
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Mutsaers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zain A Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tithi Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Darby Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho CB, Tsai JT, Chen CY, Shiah HS, Chen HY, Ting LL, Kuo CC, Lai IC, Lai HY, Chung CL, Lee KL, Tzeng HE, Lee KH, Lee HL, Chen SW, Chiou JF. Effectiveness of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Systemic Therapy Respondents with Inoperable Pulmonary Oligometastases and Oligoprogression. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13091597. [PMID: 37174988 PMCID: PMC10177978 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) may improve survival in patients with inoperable pulmonary oligometastases. However, the impact of pulmonary oligometastatic status after systemic therapy on SABR outcomes remains unclear. Hence, we investigated the outcomes of SABR in 45 patients with 77 lung tumors and the prognostic value of pulmonary oligoprogression. Eligibility criteria were pulmonary oligometastases (defined as ≤5 metastatic lung tumors), controlled extrapulmonary disease (EPD) after front-line systemic therapy, SABR as primary local treatment for inoperable pulmonary metastases, and consecutive imaging follow-up. Oligometastatic lung tumor was classified into controlled or oligoprogressive status. Overall survival (OS), in-field progression-free survival (IFPFS), out-field progression-free survival (OFPFS), and prognostic variables were evaluated. With 21.8 months median follow-up, the median OS, IFPFS, and OFPFS were 28.3, not reached, and 6.5 months, respectively. Two-year OS, IFPFS, and OFPFS rates were 56.0%, 74.2%, and 17.3%, respectively. Oligoprogressive status (p = 0.003), disease-free interval < 24 months (p = 0.041), and biologically effective dose (BED10) < 100 Gy (p = 0.006) were independently associated with inferior OS. BED10 ≥ 100 Gy (p = 0.029) was independently correlated with longer IFPFS. Oligoprogressive status (p = 0.017) and EPD (p = 0.019) were significantly associated with inferior OFPFS. Grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in four (8.9%) patients. Conclusively, SABR with BED10 ≥ 100 Gy could provide substantial in-field tumor control and longer OS for systemic therapy respondents with inoperable pulmonary oligometastases. Oligoprogressive lung tumors exhibited a higher risk of out-field treatment failure and shorter OS. Hence, systemic therapy should be tailored for patients with oligoprogression to reduce the risk of out-field treatment failure. However, in the absence of effective systemic therapy, SABR is a reasonable alternative to reduce resistant tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Beng Ho
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Camillian Saint Mary's Hospital Luodong, Yilan 265502, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Jo-Ting Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City 235041, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Chun-You Chen
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116079, Taiwan
| | - Her-Shyong Shiah
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231016, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Hsuan-Yu Chen
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115201, Taiwan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan
| | - Lai-Lei Ting
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chun Kuo
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - I-Chun Lai
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yi Lai
- Department of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Li Chung
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- School of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Division of Thoracic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Ling Lee
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Huey-En Tzeng
- Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407219, Taiwan
| | - Kuen-Haur Lee
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Lun Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Wen Chen
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404333, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fong Chiou
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee T, Kang HC, Chie E, Kim H, Wu HG, Lee J, Kim K. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pulmonary Metastasis from Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Biologically Effective Dose 150 Gy is Preferred for Tumour Control. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e384-e394. [PMID: 37003842 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To compare the local control rate of pulmonary metastatic lesions in colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using a biologically effective dose with an α/β ratio of 10 (BED10) of 150 Gy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed 231 pulmonary metastatic lesions from colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with SBRT in 135 patients. The patients were referred for the control of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease in the lungs. A dose of 40-60 Gy in three to eight fractions was delivered. The local control per tumour (LCpT) by BED10 was evaluated. The local control per patient (LCpP), pulmonary progression-free survival (PPFS), any progression-free survival (APFS) and overall survival were also reported as clinical outcomes. RESULTS A significant difference was observed in the LCpT between the BED10 groups (P < 0.001). The 1-, 2- and 3-year LCpT were 38.9%, 25.9% and 25.9% in BED10 < 100 group; 84.1%, 62.6% and 60.4% in 100 ≤ BED10 < 150 Gy group; and 97.3%, 94.9% and 85.2% in BED10 ≥ 150 Gy group, respectively. BED10 ≥ 150 Gy remained significant in the multivariate analysis of LCpT. The 3-year LCpP, PPFS, APFS and overall survival rates were 62.7%, 26.5%, 24.8% and 67.7%, respectively. Oligoprogression (versus oligometastasis), multiple pulmonary nodules and extrapulmonary metastasis were associated with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSION A BED10 ≥ 150 Gy may be required to achieve sufficient local control. The indications for SBRT and the extent of metastatic disease should be assessed for proper estimation of the clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Appel S, Lawrence YR, Bar J, Jacobson G, Marom EM, Katzman T, Ben-Ayun M, Dubinski S, Haisraely O, Weizman N, Davidson T, Weiss I, Mansano A, Goldstein JD, Symon Z. Deep inspiratory breath hold assisted by continuous positive airway pressure ventilation for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:23-30. [PMID: 36057519 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation hyperinflates the lungs and reduces diaphragmatic motion. We hypothesized that CPAP could be safely combined with deep inspiratory breath hold (CPAP-DIBH) during lung stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with stage-1 lung cancer or lung metastasis treated with CPAP-DIBH SBRT between 3/2017-5/2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient characteristics, treatment parameters, duration of breath holds in all sessions and tolerance to CPAP-DIBH were recorded. Local control (LC) was assessed from CT or PET-CT imaging. The distances between the tumor and mediastinal organs at risk (OAR) in centrally located tumors using either free breathing (FB) or CPAP-DIBH were compared. Toxicity was graded retrospectively. RESULTS Forty-five patients with 71 lesions were treated with CPAP-DIBH SBRT. Indications for CPAP-DIBH were prior radiation (35/71, 65%), lower lobe location (34/71, 48%), multiple lesions (26/71, 36.6%) and proximity to mediastinal OAR (7/71, 10%). Patient characteristics were: F:M 43%: 57%; mean gross tumor volume 4.5cm3 (SD 7.9), mean planning target volume 20cm3 (SD 27), primary: metastatic lesions (7%:93%). Mean radiation dose was 52.5 Gray (SD3.5). Mean lung volume was 5292cm3 (SD 1106). Mean duration of CPAP-DIBH was 41.3s (IQR 31-46.8). LC at 2 years was 89.5% (95% CI 76-95.5). In patients with central lesions, the distance between the tumor and mediastinal OAR increased from 0.84cm (SD 0.65) with FB to 1.23cm (SD 0.8) with CPAP-DIBH (p=0.002). Most patients tolerated CPAP well and completed all treatments after starting therapy. Three patients did not receive treatment: 2 were unable to tolerate CPAP and 1 had syncope (pre-existing). Toxicity was grade 2 in 4/65 (6%) and grade 3 in 1/65 (1.5%). There was no grade 2 or higher esophageal or tracheal toxicities. CONCLUSION CPAP-DIBH assisted lung SBRT was tolerated well and was associated with minimal toxicity and favorable LC. This technique may be considered when treating multiple lung lesions, lesions located in the lower lobes or adjacent to mediastinal OAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarit Appel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Yaacov Richard Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jair Bar
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Galia Jacobson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Edith M Marom
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tamar Katzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Maoz Ben-Ayun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Sergei Dubinski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ory Haisraely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Noam Weizman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ilana Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Anat Mansano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Zvi Symon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patients with Pulmonary Metastases from Head and Neck Cancer Benefit from Pulmonary Metastasectomy, A Systematic Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58081000. [PMID: 35893115 PMCID: PMC9332790 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The incidence of distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is approximately 10%. Pulmonary metastases are the most frequent distant location, with an incidence of 70-85%. The standard treatment options are chemo-, immuno- and radiotherapy. Despite a benefit for long-term survival for patients with isolated pulmonary metastases, pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is not the treatment of choice. Furthermore, many otorhinolaryngologists are not sufficiently familiar with the concept of PM. This work reviews the recent studies of pulmonary metastatic HNC and the results after pulmonary metastasectomy. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were checked for the case series' of patients undergoing metastasectomy with pulmonary metastases published since 1 January 2000. Results: We included the data of 15 studies of patients undergoing PM. The 5-year survival rates varied from 21% to 59%, with median survival from 10 to 77 months after PM. We could not identify one specific prognostic factor for long-term survival after surgery. However, at least most studies stated that PM should be planned if a complete (R0) resection is possible. Conclusions: PM showed reliable results and is supposedly the treatment of choice for patients with isolated pulmonary metastases. Patients not suitable for surgery may benefit from other non-surgical therapy. Every HNC patient with pulmonary metastases should be discussed in the multidisciplinary tumor board to optimize the therapy and the outcome.
Collapse
|
9
|
Oligometastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:803-811. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
10
|
Falcinelli L, Menichelli C, Casamassima F, Aristei C, Borghesi S, Ingrosso G, Draghini L, Tagliagambe A, Badellino S, di Monale e Bastia MB. Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:23-31. [PMID: 35402023 PMCID: PMC8989443 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
30-60% of cancer patients develop lung metastases, mostly from primary tumors in the colon-rectum, lung, head and neck area, breast and kidney. Nowadays, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is considered the ideal modality for treating pulmonary metastases. When lung metastases are suspected, complete disease staging includes a total body computed tomography (CT ) and/or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET -CT ) scan. PET -CT has higher specificity and sensitivity than a CT scan when investigating mediastinal lymph nodes, diagnosing a solitary lung lesion and detecting distant metastases. For treatment planning, a multi-detector planning CT scan of the entire chest is usually performed, with or without intravenous contrast media or esophageal lumen opacification, especially when central lesions have to be irradiated. Respiratory management is recommended in lung SRT, taking the breath cycle into account in planning and delivery. For contouring, co-registration and/or matching planning CT and diagnostic images (as provided by contrast enhanced CT or PET-CT ) are useful, particularly for central tumors. Doses and fractionation schedules are heterogeneous, ranging from 33 to 60 Gy in 3-6 fractions. Independently of fractionation schedule, a BED10 > 100 Gy is recommended for high local control rates. Single fraction SRT (ranges 15-30 Gy) is occasionally administered, particularly for small lesions. SRT provides tumor control rates of up to 91% at 3 years, with limited toxicities. The present overview focuses on technical and clinical aspects related to treatment planning, dose constraints, outcome and toxicity of SRT for lung metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Falcinelli
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | | | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | | | | | - Serena Badellino
- Radiation Oncology Department, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Duriseti S, Kavanaugh JA, Szymanski J, Huang Y, Basarabescu F, Chaudhuri A, Henke L, Samson P, Lin A, Robinson C, Spraker MB. LITE SABR M1: A phase I trial of Lattice stereotactic body radiotherapy for large tumors. Radiother Oncol 2022; 167:317-322. [PMID: 34875286 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an attractive treatment option for patients with metastatic and/or unresectable tumors, however its use is limited to smaller tumors. Lattice is a form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy that may allow safe delivery of ablative doses to bulky tumors. We previously described Lattice SBRT, which delivers 20 Gy in 5 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost to 66.7 Gy in a defined geometric arrangement (Lattice boost). The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the acute toxicity and quality of life (QoL) of patients with large tumors (>5 cm) treated with Lattice SBRT. METHODS This was a single-arm phase I trial conducted between October 2019 and August 2020. Patients with tumors > 4.5 cm were eligible. Lattice SBRT was delivered every other day. The primary outcome was the rate of 90-day treatment-associated (probably or definitely attributable) grade 3 + acute toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria. Other outcomes included changes in patient reported toxicity and QoL inventories, GTV, and peripheral blood cytokines. RESULTS Twenty patients (22 tumors) were enrolled. Median GTV was 579.2 cc (range: 54.2-3713.5 cc) in volume and 11.1 cm (range: 5.6-21.4 cm) in greatest axial diameter. Fifty percent of tumors were in the thorax, 45% abdomen/pelvis, and 5% extremity. There was no likely treatment-associated grade 3 + toxicity in the 90-day period (acute and sub-acute). There was one case of grade 4 toxicity possibly associated with Lattice SBRT. CONCLUSIONS This phase I study met its primary endpoint of physician reported short-term safety. An ongoing phase II clinical trial of Lattice SBRT will evaluate late safety and efficacy of this novel technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Duriseti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - James A Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Jeff Szymanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Franco Basarabescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Aadel Chaudhuri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Lauren Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Pamela Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Clifford Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
| | - Matthew B Spraker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kishi N, Matsuo Y, Yoneyama M, Ueki K, Mizowaki T. Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for multiple pulmonary oligometastases or synchronous primary lung cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100911. [PMID: 35647407 PMCID: PMC9133396 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
13
|
Rodler S, Götz M, Mumm JN, Buchner A, Graser A, Casuscelli J, Stief C, Fürweger C, Muacevic A, Staehler M. Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Lung Metastases of Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Retrospective, Single Center Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:356. [PMID: 35053519 PMCID: PMC8774253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary metastases are the most frequent site of metastases in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Metastases directed treatment remains an important treatment option despite advances in systemic therapies. However, the safety and efficacy of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) for the treatment of lung metastases of RCC remains unclear. Patients with metastatic RCC and lung metastases treated by RRS were retrospectively analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE; Version 5.0) classification for assessment of adverse events. A total of 50 patients were included in this study. Median age was 64 (range 45-92) years at the time of RRS. Prior to RRS, 20 patients (40.0%) had received either tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy and 27 patients (54.0%) were treatment naïve. In our patient cohort, the median PFS was 13 months (range: 2-93). LRFS was 96.7% after two years with only one patient revealing progressive disease of the treated metastases 13 months after RRS. Median OS was 35 months (range 2-94). Adverse events were documented in six patients (12%) and were limited to grade 2. Fatigue (n = 4) and pneumonitis (n = 2) were observed within 3 months after RRS. In conclusion, RRS is safe and effective for patients with metastatic RCC and pulmonary metastases. Radiation induced pneumonitis is specific in the treatment of pulmonary lesions, but not clinically relevant and survival rates seem favorable in this highly selected patient cohort. Future directions are the implementation of RRS in multimodal treatment approaches for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Melanie Götz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Annabel Graser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | | | | | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 62:6529440. [DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
15
|
Bhat V, Pellizzari S, Allan AL, Wong E, Lock M, Brackstone M, Lohmann AE, Cescon DW, Parsyan A. Radiotherapy and radiosensitization in breast cancer: Molecular targets and clinical applications. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103566. [PMID: 34890802 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Relatively poor survival outcomes are observed in advanced or metastatic breast cancer, where local control of the primary or metastatic disease may be achieved by surgical resection, local ablative and radiation therapies. Radioresistance, poses a major challenge in achieving durable oncologic outcomes, mandating development of novel management strategies. Although multimodality approaches that combine radiotherapy with chemotherapy, or systemic agents, are utilized for radiosensitization and treatment of various malignancies, this approach has not yet found its clinical application in breast cancer. Some agents for breast cancer treatment can serve as radiosensitizers, creating an opportunity to enhance effects of radiation while providing systemic disease control. Hence, combination of radiotherapy with radiosensitizing agents have the potential to improve oncologic outcomes in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This review discusses molecular targets for radiosensitization and novel systemic agents that have potential for clinical use as radiosensitizers in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasudeva Bhat
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Sierra Pellizzari
- Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Alison L Allan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - Eugene Wong
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - Muriel Brackstone
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Ana Elisa Lohmann
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - David W Cescon
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Armen Parsyan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
De Baère T, Woodrum D, Tselikas L, Abtin F, Littrup P, Deschamps F, Suh R, Aoun HD, Callstrom M. The ECLIPSE Study: Efficacy of cryoablation on metastatic lung tumors with a 5-year follow-up. J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:1840-1849. [PMID: 34384914 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The ECLIPSE study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of cryoablation for local tumor control in patients with pulmonary metastatic disease over five years of follow-up. METHODS ECLIPSE was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study which included patients treated with cryoablation if they had 1-5 metastatic lung tumors, each with a diameter of ≤ 3.5 cm. Patients were followed up over the course of five years. The primary endpoint was local tumor control, both per tumor and per patient; secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival, overall survival (OS), and quality of life. Quality of life was assessed using the Karnofsky Performance Score, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score, and the Short Form-12 health survey. RESULTS The study included 40 patients across 4 sites (3 US and 1 European). A total of 60 metastatic pulmonary tumors were treated with 48 cryoablation procedures. Overall local tumor control rates were 87.9% (29/33) and 79.2% (19/24) per tumor, and 83.3% (20/24) and 75.0% (15/20) per patient, at 3 and 5 years respectively. A total of 5 treated patients demonstrated local progression throughout the duration of the study. Disease specific survival rate was of 74.8% at 3 years and 55.3% at 5 years while overall survival at 3 and 5 years were of 63.2% and 46.7% respectively. Patient quality of life scores did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Cryoablation is an effective means of long-term local tumor control in patients with metastatic pulmonary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry De Baère
- Departement d'anesthésie, de chirurgie, et de radiologie interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France;.
| | - David Woodrum
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Departement d'anesthésie, de chirurgie, et de radiologie interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Fereidoun Abtin
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Peter Littrup
- Department of Radiology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Frederic Deschamps
- Departement d'anesthésie, de chirurgie, et de radiologie interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Robert Suh
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hussein D Aoun
- Department of Radiology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Matthew Callstrom
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mangaj A, Chopra S, Nout RA. Defining the role of high-dose radiation in oligometastatic & oligorecurrent cervical cancer. Indian J Med Res 2021; 154:303-318. [PMID: 35295014 PMCID: PMC9131772 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_298_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Around 5-8 per cent of women diagnosed with cervical cancer present with metastatic disease at presentation and 16-25 per cent of patients fail at either within irradiated fields or at distant sites post-curative therapy in advanced cervical cancers. Conventionally, chemotherapy with palliative intent constituted the mainstay of treatment with modest survival outcomes and radiation therapy was reserved for symptomatic benefit only. While targeted therapies and immunotherapy have been added in therapeutic armamentarium, the impact on the outcomes is modest. In limited metastatic disease, radiation therapy to metastatic sites from different primary cancers has shown survival benefits; however, the data are scarce in cervical cancer. With a better understanding of the molecular biology of the metastases and recurrence pattern, emphasis is laid upon total eradication of the disease rather than offering relief from symptoms. This article summarizes the role of radiation therapy in limited metastatic disease and recurrent cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Mangaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,For correspondence: Dr Supriya Chopra, Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India. e-mail:
| | - Remi A. Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gutiérrez E, Sánchez I, Díaz O, Valles A, Balderrama R, Fuentes J, Lara B, Olimón C, Ruiz V, Rodríguez J, Bayardo LH, Chan M, Villafuerte CJ, Padayachee J, Sun A. Current Evidence for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Lung Metastases. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:2560-2578. [PMID: 34287274 PMCID: PMC8293144 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28040233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Lung metastases are the second most common malignant neoplasms of the lung. It is estimated that 20–54% of cancer patients have lung metastases at some point during their disease course, and at least 50% of cancer-related deaths occur at this stage. Lung metastases are widely accepted to be oligometastatic when five lesions or less occur separately in up to three organs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive, safe, and effective treatment for metastatic lung disease in carefully selected patients. There is no current consensus on the ideal dose and fractionation for SBRT in lung metastases, and it is the subject of study in ongoing clinical trials, which examines different locations in the lung (central and peripheral). This review discusses current indications, fractionations, challenges, and technical requirements for lung SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Gutiérrez
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Irving Sánchez
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Omar Díaz
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Adrián Valles
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Ricardo Balderrama
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Jesús Fuentes
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Brenda Lara
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Cipatli Olimón
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Víctor Ruiz
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - José Rodríguez
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Luis H. Bayardo
- Western National Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Belisario Domínguez 1000, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico; (I.S.); (O.D.); (A.V.); (R.B.); (J.F.); (B.L.); (C.O.); (V.R.); (J.R.); (L.H.B.)
| | - Matthew Chan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Conrad J. Villafuerte
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Jerusha Padayachee
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
| | - Alexander Sun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada; (E.G.); (M.C.); (C.J.V.); (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G2M9, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-41-6946-2853
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bonichon F, de Baere T, Berdelou A, Leboulleux S, Giraudet AL, Cuinet M, Drui D, Liberge R, Kelly A, Tenenbaum F, Legmann P, Do Cao C, Leenhardt L, Toubeau M, Godbert Y, Palussière J. Percutaneous thermal ablation of lung metastases from thyroid carcinomas. A retrospective multicenter study of 107 nodules. On behalf of the TUTHYREF network. Endocrine 2021; 72:798-808. [PMID: 33770383 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-020-02580-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine efficacy and safety of thermal ablation (TA) for the local treatment of lung metastases of thyroid cancer. METHODS We retrospectively studied 47 patients from 10 centers treated by TA (radiofrequency, microwaves, and cryoablation) over 10 years. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), local efficacy, complications (CTCAE classification), and factors associated with survival. OS curves after first TA were built using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 107 lung metastases during 75 sessions were treated by radiofrequency (n = 56), microwaves (n = 9), and cryoablation (n = 10). Median follow-up time after TA was 5.2 years (0.2-13.3). OS was 93% at 2 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 86-94) and 79% at 3 years (95% CI: 66-91). On univariate and multivariate analysis with a Cox model, histology was the only significant factor for OS. OS at 3 years was 94% for follicular, oncocytic, or papillary follicular variant carcinomas, compared to 59% for papillary, medullary, insular or anaplastic carcinomas (P = 0.0001). The local control rate was 98.1% at 1 year and 94.8% at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Morbidity was low with no major complications (grade 4 and 5 CTCAE) and no complications in 29 of 75 sessions (38.7%). CONCLUSIONS TA is a useful, safe and effective option for local treatment of lung metastases from thyroid carcinoma. Prolonged OS was obtained, especially for lung metastases from follicular, oncocytic, or papillary follicular variant carcinomas. Achieving disease control with TA delays the need for systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Françoise Bonichon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Thyroid Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Thierry de Baere
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Amandine Berdelou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Cancer, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Sophie Leboulleux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Cancer, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Marie Cuinet
- Department of Radiology, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Delphine Drui
- Department of Endocrinology, Institut du Thorax, University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Renan Liberge
- Thoracic and General Radiology Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Antony Kelly
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Florence Tenenbaum
- Nuclear Medicine Service, Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Paul Legmann
- Department of radiology, Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | | | - Laurence Leenhardt
- Unité Thyroïde Tumeurs Endocrines, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Michel Toubeau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Yann Godbert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Thyroid Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean Palussière
- Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Muñoz-Montplet C, Fuentes-Raspall R, Jurado-Bruggeman D, Agramunt-Chaler S, Onsès-Segarra A, Buxó M. Dosimetric Impact of Acuros XB Dose-to-Water and Dose-to-Medium Reporting Modes on Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Its Dependency on Structure Composition. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100722. [PMID: 34258473 PMCID: PMC8256186 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to assess the dosimetric effect of switching from the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) to Acuros XB (AXB), with dose-to-medium (Dm) and dose-to-water (Dw) reporting modes, in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy patients and determine whether planning-target-volume (PTV) dose prescriptions and organ-at-risk constraints should be modified under these circumstances. Methods and Materials We included 54 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy patients. We delineated the PTV, the ipsilateral lung, the contralateral lung, the heart, the spinal cord, the esophagus, the trachea, proximal bronchi, the ribs, and the great vessels. We performed dose calculations with AAA and AXB, then compared clinically relevant dose-volume parameters. Paired t tests were used to analyze differences of means. We propose a method, based on the composition of the involved structures, for predicting differences between AXB Dw and Dm calculations. Results The largest difference between the algorithms was 4%. Mean dose differences between AXB Dm and AXB Dw depended on the average composition of the volumes. Compared with AXB, AAA underestimated all PTV dose-volume parameters (-0.7 Gy to -0.1 Gy) except for gradient index, which was significantly higher (4%). It also underestimated V5 of the contralateral lung (-0.3%). Significant differences in near-maximum doses (D2) to the ribs were observed between AXB Dm and AAA (1.7%) and between AXB Dw and AAA (-1.6%). AAA-calculated D2 was slightly higher in the remaining organs at risk. Conclusions Differences between AXB and AAA are below the threshold of clinical detectability (5%) for most patients. For a small subgroup, the difference in maximum doses to the ribs between AXB Dw and AXB Dm may be clinically significant. The differences in dose volume parameters between AXB Dw and AXB Dm can be predicted with reference to structure composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carles Muñoz-Montplet
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Avda. França s/n, 17007 Girona, Spain.,Department of Medical Sciences, University of Girona, C/Emili Grahit 77, 17003 Girona, Spain
| | - Rafael Fuentes-Raspall
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Girona, C/Emili Grahit 77, 17003 Girona, Spain.,Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Avda. França s/n, 17007 Girona, Spain
| | - Diego Jurado-Bruggeman
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Avda. França s/n, 17007 Girona, Spain
| | - Sebastià Agramunt-Chaler
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Avda. França s/n, 17007 Girona, Spain
| | - Albert Onsès-Segarra
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Avda. França s/n, 17007 Girona, Spain
| | - Maria Buxó
- Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Parc Hospitalari Martí i Julià, Edifici M2, 17190, Salt, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sato M, Yang SM, Tian D, Jun N, Lee JM. Managing screening-detected subsolid nodules-the Asian perspective. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2323-2334. [PMID: 34164280 PMCID: PMC8182721 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The broad application of low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening has resulted in the detection of many small pulmonary nodules. In Asia, a large number of these detected nodules with a radiological ground glass pattern are reported as lung adenocarcinomas or premalignant lesions, especially among female non-smokers. In this review article, we discuss controversial issues and conditions involving these subsolid pulmonary nodules that we often face in Asia, including a lack or insufficiency of current guidelines; the roles of preoperative biopsy and imaging; the location of lesions; appropriate selection of localization techniques; the roles of dissection and sampling of frozen sections and lymph nodes; multifocal lesions; and the roles of non-surgical treatment modalities. For these complex issues, we have tried to present up-to-date evidence and our own opinions regarding the management of subsolid nodules. It is our hope that this article helps surgeons and physicians to manage the complex issues involving ground glass nodules (GGNs) in a balanced manner in their daily practice and provokes further discussion towards better guidelines and/or algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaaki Sato
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shun-Mao Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu
| | - Dong Tian
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nakajima Jun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jang-Ming Lee
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Krug D, Vonthein R, Illen A, Olbrich D, Barkhausen J, Richter J, Klapper W, Schmalz C, Rody A, Maass N, Bauerschlag D, Heßler N, König IR, Dellas K, Dunst J. Metastases-directed Radiotherapy in Addition to Standard Systemic Therapy in Patients with Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Study protocol for a randomized controlled multi-national and multi-center clinical trial (OLIGOMA). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 28:90-96. [PMID: 33912695 PMCID: PMC8065185 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several recent randomized therapeutic exploratory trials demonstrated improvement of progression-free survival and in some even overall survival using stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic disease. However, only very few patients enrolled in these trials had breast cancer, and results from confirmatory trials are lacking. METHODS/DESIGN The OLIGOMA-trial is a randomized controlled multi-national multi-center therapeutic confirmatory trial studying the role of local ablative radiotherapy as an additive treatment in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer receiving standard systemic therapy. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to standard systemic therapy according to national guidelines with or without radiotherapy to all metastatic sites. Randomization will be stratified according to type and line of systemic therapy, which has to be determined by a multidisciplinary tumor board before enrollment. Patients with up to five metastatic lesions are eligible, including patients with up to three brain metastases (only in case of extracranial disease) and with locoregional recurrence (only in case of additional metastatic lesions). In the standard arm, palliative radiotherapy to symptomatic metastases is permitted if at least one lesion remains untreated. The co-primary endpoints are progression-free survival and quality of life. The primary hypothesis is that progression-free survival in the experimental arm will be superior to the standard arm while simultaneously demonstrating non-inferiority of quality of life at 12 weeks after randomization. Secondary endpoints are feasibility, overall survival, toxicity, quality of life and patient satisfaction. A translational sub-study with collection of ctDNA will be conducted. DISCUSSION The OLIGOMA-trial will provide high level evidence on the use of and benefit from local ablative radiotherapy for patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION The OLIGOMA-trial is registered at clinicialtrials.gov under the identification NCT04495309. The related information was first posted on July 31st 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Alicia Illen
- ZKS Lübeck, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | | | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Julia Richter
- Sektion für Hämatopathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Wolfram Klapper
- Sektion für Hämatopathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Claudia Schmalz
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Dirk Bauerschlag
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Nicole Heßler
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Inke R. König
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Kathrin Dellas
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Barsky AR, Yegya-Raman N, Katz SI, Simone CB, Cengel KA. Managing oligoprogressive malignant pleural mesothelioma with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Lung Cancer 2021; 157:163-164. [PMID: 33678456 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, PCAM 2-West, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, PCAM 2-West, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Sharyn I Katz
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, One Silverstein Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, 225 East 126th Street, New York, NY, 10035, United States
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, PCAM 2-West, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dosimetric evaluation of SBRT treatment plans of non-central lung tumours: clinical experience. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s146039692000103x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjectives:Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women in North America. Surgery is usually the primary treatment option for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, for patients who may not be suitable candidates for surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an alternative method of treatment. SBRT has proven to be an effective technique for treating NSCLC patients by focally administering high radiation dose to the tumour with acceptable risk of toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. The goal of this comprehensive retrospective dosimetric study is to compare the dosimetric parameters between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung SBRT treatment plans for two prescription doses.Methods:We retrospectively analysed and compared lung SBRT treatment plans of 263 patients treated with either a 3DCRT non-coplanar or with 2–3 VMAT arcs technique at 48 Gy in 4 fractions (48 Gy/4) or 50 Gy in 5 fractions (50 Gy/5) prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV), typically encompassing the 80% isodose volume. All patients were treated on either a Varian 21EX or TrueBeam linear accelerator using 6-MV or 10-MV photon beams.Results:The mean PTV V95% and V100% for treatment plans at 48 Gy/4 are 99·4 ± 0·6% and 96·0 ± 1·0%, respectively, for 3DCRT and 99·7 ± 0·4% and 96·4 ± 3·4%, respectively, for VMAT. The corresponding mean PTV V95% and V100% at 50 Gy/5 are 99·0 ± 1·4% and 95·5 ± 2·5% for 3DCRT and 99·5 ± 0·8% and 96·1 ± 1·6% for VMAT. The CIRI and HI5/95 for the PTV at 48 Gy/4 are 1·1 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for 3DCRT and 1·0 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for VMAT. The corresponding CIRI and HI5/95 at 50 Gy/5 are 1·1 ± 0·1 and 1·3 ± 0·1 for 3DCRT and 1·0 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for VMAT. The mean R50% and D2cm at 48 Gy/4 are 5·0 ± 0·8 and 61·2 ± 7·0% for 3DCRT and 4·9 ± 0·8 and 57·8 ± 7·9% for VMAT. The corresponding R50% and D2cm at 50 Gy/5 are 4·7 ± 0·5 and 65·5 ± 9·4% for 3DCRT and 4·7 ± 0·7 and 60·0 ± 7·2% for VMAT.Conclusion:The use of 3DCRT or VMAT technique for lung SBRT is an efficient and reliable method for achieving dose conformity, rapid dose fall-off and minimising doses to the organs at risk. The VMAT technique resulted in improved dose conformity, rapid dose fall-off from the PTV compared to 3DCRT, although the magnitude may not be clinically significant.
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhao R, Ma Y, Yang S, Liu Q, Tang Y, Wang K, Zhang Y, Bi N, Zhang H, Yi J, Li Y, Luo J, Xiao J. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for 35 Patients with Adrenal Metastases: A Single-Institution Experience. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:11563-11571. [PMID: 33209060 PMCID: PMC7669511 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s278781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy for adrenal metastases. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with adrenal metastases and treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy, who did not receive adrenalectomy or have disease progression after chemotherapy, from 2007 to 2019. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis was performed using Log rank test. Results Thirty-five patients with 42 lesions were enrolled, and the lung was the most common primary site (80.0%). The median follow-up time was 46.4 months. The median volume of GTV and PTV was 23.2 cm3 (range: 3.5–97.8 cm3) and 38.3 cm3 (range: 10.2–135.6 cm3), respectively. The main dose regimens were 60 Gy delivered in 4–15 fractions, with the median dose of PTV being 60 Gy (range: 40–66.3 Gy) and the biologically effective dose (BED) being 84 Gy (range: 56–110 Gy). The 1-year and 2-year LCR, OS, and PFS were 92.7% and 88.1%, 76.9% and 45.4%, and 25.1% and 14.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that chemotherapy, disease-free interval from primary disease diagnosis to adrenal metastases diagnosis, and age were significant factors for LCR, OS, and PFS, respectively (p=0.017, 0.049, and 0.004, respectively). No more than grade III toxicities were observed. Conclusion As a non-invasive approach, hypofractionated radiotherapy is safe and effective for metastatic adrenal lesions, without serious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruizhi Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuchao Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Siran Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingfeng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bensalah K, Bigot P, Albiges L, Bernhard J, Bodin T, Boissier R, Correas J, Gimel P, Hetet J, Long J, Nouhaud F, Ouzaïd I, Rioux-Leclercq N, Méjean A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l’AFU – actualisation 2020–2022 : prise en charge du cancer du rein. Prog Urol 2020; 30:S2-S51. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30749-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
27
|
Chai G, Yin Y, Zhou X, Hu Q, Lv B, Li Z, Shi M, Zhao L. Pulmonary oligometastases treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): a single institution's experience. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9:1496-1506. [PMID: 32953521 PMCID: PMC7481615 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background To investigate the effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on pulmonary oligometastases and to analyze the clinical factors and dose parameters affecting local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods This study retrospectively enrolled a total of 84 patients (148 lesions) treated in our department from May 2015 to November 2018. Pulmonary oligometastases was defined as up to 5 metastatic lesions in the lung and with both the primary tumor and any extra-thoracic metastases being controlled. Patients receiving a BED10 (biological effective dose, α/β =10) of SBRT ≥75 Gy and a dose/fraction ≥4 Gy were enrolled. The patient group consisted of 52 men (61.9%) and 32 women (38.1%), with a median age 56 years (range, 29-80 years). Median tumor diameter was 1.71cm (range, 1.2-5.0 cm). The BED10 was 75-119 Gy in 4-15 fractions. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on factors predicting the outcomes. Results All patients completed the treatment as planned, and the median follow-up time was 20.3 months. The median OS for the entire group was 34.3 months, with an actuarial 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year OS of 74.7%, 59.4%, 49.7%, and 36.8%, respectively. Among the 148 lesions in the whole group, 19 (12.8%) lesions had local recurrence (LR). The median LRFS time for all patients was 56.9 months. The LRFS rate was 93.6%, 83.5%, 81.4%, and 76.6% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. No patient developed acute grade 3 or 4 toxicity. On univariate analysis, age ≥63 years old, primary site of colorectal cancer, BED10 <85.2 Gy, pathological type of adenocarcinoma, planning target volume (PTV) min BED10 <76.6 Gy, and gross tumor volume (GTV) ≥8.8 cc, were significantly associated with poorer LRFS. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥63 years old, primary site of colorectal cancer, and PTV min BED10 <76.6 Gy were significant risk factors affecting LRFS. Conclusions SBRT is feasible for pulmonary oligometastasis with favorable local control and minimal toxicity. Multiple dose parameters, instead of a prescription dose only, in combination with clinical parameters, should be considered for optimal local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangjin Chai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yutian Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qilong Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Bo Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhaohui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lina Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Reddy AV, Mills MN, Reshko LB, Martin Richardson K, Kersh CR. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Uterine Cancer: Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity. Cancer Invest 2020; 38:522-530. [PMID: 32870714 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1817483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We report on clinical outcomes in patients with oligometastatic uterine cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Twenty-seven patients with 61 lesions were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. Local control was achieved in 49/61 (80.3%) lesions. One-year local-progression-free survival and overall survival were 75.9% and 65.4%. Lesions with favorable response were smaller than lesions with unfavorable response (p = .007). Liver lesions were less likely to achieve favorable response (p = .0128). There were no grade 3 or 4 events. Treatment with SBRT can provide excellent local control in oligometastatic uterine cancer with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav V Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew N Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - K Martin Richardson
- Riverside and University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| | - Charles R Kersh
- Riverside and University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chassagnon G, Martini K, Giraud P, Revel MP. Radiological assessment after stereotactic body radiation of lung tumours. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:379-387. [PMID: 32534799 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The increasing use of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumours comes along with new post-therapeutic imaging findings that should be known by physicians involved in patient follow-up. Radiation-induced lung injury is much more frequent than after conventional radiation therapy, it can also be delayed and has a different radiological presentation. Radiation-induced lung injury after stereotactic body radiation therapy involves the lung parenchyma surrounding the target tumour and appears as a dynamic process continuing for years after completion of the treatment. Thus, the radiological pattern and the severity of radiation-induced lung injury are prone to changes during follow-up, which can make it difficult to differentiate from local recurrence. Contrary to radiation-induced lung injury, local recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy is rare. Other complications mainly depend on tumour location and include airway complications, rib fractures and organizing pneumonia. The aim of this article is to provide a wide overview of radiological changes occurring after SBRT for lung tumours. Awareness of changes following stereotactic body radiation therapy should help avoiding unnecessary interventions for pseudo tumoral presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Chassagnon
- Service de radiologie, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, centre université de Paris, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - K Martini
- Service de radiologie, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, centre université de Paris, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - P Giraud
- Université de Paris, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, centre université de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - M-P Revel
- Service de radiologie, hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, centre université de Paris, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kalinauskaite GG, Tinhofer II, Kufeld MM, Kluge AA, Grün AA, Budach VV, Senger CC, Stromberger CC. Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with lung oligometastases. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:404. [PMID: 32393261 PMCID: PMC7216666 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06892-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with oligometastatic disease can potentially be cured by using an ablative therapy for all active lesions. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment option that lately proved to be as effective and safe as surgery in treating lung metastases (LM). However, it is not clear which patients benefit most and what are the most suitable fractionation regimens. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes after single fraction radiosurgery (SFRS) and fractionated SBRT (fSBRT) in patients with lung oligometastases and identify prognostic clinical features for better survival outcomes. METHODS Fifty-two patients with 94 LM treated with SFRS or fSBRT between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. The characteristics of primary tumor, LM, treatment, toxicity profiles and outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used for estimation of local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. RESULTS Ninety-four LM in 52 patients were treated using SFRS/fSBRT with a median of 2 lesions per patient (range: 1-5). The median planning target volume (PTV)-encompassing dose for SFRS was 24 Gy (range: 17-26) compared to 45 Gy (range: 20-60) in 2-12 fractions with fSBRT. The median follow-up time was 21 months (range: 3-68). LC rates at 1 and 2 years for SFSR vs. fSBRT were 89 and 83% vs. 75 and 59%, respectively (p = 0.026). LM treated with SFSR were significantly smaller (p = 0.001). The 1 and 2-year OS rates for all patients were 84 and 71%, respectively. In univariate analysis treatment with SFRS, an interval of ≥12 months between diagnosis of LM and treatment, non-colorectal cancer histology and BED < 100 Gy were significantly associated with better LC. However, none of these parameters remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression model. OS was significantly better in patients with negative lymph nodes (N0), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 70% and time to first metastasis ≥12 months. There was no grade 3 acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Longer time to first metastasis, good KPS and N0 predicted better OS. Good LC and low toxicity rates were achieved after short SBRT schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goda G. Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg I. Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- The Translational Radiooncology and Radiobiology Research Laboratory, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus M. Kufeld
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne A. Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne A. Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker V. Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin C. Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen C. Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Surgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of pulmonary metastases. A systematic review of literature. Future Sci OA 2020; 6:FSO471. [PMID: 32518686 PMCID: PMC7273364 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2019-0120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
It is not clear as to which is the best treatment among surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung oligometastases. A systematic review of literature with a priori selection criteria was conducted on articles on the treatment of pulmonary metastases with surgery or SBRT. Only original articles with a population of patients of more than 50 were selected. After final selection, 61 articles on surgical treatment and 18 on SBRT were included. No difference was encountered in short-term survival between pulmonary metastasectomy and SBRT. In the long-term surgery seems to guarantee better survival rates. Mortality and morbidity after treatment are 0–4.7% and 0–23% for surgery, and 0–2% and 4–31% for SBRT. Surgical metastasectomy remains the treatment of choice for pulmonary oligometastases. Patients with metastatic cancer with a limited number of deposits may benefit from surgical removal or irradiation of tumor nodules in addiction to chemotherapy. Surgical resection has been demonstrated to improve survival and, in some cases, can be curative. Stereotactic radiotherapy is emerging as a less invasive alternative to surgery, but settings and implications of the two treatments are profoundly different. The two techniques show similar results in the short-term, with lower complications rates for radiotherapy, while in the long-term surgery seems to guarantee higher survival rates.
Collapse
|
32
|
Picchi SG, Lassandro G, Bianco A, Coppola A, Ierardi AM, Rossi UG, Lassandro F. RFA of primary and metastatic lung tumors: long-term results. Med Oncol 2020; 37:35. [PMID: 32219567 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-020-01361-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The aim of our study is a retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety of Computed Tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy of primary and metastatic lung lesions in patients that cannot be considered surgical candidates. From February 2007 to September 2017, we performed 264 CT-guided ablation sessions on 264 lesions in 174 patients (112 M and 62 F; mean age, 68 years; range 36-83 years) affected by primary and metastatic lung lesions. The 45% of patients was affected by primary lung cancer, with size range lesion of 10-50 mm, and the 55% by metastatic lung lesions with size range of 5-49 mm. All patients had no more than three metastases in the lung and pulmonary relapses were treated up to three times. Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Local Progression-Free Survival (LPFS) and Cancer-specific survival (CSS) at 1, 3 and 5 years were calculated both in primary lung tumors and in metastatic patients. Immediate and late RFA-related complications were reported. Pulmonary function tests were evaluated after the procedures. The effectiveness of RFA treatment was evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT. In patients affected by primary lung lesions, the OS rates were 66.73% at 1 year, 23.13% at 3 years and 16.19% at 5 years. In patients affected by metastatic lung lesions, the OS rates were 85.11%, 48.86% and 43.33%, respectively, at 1, 3 and 5 years. PFS at 1, 3 and 5 years were 79.8%, 60.42%, 15.4% in primary lung tumors and 78.59%, 51.8% and 6.07% in metastatic patients. LPFS at 1, 3 and 5 years were 79.8%, 64.69%, 18.87% in primary lung tumors and 86.29%, 69.15% and 44.45% in metastatic patients. CSS at 1, 3 and 5 years was 95.56%, 71.84%, 56.72% in primary lung tumors and 94.07%, 71% and 71% in metastatic patients. Immediate RFA-related complications (pneumothorax, pleural effusion and subcutaneous emphysema) were observed, respectively, in 42, 53 and 13 of 264 procedures (15.9%, 20% and 5%). There also occurred one major complication (lung abscess, 0.36%). No significant worsening of pulmonary function was noted. Our retrospective evaluation showed long-term effectiveness, safety and imaging features of CT-guided RFA in patients affected by primary and metastatic lung cancer as an alternative therapy in non-surgical candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Lassandro
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Bianco
- Department of Pulmonology, Luigi Vanvitelli University, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Anna Maria Ierardi
- UOC Radiology Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Grande Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto G Rossi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging - Interventional Radiology Unit - EO Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cao C, Wang D, Tian DH, Wilson-Smith A, Huang J, Rimner A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereotactic body radiation therapy for colorectal pulmonary metastases. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:5187-5198. [PMID: 32030236 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background There is growing evidence to support the hypothesis that radical treatment of pulmonary oligometastatic disease with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can improve oncological outcomes. However, some reports suggest colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases are associated with radioresistance. The present systematic review aimed to assess the local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with CRC pulmonary metastases treated by SBRT. Secondary outcomes included assessment of peri-procedural complications and identification of prognostic factors on LC. Methods Electronic databases were systematically searched from their dates of inception using predefined criteria. Summative statistical analysis was performed for patients with CRC pulmonary metastases, and comparative meta-analysis was performed for patients with CRC versus non-CRC pulmonary metastases. Results Using predefined criteria, 18 relevant studies were identified from the existing literature. LC for CRC pulmonary metastases treated by SBRT at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were estimated to be 81%, 66%, and 60%, respectively. OS and PFS at 3-year were 52% and 13%, respectively. Patients with CRC pulmonary metastases were associated with significantly lower LC compared to non-CRC pulmonary metastases [HR, 2.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.93-4.45; P<0.00001], but higher OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.82; P=0.001). There were no reported periprocedural mortalities and low incidences of periprocedural morbidities. Conclusions These findings may have implications for patient and treatment selection, dose fractionation, and support the hypothesis that CRC pulmonary metastases may require higher biological effective doses while respecting normal tissue constraints when treated with SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Cao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel Wang
- Department of Medicine, Cornell University, New York, USA
| | - David H Tian
- Collaborative Research Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Anaesthesia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - James Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Management of metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) can be challenging. This review gives an insight of current treatment options for patients with synchronous metastatic HNSCC and suggests a therapeutic algorithm. RECENT FINDINGS With the rise of novel therapeutic techniques and medications, many treatment options for both locoregional and distant metastatic disease have become available. The evolving paradigm of metastatic disease now integrates the concept of oligometastatic disease. On top of systemic treatments, patients with low metastatic burden can benefit from curative approaches such as local therapies (surgery, radiotherapy) directed to either primary tumour and distant metastasis. However, data integrating these considerations in the management of metastatic HNSCC is still lacking. Based on this algorithm, we can provide a tailored treatment to each patient with synchronous metastatic HNSCC, according to their age, general condition and metastatic burden.
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Conventional approaches to the treatment of early-stage lung cancer have focused on the use of surgical methods to remove the tumor. Recent progress in radiation therapy techniques and in the field of interventional oncology has seen the development of several novel ablative therapies that have gained widespread acceptance as alternatives to conventional surgical options in appropriately selected patients. Local control rates with stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage lung cancer now approach those of surgical resection, while percutaneous ablation is in widespread use for the treatment of lung cancer and oligometastatic disease for selected other malignancies. Tumors treated with targeted medical and ablative therapies can respond to treatment differently when compared with conventional therapies. For example, after stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiologic patterns of posttreatment change can mimic disease progression, and, following percutaneous ablation, the expected initial increase in the size of a treated lesion limits the utility of conventional size-based response assessment criteria. In addition, numerous treatment-related side effects have been described that are important to recognize, both to ensure appropriate treatment and to avoid misclassification as worsening tumor. Imaging plays a vital role in the assessment of patients receiving targeted ablative therapy, and it is essential that thoracic radiologists become familiar with these findings.
Collapse
|
36
|
Pacelli R, Caroprese M, Palma G, Oliviero C, Clemente S, Cella L, Conson M. Technological evolution of radiation treatment: Implications for clinical applications. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:193-201. [PMID: 31395286 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The contemporary approach to the management of a cancer patient requires an "ab initio" involvement of different medical domains in order to correctly design an individual patient's pathway toward cure. With new therapeutic tools in every medical field developing faster than ever before the patient care outcomes can be achieved if all surgical, drug, and radiation options are considered in the design of the appropriate therapeutic strategy for a given patient. Radiation therapy (RT) is a clinical discipline in which experts from different fields continuously interact in order to manage the multistep process of the radiation treatment. RT is found to be an appropriate intervention for diverse indications in about 50% of cancer patients during the course of their disease. Technologies are essential in dealing with the complexity of RT treatments and for driving the increasingly sophisticated RT approaches becoming available for the treatment of Cancer. High conformal techniques, namely intensity modulated or volumetric modulated arc techniques, ablative techniques (Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery), particle therapy (proton or carbon ion therapy) allow for success in treating irregularly shaped or critically located targets and for the sharpness of the dose fall-off outside the target. The advanced on-board imaging, including real-time position management systems, makes possible image-guided radiation treatment that results in substantial margin reduction and, in select cases, implementation of an adaptive approach. The therapeutic gains of modern RT are also due in part to the enhanced anticancer activity obtained by coadministering RT with chemotherapy, targeted molecules, and currently immune checkpoints inhibitors. These main clinically relevant steps forward in Radiation Oncology represent a change of gear in the field that may have a profound impact on the management of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Pacelli
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University "Federico II", Napoli, Italy.
| | - Mara Caroprese
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University "Federico II", Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Palma
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages, National Research Council, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | - Laura Cella
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages, National Research Council, Napoli, Italy
| | - Manuel Conson
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University "Federico II", Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Stereotactic radiation therapy in oligometastatic colorectal cancer: outcome of 102 patients and 150 lesions. Clin Exp Metastasis 2019; 36:331-342. [PMID: 31165360 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-019-09976-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
To evaluate the local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), out-field PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and failure predictors of SRT in a series of various sites oligometastatic CRC patients. Patients with oligometastatic CRC disease were analyzed retrospectively. The SRT prescribed dose was dependent on the lesion volume and its location. 102 consecutive oligometastatic CRC patients (150 lesions) were included. They underwent SRT between 2012 and 2015. Median prescription dose was 45 Gy (median dose/fraction was 15 Gy/3 fractions biological equivalent dose (BED10) 112.5 Gy). Median follow-up was 11.4 months. No patients experienced G3 and G4 toxicity. No progression was found in 82% (radiological response at 3 months) and 85% (best radiological response) out of 150 evaluable lesions. At 1 and 2 years: LC was 70% and 55%; OS was 90% and 90%; PFS was 37% and 27%; out-field PFS was 37% and 23% respectively. Progressive disease was correlated with BED10 (better LC when BED10 was ≥ 75 Gy (p < 0.0001)). In multivariate analysis, LC was higher in lesions with a Plpnning target volume (PTV) volume < 42 cm3 and BED10 ≥ 75 Gy. Patients with Karnofsky performance status < 90 showed higher out-field progression. SRT is an effective treatment for patients with oligometastases from CRC. Its low treatment-associated morbidity and acceptable LC make of SRT an option not only in selected cases. Further studies should be focused to clarify which patient subgroup will benefit most from this treatment modality and to define the optimal dose to improve LC while maintaining low toxicity profile.
Collapse
|
38
|
Okonogi N, Kaminuma T, Okimoto T, Shinoto M, Yamamoto N, Yamada S, Murata K, Ohno T, Shioyama Y, Tsuji H, Nakano T, Kamada T. Carbon-ion radiotherapy for lymph node oligo-recurrence: a multi-institutional study by the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS). Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24:1143-1150. [PMID: 30968270 PMCID: PMC6687700 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01440-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background The efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for lymph node (LN) oligo-recurrence has only been evaluated in limited single-center studies. We aimed to investigate the benefit of C-ion RT for LN oligo-recurrence in a large multi-center study. Methods Patients who received C-ion RT between December 1996 and December 2015 at 4 participating facilities and who met the following eligibility criteria were included: (i) histological or clinical diagnosis of LN recurrence; (ii) controlled primary lesion; (iii) no recurrence other than LN; (iv) LN recurrence involved in a single lymphatic site; and (v) age ≥ 20 years. Results A total of 323 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up period was 34 months for surviving patients. The most common dose fractionation of C-ion RT was 48.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 12 fractions. Forty-seven patients had a history of RT at the recurrent site. The 2-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rates after C-ion RT were 85% and 63%, respectively. Only 1 patient developed grade-3 toxicity. Factors such as LN diameter, histology, and history of previous RT did not correlate with LC. Smaller diameters (< 30 mm) and numbers (≤ 3) of LN metastases as well as longer disease-free intervals post-primary therapy (≥ 16 months) were associated with significantly better OS. Conclusions C-ion RT for LN oligo-recurrence appeared to be effective and safe. C-ion RT may provide a survival benefit to patients with LN oligo-recurrence, particularly to those with few LN metastases, smaller LN diameters, and longer disease-free intervals. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10147-019-01440-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyuki Okonogi
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Takuya Kaminuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Makoto Shinoto
- Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA HIMAT Foundation, Saga, Japan
| | - Naoyoshi Yamamoto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Murata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | | | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Takashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Li J, Yuan Y, Yang F, Wang Y, Zhu X, Wang Z, Zheng S, Wan D, He J, Wang J, Ba Y, Bai C, Bai L, Bai W, Bi F, Cai K, Cai M, Cai S, Chen G, Chen K, Chen L, Chen P, Chi P, Dai G, Deng Y, Ding K, Fan Q, Fang W, Fang X, Feng F, Fu C, Fu Q, Gu Y, He Y, Jia B, Jiang K, Lai M, Lan P, Li E, Li D, Li J, Li L, Li M, Li S, Li Y, Li Y, Li Z, Liang X, Liang Z, Lin F, Lin G, Liu H, Liu J, Liu T, Liu Y, Pan H, Pan Z, Pei H, Qiu M, Qu X, Ren L, Shen Z, Sheng W, Song C, Song L, Sun J, Sun L, Sun Y, Tang Y, Tao M, Wang C, Wang H, Wang J, Wang S, Wang X, Wang X, Wang Z, Wu A, Wu N, Xia L, Xiao Y, Xing B, Xiong B, Xu J, Xu J, Xu N, Xu R, Xu Z, Yang Y, Yao H, Ye Y, Yu Y, Yu Y, Yue J, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhang S, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Zhao L, Zhao R, Zhou F, Zhou J, Jin J, Gu J, Shen L. Expert consensus on multidisciplinary therapy of colorectal cancer with lung metastases (2019 edition). J Hematol Oncol 2019; 12:16. [PMID: 30764882 PMCID: PMC6376656 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-019-0702-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The lungs are the second most common site of metastasis for colorectal cancer (CRC) after the liver. Rectal cancer is associated with a higher incidence of lung metastases compared to colon cancer. In China, the proportion of rectal cancer cases is around 50%, much higher than that in Western countries (nearly 30%). However, there is no available consensus or guideline focusing on CRC with lung metastases. We conducted an extensive discussion and reached a consensus of management for lung metastases in CRC based on current research reports and the experts' clinical experiences and knowledge. This consensus provided detailed approaches of diagnosis and differential diagnosis and provided general guidelines for multidisciplinary therapy (MDT) of lung metastases. We also focused on recommendations of MDT management of synchronous lung metastases and initial metachronous lung metastases. This consensus might improve clinical practice of CRC with lung metastases in China and will encourage oncologists to conduct more clinical trials to obtain high-level evidences about managing lung metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11, Xizhimen Nandajie, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11, Xizhimen Nandajie, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Zhenghang Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Shu Zheng
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Desen Wan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie He
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Jianping Wang
- The Sixth Hospital Affiliated of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 19, Erheng Road, Yuancun, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yi Ba
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Huanhu West Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China
| | - Chunmei Bai
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Li Bai
- Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Bai
- Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, No. 3, Zhigong Xincun, Xinghualing District, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Feng Bi
- Huaxi Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Kaican Cai
- Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, No. 1838, Guangzhou North Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Muyan Cai
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Gong Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Keneng Chen
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Lin Chen
- Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Pengju Chen
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xinquan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Guanghai Dai
- Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yanhong Deng
- The Sixth Hospital Affiliated of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 19, Erheng Road, Yuancun, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kefeng Ding
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qingxia Fan
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianhe East Road, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Weijia Fang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79, Qingchun Road, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuedong Fang
- China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126, Sendai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Fengyi Feng
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Chuangang Fu
- Tongji University Shanghai East Hospital, No. 150, Jimo Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China
| | - Qihan Fu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yanhong Gu
- Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, No. 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yulong He
- The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 628, Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Baoqing Jia
- Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Kewei Jiang
- Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11, Xizhimen Nandajie, Beijing, China
| | - Maode Lai
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 866, Yuhangtang Road, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ping Lan
- The Sixth Hospital Affiliated of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 19, Erheng Road, Yuancun, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Enxiao Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Dechuan Li
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, No. 38, Guangji Road, Banshanqiao, Gongshu District, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jin Li
- Tongji University Shanghai East Hospital, No. 150, Jimo Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China
| | - Leping Li
- Shandong Provincial Hospital, No. 324, Jingwuweiqi Road, Ji'nan, Shangdong, China
| | - Ming Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Shaolei Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Yongheng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Zhongwu Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xiaobo Liang
- Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, No. 3, Zhigong Xincun, Xinghualing District, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Zhiyong Liang
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lin
- The Sixth Hospital Affiliated of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 19, Erheng Road, Yuancun, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Guole Lin
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Hongjun Liu
- Shandong Provincial Hospital, No. 324, Jingwuweiqi Road, Ji'nan, Shangdong, China
| | - Jianzhong Liu
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Huanhu West Road, Tiyuanbei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, No. 180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunpeng Liu
- The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 3, Qingchun East Road, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhizhong Pan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Haiping Pei
- Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Meng Qiu
- Huaxi Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiujuan Qu
- The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Li Ren
- Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, No. 180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhanlong Shen
- Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11, Xizhimen Nandajie, Beijing, China
| | - Weiqi Sheng
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Chun Song
- Tongji University Shanghai East Hospital, No. 150, Jimo Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijie Song
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79, Qingchun Road, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianguo Sun
- Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, No. 83, Xinqiaozheng Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, China
| | - Lingyu Sun
- The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No. 37, Yiyuan Street, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yingshi Sun
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Min Tao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 188, Shizi Street, Canglang District, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chang Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71, Xinmin Road, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Haijiang Wang
- The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, No. 29, Bulan Road, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11, Xizhimen Nandajie, Beijing, China
| | - Shubin Wang
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120, Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Xicheng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xishan Wang
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Huaxi Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Aiwen Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Nan Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Lijian Xia
- Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital, No. 16766, Jingshi Road, Lixia District, Ji'nan, Shandong, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Baocai Xing
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Bin Xiong
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No. 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jianmin Xu
- Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, No. 180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- 307 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Road 8, Dong Street, Fengtai Distinct, Beijing, China
| | - Nong Xu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 79, Qingchun Road, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ruihua Xu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhongfa Xu
- Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 38, Wuyingshan Road, Tianqiao District, Ji'nan, Shandong, China
| | - Yue Yang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Hongwei Yao
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yingjiang Ye
- Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11, Xizhimen Nandajie, Beijing, China
| | - Yonghua Yu
- Shandong Cancer Hospital, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Ji'nan, Shandong, China
| | - Yueming Yu
- The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12, Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Jinbo Yue
- Shandong Cancer Hospital, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Ji'nan, Shandong, China
| | - Jingdong Zhang
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Suzhan Zhang
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Changhai Hospital, No. 168, Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanqiao Zhang
- Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Zhao
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, No. 1, Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Ren Zhao
- Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Fuxiang Zhou
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No. 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, No. 180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Jin
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
| | - Jin Gu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
| | - Lin Shen
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jingu K, Matsushita H, Yamamoto T, Umezawa R, Ishikawa Y, Takahashi N, Katagiri Y, Takeda K, Kadoya N. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 17:1533033818794936. [PMID: 30145943 PMCID: PMC6111389 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818794936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine whether pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer have greater radioresistance than that of pulmonary oligometastases from other cancers and whether good local control can be achieved by dose escalation in stereotactic body radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement and methods. Studies were obtained from a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for publications using search terms designed to identify studies on "oligometastases," "lung," "stereotactic radiotherapy," and "colorectal cancer." For meta-analysis 1, studies that showed the number of local failures after stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma and other cancers were included. For meta-analysis2, studies in which a comparison was made of local control rates of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma by stereotactic body radiotherapy with a higher dose and that with a lower dose were included. A meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel statics with the fixed or random-effect model by Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS Eighteen retrospective studies with 1920 patients with pulmonary oligometastases were used in meta-analysis 1. The local control rate in patients with pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer was significantly lower than that in patients with pulmonary oligometastases from other cancers (odds ratio = 3.10, P < .00001). Next, 8 retrospective studies with 478 patients were included in meta-analysis 2 for dose escalation. Better local control was achieved by a higher prescription dose than by a lower prescription dose (odds ratio = 0.16, P < .00001). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis indicated that local control of pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer by stereotactic body radiotherapy was significantly worse than that of pulmonary metastases from other cancers; however, our results also indicated that good local control of pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer can be achieved by dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichi Jingu
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Haruo Matsushita
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Rei Umezawa
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yojiro Ishikawa
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yu Katagiri
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazuya Takeda
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Beermann M, Lindeberg J, Engstrand J, Galmén K, Karlgren S, Stillström D, Nilsson H, Harbut P, Freedman J. 1000 consecutive ablation sessions in the era of computer assisted image guidance - Lessons learned. Eur J Radiol Open 2018; 6:1-8. [PMID: 30547062 PMCID: PMC6282637 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Computer assisted targeting techniques are simple to use and improve results in ablative tumour treatments. The indications for ablative soft tissue tumour ablation are increasing. Treatments are superior to resective surgery in terms of complications and hospitalization, oncological non-inferiority remains to be proven. An incomplete ablation can be retreated without negative effects on survival. Jet ventilation is an effective technique to minimize organ displacement during percutaneous or laparoscopic ablation.
Background Ablation therapies for tumours are becoming more used as ablation modalities evolve and targeting solutions are getting better. There is an increasing body of long-term results challenging resection and proving lower morbidities and costs. The aim of this paper is to share the experiences from a high-volume centre in introducing computer assisted targeting solutions and efficient ablation modalities like microwave generators and irreversible electroporation. Material and methods One thousand consecutive treatments in one high-volume centre were evaluated retrospectively from prospectively collected data. Results The purpose of this paper is to present the benefits of going into computer assisted targeting techniques and microwave technology; pitfalls and overview of outcomes. The main target organ was the liver and the main indications were ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas and colorectal liver metastases. With the assistance of computer assisted targeting the local recurrence rate within 6 months has dropped from 30 to near 10%. The survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases is not worse if the tumour can be retreated after a local recurrence. Multiple colorectal liver metastases can be treated successfully. Discussion The incorporation of computer assisted targeting technologies for ultrasound-, ct guided- and laparoscopic tumour ablation has been very successful and without a noticeable learning curve. The same is true for switching from radiofrequency energies to microwave generators and irreversible electroporation. Conclusion It is well worthwhile upgrading ablation and targeting technologies to achieve excellent and reproducible results and minimizing operator dependency.
Collapse
Key Words
- Ablation
- CAS, computer assisted surgery
- Colorectal liver metastases
- Fused ultrasound
- HFJV, high frequency jet ventilation
- HIFU, high intensity focused ultrasound
- Hepatocellular carcinoma
- IRE
- IRE, irreversible electroporation
- Jet ventilation
- Kidney
- Liver
- Lung
- MWA, microwave ablation
- Microwave
- Pancreas
- RF
- RFA, radio-frequency ablation
- Renal cell carcinoma
- SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy
- Stereotactic navigation
- TAE, TACE, trans-arterial embolization or chemo-embolization
- TIVA, total intravenous anaesthesia
- Ultrasound
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Beermann
- Dept of Radiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lindeberg
- Dept of Radiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jennie Engstrand
- Dept of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karolina Galmén
- Dept of Anaesthesiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Silja Karlgren
- Dept of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Stillström
- Dept of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Nilsson
- Dept of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piotr Harbut
- Dept of Anaesthesiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jacob Freedman
- Dept of Surgery and Urology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Franzese C, Comito T, Toska E, Tozzi A, Clerici E, De Rose F, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Reggiori G, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Predictive factors for survival of oligometastatic colorectal cancer treated with Stereotactic body radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 133:220-226. [PMID: 30414754 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents one of the major leading causes of death from cancer. Aim of the present study was to analyze outcome of oligometastatic CRC patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and to evaluate predictive factors of survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included patients with maximum 5 metastases. Previous/concomitant systemic treatments were allowed. End points of the present study were the outcome in terms of Local control of treated metastases (LC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS 437 metastases were treated in 270 patients. Lung was site of metastases in 48.5% of cases, followed by liver (36.4%). Systemic treatment was administered before SBRT in 199 patients (73.7%). Median follow-up time was 23 months (3-98.7). Rates of LC at 1, 3 and 5 years were 95%, 73% and 73%, respectively. Time from diagnosis of metastases to SBRT was the only factor predictive of LC (HR 1.62, p = 0.023). Median PFS was 8.6 months. Rates of OS at 1, 3 and 5 years were 88.5%, 56.6%, and 37.2%, respectively. Lesion greater than 30 mm (HR 1.82, p = 0.030), presence of non-lung metastases (HR 1.67, p = 0.020), the use of systemic treatment before SBRT (HR 1.82, p = 0.023), and progression of treated metastases (HR 1.80, p = 0.007), were all predictive of worse OS. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiation therapy represents an effective approach in the management of oligometastatic CRC. Control of treated oligometastases seems to be a strong positive predictive factor for both PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Franzese
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy.
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Eno Toska
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Tozzi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, Milan, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Steinbichler TB, Lichtenecker M, Anegg M, Dejaco D, Kofler B, Schartinger VH, Kasseroler MT, Forthuber B, Posch A, Riechelmann H. Persistent Head and Neck Cancer Following First-Line Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10110421. [PMID: 30400290 PMCID: PMC6265977 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10110421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Following first-line treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC), persistent disease may require second-line treatment. Methods: All patients with HNC treated between 2008 and 2016 were included. Second-line treatment modalities and survival of patients were analyzed. Results: After first-line therapy, 175/741 patients had persistent disease. Of these, 112 were considered eligible for second-line treatment. Second-line treatment resulted in 50% complete response. Median overall survival of patients receiving second-line therapy was 24 (95% CI: 19 to 29) months; otherwise survival was 10 (9 to 11; p < 0.0001) months. Patients receiving second-line surgery had a median overall survival of 45 (28 to 62) months, patients receiving second-line radiotherapy had a median overall survival of 37 (0 to 79; p = 0.17) months, and patients receiving systemic therapy had a median overall survival of 13 (10 to 16; p < 0.001) months. Patients with persistent HNC in the neck had a better median survival (45 months; 16 to 74 months; p = 0.001) than patients with persistence at other sites. Conclusion: Early treatment response evaluation allows early initiation of second-line treatment and offers selected patients with persistent disease a realistic chance to achieve complete response after all. If possible, surgery or radiotherapy are preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Madeleine Lichtenecker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Maria Anegg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Daniel Dejaco
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Barbara Kofler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Volker Hans Schartinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Maria-Therese Kasseroler
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Britta Forthuber
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Andrea Posch
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Herbert Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bensalah K, Albiges L, Bernhard JC, Bigot P, Bodin T, Boissier R, Correas JM, Gimel P, Hetet JF, Long JA, Nouhaud FX, Ouzaïd I, Rioux-Leclercq N, Méjean A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du rein. Prog Urol 2018; 28 Suppl 1:R5-R33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
45
|
Bensalah K, Albiges L, Bernhard JC, Bigot P, Bodin T, Boissier R, Correas JM, Gimel P, Hetet JF, Long JA, Nouhaud FX, Ouzaïd I, Rioux-Leclercq N, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Management of kidney cancer. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S3-S31. [PMID: 30473002 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bensalah
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-Le-Guilloux, 35033, Rennes cedex, France.
| | - L Albiges
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Département d'oncologie génito-urinaire, Gustave-Roussy, 94805, Villejuif cedex, France
| | - J-C Bernhard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - P Bigot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49000, Angers, France
| | - T Bodin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Centre d'urologie Prado-Louvain, 188, rue du Rouet, 13008, Marseille, France
| | - R Boissier
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU Conception, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - J-M Correas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'imagerie médicale (radiologie), hôpital universitaire Necker-Enfants-malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France
| | - P Gimel
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Centre d'urologie, site Médipôle, 5, avenue Ambroise-Croizat, 66330, Cabestany, France
| | - J-F Hetet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service de chirurgie urologique, clinique Jules-Verne, 2-4, route de Paris, 44314, Nantes, France
| | - J-A Long
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service de chirurgie urologique et de la transplantation rénale, hôpital Michallon, CHU Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700, La Tronche, France
| | - F-X Nouhaud
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - I Ouzaïd
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Clinique urologique, hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018, Paris, France
| | - N Rioux-Leclercq
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, CHU Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033, Rennes cedex 9, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Khadige M, Salleron J, Marchesi V, Oldrini G, Peiffert D, Beckendorf V. Cyberknife ® stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary metastases: evaluation of local control at 24 months. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:4976-4984. [PMID: 30233872 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background CyberKnife® stereotactic radiotherapy allows for minimally invasive treatment with satisfactory results in patients with inoperable primary or metastatic lung cancer. The objective of this study was to identify factors influencing the probability of local control. Methods Ninety-five patients (100 lung tumors) treated between January and December 2013 at our department by SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) using CyberKnife® were included in the study. There were 71 stage T1 or T2 primary tumors and 29 secondary tumors. The tracking methods were as follow: fiducial markers with Synchrony® in 50 cases (gold seeds in 35, coils in 15 cases), spine with 4D-CT and Xsight® Spine in 43 cases, and direct viewing by Xsight® Lung in 7 cases. The methods were allocated according to the characteristics of each target. Results With a median follow-up of 24 months, the probability of local control at 24 months was 88%. The probability of local control differed according to the size of the target (92% for tumors ≤35 mm and 54% for tumors >35 mm: P=0.013) and according to the distance of the fiducial markers in relation to the target (95% when <50 mm and 69% when ≥50 mm: P=0.011). Conclusions The best results were obtained with small lesions. With Synchrony®, the distance of the target relative to the fiducial markers should be less than 50 mm. Gold seeds are recommended, although coils may be used instead of gold seeds. The number of fiducial markers did not have a significant impact on the probability of local control. With an appropriate tracking method, stereotactic radiotherapy is an efficient treatment for stage I lung cancer and lung oligometastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Khadige
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Data Biostatistics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Vincent Marchesi
- Department of Medical physics, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Guillaume Oldrini
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France.,CRAN, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Didier Peiffert
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Comparison of clinical efficacy and complications of 125I seed brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:360-367. [PMID: 30237819 PMCID: PMC6142642 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.77956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the efficacies of 125I seed implantation and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treatment of recurrent lung metastases from colorectal cancer, to compare the tolerance of lung tissue to both forms of radiotherapy, and to analyze the factors that affect the prognosis. Material and methods According to treatment received, thirty colorectal cancer patients with post-operative lung metastases were separated into two groups: 125I seed implantation group (group A; n = 16) and SBRT group (group B; n = 14). Patients were followed up, and local control rate, survival, and post-operative complications were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the independent predictors of poor prognosis. Results Survival was significantly different between group A and group B (median survival, 15 months and 11.5 months, respectively; p = 0.015). Local control rates at the first, third, sixth, and twelfth months after treatment were all > 80%, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.829). Significant differences were seen between the two groups in the number of treatments received (p = 0.009) and the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (p < 0.001) as well as radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis (p = 0.005). On multivariate regression analysis radiation pneumonitis was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (HR = 3.356, 95% CI: 1.518-7.421; p = 0.003). Conclusions 125I seeds brachytherapy and SBRT are both effective for control of lung metastases but the former causes milder lung tissue damage. It can be repeated after short intervals, and appears to be a safe and efficient treatment for lung metastases.
Collapse
|
48
|
Baumann R, Chan MKH, Pyschny F, Stera S, Malzkuhn B, Wurster S, Huttenlocher S, Szücs M, Imhoff D, Keller C, Balermpas P, Rades D, Rödel C, Dunst J, Hildebrandt G, Blanck O. Clinical Results of Mean GTV Dose Optimized Robotic-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Tumors. Front Oncol 2018; 8:171. [PMID: 29868486 PMCID: PMC5966546 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gross tumor volume (GTV) mean dose optimized stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary and secondary lung tumors with and without robotic real-time motion compensation. Materials and methods Between 2011 and 2017, 208 patients were treated with SBRT for 111 primary lung tumors and 163 lung metastases with a median GTV of 8.2 cc (0.3–174.0 cc). Monte Carlo dose optimization was performed prioritizing GTV mean dose at the potential cost of planning target volume (PTV) coverage reduction while adhering to safe normal tissue constraints. The median GTV mean biological effective dose (BED)10 was 162.0 Gy10 (34.2–253.6 Gy10) and the prescribed PTV BED10 ranged 23.6–151.2 Gy10 (median, 100.8 Gy10). Motion compensation was realized through direct tracking (44.9%), fiducial tracking (4.4%), and internal target volume (ITV) concepts with small (≤5 mm, 33.2%) or large (>5 mm, 17.5%) motion. The local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed. Results Median follow-up was 14.5 months (1–72 months). The 2-year actuarial LC, PFS, and OS rates were 93.1, 43.2, and 62.4%, and the median PFS and OS were 18.0 and 39.8 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, prior local irradiation (hazard ratio (HR) 0.18, confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.63, p = 0.01), GTV/PTV (HR 1.01–1.02, CI 1.01–1.04, p < 0.02), and PTV prescription, mean GTV, and maximum plan BED10 (HR 0.97–0.99, CI 0.96–0.99, p < 0.01) were predictive for LC while the tracking method was not (p = 0.97). For PFS and OS, multivariate analysis showed Karnofsky Index (p < 0.01) and tumor stage (p ≤ 0.02) to be significant factors for outcome prediction. Late radiation pneumonitis or chronic rip fractures grade 1–2 were observed in 5.3% of the patients. Grade ≥3 side effects did not occur. Conclusion Robotic SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for lung tumors. Reducing the PTV prescription and keeping high GTV mean doses allowed the reduction of toxicity while maintaining high local tumor control. The use of real-time motion compensation is strongly advised, however, well-performed ITV motion compensation may be used alternatively when direct tracking is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rene Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt und Norddeutschland, Güstrow, Germany
| | - Mark K H Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Florian Pyschny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Susanne Stera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bettina Malzkuhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Stefan Wurster
- Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt und Norddeutschland, Güstrow, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Stefan Huttenlocher
- Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt und Norddeutschland, Güstrow, Germany
| | - Marcella Szücs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christian Keller
- Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt und Norddeutschland, Güstrow, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt und Norddeutschland, Güstrow, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt und Norddeutschland, Güstrow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hamaji M, Mitsuyoshi T, Yoshizawa A, Sato T, Matsuo Y, Chen-Yoshikawa TF, Sonobe M, Mizowaki T, Date H. Salvage Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Local Relapse After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105:e165-e168. [PMID: 29571347 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Although several studies have evaluated the local control and survival outcomes in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pulmonary oligometastases, little data are available on the management of local relapse. Here, we present 3 patients who underwent lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection as salvage pulmonary metastasectomy for local relapse after SBRT. The postoperative course has been uneventful for all 3 patients, with no evidence of disease at 40, 51, and 6 months from the salvage metastasectomy. Our experience suggests that salvage pulmonary metastasectomy may be associated with local control and long-term survival in carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Takamasa Mitsuyoshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Toshihiko Sato
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Makoto Sonobe
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Date
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver metastasis - clinical outcomes from the international multi-institutional RSSearch® Patient Registry. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:26. [PMID: 29439707 PMCID: PMC5811977 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-0969-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for liver metastases in patients unsuitable for surgery. We investigated factors associated with clinical outcomes for liver metastases treated with SBRT from a multi-center, international patient registry. Methods Patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT were identified in the RSSearch® Patient Registry. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics associated with treatment outcomes were assessed. Dose fractionations were normalized to BED10. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier analysis and log-rank test. Results The study included 427 patients with 568 liver metastases from 25 academic and community-based centers. Median age was 67 years (31–91 years). Colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) was the most common primary cancer. 73% of patients received prior chemotherapy. Median tumor volume was 40 cm3 (1.6–877 cm3), median SBRT dose was 45 Gy (12–60 Gy) delivered in a median of 3 fractions [1–5]. At a median follow-up of 14 months (1–91 months) the median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. Median OS was greater for patients with CRC (27 mo), breast (21 mo) and gynecological (25 mo) metastases compared to lung (10 mo), other gastro-intestinal (GI) (18 mo) and pancreatic (6 mo) primaries (p < 0.0001). Smaller tumor volumes (< 40 cm3) correlated with improved OS (25 months vs 15 months p = 0.0014). BED10 ≥ 100 Gy was also associated with improved OS (27 months vs 15 months p < 0.0001). Local control (LC) was evaluable in 430 liver metastases from 324 patients. Two-year LC rates was better for BED10 ≥ 100 Gy (77.2% vs 59.6%) and the median LC was better for tumors < 40 cm3 (52 vs 39 months). There was no difference in LC based on histology of the primary tumor. Conclusions In a large, multi-institutional series of patients with liver metastasis treated with SBRT, reasonable LC and OS was observed. OS and LC depended on dose and tumor volume, while OS varied by primary tumor. Future prospective trials on the role of SBRT for liver metastasis from different primaries in the setting of multidisciplinary management including systemic therapy, is warranted. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885299.
Collapse
|