1
|
Wang Z, Chen H, Chen Q, Zhu Y, Li M, Zhou J. Multi-institutional study of 'Sandwich treatment' for motor area large brain metastases (LBM) with diameter over 3 cm. Radiol Oncol 2024; 58:145-152. [PMID: 38183280 PMCID: PMC10878778 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2024-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of the present study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of 'Sandwich treatment' strategy for large brain metastases (LBM) with diameter over 3 cm (minimum volume >= 15 cm3) located in motor area. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients from four gamma knife center that received 'Sandwich treatment' were retrospectively studied from January 2016 to March 2023. The strategy was one-week treatment course including 2 stages of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and using bevacizumab once during SRS gap. The tumor volume and peri-tumor edema changes were analyzed before and after 'Sandwich treatment'. Manual muscle testing (MMT) score and Barthel Index (BI) score were used to evaluate the changes of patients' movement and physical strength rehabilitation. The patients' overall survival (OS) and tumor local control (TLC) rate was calculated. Cox regression model was used to analyze the risk factors that related to TLC. RESULTS 61 patients with 72 lesions received the 'Sandwich treatment'. The median prescription dose was 13.0 Gy and 12.5 Gy at the first- and second-stage SRS. The mean tumor volume at the time of 'Sandwich treatment' and 3 months later was 20.1 cm3 and 12.3, respectively (P < 0.01). The mean peri-tumor edema volume at the first- and second-stage SRS was 12.6 cm3 and 5.2 cm3, respectively (P < 0.01). Patients' median MMT score improved from 6 at the beginning to 8 at the end of 'Sandwich treatment' (P < 0.01), BI score was also greatly improved from 45 at the time of 'Sandwich treatment' to 95 after 3 months (P < 0.01). Patients' median OS was 14.0 months, and the 3, 6, 12 months OS rate was 92.0%, 86.0% and 66.0%, respectively. The TLC rate at 3, 6, 12 months was 98.4%, 93.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Patients with lung cancer had lower risk of tumor relapse. The cumulative incidence of patient's hemorrhage and radiation necrosis was 4.92% (3/61) and 13.11% (8/61) after 'Sandwich treatment'. CONCLUSIONS 'Sandwich treatment' strategy is safe and effective for LBM located in motor area. The strategy could rapidly improve the patients' movement and enhance their physical strength rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Wang
- Cancer Center, Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haining Chen
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Anhui Provincial Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Qun Chen
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center. Jiangsu Province People’s Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjing, China
| | - Yucun Zhu
- Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Ming ji Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Min Li
- Cancer Center, Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Zhou
- Cancer Center, Gamma Knife Treatment Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diehl CD, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Ille S, Kahl KH, Onken J, Rieken S, Sarria GR, Shiban E, Wagner A, Beck J, Brehmer S, Ganslandt O, Hamed M, Meyer B, Münter M, Raabe A, Rohde V, Schaller K, Schilling D, Schneider M, Sperk E, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Vatter H, Combs SE. Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3670. [PMID: 37509330 PMCID: PMC10377800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Niedersachsen (CCC-N), 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Ganslandt
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karl Schaller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Geneva Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Mannheim Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Resection of Low-Grade Gliomas in the Face Area of the Primary Motor Cortex and Neurological Outcome. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030781. [PMID: 36765739 PMCID: PMC9913697 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE During surgery on low-grade gliomas (LGG), reliable data relevant to the primary motor cortex (M1) for the face area are lacking. We analyzed the impact of tumor removal within the M1 face area on neurological deficits. METHODS We included LGG patients with resection within the M1 face area between May 2012 and November 2019. The primary endpoint was postoperative facial motor function. Secondary endpoints were postoperative aphasia, dysarthria, and dysphagia. Surgery was performed either with the awake protocol or under anesthesia with continuous dynamic mapping. The alarm criteria were speech arrest or a mapping threshold of 3 mA or less. Resection was completed in five patients. The resection was stopped due to the alarm criteria in three patients and for other reasons (vascular supply, patient performance) in four patients. A total of 66.7% (n = 8) presented with new-onset facial paresis (62.5% left LGG) and 41.7% (n = 5) with aphasia (all left LGG) postoperatively. After one year, all eight patients had recovered from the facial paresis. Tumor removal within the M1 face area was not associated with permanent facial motor deficits.
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsuda R, Hasegawa M, Tamamoto T, Ochi T, Miyasaka T, Inooka N, Hontsu S, Miura S, Takeshima Y, Tamura K, Yamada S, Nishimura F, Nakagawa I, Motoyama Y, Park YS, Nakase H. Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with a micro-multileaf collimator for brain metastasis in the primary motor cortex. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:63-70. [PMID: 34927204 PMCID: PMC8776695 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of linear accelerators (linac)-based, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) with a micro-multileaf collimator for brain metastasis in the primary motor cortex (BMPMC). Thirty-five consecutive patients with BMPMC who were treated by linac-based SRS or fSRT between January 2012 and March 2020 were analyzed. BMPMC was defined as a tumor located in the precentral gyrus on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T2-weghted imaging (T2WI). In total, 35 patients with 37 metastases were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 13 (range: 1-97) months. The tumor volume was 0.05-26.5 (median: 0.62) cm3. All patients were treated with SRS or fSRT using 35 Gy with 7 Gy per fraction daily. The median survival time (MST) was 16.9 months. The pretreatment KPS and RPA class significantly differed in terms of MST on the log-rank tests. Seven symptomatic patients had hemiparesis before SRS or fSRT. All symptomatic patients, except one with facial paresis and one who died within 3 months, experienced improvement at a 3 month follow-up. None of the patients presented with persistent radiation injury at the final follow-up. Two patients presented with grade 3 radiation-related central nervous system necrosis, which was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. In BMPMC, SRS and fSRT had good tumor control and did not cause serious complications. Therefore, they are suitable treatment options with an acceptable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Matsuda
- Corresponding author. Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan Tel: +81-744-22-3051 Fax: +81-744-29-0818
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boström JP, Jetschke K, Schmieder K, Adamietz IUA. [Surgical treatment and radiation therapy of brain metastases]. Radiologe 2021; 61:767-778. [PMID: 34272570 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00894-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this work is to outline the principles of interdisciplinary treatment of brain metastases. Interdisciplinary treatment is determined by the clinical situation, anatomical conditions and tumor entity and has the goal of reducing toxicity. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT are used to diagnose brain metastases. Neurosurgery is used for accessible, symptomatic metastases. For localized metastases, including multiple metastases, that are surgically inaccessible, radiosurgery is used. If possible, partial brain irradiation is preferred to whole-brain irradiation. Protection of the hippocampus during whole-brain radiotherapy reduces therapy toxicity. In emergency situations, steroids provide effective support and a neurosurgical intervention may be life-saving. The options for systemic drug therapy are increasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan P Boström
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Marien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Deutschland.,Gamma Knife Zentrum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Kathleen Jetschke
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Langendreer, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Kirsten Schmieder
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Langendreer, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Irenä Us A Adamietz
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Marien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Deutschland. .,Gamma Knife Zentrum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland. .,Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Asimakidou E, Abut PA, Raabe A, Seidel K. Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2803. [PMID: 34199853 PMCID: PMC8200078 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
During intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP), heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, intraoperative settings, applied warning criteria, and outcome reporting exists. A scoping review of MEP warning criteria in supratentorial surgery was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Sixty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most commonly used alarm criteria were MEP signal loss, which was always a major warning sign, followed by amplitude reduction and threshold elevation. Irreversible MEP alterations were associated with a higher number of transient and persisting motor deficits compared with the reversible changes. In almost all studies, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were high, while in most of them, sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) were rather low or modest. Thus, the absence of an irreversible alteration may reassure the neurosurgeon that the patient will not suffer a motor deficit in the short-term and long-term follow-up. Further, MEPs perform well as surrogate markers, and reversible MEP deteriorations after successful intervention indicate motor function preservation postoperatively. However, in future studies, a consensus regarding the definitions of MEP alteration, critical duration of alterations, and outcome reporting should be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evridiki Asimakidou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (E.A.); (P.A.A.); (A.R.)
| | - Pablo Alvarez Abut
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (E.A.); (P.A.A.); (A.R.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clínica 25 de Mayo, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (E.A.); (P.A.A.); (A.R.)
| | - Kathleen Seidel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (E.A.); (P.A.A.); (A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071616. [PMID: 33807384 PMCID: PMC8036330 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this comprehensive review, we focused on the neurosurgical treatment as an integrative part of the challenging multidisciplinary management of cerebral metastases, a neuro-oncologic entity, which has been observed to have an increased incidence over the last years. In selected cases, the surgical removal of the space-occupying mass reduces the intracranial pressure, normalizes the metabolic environment, reduces the symptom burden, and allows for the intensification of local and systemic adjuvant treatment. In detail, we discuss the incidence of brain metastases, the role of surgical resection, as well as the evolution of current neurosurgical techniques, the surgical morbidity and mortality of single and multiple lesions, and we enlighten the role of surgery for recurrent tumors. Abstract The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.
Collapse
|
8
|
Jünger ST, Pennig L, Schödel P, Goldbrunner R, Friker L, Kocher M, Proescholdt M, Grau S. The Debatable Benefit of Gross-Total Resection of Brain Metastases in a Comprehensive Treatment Setting. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061435. [PMID: 33801110 PMCID: PMC8004079 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this monocentric retrospective analysis, the extent of resection of singular/solitary brain metastases has no impact on local recurrence and overall survival rates in patients receiving multidisciplinary adjuvant treatment. Since systemic disease progression is the leading cause of death, and an uncontrolled systemic disease status, along with adjuvant treatment, present independent predictors of overall survival, a comprehensive, multidisciplinary treatment concept is essential for patients with brain metastases. Abstract Background and Purpose: The value of gross-total surgical resection remains debatable in patients with brain metastases (BMs) as most patients succumb to systemic disease progression. In this study, we evaluated the impact of the extent of resection of singular/solitary BM on in-brain recurrence (iBR), focusing on local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) in an interdisciplinary adjuvant treatment setting. Patients and Methods: In this monocentric retrospective analysis, we included patients receiving surgery of one BM and subsequent adjuvant treatment. A radiologist and a neurosurgeon determined in consensus the extent of resection based on magnetic resonance imaging. The OS was calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimates; prognostic factors for LR and OS were analysed by Log rank test and Cox proportional hazards. Results: We analyzed 197 patients. Gross-total resection was achieved in 123 (62.4%) patients. All patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, and 130 (66.0%) received systemic treatment. Ninety-six (48.7%) patients showed iBR with an LR rate of 23.4%. LR was not significantly influenced by the extent of resection (p = 0.139) or any other parameter. The median OS after surgery was 18 (95%CI 12.5–23.5) months. In univariate analysis, the extent of resection did not influence OS (p = 0.6759), as opposed to adjuvant systemic treatment (p < 0.0001) and controlled systemic disease (p = 0.039). Systemic treatment and controlled disease status remained independent factors for OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: In this study, the extent of resection of BMs neither influenced the LR nor the OS of patients receiving interdisciplinary adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie T. Jünger
- Centre for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; (S.T.J.); (R.G.); (L.F.)
- Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Lenhard Pennig
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Petra Schödel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (P.S.); (M.P.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit and Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Centre for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; (S.T.J.); (R.G.); (L.F.)
- Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Lea Friker
- Centre for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; (S.T.J.); (R.G.); (L.F.)
| | - Martin Kocher
- Centre for Neurosurgery, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Martin Proescholdt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (P.S.); (M.P.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit and Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Grau
- Centre for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; (S.T.J.); (R.G.); (L.F.)
- Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-221-478-82764; Fax: +49-221-478-82825
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zuo F, Hu K, Kong J, Zhang Y, Wan J. Surgical Management of Brain Metastases in the Perirolandic Region. Front Oncol 2020; 10:572644. [PMID: 33194673 PMCID: PMC7649351 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.572644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequent intracranial tumors, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality when the lesions involve the perirolandic region. Surgical intervention for BM in the perirolandic region is still under discussion even though prompt relief of mass effect and avoidance of necrosis together with brain edema may not be achieved by radiotherapy. More recently, several researchers attempt to evaluate the benefit of surgery for BM within this pivotal sensorimotor area. Nevertheless, data are sparse and optimal treatment paradigm is not yet widely described. Since the advance in intraoperative neuroimaging and neurophysiology, resection of BM in the perirolandic region has been proven to be safe and efficacious, sparing this eloquent area while retaining reasonably low morbidity rates. Although management of BM becomes much more tailored and multimodal, surgery remains the cornerstone and principles of resection as well as indications for surgery should be well defined. This is the first review concerning the characteristics of BM involving the perirolandic region and the current impact of surgical therapy for the lesions. Future perspectives of advanced neurosurgical techniques are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuxing Zuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianxin Kong
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jinghai Wan
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Protopapa M, Kouloulias V, Nikoloudi S, Papadimitriou C, Gogalis G, Zygogianni A. From Whole-Brain Radiotherapy to Immunotherapy: A Multidisciplinary Approach for Patients with Brain Metastases from NSCLC. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:3267409. [PMID: 30853981 PMCID: PMC6378013 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3267409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases have a multitude of treatment options, but there is currently no international and multidisciplinary consensus concerning their optimal treatment. Local therapies have the principal role, especially in symptomatic patients. Advances in surgery and radiation therapy manage considerable local control. Systemic treatments have shown effect in clinical trials and in real life clinical settings; yet, at present, this is restricted to patients with asymptomatic or stable intracranial lesions. Targeted agents can have a benefit only in patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangement. Immunotherapy has shown impressive results in patients with PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Its effects can be further enhanced by a synergy with radiotherapy, possibly by increasing the percentage of responders. The present review summarizes the need for more effective systemic treatments, so that the increased intracranial control achieved by local treatments can be translated in an increase in overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Protopapa
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Greece
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Radiation Oncology Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University General Hospital, Greece
| | - Styliani Nikoloudi
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Greece
| | - Christos Papadimitriou
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Medical Oncology Unit, 2nd Surgery Clinic, Aretaieion University Hospital of Athens, Greece
| | - Giannis Gogalis
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Greece
| | - Anna Zygogianni
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Greece
| |
Collapse
|