Bone marrow suppression as a complication of total skin helical tomotherapy in the treatment of mycosis fungoides

Safety of Concurrent Radiation Therapy With Brentuximab Vedotin in the Treatment of Lymphoma

Purpose

Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) and the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) are standard-of-care treatment options for patients with certain B and T-cell lymphomas; however, there are limited data exploring the safety of concurrent BV and RT (BVRT).

Methods and Materials

We performed a single institutional retrospective review of 44 patients who received BVRT.

Results

Twenty percent of patients (9/44) developed new grade 2 or higher (G2+) hematologic toxicity (HT) after BVRT, which was associated with radiation dose (median dose of 35 Gy in those with new G2+ HT compared with 15 Gy in those without; P < .001). Acute G2+ elevation in aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase level was associated with administration of concurrent chemotherapy with BVRT (57% vs 21%; P = .047) but was not associated with any RT factors. Local control (LC) was achieved in 24 of 42 patients (57%) with available follow-up. Ten patients (23%) proceeded to stem cell transplant or cellular therapy after BVRT at a median of 48 days (interquartile range, 27-188 days). At last follow-up, 10 patients (23%) remained without evidence of disease.

Conclusions

Our analysis demonstrates that the combination of BV and RT is well tolerated, though care should be taken during RT planning to reduce the risk of HT. This combination can be considered for patients in need of both local and systemic disease control.

Investigation of total skin helical tomotherapy using a 3D-printed total skin bolus

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of using a 3D-printed total skin bolus in total skin helical tomotherapy for the treatment of mycosis fungoides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 65-year-old female patient with a 3-year history of mycosis fungoides underwent treatment using an in-house desktop fused deposition modelling printer to create a total skin bolus made of a 5-mm-thick flexible material, which increased the skin dose through dose building. The patient's scan was segmented into upper and lower sections, with the division line placed 10 cm above the patella. The prescription was to deliver 24 Gy over 24 fractions, given 5 times per week. The plan parameters consisted of a field width of 5 cm, pitch of 0.287 and modulation factor of 3. The complete block was placed 4 cm away from the planned target region to reduce the area of the internal organs at risk, especially the bone marrow. Dose delivery accuracy was verified using point dose verification with a "Cheese" phantom (Gammex RMI, Middleton, WI), 3D plane dose verification with ArcCHECK (Model 1220, Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL), and multipoint film dose verification. Megavoltage computed tomography guidance was also utilized to ensure the accuracy of the setup and treatment.

RESULTS

A 5-mm-thick 3D-printed suit was used as a bolus to achieve a target volume coverage of 95% of the prescribed dose. The conformity index and homogeneity index of the lower segment were slightly better than those of the upper segment. As the distance from the skin increased, the dose to the bone marrow gradually decreased, and the dose to other organs at risk remained within clinical requirements. The point dose verification deviation was less than 1%, the 3D plane dose verification was greater than 90%, and the multipoint film dose verification was less than 3%, all of which confirmed the accuracy of the delivered dose. The total treatment time was approximately 1.5 h, which included 0.5 h of wearing the 3D-printed suit and 1 h with the beam on. Patients only experienced mild fatigue, nausea or vomiting, low-grade fever, and grade III bone marrow suppression.

CONCLUSION

The use of a 3D-printed suit for total skin helical tomotherapy can result in a uniform dose distribution, short treatment time, simple implementation process, good clinical outcomes, and low toxicity. This study presents an alternative treatment approach that can potentially yield improved clinical outcomes for mycosis fungoides.

Total Skin Treatment with Helical Arc Radiotherapy

For widespread cutaneous lymphoma, such as mycosis fungoides or leukemia cutis, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and for chronic myeloproliferative diseases, total skin irradiation is an efficient treatment modality for disease control. Total skin irradiation aims to homogeneously irradiate the skin of the entire body. However, the natural geometric shape and skin folding of the human body pose challenges to treatment. This article introduces treatment techniques and the evolution of total skin irradiation. Articles on total skin irradiation by helical tomotherapy and the advantages of total skin irradiation by helical tomotherapy are reviewed. Differences among each treatment technique and treatment advantages are compared. Adverse treatment effects and clinical care during irradiation and possible dose regimens are mentioned for future prospects of total skin irradiation.

Low-Dose Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for a Patient With Head and Neck Involvement of Mycosis Fungoides: A Case Report With a Review of Literature

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that slowly progresses over a period of years to decades. In some cases, lesions that spread to the scalp, neck, or facial skin can have a significant impact on cosmetic appearance and a patient's quality of life. Among the various treatments, radiation therapy is one of the most effective treatment modalities for patients with symptomatic cutaneous lesions. We report on an MF patient who had gradually increasing patches and plaques on the scalp, face, and neck and who underwent irradiation with 20 Gy administered in 10 fractions using volumetric modulated arc therapy. After undergoing this highly conformal technique, the patient obtained prolonged local control and significant alleviation of symptoms with acceptable adverse events. This technique constitutes a promising approach for treating a complex target due to its ability to provide homogeneous coverage of irregularly shaped target volumes along with its ability to preserve organs at risk. In addition, we systematically reviewed clinical reports on the management of extensive cutaneous lesions in MF patients undergoing other irradiation techniques.

Current treatment strategies and emerging therapies for cutaneous lymphoma

Cutaneous lymphoma is generally treated with skin-directed therapies (SDT) during the early and localized stages. For the refractory or advanced stages, systemic therapies are used. Previously, retinoids and interferons were used for SDT-resistant cases. Only a few chemotherapy options were available for more advanced disease. In recent years, many novel agents have been introduced and the strategy for systemic therapy has changed, especially for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). For SDT, helical tomotherapy, a new radiation modality, has been drawing attention as an option for radiotherapy. Targeted therapies such as histone deacetylase inhibitors, mogamulizumab, brentuximab vedotin, and denileukin diftitox are new treatment options. Chemotherapy agents such as gemcitabine and pralatrexate have been introduced; they are expected to have meaningful efficacy as monotherapy. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is still considered for young patients with advanced CTCL as the only potentially curative treatment.

Successful treatment of tumor stage mycosis fungoides with total skin helical tomotherapy

Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is a treatment option for mycosis fungoides (MF). In Japan, it has been rarely performed because of the time required for each treatment, physical burden on patients, and difficulties in providing uniform dosimetry. In recent years, helical tomotherapy, an intensity-modulated radiation therapy that applies helical computed tomography technology, has been used to treat cancer. Total skin helical tomotherapy (TSHT) has been suggested as a promising alternative to TSEBT for patients with MF, but there are few reports from Japan. We used TSHT to treat a 28-year-old Japanese woman with tumor stage MF. She achieved complete remission with TSHT (12 Gy in six fractions over 6 days) and remained in remission for 32 months without additional treatment. Treatment-related grade 4 myelosuppression was observed, but resolved with blood transfusions and subcutaneous injection of granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Other adverse events were tolerable. Although careful attention should be paid to myelosuppression, TSHT might be a useful treatment option for MF.

Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for superficial skin irradiation with significant curvature in one or more planes

PURPOSE

This study compares the plan quality of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for superficial irradiation of large areas of skin with significant curvature in one or more planes.

METHODS

A total of 14 patients from two centres previously treated with either HDR-BT or VMAT were retrospectively replanned using the alternative technique. Sites included scalp and lower limbs. Identical computed tomography (CT) scans, clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) and prescription were used for both techniques. Conformity, skin surface dose and OAR doses were compared.

RESULTS

Conformity index was consistently better with VMAT than HDR-BT (p < 0.01). Maximum skin surface dose (D0.1cc) had a higher mean of 49.6 Gy with HDR-BT compared to 31.4 Gy for VMAT (p < 0.01). Significantly smaller volumes of healthy tissue were irradiated with VMAT than with HDR-BT. This can be seen in brain volumes receiving 10, 20 and 30 Gy EQD2 and in extremities receiving 5 and 10 Gy. When close to the volume, the lens received significantly lower doses with VMAT (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In this small sample, VMAT gives equal coverage with lower OAR and skin surface doses than HDR-BT for both scalp and extremities. VMAT is a useful technique for treating large, superficial volumes with significant curvature in one or more planes.

Helical Skin Radiation Therapy Including Total Skin Radiation Therapy Using Tomotherapy for Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma With Bone Marrow Suppression as a Related Adverse Event

PURPOSE

Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is useful for primary cutaneous lymphoma. However, helical skin radiation therapy (HSRT) using tomotherapy may avoid the complexity and uncertainty of TSEBT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma who underwent HSRT at our hospital between June 2015 and July 2019 were investigated, including 7 patients registered in a clinical trial approved by an institutional review board (ID UMIN000022142). HSRT was performed in 3 partitioned skin areas: head and neck, trunk and arms, and legs.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients with 53 skin areas (including 8 patients with 24 skin areas who had undergone sequential total skin irradiation), with a median follow-up time of 13 months (range, 2-50), were investigated. Twenty patients (83.3%) had mycosis fungoides (MF). For 41 of 53 (77.4%) cases, a dose of 20 Gy in 10 fractions was used. The overall response rate in the treated fields of each HSRT in patients with MF was 100%, including 38 (80.9%) complete response, 4 (8.5%) good partial response, and 5 (10.6%) partial response. Eight patients with MF who underwent sequential total skin irradiation showed a 100% complete response. For patients with MF, the median survival time after a first round of HSRT was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.6-30.4 months), the median response duration of each HSRT was 5 months (95% CI, 3.67-6.32 months), and the median time to in-field reirradiation for each HSRT was 15 months (95% CI, 9.76-20.24 months). Bone marrow suppression (grade ≥3) often occurred (94.1%) with HSRT on trunk and arm skin. An early patient died of HSRT-caused grade 5 leukopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

HSRT targeting trunk and arm skin induced severe bone marrow suppression that led to a temporary palliative effect. TSEBT should still be considered standard treatment for primary cutaneous lymphoma covering the total body surface area.

Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: Updates and Review of Current Therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

While most patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) follow an indolent course, patients with advanced-stage MF/Sézary syndrome (SS) have a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 5 years. Although there are a number of treatments currently available, achieving and maintaining a durable response remain challenging, especially in advanced-stage MF/SS. The choice of frontline therapy is dependent on the stage of disease. For early-stage MF, the treatment concept is to control skin lesions mainly by skin-directed therapies, such as topical therapies, phototherapies, and radiotherapies. For advanced-stage MF/SS, systemic treatments by biological or targeted therapies including bexarotene and interferon either alone or in combination are tried first, with more immunosuppressive chemotherapies being reserved for refractory or rapidly progressive disease. Recent improvements in biological or targeted therapies include brentuximab vedotin and mogamulizumab. When biopsy samples have 10% or more CD30-positive malignant cells, brentuximab vedotin, an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristin E, can be a desirable treatment option. For cases with blood involvement, mogamulizumab, an antibody binding to C-C chemokine receptor 4, is effective with high response rates. In the refractory setting, alemtuzumab, histone deacetylase inhibitors, pralatrexate, gemcitabine, and doxorubicin are considered as the treatment option. Because only allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can offer a chance of cure with durable complete remission, advanced-stage patients with a markedly short life expectancy should be evaluated for eligibility. Given that there are few randomized controlled studies in the literature, it is necessary to investigate which therapy is preferable for each patient with MF/SS by comparative prospective trials.

A case report of total skin photon radiation therapy for cutaneous epitheliotropic lymphoma in a dog

Background

Total skin electron beam radiation therapy (TSEBT) is an effective treatment for primary diffuse cutaneous lymphomas in humans. While several techniques exist, they all require significant commitment of staff time and resources. In veterinary medicine, canine-specific techniques and strategies have been adapted and delivered but deemed not “realistically” clinically implementable given the time commitment of over 2.5 h plus per fraction or have been relegated to palliative intent. Leveraging these technologies of helical tomotherapy and 3D printing, we developed and clinically implemented a radiotherapeutic treatment strategy for the management of medically refractory diffuse cutaneous lymphoma in the dog.

Case presentation

A 13.5-year-old female spayed Bichon Frise presented to the Oncology service at Texas A&M University, College of Veterinary Medicine due to the progression of diffuse cutaneous epitheliotropic lymphoma (CEL) that had failed medical management. Twenty-seven gray were delivered to the patient with a treatment time requirement under 40 min including real time monitoring of anesthesia during setup and treatment. A partial response was noticeable after four fractions and the tumor completely regressed progressively over the entire treated area by the end of therapy. A grade 1 lethargy, fatigue, weight loss, and oral mucositis and grade 2 alopecia, nail/claw changes, pruritus, scaling, anorexia, and diarrhea were noted during treatment. Additionally, a grade 3 thrombocytopenia developed after fraction eight requiring a treatment interruption of 6 weeks and prescription modification prior to treatment continuation and completion. From the beginning of total skin photon radiation therapy (TSPT) treatment until the time of the patient was euthanized unrelated to cutaneous epitheliotropic lymphoma (123 days), only one new lesion on the head was identified and confirmed by histopathology within the treated fields.

Conclusions

The proposed technique is an acceptable alternative to TSEBT that is actually clinically implementable within a palliative or definitive setting and clinical constraints, however further testing and refinement is needed to reduce hematological complications and to confirm and expand on preliminary findings.

Simultaneous integrated boost with helical arc radiotherapy of total skin (HEARTS) to treat cutaneous manifestations of advanced, therapy-refractory cutaneous lymphoma and leukemia - dosimetry comparison of different regimens and clinical application

Background

Helical irradiation of the total skin (HITS) was modified as simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-helical arc radiotherapy of total skin (HEARTS) technique and applied to an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient with disseminated leukemia cutis.

Methods

The original HITS plan was revised for different regimens, i.e. HEARTS, low-dose HEARTS and SIB-HEARTS. The uniformity index (UI), conformity index (CI), and dose of organs at risk (OARs) were used to evaluate the plans. Additionally, the SIB-HEART (21/15 Gy) was delivered to the total skin and chloromas.

Results

No significant differences were observed for the CI and UI between HITS and HEARTS regimens. Compared with HITS, the reduced mean doses to various bone marrows ranged from 17 to 88%. The mean OARs doses for the head, chest and abdomen of a patient with AML treated with SIB-HEARTS (21/15 Gy) were 2.1 to 21.9 Gy, 1.8 to 7.8 Gy and 1.7 to 3.3 Gy, respectively. No severe adverse effects were noted except for grade 4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia.

Conclusion

HEARTS and different regimens reduced the dose to OARs and bone marrow while maintaining the uniformity and conformity. SIB-HEARTS deliveries different doses to the total skin and enlarged tumors simultaneously.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered and approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (FEMH-106151-C).