1
|
Morrison J, Baldwin P, Hanna L, Andreou A, Buckley L, Durrant L, Edey K, Faruqi A, Fotopoulou C, Ganesan R, Hillaby K, Taylor A. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) vulval cancer guidelines: An update on recommendations for practice 2023. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 292:210-238. [PMID: 38043220 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK.
| | - Peter Baldwin
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Adrian Andreou
- Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Lynn Buckley
- Department of Gynae-Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, East Yorkshire HU16 5JQ, UK; Perci Health Ltd, 1 Vincent Square, London SW1P 2PN, UK. https://www.percihealth.com/
| | - Lisa Durrant
- Radiotherapy Department, Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Katharine Edey
- Centre for Women's Health Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Asma Faruqi
- Department of Cellular Pathology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 2ES, UK
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Cellular Pathology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 2ES, UK; Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London SW7 2DD, UK
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | - Kathryn Hillaby
- Department Gynaecological Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, GL53 7AN, UK
| | - Alexandra Taylor
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Biran A, Bolnykh I, Rimmer B, Cunliffe A, Durrant L, Hancock J, Ludlow H, Pedley I, Rees C, Sharp L. A Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies of Chronic Bowel Symptoms in Cancer Survivors following Pelvic Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4037. [PMID: 37627064 PMCID: PMC10452492 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic radiotherapy can damage surrounding tissue and organs, causing chronic conditions including bowel symptoms. We systematically identified quantitative, population-based studies of patient-reported bowel symptoms following pelvic radiotherapy to synthesize evidence of symptom type, prevalence, and severity. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsychINFO were searched from inception to September 2022. Following independent screening of titles, abstracts, and full-texts, population and study characteristics and symptom findings were extracted, and narrative synthesis was conducted. In total, 45 papers (prostate, n = 39; gynecological, n = 6) reporting 19 datasets were included. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous. Most frequently assessed was bowel function ('score', 26 papers, 'bother', 19 papers). Also assessed was urgency, diarrhea, bleeding, incontinence, abdominal pain, painful hemorrhoids, rectal wetness, constipation, mucous discharge, frequency, and gas. Prevalence ranged from 1% (bleeding) to 59% (anal bleeding for >12 months at any time since start of treatment). In total, 10 papers compared radiotherapy with non-cancer comparators and 24 with non-radiotherapy cancer patient groups. Symptom prevalence/severity was greater/worse in radiotherapy groups and symptoms more common/worse post-radiotherapy than pre-diagnosis/treatment. Symptom prevalence varied between studies and symptoms. This review confirms that many people experience chronic bowel symptoms following pelvic radiotherapy. Greater methodological consistency, and investigation of less-well-studied survivor populations, could better inform the provision of services and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Biran
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Iakov Bolnykh
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Ben Rimmer
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Anthony Cunliffe
- NHS Southwest London Clinical Commissioning Group, London SW19 1RH, UK;
| | - Lisa Durrant
- Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK;
| | - John Hancock
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Hartlepool TS24 9AH, UK;
| | - Helen Ludlow
- Llandough, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF64 2XX, UK;
| | - Ian Pedley
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 3HD, UK;
| | - Colin Rees
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Linda Sharp
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ward J, Gill S, Armstrong K, Fogarty T, Tan D, Scott A, Yahya A, Dhaliwal SS, Jacques A, Tang C. Randomised controlled trial on the effect of simethicone bowel preparation on rectal variability during image-guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer (SPoRT study). J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:866-873. [PMID: 35322563 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to assess whether simethicone reduces the rectal volume (RV) and gas volume (GV), to increase treatment accuracy and to decrease toxicity of prostate radiation therapy. METHODS 30 patients were randomised to simethicone or no intervention. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed on Days 1-3 and weekly until completion of radiation. RV and GV were measured using volume delineation. Toxicity data were collected. RESULTS 264 CBCTs were analysed. RV and GV were not significantly different in the simethicone group compared with the control group at each time point (P >0.05) after adjusting for Week 0 values as a covariate. The simethicone group showed an average reduction in RV and GV of 10% and 21%, respectively, compared with the control group (P >0.05). Standard deviations were calculated over 10 time points, which were grouped to represent the first 2-3 weeks of radiation therapy versus subsequent weeks. These were not significantly different between the simethicone and control group. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the variability of RV at time points 6-10 compared with time points 1-5 within the simethicone group (P = 0.012), but no significant difference was found between these grouped time points in the control group (P = 0.581). The toxicity questionnaires showed no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Simethicone did not decrease the RV or GV overall. However, simethicone appeared to significantly decrease the RV variability from Week three onwards. This suggests that taking simethicone two to three weeks before starting radiation therapy may reduce RV variability, although a larger study is needed to confirm this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Ward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suki Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Division of Internal Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kevin Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tamara Fogarty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daren Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Alison Scott
- Radiation Oncology Medical Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Aylin Yahya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Trials and Research Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Satvinder Singh Dhaliwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Trials and Research Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Angela Jacques
- Department of Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Colin Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Cancer Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morrison J, Balega J, Buckley L, Clamp A, Crosbie E, Drew Y, Durrant L, Forrest J, Fotopoulou C, Gajjar K, Ganesan R, Gupta J, Hughes J, Miles T, Moss E, Nanthakumar M, Newton C, Ryan N, Walther A, Taylor A. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) uterine cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 270:50-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
5
|
Møller PK, Pappot H, Bernchou U, Schytte T, Dieperink KB. Development of patient-reported outcomes item set to evaluate acute treatment toxicity to pelvic online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:47. [PMID: 34160732 PMCID: PMC8220120 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00326-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A new technology in cancer treatment, the MR-linac, provides online magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) that combines real-time visualization of the tumor and surrounding tissue with radiation therapy to deliver treatment more accurately. Online MRgRT makes it possible to minimize treatment volume, potentially reducing acute treatment toxicity. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) add the patient perspective to evaluating treatment toxicity related to new technology. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to develop and explore the content validity of a set of PRO items to evaluate acute pelvic toxicity to radiotherapy including online MRgRT. Methods A literature review and chart audit were conducted to identify symptomatic adverse events (AEs) to be selected from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) library and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) item library. To validate the content, the item set was applied in a prospective pilot cohort of patients referred for primary pelvic RT with curative intent. Patients reported symptoms weekly during RT (4–8 weeks) and the subsequent 4 weeks. Follow-up reports were collected at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after RT. To ensure symptom coverage clinician-reported toxicity and individual patient interviews were conducted. The symptomatic AEs were included in the final item set if ≥20% of patients reported them. Results Eighteen acute symptomatic AEs were selected for the initial item set. Forty patients (32 prostate cancer, 8 cervical cancer) were included in the pilot study. Patients with prostate cancer and those with cervical cancer both reported all 18 acute AEs. However, vomiting was not reported by > 20% of patients thus excluded from the item set. Adding a few diagnosis-specific AEs to the final item set was required for both prostate and cervical cancer patients. Conclusions A PRO item set for patients with pelvic cancer treated with radiotherapy with a curative intent was developed and content validity explored. In the pilot study, the item set captured the most common acute symptomatic AEs for patients with prostate and cervical cancer related to pelvic RT including online MRgRT. Further validation of the content in broader disease sites would be needed in future studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00326-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P K Møller
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, AgeCare, Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - U Bernchou
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - T Schytte
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - K B Dieperink
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, AgeCare, Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Purpose of Review With advances in radiation therapy (RT) techniques for rectal and anal cancers allowing for the modulation of critical normal tissues, there has been an increased emphasis on improving the quality of life (QOL) of cancer survivors. Herein, we review the literature to examine the impact of RT on QOL and patient reported outcomes (PROs) to better inform providers about the challenges of survivorship. Recent Findings Large systematic reviews, recent studies and long-term follow-up of pivotal clinical trials have shown that RT impacts QOL, particularly fecal continence and sexual function. Modern preoperative RT techniques allow for decreased dose to organs-at-risk will likely improve QOL. Summary RT, though critical in the treatment of rectal and anal cancer, has a profound impact on QOL for some patients. Recent studies have included PROs and validated QOL metrics to better inform providers and patients.
Collapse
|