Dosimetric analysis and comparison of reduced longitudinal cranial margins of VMAT-IMRT of rectal cancer

Very pronounced bowel sparing during radiation therapy for anal carcinoma using a natural spacer (Myoma) - a case report

BACKGROUND

Using dose-painted intensity-modulated radiation therapy, specific dose volume constraints or implantation of tissue expanders prior to radiotherapy are validated options for reducing radiation dose on the bowel and therefore minimizing acute gastrointestinal toxicity during chemoradiation for anorectal malignancies. We describe the rare case of a female patient with a locally advanced anal carcinoma where a large myomatous uterus served as a natural spacer to protect the bowel during radiation therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

Initially the patient presented with anal pain, proctoscopy followed by an excisional biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Imaging examination showed a locally advanced tumor and in addition a large uterus with typical leiomyomas up to 11.5 cm in diameter. The patient underwent chemoradiation; because of the large leiomyomas there was almost no dose burden for the small intestine and therefore practically no gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

As we know, this report describes the situation that a large myomatous uterus served as a natural spacer during radiation therapy in a way that is unique to date.

A meta-analysis of the watch-and-wait strategy versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer exhibiting complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

Some clinical researchers have reported that patients with cCR (clinical complete response) status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) could adopt the watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy. Compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, the W&W strategy could achieve a similar overall survival. Could the W&W strategy replace TME surgery as the main treatment option for the cCR patients? By using the meta-analysis method, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the W&W strategy and TME surgery for rectal cancer exhibiting cCR after nCRT.

Methods

We evaluated two treatment strategies for rectal cancer with cCR after nCRT up to July 2021 by searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. Clinical data for primary outcomes (local recurrence, cancer-related death and distant metastasis), and secondary outcomes (disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)) were collected to evaluate the efficacy and safety in the two groups.

Results

We included nine studies with 818 patients in the meta-analysis, and there were five moderate-quality studies and four high-quality studies. A total of 339 patients were in the W&W group and 479 patients were in the TME group. The local recurrence rate in the W&W group was greater than that in the TME group in the fixed-effects model (OR 8.54, 95% CI 3.52 to 20.71, P < 0.001). The results of other outcomes were similar in the two groups.

Conclusion

The local recurrence rate of the W&W group was greater than that in the TME group, but other results were similar in the two groups. With the help of physical examination and salvage therapy, the W&W strategy could achieve similar treatment effects with the TME approach.

Trial registration

Protocol registration number: CRD42021244032.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02415-y.