1
|
Wahner HCW, Träger M, Bender K, Schweizer L, Onken J, Senger C, Ehret F, Budach V, Kaul D. Predicting survival in anaplastic astrocytoma patients in a single-center cohort of 108 patients. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:282. [PMID: 33334378 PMCID: PMC7745461 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01728-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines for the treatment of anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) recommend maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite this multimodal treatment approach, patients have a limited life expectancy. In the present study, we identified variables associated with overall survival (OS) and constructed a model score to predict the OS of patients with AA at the time of their primary diagnosis. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients with newly diagnosed AA. The patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed for their impact on OS. Variables significantly associated with OS on multivariable analysis were included in our score. The final algorithm was based on the 36-month survival rates corresponding to each characteristic. RESULTS On univariate analysis, age, Karnofsky performance status, isocitrate dehydrogenase status, and extent of resection were significantly associated with OS. On multivariable analysis all four variables remained significant and were consequently incorporated in the score. The total score ranges from 20 to 33 points. We designated three prognostic groups: A (20-25), B (26-29), and C (30-33 points) with 36-month OS rates of 23%, 71%, and 100%, respectively. The OS rate at 5 years was 8% in group A, 61% in group B and 88% in group C. CONCLUSIONS Our model score predicts the OS of patients newly diagnosed with AA and distinguishes patients with a poor survival prognosis from those with a greater life expectancy. Independent and prospective validation is needed. The upcoming changes of the WHO classification of brain tumors as well as the practice changing results from the CATNON trial will most likely require adaption of the score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena C W Wahner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Malte Träger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katja Bender
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonille Schweizer
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Straube C, Kessel KA, Antoni S, Gempt J, Meyer B, Schlegel J, Schmidt-Graf F, Combs SE. A balanced score to predict survival of elderly patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:97. [PMID: 32375830 PMCID: PMC7201994 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01549-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past years, several treatment regimens have been recommended for elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM), ranging from ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) over monochemotherapy (ChT) to combined radiochemotherapy (RChT). The current guidelines recommend active treatment in elderly patients in cases with a KPS of at least 60%. We established a score for selecting patients with a very poor prognosis from patients with a better prognosis. METHODS One hundred eighty one patients ≥65 years old, histologically diagnosed with GBM, were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical characteristics were analysed for their impact on the overall survival (OS). Factors which were significant in univariate analysis (log-rank test, p < 0.05) were included in a multi-variate model (multi-variate Cox regression analysis, MVA). The 9-month OS for the significant factors after MVA (p < 0.05) was included in a prognostic score. Score sums with a median OS of < and > 6 months were summarized as Group A and B, respectively. RESULTS Age, KPS, MGMT status, the extent of resection, aphasia after surgery and motor dysfunction after surgery were significantly associated with OS on univariate analysis (p < 0.05). On MVA age (p 0.002), MGMT promotor methylation (p 0.013) and Karnofsky performance status (p 0.005) remained significant and were included in the score. Patients were divided into two groups, group A (median OS of 2.7 months) and group B (median OS of 7.8 months). The score was of prognostic significance, independent of the adjuvant treatment regimen. CONCLUSIONS The score distinguishes patients with a poor prognosis from patients with a better prognosis. Its inclusion in future retrospective or prospective trials could help enhance the comparability of results. Before its employment on a routine basis, external validation is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
- Deutsches Konsortium für translationale Krebsforschung (dktk), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juergen Schlegel
- Department of Neuropathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für translationale Krebsforschung (dktk), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Strahlenmedizin (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mezei T, Horváth A, Pollner P, Czigléczki G, Banczerowski P. Research on the predicting power of the revised Tokuhashi system: how much time can surgery give to patients with short life expectancy? Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:755-764. [PMID: 31993865 PMCID: PMC7118051 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01612-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Object The primary treatment option for symptomatic metastatic spinal tumors is surgery. Prognostic systems are designed to assist in the establishment of the indication and the choice of surgical methodology. The best-known prognostic system is the revised Tokuhashi system, which has a predictive ability of about 60%. In our study, we are attempting to find the reason for its poor predictive ability, despite its proper separation ability. Methods We have designed a one-center-based retrospective clinical trial, by which we would like to test the feasibility and the inaccuracy of the revised Tokuhashi system. In our database, there are 329 patients who underwent surgery. Statistical analysis was performed. Results A significant increase in survival time was observed in the ‘conservative’ category. Earlier studies reported OS 0.15 at the 180-day control time, in contrast with our 0.38 OS value. The literature suggested supportive care for this category, but in our population, every patient underwent surgery. Our population passes the 0.15 OS value on day 475. We propose an adjustment of the Tokuhashi category scores. We observed significant success in resolving pain. Motor functions were improved or stabilized compared to changes in vegetative dysfunction. Conclusion According to our results, the Tokuhashi scoring system makes very conservative predictions and prefers non-surgical palliative or supportive care. Surgical treatment increases the life expectancy of patients in poor condition. We propose modifying the therapeutic options of the revised Tokuhashi system, taking into consideration modern spine surgery techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Mezei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, 57 Amerikai Rd, Budapest, 1145, Hungary. .,National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, 57 Amerikai Rd, Budapest, 1145, Hungary.
| | - Anna Horváth
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, 4 Kútvölgyi Rd, Budapest, 1125, Hungary
| | - Péter Pollner
- MTA-ELTE Statistical and Biological Physics Research Group, 1/a. Pázmány Péter S., Budapest, 1117, Hungary.,Health Services Management Training Center, Semmelweis University, 2 Kútvölgyi Rd, Budapest, 1125, Hungary
| | - Gábor Czigléczki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, 57 Amerikai Rd, Budapest, 1145, Hungary.,National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, 57 Amerikai Rd, Budapest, 1145, Hungary
| | - Péter Banczerowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, 57 Amerikai Rd, Budapest, 1145, Hungary.,National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, 57 Amerikai Rd, Budapest, 1145, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|