Predicting survival in melanoma patients treated with concurrent targeted- or immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy : Melanoma brain metastases prognostic score

The role of histological subtypes in the survival of patients diagnosed with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma in the United States of America

BACKGROUND

Literature presents limited information on histological subtypes and their association with other factors influencing the survival of melanoma patients. To explore the risk of death due to melanoma associated with histological subtypes, this retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) data from 1998 to 2019.

METHODS

A total of 27,532 patients consisting of 15,527 males and 12,005 females. The Hypertabastic Accelerated Failure Time model was used to analyze the impact of histology on the survival of patients with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) for cutaneous patients was 149 months, whereas those diagnosed with mucosal melanoma was 34 months. Nodular melanoma had a hazard ratio of 3.40 [95% CI: (2.94, 3.94)] compared to lentigo maligna melanoma. Across all histological subtypes, females had a longer MST, when compared to males. The hazard ratio (HR) of distant to localized melanoma was 9.56 [95% CI: (7.58, 12.07)].

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of patients' histological subtypes and their hazard assessment would enable clinicians and healthcare providers to perform personalized treatment, resulting in a lower risk of complication and higher survivability of melanoma patients. Significant factors were stage of the disease, age, histology, sex, and income. Focus should be placed on high-risk populations with severe and aggressive histological subtypes. Programs that emphasize preventive measures such as awareness, education, and early screening could reduce risk.

30-day mortality in patients treated for brain metastases: extracranial causes dominate

Background

Established prognostic models, such as the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment, were not designed to specifically address very short survival. Therefore, a brain metastases-specific 30-day mortality model may be relevant. We hypothesized that in-depth evaluation of a carefully defined cohort with short survival, arbitrarily defined as a maximum of 3 months, may provide signals and insights, which facilitate the development of a 30-day mortality model.

Methods

Retrospective analysis (2011–2021) of patients treated for brain metastases with different approaches. Risk factors for 30-day mortality from radiosurgery or other primary treatment were evaluated.

Results

The cause of death was unrelated to brain metastases in 61%. Treatment-related death (grade 5 toxicity) did not occur. Completely unexpected death was not observed, e.g. accident, suicide or sudden cardiac death. Logistic regression analysis showed 9 factors associated with 30-day mortality (each assigned 3–6 points) and a point sum was calculated for each patient. The point sum ranged from 0 (no risk factors for death within 30 days present) to 30. The results can be grouped into 3 or 4 risk categories. Eighty-three percent of patients in the highest risk group (> 16 points) died within 30 days, and none survived for more than 2 months. However, many cases of 30-day mortality (more than half) occurred in intermediate risk categories.

Conclusion

Extracranial tumor progression was the prevailing cause of 30-day mortality and few, if any deaths could be considered relatively unexpected when looking at the complete oncological picture. We were able to develop a multifactorial prediction model. However, the model’s performance was not fully satisfactory and it is not routinely applicable at this point in time, because external validation is needed to confirm our hypothesis-generating findings.

Melanoma Brain Metastases: An Update on the Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Molecularly Targeted Agents

Brain metastases from melanoma are no longer uniformly associated with dismal outcomes. Impressive tumor tissue-based (craniotomy) translational research has consistently shown that distinct patient subgroups may have a favorable prognosis. This review provides a historical overview of the standard-of-care treatments until the early 2010s. It subsequently summarizes more recent advances in understanding the biology of melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) and treating patients with MBMs, mainly focusing upon prospective clinical trials of BRAF/MEK and PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors in patients with previously untreated MBMs. These additional systemic treatments have provided effective complementary treatment approaches and/or alternatives to radiation and craniotomy. The current role of radiation therapy, especially in conjunction with systemic therapies, is also discussed through the lens of various retrospective studies. The combined efficacy of systemic treatments with radiation has improved overall survival over the last 10 years and has sparked considerable research interest regarding optimal dosing and sequencing of radiation treatments with systemic treatments. Finally, the review describes ongoing clinical trials in patients with MBMs.

Improving Brain Metastases Outcomes Through Therapeutic Synergy Between Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Targeted Cancer Therapies

Brain metastases are the most common form of brain cancer. Increasing knowledge of primary tumor biology, actionable molecular targets and continued improvements in systemic and radiotherapy regimens have helped improve survival but necessitate multidisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgical, medical and radiation oncologists. In this review, we will discuss the advances of targeted therapies to date and discuss findings of studies investigating the synergy between these therapies and stereotactic radiosurgery for non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma brain metastases.

Correction to: Predicting survival in melanoma patients treated with concurrent targeted- or immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy : Melanoma brain metastases prognostic score

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.