Residual positioning errors and uncertainties for pediatric craniospinal irradiation and the impact of image guidance

Robustness and dosimetric verification of hippocampal-sparing craniospinal pencil beam scanning proton plans for pediatric medulloblastoma

Background and Purpose

Hippocampal-sparing (HS) is a method that can potentially reduce late cognitive complications for pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) patients treated with craniospinal proton therapy (PT). The aim of this study was to investigate robustness and dosimetric plan verification of pencil beam scanning HS PT.

Materials and Methods

HS and non-HS PT plans for the whole brain part of craniospinal treatment were created for 15 pediatric MB patients. A robust evaluation of the plans was performed. Plans were recalculated in a water phantom and measured field-by-field using an ion chamber detector at depths corresponding to the central part of hippocampi. All HS and non-HS fields were measured with the standard resolution of the detector and in addition 16 HS fields were measured with high resolution. Measured and planned dose distributions were compared using gamma evaluation.

Results

The median mean hippocampus dose was reduced from 22.9 Gy (RBE) to 8.9 Gy (RBE), while keeping CTV V95% above 95 % for all nominal HS plans. HS plans were relatively robust regarding hippocampus mean dose, however, less robust regarding target coverage and maximum dose compared to non-HS plans. For standard resolution measurements, median pass rates were 99.7 % for HS and 99.5 % for non-HS plans (p < 0.001). For high-resolution measurements, median pass rates were 100 % in the hippocampus region and 98.2 % in the surrounding region.

Conclusions

A substantial reduction of dose in the hippocampus region appeared feasible. Dosimetric accuracy of HS plans was comparable to non-HS plans and agreed well with planned dose distribution in the hippocampus region.

Pituitary adenoma treatment plan quality comparison between linear accelerator volumetric modulated arc therapy and Leksell Gamma Knife® radiosurgery

The aim of this study was to compare radiosurgical treatment plan quality of a linear accelerator with Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) for pituitary adenoma irradiation. Thirty pituitary adenoma patients were evaluated in this study. Treatment plans were prepared on LGK and stereotactic linear accelerator Varian TrueBeam STx. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans (21 plans with 2 coplanar arcs and 9 plans with 4 non-coplanar arcs) were calculated for linear accelerator. All the plans were evaluated in terms of conformity, selectivity, gradient index and organ at risk (OAR) sparing. VMAT produced dosimetrically comparable treatment plans to LGK regarding conformity and selectivity (New Conformity Index (NCI): 1.76 ± 0.65 for 4 arc VMAT, 2.33 ± 1,16 for 2 arc VMAT and 1.96 ± 0.71 for LGK; Selectivity Index (SI): 0.63 ± 0.16 for 4 arc VMAT, 0.51 ± 0.16 for 2 arc VMAT and 0.58 ± 0.17 for LGK). Gradient index (GI) was superior for LGK plans (GI: 2.74 ± 0.20 for LGK and 5.28 ± 2.29 for 4 arc VMAT). OAR sparing for optics, brainstem, and hypophysis was similar for both modalities while target volume coverage was maintained the same. Finally, treatment time resulted in favor of VMAT plans (in this study VMAT plans were almost 5 times faster than LGK treatment regarding beam on time). According to the results of this study stereotactic linear accelerator with VMAT treatment could be used as a reasonable alternative to LGK for pituitary adenoma radiosurgery but only if the same head fixation method accuracy and target volume delineation are maintained for both modalities.