Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Tumor markers in non-small cell lung cancer spine metastasis: an assessment of prognosis and overall survival

PURPOSE

The identification of gene mutations in the modern medical workup of metastatic spine tumors has become more common but has not been highly utilized in surgical planning. Potential utility of these genetic markers as surrogates for cancer behavior in current prognosis scoring systems and overall survival (OS) remains underexplored in existing literature. This study seeks to investigate the association of frequently identified tumor markers, EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1, in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the spine with Tokuhashi prognosis scoring and OS.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC metastasis to spine were identified through chart review. EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 wild type vs. mutant type were identified from targeted chemotherapy genetic testing. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess gene profile contributions to Tokuhashi score. Cox Proportional Hazards models were generated for each tumor marker to assess the relationship between each marker and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients with NSCLC spine metastasis were identified. We employed a multiple linear regression analysis to investigate the influence of EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 genotypes on the Tokuhashi score, revealing statistically significant relationships overall (p = 0.002). Individual genotype contributions include EGFR as a non-significant contributor (p = 0.269) and ALK and PD-L1 as significant contributors (p = 0.037 and p = 0.001 respectively). Overall survival was not significantly associated with tumor marker profiles through Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.46) or by multivariable analysis (p = 0.108).

CONCLUSION

ALK and PD-L1 were significantly associated with Tokuhashi score while EGFR was not. Tumor markers alone were not predictive of OS. These findings indicate that genetic markers found in NSCLC metastases to the spine may demonstrate prognostic value. Therefore, employing standard tumor markers could enhance the identification of appropriate surgical candidates, although they demonstrate limited effectiveness in predicting overall survival.

Antibody nanoparticle conjugate-based targeted immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which activate T cells, is a paradigm shift in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, the overall response remains low. To address this limitation, here we describe a novel platform, termed antibody-conjugated drug-loaded nanotherapeutics (ADN), which combines immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy. An ADN was designed with an anti-CD47 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) antibody pair on the surface of the nanoparticle and a molecularly targeted inhibitor of the PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase)/AKT/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway, PI103, entrapped in the nanoparticle. The anti-CD47-PDL1-ADN exhibited greater antitumor efficacy than current treatment options with a PDL1 inhibitor in vivo in an aggressive lung cancer immunocompetent mouse model. Dual antibody-drug-loaded nanotherapeutics can emerge as an attractive platform to improve outcomes with cancer immunotherapy.

Efficacy of consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitor after chemoradiation for unresectable, locally advanced PD‑L1 negative non‑small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as durvalumab or pembrolizumab, for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumor PD-L1 expression <1% remains a topic of controversy. Previous studies from PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for a meta-analysis. A total of 16 studies were included in part one of the meta-analysis and it was observed that consolidation of ICIs after CRT improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46; P=0.005] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.26; P=0.023) for the patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%. Then, 15 studies were included in part two of the meta-analysis and the results indicated that the pooled 1, 2 and 3-year OS were 77% vs. 83% (P=0.07), 55% vs. 59% (P=0.327) and 38% vs. 51% (P=0.006) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The pooled 1, 2 and 3-year PFS were 51% vs. 53% (P=0.632), 29% vs. 40% (P=0.015) and 20% vs. 28% (P=0.153) for CRT alone compared with CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs, respectively. The findings of the present study highlighted that the benefits of CRT followed by consolidation of ICIs were higher compared with CRT alone in patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <1%. Consolidation of ICIs after CRT would provide greater benefits for locally advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1% compared with those with PD-L1 expression <1%.

Cross-Talks between Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein and Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expressions in Cancer: Role in Immune Evasion and Therapeutic Implications

Innovations in cancer immunotherapy have resulted in the development of several novel immunotherapeutic strategies that can disrupt immunosuppression. One key advancement lies in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have shown significant clinical efficacy and increased survival rates in patients with various therapy-resistant cancers. This immune intervention consists of monoclonal antibodies directed against inhibitory receptors (e.g., PD-1) on cytotoxic CD8 T cells or against corresponding ligands (e.g., PD-L1/PD-L2) overexpressed on cancer cells and other cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, not all cancer cells respond-there are still poor clinical responses, immune-related adverse effects, adaptive resistance, and vulnerability to ICIs in a subset of patients with cancer. This challenge showcases the heterogeneity of cancer, emphasizing the existence of additional immunoregulatory mechanisms in many patients. Therefore, it is essential to investigate PD-L1's interaction with other oncogenic genes and pathways to further advance targeted therapies and address resistance mechanisms. Accordingly, our aim was to investigate the mechanisms governing PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, given its correlation with immune evasion, to uncover novel mechanisms for decreasing PD-L1 expression and restoring anti-tumor immune responses. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the upregulation of Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP) in many cancers contributes to the suppression of key hyperactive pathways observed in malignant cells, alongside its broadening involvement in immune responses and the modulation of the TME. We, therefore, hypothesized that the role of PD-L1 in cancer immune surveillance may be inversely correlated with the low expression level of the tumor suppressor Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP) expression in cancer cells. This hypothesis was investigated and we found several signaling cross-talk pathways between the regulations of both RKIP and PD-L1 expressions. These pathways and regulatory factors include the MAPK and JAK/STAT pathways, GSK3β, cytokines IFN-γ and IL-1β, Sox2, and transcription factors YY1 and NFκB. The pathways that upregulated PD-L1 were inhibitory for RKIP expression and vice versa. Bioinformatic analyses in various human cancers demonstrated the inverse relationship between PD-L1 and RKIP expressions and their prognostic roles. Therefore, we suspect that the direct upregulation of RKIP and/or the use of targeted RKIP inducers in combination with ICIs could result in a more targeted anti-tumor immune response-addressing the therapeutic challenges related to PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy alone.

Molecular epidemiology study of programmed death ligand 1 and ligand 2 protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Objectives

Prevalence of tumor PD-L1 expression in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is variable, and data on PD-L2 expression are limited. The prognostic values of these biomarkers are not well understood. The current study was conducted to address these data gaps.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of Danish patients with histologically confirmed ES-SCLC and evaluable tumor samples who were receiving usual care before the introduction of immunotherapy was conducted. Protein expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay and a PD-L2 IHC assay using a propriety mouse monoclonal antibody. A combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1 was used to define biomarker positivity. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to assess the relationship between PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein expression and OS.

Results

Among 80 patients, 31% (n=25) and 36% (n=29) had disease positive for PD-L1 and PD-L2, respectively. Overall, 85% (n=68) of patients had concordant PD-L1/PD-L2 status; 26% (n=21) had double positive disease (both PD-L1 and PD-L2 CPS ≥1) and 59% (n=47) had double negative disease (both PD-L1 and PD-L2 CPS <1). PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity were each associated with longer OS (unadjusted hazard ratios [HRs], 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21-0.61] and 0.50 [95% CI, 0.31-0.82]); the associations persisted after adjustment for several known prognostic factors (HRs, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22-0.75] and 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25-0.79] for PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity, respectively). When evaluating OS in patients with double positive disease, unadjusted and adjusted HRs for double positive compared with double negative were similar to those with only PD-L1 or PD-L2 positivity (unadjusted HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.20-0.64]; adjusted HR, 0.36 [0.18-0.73]).

Conclusion

PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity were observed in approximately one-third of assessed ES-SCLC tumor samples and were highly congruent. Patients with PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity, alone or combined, were associated with longer OS, independent of other prognostic factors.

Real-world prevalence of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: an Australia-wide multi-centre retrospective observational study

An investigator-initiated, Australia-wide multi-centre retrospective observational study was undertaken to investigate the real-world prevalence of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Multiple centres around Australia performing PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) were invited to participate. Histologically confirmed NSCLC of any stage with a PD-L1 IHC test performed for persons aged ≥18 years between 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2020, and eligible for review, were identified at each centre, followed by data extraction and de-identification, after which data were submitted to a central site for collation and analysis. In total data from 6690 eligible PD-L1 IHC tests from histologically (75%) or cytologically (24%) confirmed NSCLC of any stage were reviewed from persons with a median age of 70 years, 43% of which were female. The majority (81%) of tests were performed using the PD-L1 IHC SP263 antibody with the Ventana BenchMark Ultra platform and 19% were performed using Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay. Reported PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) was ≥50% for 30% of all tests, with 62% and 38% scoring PD-L1 ≥1% and <1%, respectively. Relative prevalence of clinicopathological features with PD-L1 scores dichotomised to <50% and ≥50%, or to <1% and ≥1%, were examined. Females scored ≥1% slightly more often than males (64% vs 61%, respectively, p=0.013). However, there was no difference between sexes or age groups (<70 or ≥70 years) where PD-L1 scored ≥50%. Specimens from patients with higher stage (III/IV) scored ≥1% or ≥50% marginally more often compared to specimens from patients with lower stage (I/II) (p≤0.002). Proportions of primary and metastatic specimens did not differ where PD-L1 TPS was ≥1%, however more metastatic samples scored TPS ≥50% than primary samples (metastatic vs primary; 34% vs 27%, p<0.001). Cytology and biopsy specimens were equally reported, at 63% of specimens, to score TPS ≥1%, whereas cytology samples scored TPS ≥50% slightly more often than biopsy samples (34% vs 30%, respectively, p=0.004). Resection specimens (16% of samples tested) were reported to score TPS ≥50% or ≥1% less often than either biopsy or cytology samples (p<0.001). There was no difference in the proportion of tests with TPS ≥1% between PD-L1 IHC assays used, however the proportion of tests scored at TPS ≥50% was marginally higher for 22C3 compared to SP263 (34% vs 29%, respectively, p<0.001). These real-world Australian data are comparable to some previously published global real-world data, with some differences noted.

The differential prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression in the outcomes of Filipinos with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

The tumor immune microenvironment influences tumor evolution in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet, the prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC remains controversial. Additionally, prognostic studies in Filipinos with EGFR-mutant NSCLC remain unexplored to this day.

Methods

We prospectively studied the outcomes of EGFR-mutant NSCLC in Filipino cohort, and retrospectively verified the survival trend using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. Kaplan-Meier method and generalized linear regression were used to assess survival. Expression and DNA methylation of cluster of differentiation 274 (CD274, gene that codes for PD-L1) were examined from TCGA tumor profiles. Pearson's correlation was used to correlate PD-L1 expression with outcomes associated with occurrence of EGFR mutations, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) types, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) expression. Proteome network analysis was used to examine the correlation between drug resistance and PD-L1.

Results

PD-L1 positivity was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; P=0.0096) but had a significantly contrasting influence in the overall survival (OS; P=0.0011). PD-L1 positivity (in both protein and RNA) was associated with longer median OS (mOS) in exon21 L858R, whereas, negativity was associated with longer mOS in exon19 deletion (exon19del). Stratification (high, low, negative) of PD-L1 expression lacked significant prognostic value (all P>0.05). PD-L1/CD274 expression (P<0.05) and DNA methylation (P<0.001) vary significantly among NSCLC subtypes and in different disease stages. Erlotinib treatment produced the longest median progression-free survival (mPFS; 874 days) relative to other EGFR-TKIs (137-311 days). PD-L1 lacked a significant correlation with EGFR-TKIs. Consistent with the immune-regulation activities of PD-1, higher expression leads to relatively shorter mOS. PD-1 correlated positively with PD-L1 expression and occurrence of exon21 L858R.

Conclusions

PD-L1 differentially influenced the outcomes of Filipinos with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. NSCLC subtypes, disease stage, and PD-1 expression may impact the collective outcomes associated with PD-L1 and EGFR-sensitizing mutations.

Potential biomarkers for immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

For individuals with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the primary treatment is platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), primarily PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4, have been found to be effective in patients with NSCLC who have no EGFR/ALK mutations. Furthermore, ICIs are considered a standard therapy. The quantity of fresh immunogenic antigens discovered by cytotoxic T cells was measured by PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB), which were the first biomarkers assessed in clinical trials. However, immunotherapy did not have response efficacy markers similar to targeted therapy, highlighting the significance of newly developed biomarkers. This investigation aims to review the research on immunotherapy for NSCLC, focusing primarily on the impact of biomarkers on efficacy prediction to determine whether biomarkers may be utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy.

Beyond PACIFIC: Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Durvalumab According to Treatment Received and PD-L1 Expression

Adjuvant durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of PACIFIC revealed no OS benefit in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. This retrospective analysis assesses the real-world impact of durvalumab on OS according to PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). Patients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC treated by CRT, with available PD-L1 TPS, from 1 March 2018 to 31 December 2020, at BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada were included. Patients were divided into two groups, CRT + durvalumab and CRT alone. OS and PFS were analyzed in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% and <1% subgroups. A total of 134 patients were included in the CRT + durvalumab group and 117, in the CRT alone group. Median OS was 35.9 months in the CRT + durvalumab group and 27.4 months in the CRT alone group [HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83), p = 0.003]. Durvalumab improved OS in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.81), p = 0.003, n = 175], but not in the <1% subgroup [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.44-1.42), p = 0.4, n = 76]. This retrospective study demonstrates a statistically significant improvement in OS associated with durvalumab after CRT in PD-L1 ≥ 1%, but not PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Variables not accounted for may have biased the survival analysis. A prospective study would bring more insight.

Subtyping of advanced lung cancer based on PD-L1 expression, tumor histopathology and mutation burden (EGFR and KRAS): a study from North India

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (PD-L1) therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has variable outcomes. Tumor subtypes based on PD-L1 expression, histopathology, mutation burden is required for patient stratification and formulation of treatment guidelines. Lung cancers (n=57) diagnosed at Pathology department, VPCI (2018-2021) were retrospectively analyzed. PD-L1(SP263) expressed by tumor cells [low (<1%), medium (1-49%), high (≥50%)] was correlated with histopathology, microenvironment, EGFR, KRAS expression. Patients were categorized into high and low risk based on their: i) gender: males (n=47, 30-89 years), females (n=10, 45-80 years); ii) smoking history: males 26/47 (45.61%), females 1/10 (10%); iii) tumor subtyping: squamous cell carcinoma 15/57 (26.32%), adenocarcinoma 6/57 (17.54%), NSCLC-undifferentiated 24/57 (42.10%), adenosquamous carcinoma 5/57 (8.77 %), carcinosarcoma 4/57 (7.02%), small cell carcinoma 1/57 (1.75%); iv) inflammatory tumor microenvironment/TILs 44/57 (77.1%); iv) PD-L1 positivity-31/57 (54.3%); v) concomitant EGFR/KRAS positivity. PD-L1positive cases showed squamous/undifferentiated histopathology, concomitant EGFR+ (9/20, 45%) and KRAS+ (8/15, 53.3%), smoking+ (21/31,67.74%).PD-L1 negative cases (26/57, 45.6%), were EGFR+ (2/14, 14.28%) and KRAS+ (6/19, 31.5%). The high-risk lung cancer subtypes show squamous/undifferentiated histopathology, inflammatory microenvironment, male preponderance, smoking history, higher concomitant PD-L1, KRAS and EGFR positivity. Lung cancer subtyping can predict clinical response/resistance of patients prior to initiation of PD-L1 inhibitor therapies and can be used to guide therapy.

PD-L1 Expression is not a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Although targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), is an established treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC patients who undergo pulmonary resection is controversial.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-seven NSCLC patients who underwent pulmonary resection were enrolled and the relationship between PD-L1 and various clinicopathological factors, as well as the prognostic relevance of PD-L1, was evaluated.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in male patients (p < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p < 0.01), grade 3-4 differentiation (p < 0.01), squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.01), and pathological stage > II (p < 0.01), but significantly lower in those who were epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation negative (p < 0.01). Relapse-free survival was significantly worse in patients with PD-L1 expression (p = 0.04). Univariate analysis showed that male sex (p = 0.04), carcinoembryonic antigen expression (CEA) (p < 0.01), maximum standardized uptake value (p < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p < 0.01), grade 3-4 differentiation (p < 0.01), lower lobe disease (p = 0.04), PD-L1 expression (p = 0.03), and pathological stage (p < 0.01) were significant risk factors of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, CEA expression (p = 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.04), and pathological stage (p < 0.01) were risk factors for recurrence, whereas PD-L1 expression was not a significant factor of recurrence (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression was not a risk factor of recurrence but tumor progression tended to increase PD-L1 expression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Institutional Review Board of Kanazawa Medical University approved the protocol of this retrospective study (approval number: I392), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Correlation Between Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline treatment is an important marker of systemic inflammation, which is correlated with survival benefits in lung, breast, ovarian, bladder, and colorectal cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a biomarker with discording results regarding survival benefits in lung cancer. In our research, we studied the relationship between these two markers in patients with lung cancer.

Methods

Patients with stage I, II, III, and IV lung cancer (n = 80) were included in this retrospective study. The NLR baseline was recorded before the initiation of treatment. The NLR cut-off value was 4. PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted to test their prognostic value.

Results

NLR proved to be a significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.002, Log Rank) with a mean PFS of 27.7 months for low NLR patients and 12.8 months for high NLR patients. It was also significant for overall survival (OS) (p=0.007, Log Rank) with a mean OS of 52 months for low NLR patients and 41.6 months for high NLR patients. The prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression on PFS and OS was not statistically significant with a mean PFS of 23.1 months for PD-L1-negative patients and 15.8 months for PD-L1-positive patients (p=0.422, Log Rank). Mean OS was 49 months for PD-L1-negative patients while for PD-L1-positive patients, it was 43.3 months (p=0.550 Log Rank). Regarding the correlation between PD-L1 expression and NLR value, PFS mean survival times were 13.1 months for PD-L1(+)/NLR>4, 15.1 months for PD-L1(-)/NLR>4, 16.4 months for PD-L1(+)/NLR<4 and 27.8 months for PD-L1(-)/NLR<4. This correlation between PFS and the combined PD-L1 and NLR prognostic factor was statistically relevant (p=0.04). For OS, the PD-L1/NLR combined prognostic factor was not statistically relevant (p=0.055). A mean PFS time of 27.8 months was reported for PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 group patients while for the other groups, the mean PFS was 14.9 months (p=0.045). In univariate analysis, the elevated NLR was significantly associated with a decreased PFS time (HR=2.31, 95% CI =1.323- 4.051, p=0.03) as well as OS (HR=3.555, 95% CI=1.310- 9.652, p=0.013). In multivariate analysis, NLR remained statistically significant for PFS (HR=2.160, 95% CI=1.148- 4.062, p=0.013) and OS (HR=4.364, 95% CI=1.474- 12.921, p=0.008) after adjusting for the factors of age, gender, tumor stage, lymph node stage, clinical stage, histology, and PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was not a valid prognostic factor for progression or death in either univariate or multivariate analysis. We also stratified the disease control rate (DCR) depending on PD-L1/NLR combined factor expression. In the PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 group, we had the highest number of partial responses (PRs) and only one complete response (CR) compared to the other groups (p=0.006).

Conclusions

As the number of patients is limited in the present analysis, it is hypothesized that these two markers can be useful in dividing patients into two prognostic groups: the good prognostic group reunites PD-L1(+)/NLR<4 and PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 and the poor prognostic group reunites PD-L1(+)/NLR>4 and PD-L1(-)/NLR>4.

Immune checkpoint inhibition for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: limitations and prospects: a systematic review

Pancreatic cancer is an extremely malignant tumor with the lowest 5-year survival rate among all tumors. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as the most common pathological subtype of pancreatic cancer, usually has poor therapeutic results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can relieve failure of the tumor-killing effect of immune effector cells caused by immune checkpoints. Therefore, they have been used as a novel treatment for many solid tumors. However, PDAC is not sensitive to monotherapy with ICIs, which might be related to the inhibitory immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer. Therefore, the way to improve the microenvironment has raised a heated discussion in recent years. Here, we elaborate on the relationship between different immune cellular components in this environment, list some current preclinical or clinical attempts to enhance the efficacy of ICIs by targeting the inhibitory tumor microenvironment of PDAC or in combination with other therapies. Such information offers a better understanding of the sophisticated tumor-microenvironment interactions, also providing insights on therapeutic guidance of PDAC targeting. Video Abstract.

Clinical outcomes in stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with durvalumab after sequential or concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy - single institute experience

Background

Chemoradiotherapy (ChT-RT) followed by 12-month durvalumab is the new standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Survival data for patients from everyday routine clinical practice is scarce, as well as potential impact on treatment efficacy of sequential or concomitant chemotherapy and the usage of gemcitabine.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analysed unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who were treated with durvalumab after radical concurrent or sequential chemotherapy (ChT) from December 2017 and completed treatment until December 2020. We assessed progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity regarding baseline characteristic of patients.

Results

Eighty-five patients with median age of 63 years of which 70.6% were male, 56.5% in stage IIIB and 58.8% with squamous cell carcinoma, were included in the analysis. Thirty-one patients received sequential ChT only, 51 patients received induction and concurrent ChT and 3 patients received concurrent ChT only. Seventy-nine patients (92.9%) received gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy and switched to etoposide and cisplatin during concurrent treatment with radiotherapy (RT). Patients started durvalumab after a median of 57 days (range 12–99 days) from the end of the RT and were treated with the median of 10.8 (range 0.5–12 months) months. Forty-one patients (48.2%) completed treatment with planned 12-month therapy, 25 patients (29.4%) completed treatment early due to the toxicity and 16 patients (18.8%) due to the disease progression. Median PFS was 22.0 months, 12- and estimated 24-month PFS were 71% (95% CI: 61.2–80.8%) and 45.8% (95% CI: 32.7–58.9%). With the median follow-up time of 23 months (range 2–35 months), median OS has not been reached. Twelve- and estimated 24-month OS were 86.7% (95% CI: 79.5–93.9%) and 68.6% (95% CI: 57.2–79.9%).

Conclusions

Our survival data are comparable with published research as well as with recently published real-world reports. Additionally, the regimen with gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy as induction treatment was efficient and well tolerated.

PD-L1 expression, EGFR and KRAS mutations and survival among stage III unresected non-small cell lung cancer patients: a Danish cohort study

Programmed cell death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, KRAS (KRASm) and EGFR (EGFRm) mutations may influence non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis. We aimed to evaluate PD-L1 expression, KRASm, and EGFRm and survival among stage III unresected NSCLC patients. Using Danish registries, we collected data on stage III unresected NSCLC patients diagnosed 2001–2012 and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from pathology archives. We assessed PD-L1 expression in tumors and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) by immunohistochemistry (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document}≥ 1% threshold for PD-L1+). We genotyped KRAS and EGFR. Follow-up extended from 120 days post-diagnosis to death, emigration, or 31/12/2014. We computed median survival using Kaplan–Meier methods, and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression associating the biomarkers with death, adjusting for confounders. Among 305 patients, 48% had adenocarcinoma; 38% squamous cell carcinoma. Forty-nine percent had PD-L1+ tumors—51% stage IIIA and 26% KRASm. Few (2%) patients had EGFRm. Median survival in months was 14.7 (95% CI = 11.8–17.9) and 13.4 (95% CI = 9.5–16.3) in PD-L1+ and PD-L1− tumors, respectively. KRASm was not associated with death (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.74–1.51 versus wildtype). PD-L1+ tumors yielded a HR = 0.83 (95% CI = 0.63–1.10); PD-L1+ ICs a HR = 0.51 (95% CI = 0.39–0.68). Tumor expression of PD-L1 did not influence survival. PD-L1+ ICs may confer survival benefit in stage III unresected NSCLC patients.

Prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in locally advanced NSCLC treated with simultaneous radiochemotherapy in the randomized, multicenter, phase III German Intergroup lung Trial (GILT)

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy (RTCT) has become a new standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, little is known about the prognostic role of immune response markers in this setting. We analysed PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in tumour biopsies from the multicenter German Intergroup Lung Trial (GILT), which previously randomised patients with stage III NSCLC to RTCT with or without consolidation chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed tumour biopsies from patients treated in the GILT trial. PD-L1 expression was analysed using the Ventana SP263 assay and TiL score (low, intermediate, high) and pattern (excluded, inflamed, desert) were assessed. The primary endpoint of the biomarker analysis was PFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% vs. PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Secondary endpoints explored the prognostic relevance of additional PD-L1 expression levels and TiL score and pattern.

RESULTS

Biopsies were available from 92 patients treated with RTCT. Patients with available tumor tissue did not differ significantly from the whole study population. PD-L1 scores from 78 samples were available for analysis. There was no difference in PFS in the PD-L1 < 1% vs. PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroups. TiL score was available in 66 patients. Patients with high TiL score showed favourable overall survival compared to the low TiL subgroup. This trend was most pronounced in those patients treated with consolidative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, PD-L1 expression did not correlate with PFS following RTCT. However, patients with TiLs > 10% were found to have longer overall survival, especially for those patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after the end of RTCT. Further analyses to explore the prognostic and predictive relevance of TiLs in the context of consolidative checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab are required.