1
|
Ballhausen H, Corradini S, Belka C, Bogdanov D, Boldrini L, Bono F, Goelz C, Landry G, Panza G, Parodi K, Talviste R, Tran HE, Gambacorta MA, Marschner S. Privacy-friendly evaluation of patient data with secure multiparty computation in a European pilot study. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7:280. [PMID: 39397162 PMCID: PMC11471812 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01293-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
In multicentric studies, data sharing between institutions might negatively impact patient privacy or data security. An alternative is federated analysis by secure multiparty computation. This pilot study demonstrates an architecture and implementation addressing both technical challenges and legal difficulties in the particularly demanding setting of clinical research on cancer patients within the strict European regulation on patient privacy and data protection: 24 patients from LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany, and 24 patients from Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy, were treated for adrenal gland metastasis with typically 40 Gy in 3 or 5 fractions of online-adaptive radiotherapy guided by real-time MR. High local control (21% complete remission, 27% partial remission, 40% stable disease) and low toxicity (73% reporting no toxicity) were observed. Median overall survival was 19 months. Federated analysis was found to improve clinical science through privacy-friendly evaluation of patient data in the European health data space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Ballhausen
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Dan Bogdanov
- Information Security Research Institute, Cybernetica AS, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Bono
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Goelz
- Department of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giulia Panza
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Katia Parodi
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Riivo Talviste
- Information Security Research Institute, Cybernetica AS, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Huong Elena Tran
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hamidi O, Miljanic M, Tumyan G, Christie A, Mirfakhraee S, Ali S, Dohopolski M, Gottumukkala S, Brugarolas J, Timmerman R, Hannan R. Adrenal Insufficiency following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) of Adrenal Gland Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3140. [PMID: 39335112 PMCID: PMC11429775 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Revised: 09/07/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adrenal metastases are often treated with stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR). We aimed to assess the incidence, timing, and factors associated with the development of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) following SAbR. METHODS A retrospective cohort study comprised 66 consecutive patients (73% men, median age 61 years) who underwent SAbR for adrenal metastasis. RESULTS The series encompassed metastases from renal cell carcinoma (41%), lung tumors (38%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (9%), melanoma (5%), and others (7%). Median follow-up was 17 months from SAbR. Nine (14%) patients developed PAI at a median of 4.3 months (range, 0.7-20.2). The incidence of PAI was 44% in patients with prior adrenalectomy receiving unilateral SAbR, 44% with bilateral SAbR, 2% with unaffected contralateral gland, and 0% with bilateral metastases treated with unilateral SAbR. PAI was associated with prior adrenalectomy (odds ratio [OR] 32) and bilateral SAbR (OR 8.2), but not age, sex, metastasis size, or biological effective dose. Post-SAbR 6-month and 1-year local control rates were 82% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing SAbR for adrenal metastasis are at high risk of developing PAI. PAI is associated with bilateral SAbR and contralateral adrenalectomy. PAI is unlikely with a remaining unaffected adrenal gland or in the setting of bilateral adrenal metastases with unilateral SAbR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oksana Hamidi
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (O.H.); (G.T.); (S.M.); (S.A.)
| | - Mihailo Miljanic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (M.M.); (R.T.)
| | - Gayane Tumyan
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (O.H.); (G.T.); (S.M.); (S.A.)
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (A.C.); (M.D.); (S.G.); (J.B.)
| | - Sasan Mirfakhraee
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (O.H.); (G.T.); (S.M.); (S.A.)
| | - Sadia Ali
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (O.H.); (G.T.); (S.M.); (S.A.)
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (A.C.); (M.D.); (S.G.); (J.B.)
| | - Sujana Gottumukkala
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (A.C.); (M.D.); (S.G.); (J.B.)
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (A.C.); (M.D.); (S.G.); (J.B.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (M.M.); (R.T.)
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (M.M.); (R.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rivas D, de la Torre-Luque A, Moreno-Olmedo E, Moreno P, Suárez V, Serradilla A, Arregui G, Álvarez D, Sallabanda M, Lazo A, Núñez MI, López E. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: is less fractionation more effective in adrenal and renal malignant lesions? World J Urol 2024; 42:435. [PMID: 39046532 PMCID: PMC11269452 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05140-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become an excellent non-invasive alternative for many patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and adrenal malignancies (AM). The aims of this study were to analyse how tumor-, patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the outcomes and side effects of SBRT and to assess its benefits as an alternative to surgery. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study included 25 lesions in 23 patients treated with SBRT using different devices (LINAC, CyberKnife® and Tomotherapy®). A multivariate linear regression was used for the statistical study. RESULTS Local control time was higher than six months in more than 87% of patients and treatment response was complete for 73.68%. There was an overall 2-year survival of 40% and none of the deaths were secondary to renal or adrenal local progression. Patients treated with lower total radiation dose (mean [m] = 55 Gy) but less fractions with more dose per fraction (> 8.5 Gy) showed better outcome. Patients with previous chemotherapy and surgery treatments also showed higher complete response and disease-free survival (> 6 months). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance of ultra-hypofractionated regimens with higher doses per session. Thus, the referral of patients with RCC and AM to Radiotherapy and Oncology departments should be encouraged supporting the role of SBRT as a minimally invasive and outpatient treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Rivas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Málaga, Spain
- Clinical Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Alejandro de la Torre-Luque
- Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid. CIBERSAM ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Moreno-Olmedo
- Department of Stereotactic and MR-guided Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Genesiscare, Oxford, UK
| | - Paloma Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Ana Serradilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Jaen, Jaen, Spain
| | | | | | - Morena Sallabanda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto de Radiocirugía Avanzada y Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Lazo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria Clinical University Hospital, Málaga, Spain
| | - María Isabel Núñez
- Department of Radiology and Physical Medicine, Granada University, Granada, Spain.
- Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), Centre for Biomedical Research, Granada University, Granada, Spain.
- Biosanitary Research Institute, ibs. Granada, Spain.
| | - Escarlata López
- GenesisCare South Spain Chief Medical Officer, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu JB, Grew DJ, Sculley E, Hitchcock KE, Kim M, Lo SS. Practical Considerations for the Treatment of an Adrenal Metastasis With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:338-342. [PMID: 38493984 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to summarize 3 methods for treating adrenal metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy. This article is not meant to provide consensus guidelines but rather to present 4 practical examples of treatment techniques using different treatment platforms from 3 institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Yu
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center at Yale, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Radiation Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Saint Francis Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.
| | - David J Grew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Saint Francis Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Erin Sculley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Saint Francis Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Kathryn E Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Minsun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haisraely O, Weiss I, Jaffe M, Appel S, Person-Kaidar O, Symon Z, Ben-Ayun M, Dubinski S, Lawrence Y. Total dose, fraction dose and respiratory motion management impact adrenal SBRT outcome. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100788. [PMID: 38745963 PMCID: PMC11090868 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for oligometastatic disease in multiple sites. However, the optimal radiation dose for long-term local control of adrenal metastases has yet to be determined. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of adrenal SBRT and to evaluate factors that correlate with local control. Materials/Methods After IRB approval, a retrospective data review of patients treated with SBRT for adrenal metastases at a medical center in Israel between 2015 and 2021 was conducted. A biological effective dose was calculated using an alpha beta ratio of 10. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression were calculated using SPSS software to describe the hazard ratio for local control and survival. Results 83 cases of adrenal SBRT were identified. The average age was 67 (range 42-92 years old). Non-small cell lung cancer was the primary site in 44 % of patients. A total of 70 % of the patients had oligometastatic disease (less than five lesions), and the rest were polymetastatic, responding to systemic therapy with oligo progression in the adrenal. The average gross tumor volume (GTV) was 42 ml. Respiratory control was applied in 88 % of cases; 49.3 % used 4-D/ITV, and 38.5 % used breath-hold or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with free breathing. On multivariable analysis, Dose above 75 Gy (biological effective Dose) (HR = 0.41, p = 0.031), Dose above 8 Gy per fraction (HR = 0.53p = 0.038), and breath-holds or CPAP (HR = 0.65, p = 0.047) were significant for local control. From multivariable analysis, we computed a predicted nomogram curve using seven clinical parameters to evaluate local control odds. Conclusion In this single institution series reported to date, we found unilateral adrenal SBRT safe, yet bilateral treatment harbors a risk of adrenal insufficiency. Biological effective Dose > 75 Gy (BED), motion management with breath-hold or CPAP, and Dose per fraction > 8 Gy were the enhanced local controls. We propose a nomogram to help in decision-making regarding total Dose and Dose per fraction when treating adrenal SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ory Haisraely
- Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Unit, Israel
| | - Ilana Weiss
- Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Unit, Israel
| | - Marcia Jaffe
- University of Nicosia (UNIC) Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Sarit Appel
- Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Unit, Israel
| | | | - Zvi Symon
- Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Unit, Israel
| | - Maoz Ben-Ayun
- Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Unit, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Jessen I, Buchele C, Schlüter F, Rippke C, Renkamp CK, Weykamp F, Regnery S, Liermann J, Meixner E, Hoeltgen L, Eichkorn T, König L, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Clinical Outcomes of Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Adrenal Metastases from a Single Institution. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2273. [PMID: 38927978 PMCID: PMC11201609 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Recent publications foster stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with adrenal oligometastases or oligoprogression. However, local control (LC) after non-adaptive SBRT shows the potential for improvement. Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) improves tumor coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. Long-term results of adaptive MRgSBRT are still sparse. (2) Methods: Adaptive MRgSBRT was performed on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. LC, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity were assessed. (3) Results: 35 patients with 40 adrenal metastases were analyzed. The median gross tumor volume was 30.6 cc. The most common regimen was 10 fractions at 5 Gy. The median biologically effective dose (BED10) was 75.0 Gy. Plan adaptation was performed in 98% of all fractions. The median follow-up was 7.9 months. One local failure occurred after 16.6 months, resulting in estimated LC rates of 100% at one year and 90% at two years. ORR was 67.5%. The median OS was 22.4 months, and the median PFS was 5.1 months. No toxicity > CTCAE grade 2 occurred. (4) Conclusions: LC and ORR after adrenal adaptive MRgSBRT were excellent, even in a cohort with comparably large metastases. A BED10 of 75 Gy seems sufficient for improved LC in comparison to non-adaptive SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inga Jessen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Overeem Felter M, Møller PK, Josipovic M, Bekke SN, Bernchou U, Serup-Hansen E, Madsen K, Parikh PJ, Kim J, Geertsen P, Behrens CP, Vogelius IR, Pøhl M, Schytte T, Persson GF. MR-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic oligometastases: Evaluation of toxicity and dosimetric parameters. Radiother Oncol 2024; 192:110090. [PMID: 38224916 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The SOFT trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial investigating magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for abdominal, soft tissue metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04407897). We present the primary endpoint analysis of 1-year treatment-related toxicity (TRAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with up to five oligometastases from non-hematological cancers were eligible for inclusion. A risk-adapted strategy prioritized fixed organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. Fractionation schemes were 45-67.5 Gy in 3-8 fractions. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 4 TRAE within 12 months post-SABR. The association between the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical and dosimetric parameters was tested using a normal tissue complication probability model. RESULTS We included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic targets, mainly located in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). Nearly half of all targets (48 %, n = 71) were within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs, 3.5 % grade 3 TRAEs, and 43.7 % grade 2 TRAEs were reported within the first year of follow-up. We found a significant association between grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity and the parameters GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc. CONCLUSION In this phase II study of MR-guided SABR of oligometastases in the infra-diaphragmatic region, we found a low incidence of toxicity despite half of the lesions being within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc were associated with grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette van Overeem Felter
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Pia Krause Møller
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network at Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9a, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne Nørring Bekke
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Uffe Bernchou
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3. 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Eva Serup-Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Kasper Madsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Department of Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2800 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, United States
| | - Joshua Kim
- Department of Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2800 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, United States
| | - Poul Geertsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Claus P Behrens
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Pøhl
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3. 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Gitte Fredberg Persson
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhelev K, Mihaylova-Hristov M, Conev N, Cholakova M, Korabova B, Petrov I, Georgieva N, Nedev N, Mihaylova I, Petrova M, Zahariev Z, Donev I. Lower fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography maximum standardized uptake value may show a better response to stereotactic body radiotherapy of adrenals in oligometastatic disease. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2024; 27:263-268. [PMID: 38405207 PMCID: PMC10883199 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2023.135288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is well established for oligometastatic disease, and it is increasingly used to treat adrenal metastases. Material and methods In this retrospective study we performed an analysis of 75 metastatic adrenal lesions in 64 patients with oligometastatic disease. According to the fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of adrenal metastases, patients were categorized into three groups: low, intermediate, and high SUVmax. Results For all clinicopathological characteristics we found significant relationships for levels of SUVmax and objective response rate (Kendall Tau-c = 0.290; p = 0.017). Patients who responded to SBRT had a significantly lower SUVmax value than those who did not respond (7.6 ±2.4 vs. 9.7 ±3.8; p = 0.015). At the appropriate SUVmax cut-off values, the biomarker distinguished between patients with and without a response significantly and moderately (area under the curve = 0.670, 95% confidence intervals: 0.540-0.790; p = 0.015). Conclusions Lower SUVmax is associated with a better response to SBRT in patients whose disease progressed mainly in the adrenal glands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiril Zhelev
- Department of Radiotherapy, MHAT “Heart and Brain”, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | | | | | - Manoela Cholakova
- Department of Radiotherapy, MHAT “Heart and Brain”, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Bilyana Korabova
- Department of Radiotherapy, MHAT “Heart and Brain”, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Ivaylo Petrov
- Department of Radiotherapy, MHAT “Heart and Brain”, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | | | - Nikolay Nedev
- Department of Radiotherapy, MHAT “City Clinic”, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Mila Petrova
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, MHAT “Nadezhda”, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Zahari Zahariev
- Department of Radiotherapy, Uni Hospital, Panagyurishte, Bulgaria
| | - Ivan Donev
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, MHAT “Nadezhda”, Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beckers C, Pruschy M, Vetrugno I. Tumor hypoxia and radiotherapy: A major driver of resistance even for novel radiotherapy modalities. Semin Cancer Biol 2024; 98:19-30. [PMID: 38040401 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Hypoxia in solid tumors is an important predictor of poor clinical outcome to radiotherapy. Both physicochemical and biological processes contribute to a reduced sensitivity of hypoxic tumor cells to ionizing radiation and hypoxia-related treatment resistances. A conventional low-dose fractionated radiotherapy regimen exploits iterative reoxygenation in between the individual fractions, nevertheless tumor hypoxia still remains a major hurdle for successful treatment outcome. The technological advances achieved in image guidance and highly conformal dose delivery make it nowadays possible to prescribe larger doses to the tumor as part of single high-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy, while keeping an acceptable level of normal tissue complication in the co-irradiated organs at risk. However, we insufficiently understand the impact of tumor hypoxia to single high-doses of RT and hypofractionated RT. So-called FLASH radiotherapy, which delivers ionizing radiation at ultrahigh dose rates (> 40 Gy/sec), has recently emerged as an important breakthrough in the radiotherapy field to reduce normal tissue toxicity compared to irradiation at conventional dose rates (few Gy/min). Not surprisingly, oxygen consumption and tumor hypoxia also seem to play an intriguing role for FLASH radiotherapy. Here we will discuss the role of tumor hypoxia for radiotherapy in general and in the context of novel radiotherapy treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Beckers
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Pruschy
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Irene Vetrugno
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liao X, Kishi K, Du K, Komaki R, Mizoe J, Aikawa G, Zheng W, Pan C. Risk factors of local control in adrenal metastases treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1193574. [PMID: 38045003 PMCID: PMC10691549 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1193574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study is aimed to explore risk factors affect the therapy outcomes of adrenal metastases (AM) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and guide clinical dose selection. Methods and materials PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched in September 22, 2022 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to search for sources of heterogeneity and identify risky outcomes factors. Publication bias test and sensitivity analysis were also conducted. Results Thirty-three studies with full text from 2009 to 2022 about AM with SBRT on 1483 patients were included. Pooled 1- and 2-year local control (LC) and overall survival(OS) were 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.6%-86.5%), 62.8% (95% CI, 53.8%-71.8%), 67.4% (95%CI, 61.8%-73.1%) and 46.5% (95%CI, 40.4%-52.6%), respectively. Biological effective dose (BED, α/β=10Gy) and dose per fraction affected 1-year LC (Qm=23.89, 15.10; P<0.0001, 0.0001). In the range of 60-80Gy (BED10), the group of dose per fraction ≥ 9Gy achieved the excellent 1-year LC (< 9Gy: ≥ 9Gy =78%, 91%; χ2 = 10.16, P = 0.001). Tracking technology significantly affected 1- and 2-year OS (Qm = 5.73, 8.75; P = 0.017, 0.003) and high tracking adoption group showed excellent 1- and 2- year OS (78.7% [95%CI, 68.6%- 88.9%]; and 62.9% [95%CI, 53.1%-72.7%]). Conclusion Increasing the dose per fraction appropriately may help control locally AM lesious. Tracking technology might contribute to improve survival of advanced patients with AM. But these results need prospective studies to verify them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuehong Liao
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazushi Kishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Disaster Medical Center, National Hospital Organization (NHO), Incorporated Administrative Agency 3256 Tachitawa City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaixin Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Humanity Hospital Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emeritus of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Junetsu Mizoe
- Department of Sapporo High Functioning Radiotherapy Center, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Gosuke Aikawa
- Department of Sapporo High Functioning Radiotherapy Center, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Chao Pan
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ebadi M, Ladbury C, Liu J, Rock A, Onyshchenko M, Villaflor V, Villalona-Calero M, Salgia R, Massarelli E, Lee P, Williams T, Amini A. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive and Oligorecurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2023; 24:651-659. [PMID: 37714807 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in oligoprogressive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. We evaluated whether SBRT in a subset of patients with oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent NSCLC offers a durable response, obviating the need to change systemic therapy. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 168 NSCLC patients who underwent SBRT for oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent disease was performed. Oligoprogression was defined as progression in ≤5 lesions during or after systemic therapy following an initial complete or partial response. Oligorecurrence was defined as progression while off systemic therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment or death (TNT-D) were estimated. RESULTS Median age was 68 years. Sixty-seven percent of patients were on systemic therapy at the time of progression. Progression at the primary site was present in 31% of the patients. The number of sites of metastatic progression was 0 to 2 in 76% and 3 to 5 in 24% of the patients. Two-year OS and PFS were 56% (95%CI 46%-64%) and 14% (95%CI 8%-21%), respectively. Median TNT-D was 9 months (95%CI 6-11). No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was seen. In multivariable analysis, patients with 3 to 5 sites of metastatic progression had worse OS (HR 2.6, 95%CI 1.5-4.3, P < .001) and shorter TNT-D (HR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.5, P = .01) than those with 0 to 2 sites. CONCLUSION SBRT is a safe and viable treatment option for oligoprogressive and oligorecurrent NSCLC. Patients with 0 to 2 sites had better OS and longer TNT-D compared to those with 3 to 5 lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Ebadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Jason Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Adam Rock
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Mykola Onyshchenko
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Victoria Villaflor
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Miguel Villalona-Calero
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Erminia Massarelli
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Terence Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Herndon J, Hallemeier C, Jethwa K, Shariff A, Bancos I. Radiation of bilateral adrenal metastases is associated with a high risk of primary adrenal insufficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2023; 99:35-42. [PMID: 36905107 PMCID: PMC10247529 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adrenal metastasis is the most common adrenal malignancy and can be bilateral in up to 43% of patients. Radiotherapy (RT) is one option available to treat adrenal metastases. The risk of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) after adrenal RT is unclear. OBJECTIVE Determine the incidence and the timeline of PAI in patients undergoing adrenal RT. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Single-centre longitudinal retrospective cohort study of adult patients with adrenal metastases treated with RT between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS Of 56 patients with adrenal metastases treated with adrenal RT, eight (14.3%) patients developed PAI at a median of 6.1 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.9-13.8) after RT All patients developing PAI had either unilateral RT in the setting of contralateral adrenalectomy or bilateral adrenal RT. Patients who developed PAI received a median RT dose of 50 Gy (IQR: 44-50 Gy), administered in a median of five fractions (IQR: 5-6). Treated metastases decreased in size and/or metabolic activity on positron emission tomography in seven patients (87.5%). Patients were initiated on hydrocortisone (median daily dose of 20 mg, IQR: 18-40) and fludrocortisone (median daily dose of 0.05 mg, IQR: 0.05-0.05 mg). At the end of the study period, five patients died, all due to extra-adrenal malignancy, at a median time of 19.7 months (IQR: 16-21.1 months) since RT and median time of 7.7 months (IQR: 2.9-12.5 months) since the diagnosis of PAI. CONCLUSION Patients receiving unilateral adrenal RT with two intact adrenal glands have a low risk of PAI. Patients receiving bilateral adrenal RT have a high risk of PAI and require close monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Herndon
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Krishan Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Afreen Shariff
- Division of Endocrinology, Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Irina Bancos
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Franzese C, Stefanini S, Scorsetti M. Radiation Therapy in the Management of Adrenal Metastases. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:193-202. [PMID: 36990636 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Adrenal glands represent a common site of metastases from several primary tumors, including lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma. Surgical resection is considered the standard of care, but surgery is not always feasible given the challenges related to anatomical site and/or due to patient and/or disease characteristics. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) represents a promising treatment for oligometastases, though the literature on its role for adrenal metastases is still heterogeneous. Herein are summarized the most relevant published studies on the efficacy and safety of SBRT for adrenal gland metastases. The preliminary data suggests that SBRT yields high local control rates and symptom relief with a mild pattern of toxicity. Advanced radiotherapy techniques including IMRT and VMAT, a BED10 > 72 Gy and the use of 4DCT for motion control should be considered for a high quality ablative treatment of adrenal gland metastases.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kekilli E, Demirkasımoğlu T. The efficacy and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in adrenal gland metastases. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:S47-S51. [PMID: 37147982 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_891_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Aim This retrospective study presents our single-institutional experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases. Materials and Methods We evaluated patients with adrenal metastases treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) from 2014 to 2020. We performed an analysis of 35 patients. The median age of the patients was 62.2. Dosimetric parameters and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results The primary diagnosis of the majority of patients was non-small cell lung cancer (94.3%). Treatment was performed in a median of 3 fractions, and the median prescribed dose was 24 Gy (range 22,5-27). The median follow-up was 17 months. Treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours was categorized as complete response in 11 patients, partial response in nine patients, stable disease in 7, and progressive disease in eight patients. Twenty seven patients had oligometastatic disease and treatment response. Patients with oligometastatic disease had a significantly higher rate of complete response and partial response to treatment than patients with common disease (P = 0,011). The 6-month and 1-year local control rates were 68.4% and 43%, respectively. In general, SBRT was well tolerated and no acute toxicities were observed. Conclusion Our retrospective study shows that SBRT can be applied safely in adrenal metastases with good results especially in patients with oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esra Kekilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taciser Demirkasımoğlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ehret F, Kaul D, Kufeld M, Endt CV, Budach V, Senger C, Fürweger C, Haidenberger A, Muacevic A. Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for the management of adrenal gland metastases: a bi-institutional analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1095-1101. [PMID: 35290521 PMCID: PMC9984319 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03943-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adrenal gland metastases (AGMs) are a common manifestation of metastatic tumor spread, especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In patients with a limited systemic tumor burden, effective treatments for AGMs are needed. Due to varying fractionation schemes and limited reports, short-course treatment results for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for AGMs are lacking. This work analyzes the outcomes of short-course SBRT for AGMs. METHODS Patients who underwent robotic SBRT for AGMs with one to five fractions were eligible for analysis. RESULTS In total, data from 55 patients with 72 AGMs from two institutions were analyzed. Most AGMs originated from renal cell carcinoma (38%) and NSCLC (35%). The median follow-up was 16.4 months. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 24 Gy and 70%, respectively. Most patients (85%) received SBRT with just one fraction. The median biologically effective dose assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED10) was 80.4 Gy. The local control and progression-free survival after 1 and 2 years were 92.9%, 67.8%, and 46.2%, as well as 24.3%, respectively. Thirteen patients (24%) suffered from grade 1 or 2 toxicities. The BED10 showed a significant impact on LC (p < 0.01). Treatments with a BED10 equal to or above the median were associated with a better LC (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Robotic SBRT is an efficient and safe treatment modality for AGM. Treatment-associated side effects are sporadic and manageable. Results suggest short-course SBRT to be a preferable and time-saving treatment option for the management of AGMs if an adequate BED10 can be safely applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany. .,European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Berlin, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Kufeld
- European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clara Vom Endt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Fürweger
- European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoegen P, Katsigiannopulos E, Buchele C, Regnery S, Weykamp F, Sandrini E, Ristau J, Liermann J, Meixner E, Forster T, Renkamp CK, Schlüter F, Rippke C, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of adrenal metastases combines high ablative doses with optimized sparing of organs at risk. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100567. [PMID: 36935853 PMCID: PMC10014324 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective To evaluate the potential of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) to fulfill dose recommendations for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of adrenal metastases and spare organs at risk (OAR). Materials and methods In this subgroup analysis of a prospective registry trial, 22 patients with adrenal metastases were treated on a 0.35 T MR-Linac in 5-12 fractions with fraction doses of 4-10 Gy. Baseline plans were re-calculated to the anatomy of the day. These predicted plans were reoptimized to generate adapted plans. Baseline, predicted and adapted plans were compared with regard to PTV objectives, OAR constraints and published dose recommendations. Results The cohort comprised patients with large GTV (median 36.0 cc) and PTV (median 66.6 cc) and predominantly left-sided metastases. 179 of 181 fractions (98.9 %) were adapted because of PTV and/or OAR violations. Predicted plans frequently violated PTV coverage (99.4 %) and adjacent OAR constraints (bowel: 32.9 %, stomach: 32.8 %, duodenum: 10.4 %, kidneys: 10.8 %). In the predicted plans, the volume exposed to the maximum dose was exceeded up to 16-fold in the duodenum and up to 96-fold in the spinal cord. Adapted plans significantly reduced OAR violations by 96.4 % for the bowel, 98.5 % for the stomach, 85.6 % for the duodenum and 83.3 % for the kidneys. Plan adaptation improved PTV coverage from 82.7 ± 8.1 % to 90.6 ± 4.9 % (p < 0.001). Furthermore, recently established target volume thresholds could easily be fulfilled with SMART. No toxicities > grade II occurred. Conclusion SMART fulfills established GTV and PTV dose recommendations while simultaneously sparing organs at risk even in a challenging cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Efthimios Katsigiannopulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhong H, Wang Z, Liu Y, Ke H, Liu P, Lian X, Xu Z. Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Ablation for Adrenal Metastases: A Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2023. [PMID: 36840701 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation (US-PA) for adrenal metastases (AMs) using a meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases was performed to identify studies on US-PA for AM. Seven studies published between January 2000 and August 2022 were analyzed, which resulted in a sample size of 140 patients. Both random effects and common effects meta-analysis models were used to analyze the following efficacy and safety outcomes: the first and secondary technical success rate, 1-year overall survival rates, 1-year local tumor control rate, incidence rate of intraoperative hypertensive crises, and major complications. The subgroup analysis was performed to explore the origin of heterogeneity. RESULTS Among 140 patients from 7 studies included in this meta-analysis: 51 (36.43%) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 89 (63.57%) underwent microwave ablation (MWA). Pooled data analysis revealed that the first and secondary technical success rates were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73-96) and 99% (95% CI, 96-100), the 1-year overall survival rate was 83% (95% CI, 71-93), the 1-year local tumor control rate was 83% (95% CI, 75-90), and the incidence rate of intraoperative hypertensive crises was 14% (95% CI, 8-20). The overall rate of major complications was 3.6%. In the subgroup analysis, lower heterogeneity was indicated to be associated with mean tumor size and ablation type. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis showed that US-PA can be both effective and safe for AM in terms of overall survival, technical success rate, and local control for AM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huohu Zhong
- Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Zecheng Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Yingchao Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Helin Ke
- Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Piaopiao Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Xihua Lian
- Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Zhenhong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Xu B, Zhao X, Chen D, Zhao W, Wang X, Ding C, Yuan Z, Zhang H. Two-institution results of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for treating adrenal gland metastases from liver cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:73. [PMID: 36681809 PMCID: PMC9862519 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10519-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) has been found beneficial for adrenal gland metastases (AGMs) with a high local control rate and low toxicity. The role of SBRT for AGMs in patients with liver cancer has not been well-discussed before. We, therefore, report our two-institution experience to further elaborate on the feasibility and effectiveness of SBRT in the treatment of AGMs from liver cancer. METHODS A total of 23 liver cancer patients (19 males, 4 females) with 24 AGMs treated by SBRT from July 2006 to April 2021 were retrospectively included in this study. Toxicity was assessed based on clinical adverse events using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. The effectiveness was assessed based on local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), which were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were compared by log-rank test. The relevant covariates were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS The median dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions, with the corresponding median biological effective dose (BED10, α/β = 10 Gy) of 72 Gy. The median overall follow-up time was 15.4 months (range: 4.2-70.6 months). The complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) rates were 25.0%, 20.8%, 33.3%, and 20.8%, respectively. All 6 patients with AGMs accompanying symptoms had varying degrees of alleviation after SBRT. The 0.5-, 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 87.5%, 77.8%, and 77.8%, respectively. The 0.5-, 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 95.5%, 66.8%, and 41.1%, respectively. The treatments were all tolerated with only one patient reporting a grade-3 hepatic injury. The univariate analysis concluded that only gross tumor volume (GTV) < 34.5 ml (p = 0.039) was associated with a favorable LC rate. After multivariate analysis, favorable predictors correlated with OS were GTV < 34.5 ml (p = 0.043), systemic therapy (p = 0.017), and without additional organ metastasis after SBRT (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that SBRT is a safe and effective technique to treat AGM from liver cancer, especially for small GTV (< 34.5ml). Moreover, the small metastatic lesion volume, fewer metastatic lesions, and intervention of systemic therapy are more likely to improve OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bichun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the Navy Medical University, 200433, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianzhi Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the Navy Medical University, 200433, Shanghai, China
| | - Di Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the Navy Medical University, 200433, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenjuan Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the Navy Medical University, 200433, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the Navy Medical University, 200433, Shanghai, China
| | - Changhua Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the Navy Medical University, 200433, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 300060, Tianjin, China
| | - Huojun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the Navy Medical University, 200433, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stefanovic M, Calvet G, Pérez-Montero H, Esteve A, Bujalance MV, Navarro-Martín A, Fernández MDA, González FF, Borras SM, Borbalas AL, Fernandez MN, Garau MM, Calduch AL, Edo FG. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer patients with oligometastatic disease: a real world study. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023; 25:199-206. [PMID: 36068449 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02923-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment modality with curative intent for oligometastatic cancer patients, commonly defined by a low-burden metastatic disease with 1-5 systemic metastases. Better knowledge of the clinical profile and prognostic factors in oligometastatic cancer patients could help to improve the selection of candidates who may obtain most benefits from SBRT. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical data and outcome in term of overall survival (OS) of patients with oligometastatic disease treated with SBRT over a 6-year period. METHODS From 2013 to 2018, 284 solid tumor cancer patients with 1-5 oligometastases underwent SBRT at a large university-affiliated oncological center in Barcelona, Spain. Variables related to the patient profile, tumor, oligometastatic disease, and treatment were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 327 metastatic tumors were treated with SBRT. In 65.5% of cases, metachronous tumors were diagnosed at least 1 year after diagnosis of the primary tumor. The median age of the patients was 73.9 years and 66.5% were males. The median follow-up was 37.5 months. The most common primary tumors were lung and colorectal cancer, with lung and bone as the most commonly treated metastatic sites. Ninety-three percent of patients showed a Karnofsky score (KPS) between 80 and 100. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type. The median overall survival was 53.4 months, with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 90.5%, 73.9% and 43.4%, respectively. Overall survival rates of breast (67.6 months, 95% CI 56.4-78.9), urological (63.3 months, 95% CI 55.8-70.8), and colorectal (50.8 months, 95% CI 44.2-57.4) tumors were higher as compared with other malignancies (20 months, 95% CI 11.2-28.8 months) (p < 0.001). Patients with Karnofsky score (KPS) of 90 and 100 showed a significantly better survival than those with impaired performance status (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION SBRT appears to be well tolerated and safe approach in oligometastatic patients. Patients with good performance status and with primary breast, urological and colorectal cancer have higher OS compared with other malignancies. More studies are necessary to evaluate the prognostic factors in oligometastatic disease (OMD) in order to select patients who could benefit more from this therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milica Stefanovic
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain. .,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Gemma Calvet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Héctor Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Esteve
- Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B·ARGO), Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO Badalona), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet s/n, Badalona, 08916, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montse Ventura Bujalance
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martín
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Dolores Arnaiz Fernández
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Ferrer González
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susanna Marin Borras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano Borbalas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Nuñez Fernandez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Macia Garau
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Lucas Calduch
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Guedea Edo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Michalet M, Bettaïeb O, Khalfi S, Ghorbel A, Valdenaire S, Debuire P, Aillères N, Draghici R, De Méric De Bellefon M, Charissoux M, Boisselier P, Demontoy S, Marguerit A, Cabaillé M, Cantaloube M, Keskes A, Bouhafa T, Farcy-Jacquet MP, Fenoglietto P, Azria D, Riou O. Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Adrenal Gland Metastases: First Clinical Results. J Clin Med 2022; 12:jcm12010291. [PMID: 36615093 PMCID: PMC9821305 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic MR-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) is an interesting treatment option for adrenal gland metastases (AGM). We reviewed data from 12 consecutive patients treated with MRgRT for an AGM in our center between 14 November 2019 and 17 August 2021. Endpoints were tolerance assessment, the impact of adaptive treatment on target volume coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing, local control (LC), and overall survival (OS). The majority of patients were oligometastatic (58.3%), with 6 right AGM, 5 left AGM and 1 left and right AGM. The prescribed dose was 35 to 50 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions. The median PTV V95% on the initial plan was 95.74%. The median V95% of the PTVoptimized (PTVopt) on the initial plan was 95.26%. Thirty-eight (69%) fractions were adapted. The PTV coverage was significantly improved for adapted plans compared to predicted plans (median PTV V95% increased from 89.85% to 91.17%, p = 0.0478). The plan adaptation also significantly reduced Dmax for the stomach and small intestine. The treatment was well tolerated with no grade > 2 toxicities. With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the 1−year LC and OS rate were 100% and 91.7%. Six patients (50%) presented a metastatic progression, and one patient (8.3%) died of metastatic evolution during the follow-up. Adaptation of the treatment plan improved the overall dosimetric quality of MRI-guided radiotherapy. A longer follow-up is required to assess late toxicities and clinical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Michalet
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Ons Bettaïeb
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Samia Khalfi
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Asma Ghorbel
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Valdenaire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Debuire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Norbert Aillères
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Roxana Draghici
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Mailys De Méric De Bellefon
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Charissoux
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Boisselier
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvain Demontoy
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Alexis Marguerit
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Morgane Cabaillé
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Cantaloube
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Aïcha Keskes
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Touria Bouhafa
- CHU Hassan II, Radiotherapy and Brachyterapy, 30050 Fez, Morocco
| | - Marie-Pierre Farcy-Jacquet
- Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, CHU Carémeau, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jiang W, DiPrete D, Taleyarkhan RP. PLA Renewable Bio Polymer Based Solid-State Gamma Radiation Detector-Dosimeter for Biomedical and Nuclear Industry Applications. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:8265. [PMID: 36365965 PMCID: PMC9655317 DOI: 10.3390/s22218265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Polylactic acid (PLA) as a "green," renewable corn-soy based polymer resin was assessed as a novel solid-state detector for rapid-turnaround gamma radiation dosimetry in the 1-100 kGy range-of significant interest in biomedical and general nuclear industry applications. Co-60 was used as the source of gamma photons. It was found that PLA resin responds well in terms of rheology and porosity metrics with an absorbed gamma dose (Dg). In this work, rheological changes were ascertained via measuring the differential mass loss ratio (MLR) of irradiated PLA placed within PTFE-framed (40 mm × 20 mm × 0.77 mm) cavities bearing ~0.9 g of PLA resin and pressed for 12-16 min in a controlled force hot press under ~6.6 kN loading and platens heated to 227 °C for the low Dg range: 0-11 kGy; and to 193 °C for the extended Dg range: 11-120 kGy. MLR varied quadratically from 0.05 to ~0.2 (1σ ~ 0.007) in the 0-11 kGy experiments, and from 0.05 to ~0.5 (1σ ~0.01) in the 0-120 kGy experiments. Rheological changes from gamma irradiation were modeled and simultaneously correlated with void-pocket formations, which increase with Dg. A single PLA resin bead (~0.04 g) was compressed 5 min at 216 °C in 0-16 kGy experiments, and compressed 2 min at 232 °C in the 16-110 kGy experiments, to form sturdy ~100 µm thick wafers in the same press. Aggregate coupon porosity was then readily measurable with conventional optical microscope imaging and analyzed with standard image processing; this provided complementary data to MLR. Average porosity vs. dose varied quadratically from ~0 to ~15% in the 0-16 kGy range and from ~0 to ~18% over the 16-114 kGy range. These results provide evidence for utilizing "green"/renewable (under $0.01) PLA resin beads for rapid and accurate (+/-5-10%) gamma dosimetry over a wide 0-120 kGy range, using simple to deploy mass and void measuring techniques using common laboratory equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Jiang
- School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - David DiPrete
- Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC 29808, USA
| | - Rusi P. Taleyarkhan
- School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Predicting the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 36:91-98. [PMID: 35942398 PMCID: PMC9356237 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Predicting the benefit from Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of colorectal cancer metastases. CLInical Categorical Algorithm (CLICAL©) – a predictive algorithm applied to SBRT. The benefit from SBRT varies among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. CLICAL© may be used as a screening tool for SBRT referrals.
Aim Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim H, Kim D, Kim W, Kim E, Jang WI, Kim MS. The Efficacy of Radiation is Enhanced by Metformin and Hyperthermia Alone or Combined Against FSaII Fibrosarcoma in C3H Mice. Radiat Res 2022; 198:190-199. [DOI: 10.1667/rade-21-00231.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunkyung Kim
- Clinical Translational Research Team, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dohyeon Kim
- Clinical Translational Research Team, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonwoo Kim
- Clinical Translational Research Team, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - EunJi Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schiff JP, Stowe HB, Price A, Laugeman E, Hatscher C, Hugo GD, Badiyan SN, Kim H, Robinson CG, Henke LE. In Silico Trial of Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the Treatment of Abdominal Oligometastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:1022-1031. [PMID: 35768023 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a prospective, in silico clinical imaging study (NCTXXXX) to evaluate the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of abdominal oligometastases. We hypothesized that CT-STAR produces improved dosimetry compared to non-adapted CT-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS/MATERIALS Eight patients receiving SBRT for abdominal oligometastatic disease received five additional kV cone beam CTs (CBCTs) on the ETHOS system. These additional CBCTs were used for imaging during an emulator treatment session. Initial plans were created based on their simulation (PI) and emulated adaptive plans (PA) were based on anatomy-of-the-day. The prescription was 50 Gy/5 fractions. Organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints were prioritized over planning target volume coverage under a strict isotoxicity approach. The PI was applied to the patient's anatomy-of-the-day and compared to the re-optimized PA using dose volume histogram metrics, with selection of the superior plan. Feasibility was defined as completion of the adaptive workflow and compliance with strict OAR constraints in ≥80% of fractions. Fractions were performed under time pressures by a physician and physicist to mimic the adaptive process. RESULTS CT-STAR was feasible, with successful workflow completion in 38/40 (95%) fractions. PI application to daily anatomy created OAR constraint violations in 30/40 (75%) fractions. There were 8 stomach, 18 duodenum, 16 small bowel, and 11 large bowel PI OAR constraint violations. In contrast, OAR violations occurred in 2/40 (5%) PA (both small bowel violations, both improved from the PI). CT-STAR also improved GTV V100 and D95 coverage in 25/40 (63%) and 20/40 (50%) fractions, respectively. 0/40 (0%) fractions were deemed non-feasible due to poor image quality and/or inability to delineate structures. Adaptation time per fraction was a median of 22.59 minutes (10.97-47.23). CONCLUSIONS CT-STAR resolved OAR hard constraint violations and/or improved target coverage in silico when compared to non-adapted CT-guided SBRT for the ablation of abdominal oligometastatic disease. While limitations of this study include its small sample size and in silico design, the consistently high quality CBCT images captured and comparable timing metrics to prior adaptive studies suggest that CT- STAR is a viable treatment paradigm for the ablation of abdominal oligometastatic disease. Clinical trials are in development to further evaluate CT-STAR in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua P Schiff
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
| | - Hayley B Stowe
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Alex Price
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Eric Laugeman
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Casey Hatscher
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Hugo
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Shahed N Badiyan
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Hyun Kim
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Clifford G Robinson
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Lauren E Henke
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
McCann B, Higgins M, Kok DL, Hong W, Alipour R, Chua MST. Long-term control of melanoma adrenal metastasis treated with radiotherapy. Melanoma Res 2022; 32:166-172. [PMID: 35256569 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma remains a large global burden with a significant proportion of patients succumbing to metastatic disease. The adrenal gland is a common area for metastasis with surgical treatment as the main modality. Radiotherapy is less utilised in this setting with uncertainty over deliverability and efficacy. Here, we present the details and outcomes of 20 patients treated with radiotherapy, with or without systemic therapy, for melanoma adrenal metastasis in a single institute. Twenty patients were identified from radiation treatment and medical records from between 2015 and 2019 at our institution. Three patients had bilateral radiotherapy treatments and therefore 23 adrenal lesions were analysed. Demographics, indications for treatment, radiotherapy methodology and outcomes were recorded. Outcomes were based on serial 18F FDG PET/computerized tomography scans reporting using the PERCIST criteria. The most common indication for radiotherapy was oligo-progressive disease (70%) followed by symptom palliation. Eight (35%) of the treatments were delivered by stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. Twelve (60%) patients had concurrent immunotherapy. Twenty of twenty-three (87%) adrenal lesions had an initial response to treatment with 12 (60%) maintaining local control until death or end of follow-up. Median adrenal-specific progression-free survival was 13 months. Four patients (17%) required salvage adrenalectomy. Symptom palliation was achieved in the majority of patients for which it was indicated and there were no grade three toxicities. The median time from radiotherapy to change of immunotherapy treatment was 4 months. Radiotherapy for melanoma adrenal metastasis is effective and deliverable. With the majority of patients achieving a palliative and clinically relevant durable response, adrenalectomy can be reserved as a salvage option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan McCann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David L Kok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wei Hong
- St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy
- Department of Cancer Research, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville
| | - Ramin Alipour
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret S T Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Borghesi S, Casamassima F, Aristei C, Grandinetti A, Di Franco R. Stereotactic radiotherapy for adrenal oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:52-56. [PMID: 35402020 PMCID: PMC8989453 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 50% of melanomas, 30–40% of lung and breast cancers and 10–20% of renal and gastrointestinal tumors metastasize to the adrenal gland. Metastatic adrenal involvement is diagnosed by computed tomography (CT ) with contrast medium, ultrasound (which does not explore the left adrenal gland well), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast medium and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18FDGPET-CT ) which also evaluates lesion uptake. The simulation CT should be performed with contrast medium; an oral bolus of contrast medium is useful, given adrenal gland proximity to the duodenum. The simulation CT may be merged with PET-CT images with 18FDG in order to evaluate uptaking areas. In contouring, the radiologically visible and/or uptaking lesion provides the gross tumor volume (GTV ). Appropriate techniques are needed to overcome target motion. Single fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) with median doses of 16–23 Gy is rarely used. More common are doses of 25–48 Gy in 3–10 fractions although 3 or 5 fractions are preferred. Local control at 1 and 2 years ranges from 44 to 100% and from 27 to 100%, respectively. The local control rate is as high as 90%, remaining stable during follow-up when BED10Gy is equal to or greater than 100 Gy. SRT-related toxicity is mild, consisting mainly of gastrointestinal disorders, local pain and fatigue. Adrenal insufficiency is rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Di Franco
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Buergy D, Würschmidt F, Gkika E, Hörner-Rieber J, Knippen S, Gerum S, Balermpas P, Henkenberens C, Voglhuber T, Kornhuber C, Barczyk S, Röper B, Rashid A, Blanck O, Wittig A, Herold HU, Brunner TB, Sweeney RA, Kahl KH, Ciernik FI, Ottinger A, Izaguirre V, Putz F, König L, Hoffmann M, Combs SE, Guckenberger M, Boda-Heggemann J. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of adrenal metastases - A dose-finding study. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:412-421. [PMID: 35383919 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Optimal doses for the treatment of adrenal metastases with stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) are unknown. We aimed to identify dose-volume cut-points associated with decreased local recurrence rates (LRR). A multicenter database of patients with adrenal metastases of any histology treated with SBRT (biologically effective dose, BED10 ≥ 50Gy, ≤ 12 fractions) was analyzed. Details on dose-volume parameters were required (planning target volume: PTV-D98%, PTV-D50%, PTV-D2%; gross tumor volume: GTV-D50%, GTV-mean). Cut-points for LRR were optimized using the R maxstat package. 196 patients with 218 lesions were included, the largest histopathological subgroup was adenocarcinoma (n = 101). Cut-point optimization resulted in significant cut-points for PTV-D50% (BED10: 73.2Gy; p = 0.003), GTV-D50% (BED10: 74.2Gy; p = 0.006), GTV-mean (BED10: 73.0Gy; p = 0.007), and PTV-D2% (BED10: 78.0Gy; p = 0.02) but not for the PTV-D98% (p = 0.06). Differences in LRR were clinically relevant (LRR ≥ doubled for cut-points that were not achieved). Further dose-escalation was not associated with further improved LRR. PTV-D50%, GTV-D50%, and GTV-mean cut-points were also associated with significantly improved LRR in the adenocarcinoma subgroup. Separate dose optimizations indicated a lower cut-point for the PTV-D50% (BED10: 69.1Gy) in adenocarcinoma lesions, other values were similar (< 2% difference). Associations of cut-points with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were not significant but durable freedom from local recurrence was associated with OS in a landmark model (p < 0.001). To achieve a significant improvement of LRR for adrenal SBRT, a moderate escalation of PTV-D50% BED10 > 73.2Gy (adenocarcinoma: 69.1Gy) should be considered. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Buergy
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | | | - Eleni Gkika
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Strahlenheilkunde, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Deutschland.,Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, München, Deutschland.,Klinik für Radiotherapie und Radioonkologie, Paracelsus Universität Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Österreich
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Theresa Voglhuber
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich
| | - Christine Kornhuber
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Steffen Barczyk
- Zentrum für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Belegklinik am St. Agnes-Hospital, Bocholt, Deutschland
| | - Barbara Röper
- DIE RADIOLOGIE, MVZ Strahlentherapie Bogenhausen - Harlaching - Neuperlach, München, Deutschland
| | - Ali Rashid
- MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Andrea Wittig
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Herold
- Cyberknife Centrum Mitteldeutschland GmbH, Institut für Radiochirurgie und Präzisionsbestrahlung, Erfurt, Deutschland
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Magdeburg, Deutschland
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Schweinfurt, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Augsburg, Deutschland
| | - F Ilja Ciernik
- Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Dessau, Deutschland
| | - Annette Ottinger
- Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Darmstadt, Deutschland
| | - Victor Izaguirre
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Florian Putz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Laila König
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, München, Deutschland
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich.,Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Deutschland.,Deutsches Zentrum für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) Partner Site Munich
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen YH, Ho UC, Kuo LT. Oligometastatic Disease in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Update. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051350. [PMID: 35267658 PMCID: PMC8909159 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Approximately 7–50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop oligometastases, which are new tumors found in another part of the body, arising from cancer cells of the original tumor that have travelled through the body. In recent years, these patients have been increasingly regarded as a distinct group that could benefit from treatment that intends to cure the disease, rather than palliative care, to achieve a better clinical outcome. Various treatment procedures have been developed for treating NSCLC patients with different oligometastatic sites. In addition, the newly proposed uniform definition for oligometastases as well as ongoing trials may lead to increased appropriate patient selection and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. The aim of this review article is to summarize the latest evidence regarding optimal management strategies for NSCLC patients with oligometastases. Abstract Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct entity that is different from localized and disseminated diseases. The definition of oligometastatic NSCLC varies across studies in past decades owing to the use of different imaging modalities; however, a uniform definition of oligometastatic NSCLC has been proposed, and this may facilitate trial design and evaluation of certain interventions. Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC are candidates for curative-intent management, in which local ablative treatment, such as surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, should be instituted to improve clinical outcomes. Although current guidelines recommend that local therapy for thoracic and metastatic lesions should be considered for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC with stable disease after systemic therapy, optimal management strategies for different oligometastatic sites have not been established. Additionally, the development of personalized therapies for individual patients with oligometastatic NSCLC to improve their quality of life and overall survival should also be addressed. Here, we review relevant articles on the management of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC and categorize the disease according to the site of metastases. Ongoing trials are also summarized to determine future directions and expectations for new treatment modalities to improve patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Hsing Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Douliu 640, Taiwan; (Y.-H.C.); (U.-C.H.)
| | - Ue-Cheung Ho
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Douliu 640, Taiwan; (Y.-H.C.); (U.-C.H.)
| | - Lu-Ting Kuo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-2-2312-3456
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Adrenal Gland Irradiation Causes Fatigue Accompanied by Reactive Changes in Cortisol Levels. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051214. [PMID: 35268304 PMCID: PMC8911448 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental radiotherapy (RT) to the adrenal gland may have systemic effects. This study aimed to investigate the effects of adrenal RT on fatigue. METHODS BALB/c mice were surgically explored to identify the left adrenal gland and delivered intra-operative RT. The swimming endurance test was used for endurance assessment to represent fatigue. Plasma levels of stress hormones and histopathological features were examined. Three patients with inevitable RT to the adrenal gland were enrolled for the preliminary study. Serum levels of cortisol, aldosterone, and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) were measured before and after RT. Fatigue score by using the fatigue severity scale and RT dosimetric parameters were collected. RESULTS In the experimental mouse model, adrenal RT decreased baseline cortisol from 274.6 ± 37.8 to 193.6 ± 29.4 ng/mL (p = 0.007) and swimming endurance time from 3.7 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.6 min (p = 0.02). In histopathological assessment, the irradiated adrenal glands showed RT injury features in the adrenal cortex. In the enrolled patients, baseline cortisol significantly declined after RT. There were no significant differences in the levels of morning cortisol, aldosterone, and ACTH before and after RT. CONCLUSIONS The RT dose distributed to the adrenal gland may correlate with unwanted adverse effects, including fatigue and adrenal hormone alterations.
Collapse
|
30
|
Durmus IF, Okumus A. Dosimetric comparison of mDCAT and VMAT techniques according to 6MV-FFF and 10MV-FFF energies in patients with single adrenal metastasis. JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2022; 30:1023-1032. [PMID: 35848004 DOI: 10.3233/xst-221192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare dosimetric and radiobiological terms of modified dynamic conformal arc therapy (mDCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques using different flattening-filter free (FFF) energies in patients with single adrenal metastasis. METHODS In this study, plans were prepared for 10 patients drawing on the mDCAT and VMAT techniques with 6MV-FFF and 10MV-FFF energies. Target volume doses, biological effective doses (BED), quality indices, Monitor Unit (MU), number of segments, beam-on time and critical organ doses were compared in the plans. RESULTS Plans with the significantly lower gradient index (GI) and conformity index (CI) values were obtained with 6MV-FFF energy VMAT planning (p < 0.05). The higher values were obtained for dose to 95% of internal target volume (ITVD95), ITVD95-BED10 with 10MV-FFF energy VMAT planning, whereas lower results were obtained for high dose spillage (HDS%) values (p < 0,05). With 10MV-FFF energy, HDS% values were 21.1% lower in VMAT plans and 5.6% lower in mDCAT plans compared to 6MV-FFF energy. Plans with approximately 50% fewer segments were obtained in mDCAT plans than VMAT plans (p < 0,05). Beam-on time values with mDCAT was 1.84 times lower when 6MV-FFF energies were analyzed, and 2.11 times lower when 10MV-FFF was analyzed (p < 0,05). Additionally, when 6MV-FFF and 10MV-FFF energies were examined, MU values with mDCAT were 2.1 and 2.5 times lower (p < 0,05). In general, the smaller the target volume size, the greater the differences between MU and beam-on time values mDCAT and VMAT. CONCLUSIONS The study results implied that VMAT enabled to offer significantly more conformal SBRT plans with steeper dose fall-off beyond the target volume for single adrenal metastasis than the mDCAT, which attained at the cost of significantly higher MU and beam-on times. Especially with 10MV-FFF energy mDCAT plans, low-dose-bath zones can be reduced, and shorter-term treatments can be implemented with large segments. In adrenal gland SBRT, higher effective doses can be achieved with the right energy and technique, critical organ doses can be reduced, thus increasing the possibility of local control of the tumor with low toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Faruk Durmus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nisantasi University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeni Yuzyil University Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayse Okumus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nisantasi University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
CT-guided versus MR-guided radiotherapy: Impact on gastrointestinal sparing in adrenal stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 166:101-109. [PMID: 34843842 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To quantify the indication for adaptive, gated breath-hold (BH) MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRTBH) versus BH or free-breathing (FB) CT-based image-guided radiotherapy (CT-IGRT) for the ablative treatment of adrenal malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty adrenal patients underwent adaptive IMRT MRgRTBH to a median dose of 50 Gy/5 fractions. Each patient was replanned for VMAT CT-IGRTBH and CT-IGRTFB on a c-arm linac. Only CT-IGRTFB used an ITV, summed from GTVs of all phases of the 4DCT respiratory evaluation. All used the same 5 mm GTV/ITV to PTV expansion. Metrics evaluated included: target volume and coverage, conformality, mean ipsilateral kidney and 0.5 cc gastrointestinal organ-at-risk (OAR) doses (D0.5cc). Adaptive dose for MRgRTBH and predicted dose (i.e., initial plan re-calculated on anatomy of the day) was performed for CT-IGRTBH and MRgRTBH to assess frequency of OAR violations and coverage reductions for each fraction. RESULTS The more common VMAT CT-IGRTFB, with its significantly larger target volumes, proved inferior to MRgRTBH in mean PTV and ITV/GTV coverage, as well as small bowel D0.5cc. Conversely, VMAT CT-IGRTBH delivered a dosimetrically superior initial plan in terms of statistically significant (p ≤ 0.02) improvements in target coverage, conformality and D0.5cc to the large bowel, duodenum and mean ipsilateral kidney compared to IMRT MRgRTBH. However, non-adaptive CT-IGRTBH had a 71.8% frequency of predicted indications for adaptation and was 2.8 times more likely to experience a coverage reduction in PTV D95% than predicted for MRgRTBH. CONCLUSION Breath-hold VMAT radiotherapy provides superior target coverage and conformality over MRgRTBH, but the ability of MRgRTBH to safely provide ablative doses to adrenal lesions near mobile luminal OAR through adaptation and direct, real-time motion tracking is unmatched.
Collapse
|
32
|
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for adrenal gland metastases: outcome and predictive factors from a multicenter analysis. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:511-518. [PMID: 34651241 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10124-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Adrenal metastases occur in 15-35% of oncological patients. Surgery is the first treatment option. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been largely explored in oligometastatic patients unfit for surgery, representing an effective and non-invasive local treatment. The results of a multi-institutional experience of SBRT on adrenal metastases in the oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive setting are herein reported. We collected data of adrenal gland metastases treated with SBRT in three Italian centers from 2010 to 2020. End-points of the present study were: Overall survival (OS), Local control of treated metastases (LC), Progression free survival (PFS), and toxicity. 149 adrenal gland metastases were treated with SBRT in 142 patients. The most common primary tumor was lung cancer (58.4%), followed by kidney cancer (9.4%). Median lesion's volume was 28.5 cm3 (2.5-323.4). The median SBRT dose was 40 Gy (10-60). Median follow-up was 14.4 months. One- and two-year OS were 72.3% and 53.5%. At univariate analysis performance status correlated with survival (HR 1.57, p = 0.006). One- and two-year LC were 85.4% and 79.2%, with lung primary tumor (HR 0.33, p = 0.021) and BED10 (HR 0.97, p = 0.036) significant independent factors. One- and two-year PFS were 37.7% and 24.8%. Median time to polymetastatic disease was 11.3 months. Grade 1 and 2 toxicity occurred in 21 (14.7%) and 3 (2.1%) patients. The results from this large multi-center study confirm the efficacy and safety of SBRT in the management of adrenal gland metastases, as a valid alternative to other more invasive local approaches.
Collapse
|
33
|
Janopaul-Naylor JR, Shen Y, Qian DC, Buchwald ZS. The Abscopal Effect: A Review of Pre-Clinical and Clinical Advances. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:11061. [PMID: 34681719 PMCID: PMC8537037 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy has been used for more than a hundred years to cure or locally control tumors. Regression of tumors outside of the irradiated field was occasionally observed and is known as the abscopal effect. However, the occurrence of systemic anti-tumor effects was deemed too rare and unpredictable to be a therapeutic goal. Recent studies suggest that immunotherapy and radiation in combination may enhance the abscopal response. Increasing numbers of cases are being reported since the routine implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, showing that combined radiotherapy with immunotherapy has a synergistic effect on both local and distant (i.e., unirradiated) tumors. In this review, we summarize pre-clinical and clinical reports, with a specific focus on the mechanisms behind the immunostimulatory effects of radiation and how this is enhanced by immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R. Janopaul-Naylor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (Y.S.); (D.C.Q.); (Z.S.B.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Reshko LB, Gaskins JT, Silverman CL, Dunlap NE. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of adrenal gland metastases in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:325-340. [PMID: 34277086 PMCID: PMC8281902 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a form of noninvasive treatment that is becoming increasingly used to manage cancers with adrenal gland metastases. There is a paucity of data on safety and efficacy of this modality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adrenal gland SBRT in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we performed a single-institution analysis of 26 adrenal lesions from 23 patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease treated from 2013 to 2019 with the goal of achieving durable local control. Palliative cases were excluded. Radiation dosimetry data was collected. Kaplan Meier product estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS The median dose was 36 Gy in 3 fractions (range: 24-50 Gy and 3-6 fractions) with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 (range: 40-100). 1-year local control rate was 80% and median local control was not achieved due to a low number of failures. 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 66% and 32%. Toxicity was mild with only one case of grade 2 nausea and no grade 3-5 toxicity. Higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was associated with worse overall survival and a trend toward worse progression-free survival. In addition, worse performance status and lower BED10 were associated with worse survival. No such association could be shown for primary tumor location, histology, size or stage. CONCLUSION Adrenal SBRT for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease is a safe and effective form of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, United States of America
| | - Jeremy T Gaskins
- Department of Bioinformatics & Biostatistics, University of Louisville School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Louisville, United States of America
| | - Craig L Silverman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, United States of America
| | - Neal E Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Buergy D, Würschmidt F, Gkika E, Hörner-Rieber J, Knippen S, Gerum S, Balermpas P, Henkenberens C, Voglhuber T, Kornhuber C, Barczyk S, Röper B, Rashid A, Blanck O, Wittig A, Herold HU, Brunner TB, Klement RJ, Kahl KH, Ciernik IF, Ottinger A, Izaguirre V, Putz F, König L, Hoffmann M, Combs SE, Guckenberger M, Boda-Heggemann J. Stereotactic or conformal radiotherapy for adrenal metastases: Patient characteristics and outcomes in a multicenter analysis. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:358-370. [PMID: 33682927 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
To report outcome (freedom from local progression [FFLP], overall survival [OS] and toxicity) after stereotactic, palliative or highly conformal fractionated (>12) radiotherapy (SBRT, Pall-RT, 3DCRT/IMRT) for adrenal metastases in a retrospective multicenter cohort within the framework of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). Adrenal metastases treated with SBRT (≤12 fractions, biologically effective dose [BED10] ≥ 50 Gy), 3DCRT/IMRT (>12 fractions, BED10 ≥ 50 Gy) or Pall-RT (BED10 < 50 Gy) were eligible for this analysis. In addition to unadjusted FFLP (Kaplan-Meier/log-rank), we calculated the competing-risk-adjusted local recurrence rate (CRA-LRR). Three hundred twenty-six patients with 366 metastases were included by 21 centers (median follow-up: 11.7 months). Treatment was SBRT, 3DCRT/IMRT and Pall-RT in 260, 27 and 79 cases, respectively. Most frequent primary tumors were non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 52.5%), SCLC (16.3%) and melanoma (6.7%). Unadjusted FFLP was higher after SBRT vs Pall-RT (P = .026) while numerical differences in CRA-LRR between groups did not reach statistical significance (1-year CRA-LRR: 13.8%, 17.4% and 27.7%). OS was longer after SBRT vs other groups (P < .05) and increased in patients with locally controlled metastases in a landmark analysis (P < .0001). Toxicity was mostly mild; notably, four cases of adrenal insufficiency occurred, two of which were likely caused by immunotherapy or tumor progression. Radiotherapy for adrenal metastases was associated with a mild toxicity profile in all groups and a favorable 1-year CRA-LRR after SBRT or 3DCRT/IMRT. One-year FFLP was associated with longer OS. Dose-response analyses for the dataset are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Buergy
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eleni Gkika
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Strahlenheilkunde, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Germany.,Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Munich, Germany.,Klinik für Radiotherapie und Radioonkologie, Paracelsus Universität Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Hannover, Germany
| | - Theresa Voglhuber
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Kornhuber
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Steffen Barczyk
- Zentrum für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Belegklinik am St. Agnes-Hospital, Bocholt, Germany
| | - Barbara Röper
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Strahlentherapie, Bogenhausen - Harlaching - Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | - Ali Rashid
- MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittig
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Herold
- Cyberknife Centrum Mitteldeutschland GmbH, Institut für Radiochirurgie und Präzisionsbestrahlung, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Rainer J Klement
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Switzerland.,Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ilja F Ciernik
- Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Dessau, Germany
| | - Annette Ottinger
- Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Victor Izaguirre
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Florian Putz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany.,Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Eichhorn F, Winter H. How to handle oligometastatic disease in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur Respir Rev 2021; 30:30/159/200234. [PMID: 33650527 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0234-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and limited metastatic disease have been defined as oligometastatic if local ablative therapy of all lesions is amenable. Evidence from different clinical retrospective series suggests that this subgroup harbours better prognosis than other stage IV patients. However, most reports have included patients with inconsistent numbers of metastases in different locations treated by a variety of invasive and noninvasive therapies. As long as further results from randomised clinical trials are awaited, treatment decision follows an interdisciplinary debate in each individual case. Surgery and radiotherapy should capture a dominant role in the treatment course offering the option of a curative-intended local therapy in combination with a systemic therapy based on an interdisciplinary decision. This review summarises the current treatment standard in oligometastatic lung cancer with focus on an ablative therapy for both lung primary and distant metastases in prognostically favourable locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Eichhorn
- Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany .,Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zhao R, Ma Y, Yang S, Liu Q, Tang Y, Wang K, Zhang Y, Bi N, Zhang H, Yi J, Li Y, Luo J, Xiao J. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for 35 Patients with Adrenal Metastases: A Single-Institution Experience. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:11563-11571. [PMID: 33209060 PMCID: PMC7669511 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s278781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy for adrenal metastases. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with adrenal metastases and treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy, who did not receive adrenalectomy or have disease progression after chemotherapy, from 2007 to 2019. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis was performed using Log rank test. Results Thirty-five patients with 42 lesions were enrolled, and the lung was the most common primary site (80.0%). The median follow-up time was 46.4 months. The median volume of GTV and PTV was 23.2 cm3 (range: 3.5–97.8 cm3) and 38.3 cm3 (range: 10.2–135.6 cm3), respectively. The main dose regimens were 60 Gy delivered in 4–15 fractions, with the median dose of PTV being 60 Gy (range: 40–66.3 Gy) and the biologically effective dose (BED) being 84 Gy (range: 56–110 Gy). The 1-year and 2-year LCR, OS, and PFS were 92.7% and 88.1%, 76.9% and 45.4%, and 25.1% and 14.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that chemotherapy, disease-free interval from primary disease diagnosis to adrenal metastases diagnosis, and age were significant factors for LCR, OS, and PFS, respectively (p=0.017, 0.049, and 0.004, respectively). No more than grade III toxicities were observed. Conclusion As a non-invasive approach, hypofractionated radiotherapy is safe and effective for metastatic adrenal lesions, without serious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruizhi Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuchao Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Siran Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingfeng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Arcidiacono F, Aristei C, Marchionni A, Italiani M, Fulcheri CPL, Saldi S, Casale M, Ingrosso G, Anselmo P, Maranzano E. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for adrenal oligometastasis in lung cancer patients. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200645. [PMID: 32822540 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report our experience on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in adrenal metastases from lung cancer. METHODS 37 oligometastatic lung cancer patients with 38 adrenal metastases submitted to SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. SBRT was delivered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or helical tomotherapy (HT). Primary study end point was local recurrence-free survival (LR-FS) and secondary end points were distant-progression free survival (d-PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Median age was 67 years and primary tumor was non-small-cell lung cancer in 27 (73%) and small-cell lung cancer in 10 (27%) patients. Adrenal metastases were in the left side in 66% cases. Median prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 5 fractions for a median biologically equivalent dose (α/β ratio 10 Gy, BED10) of 48 Gy. Most patients (62%) were submitted to SBRT alone, while the others (38%) received chemo-, immune- or target- therapies. Median follow-up was 10.5 months, median OS 16 months and median d-PFS 3 months. 27 (70%) patients obtained a local control with a median LR-FS of 32 months. LR-FS was significantly related to BED10 with a better LC with BED10 ≥72 Gy, 1- and 2 year LR-FS rates were 54.1±11.6% and 45±12.7% vs 100 and 100% for BED ≤59.5 Gy and BED ≥72 Gy, respectively (p = 0.05). There was no severe toxicity. CONCLUSION SBRT was effective and safe in lung cancer adrenal metastases. A dose-response relationship was found between BED10 >72 Gy and better local control. No significant toxicity was registered thanks to the respect of dose constraints and suspension of chemo- and target-therapies. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE SBRT with a BED10 >72 Gy is an effective treatment for adrenal oligometastatic lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, University of Perugia and "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marchionni
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, University of Perugia and "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marco Italiani
- Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, "S. Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | - Simonetta Saldi
- Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, University of Perugia and "Santa Maria della Misericordia" Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paola Anselmo
- Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, "S. Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Point du Jour KS, Alwelaie Y, Coleman A, Tadros T, Aneja R, Reid MD. Adrenal gland fine needle aspiration: a multi-institutional analysis of 139 cases. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020; 10:168-174. [PMID: 32988789 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adrenal gland lesions span a range of entities from benign and malignant primary neoplasms to metastatic tumors. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) provides a minimally invasive diagnostic tool to stage patients with known malignancy and procure material for molecular testing. This study characterizes the clinicopathologic associations of patients with adrenal gland FNA from 2 large hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS FNAs were identified by query of electronic medical record from 2002-2019. Clinical and pathological information was collated and correlated with corresponding surgical diagnosis when available. RESULTS Of 139 cases, the majority (n = 127, 91%) were adequate computed tomography-guided FNAs and included the following diagnoses: positive for malignancy (n = 77, 55%), negative for malignancy (n = 32, 23%), neoplastic cells present (n = 16, 12%), nondiagnostic (n = 12, 9%), atypical (n = 1, 1%), and suspicious for carcinoma (n = 1, 1%). The majority (94%, n = 72 of 77) of malignancies were metastatic tumors, most frequently carcinoma (n = 53 of 72, 74%), followed by melanoma (n = 11 of 72, 15%), lymphoma (n = 4 of 72, 6%), and sarcoma (n = 4 of 72, 6%). Metastatic carcinomas included lung (n = 21 of 72, 29%), genitourinary (n = 12 of 72, 17%), and hepatobiliary or gastrointestinal tract (n = 11 of 72, 15%) primaries. Primary adrenal neoplasms (n = 23) included adenomas (n = 11 of 23, 48%), pheochromocytomas (n = 4 of 23, 17%), and myelolipomas (n = 3 of 23, 13%). Thirty-two patients with metastases died of disease after median follow-up of 8 months. CONCLUSIONS High specimen adequacy (n = 127, 91%) and low indeterminate rates (n = 2, 2%) are achieved with adrenal FNA. Most aspirated lesions represent metastases from primary lung carcinomas, but other primary sites including those below the diaphragm are part of the diagnostic differential. Adrenal metastasis was associated with a poor prognosis, with median survival of 8 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yazeed Alwelaie
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Arlixer Coleman
- Department of Pathology, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Talaat Tadros
- Department of Pathology, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ritu Aneja
- Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Voglhuber T, Kessel KA, Oechsner M, Vogel MME, Gschwend JE, Combs SE. Single-institutional outcome-analysis of low-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of adrenal gland metastases. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:536. [PMID: 32513136 PMCID: PMC7282163 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07030-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adrenal gland metastases are a common diagnostic finding in various tumor diseases. Due to the increased use of imaging methods, they are diagnosed more frequently, especially in asymptomatic patients. SBRT has emerged as a new, alternative treatment option in the field of radiation oncology. In the past, it was often used for treating inoperable lung, liver, prostate, and brain tumors. Meanwhile, it is also an established keystone in the treatment of oligometastatic diseases. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the effect of low-dose SBRT in patients with adrenal metastases. METHODS We analyzed a group of 31 patients with 34 adrenal gland lesions treated with low-dose SBRT between July 2006 and July 2019. Treatment-planning was performed through contrast-enhanced CT, followed by image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy using cone-beam CT. The applied cumulative median dose was 35 Gy; the median single dose was 7 Gy. We focused on local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), as well as acute and late toxicity. RESULTS Seven adrenal gland metastases (20.6%) experienced local failure, 80.6% of the patients faced a distant progression. Fourteen patients were still alive. Median follow-up for all patients was 9.8 months and for patients alive 14.4 months. No treatment-related side-effects >grade 2 occurred. Of all, 48.4% suffered from acute gastrointestinal disorders; 32.3% reported acute fatigue, throbbing pain in the renal area, and mild adrenal insufficiency. Altogether, 19.4% of the patients faced late-toxicities, which were as follows: Grade 1: 12.9% gastrointestinal disorders, 3.2% fatigue, Grade 2: 9.7% fatigue, 6.5% headache, 3.2% loss of weight. The 1-year OS and probability of LF were 64 and 25.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION Low-dose SBRT has proven as an effective and safe method with promising outcomes for treating adrenal metastases. There appeared no high-grade toxicities >grade 2, and 79.4% of treated metastases were progression-free. Thus, SBRT should be considered as a therapy option for adrenal metastases as an individual therapeutic concept in the interdisciplinary discussion as an alternative to surgical or systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Voglhuber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Oechsner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|