Radiation necrosis after a combination of external beam radiotherapy and iodine-125 brachytherapy in gliomas

Dosimetric Impact of Source Displacement in GammaTile Surgically Targeted Radiation Therapy for Gliomas

Background This study aims to evaluate dosimetric changes that happened during the first month after GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) for gliomas due to Cesium-131 (Cs-131) seed displacement caused by cavity shrinkage in brain brachytherapy. Methodology In this study, 10 glioma patients had 4-11 GammaTiles placed along the resection bed after maximal safe resection during craniotomy. Each GammaTile is composed of four Cs-131 seeds embedded in a biodegradable collagen sponge to minimize seed movement and maintain seed-to-cavity surface distance. The Cs-131 seed positions were identified using VariSeed on day one. On day 30, post-implant computed tomography (CT) images and dosimetry parameters were calculated. An iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm was used to compute rigid transformation between the day one and day 30 seed clouds. The seed displacement was calculated after registration. The volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100), the dose received by 90% of the planning target volume (D90_PTV), the planning target volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100_PTV), and the dose to organs at risk (OARs) were calculated for both CT images to determine the dosimetric changes from any seed displacement. Results The mean seed displacement of 1.8 ± 1.0 mm for all patients was observed between day one and day 30. The maximum seed displacement for each patient ranged from 2.3 mm to 7.3 mm. The mean V100 difference between day one and day 30 was 2.5 cc (range = 0.5-6.5 cc). The mean D90_PTVs were 95.5% (range = 69.0%-131.0%) and 98.1% (range = 19.9%-149.0%) on day one and day 30, respectively. The mean V100_PTVs were 88.4% (range = 81.3%-99.1%) and 87.9% (range = 47.0%-99.7%) on day one and day 30, respectively. On day one, the brainstem dose was 63.5 Gy for one case and 28.1 Gy for another case; while on day 30, the brainstem dose was 55.8 Gy and 20.6 Gy for the same patients, contributing to 7.7 Gy (12.8%) and 7.5 Gy (12.5%) dose reductions to brainstem for these patients, respectively. Only two patients received a dose to the optic nerves (34.1 Gy and 5.2 Gy). There were small changes (1.8 Gy and 0.5 Gy, respectively) in the dose to optic nerves when comparing the dose calculated on day one and the dose calculated on day 30 CT images. The same two patients received 30.4 Gy and 6.8 Gy to the chiasm, respectively. Small changes in the dose to the chiasm (≤1.1 Gy) were noted between day one and day 30. Conclusions A maximum seed displacement of up to 7.3 mm and a mean seed displacement of 1.8 mm caused by cavity shrinkage were observed during the first month after GammaTile STaRT for gliomas. There were noticeable changes in dosimetry parameters. Changes in the doses to OARs, particularly the brainstem, were large (up to 12.8% of the prescription dose). These changes in dosimetry should be considered when evaluating treatment outcomes and planning future GammaTile treatments.

Radiotherapy of High-Grade Gliomas: First Half of 2021 Update with Special Reference to Radiosensitization Studies

Albeit the effort to develop targeted therapies for patients with high-grade gliomas (WHO grades III and IV) is evidenced by hundreds of current clinical trials, radiation remains one of the few effective therapeutic options for them. This review article analyzes the updates on the topic "radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas" during the period 1 January 2021-30 June 2021. The high number of articles retrieved in PubMed using the search terms ("gliom* and radio*") and manually selected for relevance indicates the feverish research currently ongoing on the subject. During the last semester, significant advances were provided in both the preclinical and clinical settings concerning the diagnosis and prognosis of high-grade gliomas, their radioresistance, and the inevitable side effects of their treatment with radiation. The novel information concerning tumor radiosensitization was of special interest in terms of therapeutic perspective and was discussed in detail.