1
|
Zhang JH, Neumann T, Schaeffter T, Kolbitsch C, Kerkering KM. Respiratory motion-corrected T1 mapping of the abdomen. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024:10.1007/s10334-024-01196-1. [PMID: 39133420 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01196-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate an approach for motion-corrected T1 mapping of the abdomen that allows for free breathing data acquisition with 100% scan efficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were acquired using a continuous golden radial trajectory and multiple inversion pulses. For the correction of respiratory motion, motion estimation based on a surrogate was performed from the same data used for T1 mapping. Image-based self-navigation allowed for binning and reconstruction of respiratory-resolved images, which were used for the estimation of respiratory motion fields. Finally, motion-corrected T1 maps were calculated from the data applying the estimated motion fields. The method was evaluated in five healthy volunteers. For the assessment of the image-based navigator, we compared it to a simultaneously acquired ultrawide band radar signal. Motion-corrected T1 maps were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively for different scan times. RESULTS For all volunteers, the motion-corrected T1 maps showed fewer motion artifacts in the liver as well as sharper kidney structures and blood vessels compared to uncorrected T1 maps. Moreover, the relative error to the reference breathhold T1 maps could be reduced from up to 25% for the uncorrected T1 maps to below 10% for the motion-corrected maps for the average value of a region of interest, while the scan time could be reduced to 6-8 s. DISCUSSION The proposed approach allows for respiratory motion-corrected T1 mapping in the abdomen and ensures accurate T1 maps without the need for any breathholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Huiyue Zhang
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Tom Neumann
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Schaeffter
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christoph Kolbitsch
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prime S, Schiff JP, Hosni A, Stanescu T, Dawson LA, Henke LE. The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Liver Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:36-44. [PMID: 38105091 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
The role of radiotherapy in the management of primary and metastatic liver malignancies has expanded in recent years due to advances such as IGRT and SBRT. MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has arisen as an excellent option for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and liver metastases due to the ability to combine improved hepatic imaging with conformal treatment planning paradigms like adaptive radiotherapy and advanced motion management techniques. Herein we review the data for MRgRT for liver malignancies, as well as describe workflow and technical considerations for the 2 commercially available MRgRT delivery platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Prime
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO
| | - Joshua P Schiff
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren E Henke
- University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Chung C, Fuller D, Tanadini-Lang S, Jaffray DA. The Future of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:135-144. [PMID: 38105088 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) is a relatively new technology that has already shown outcomes benefits but that has not yet reached its clinical potential. The improved soft-tissue contrast provided with MR, coupled with the immediacy of image acquisition with respect to the treatment, enables expansion of on-table adaptive protocols, currently at a cost of increased treatment complexity, use of human resources, and longer treatment slot times, which translate to decreased throughput. Many approaches are being investigated to meet these challenges, including the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to accelerate and automate much of the workflow and improved technology that parallelizes workflow tasks, as well as improvements in image acquisition speed and quality. This article summarizes limitations of current available integrated MRIgRT systems and gives an outlook about scientific developments to further expand the use of MRIgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland..
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dave Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David A Jaffray
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morel A, Prunaretty J, Trauchessec D, Ailleres N, Fenoglietto P, Azria D. Comprehensive commissioning and quality assurance validation of Ethos™ therapy. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:355-361. [PMID: 37085341 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adaptive radiotherapy with the Ethos® therapy Varian system has been recently implemented at the Montpellier Cancer Institute, France. This article details the commissioning performed before the implementation of this new treatment planning system (TPS). MATERIAL AND METHODS To validate the golden beam data of the machine (Halcyon linear accelerator), percentage depth doses (PDD) and profiles were measured for several field sizes and at different depths with a microdiamond chamber. The final doses calculated for different plan types with the Ethos Acuros XB algorithm and the Halcyon Eclipse Analytic Anisotropic Algorithm were compared using the gamma index method. Lastly, for the patient quality assurance (QA) process, the patient treatment plan results obtained with the Mobius3D QA platform (Varian) were compared with the portal dosimetry results obtained with Epiqa (Epidos). RESULTS Minor differences were observed for the PDD and profile curves (mean difference of 0.2% and 2%, respectively). The χ index pass rate was above 98% for all measures using the 1%/1mm and 2%/2mm criteria for PDD and profile evaluations. The Ethos AXB algorithm was validated for every configuration (fixed fields, standard IMRT and VMAT fields, and clinical plans) with 2D/3D gamma index values>99%. Seventy-three 3-arcs-VMAT QA plans and 27 9-fields-IMRT QA plans were evaluated. Both showed excellent agreement with the TPS calculations (mean gamma pass rate higher than 99%). No difference was observed between IMRT and VMAT. CONCLUSION The beam delivery, the Ethos AXB algorithm, and the patient QA were comprehensively validated using independent tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Morel
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - J Prunaretty
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France.
| | - D Trauchessec
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - N Ailleres
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - P Fenoglietto
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - D Azria
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chin RI, Schiff JP, Bommireddy A, Kang KH, Andruska N, Price AT, Green OL, Huang Y, Korenblat K, Parikh PJ, Olsen J, Samson PP, Henke LE, Kim H, Badiyan SN. Clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable primary liver cancer treated with MR-guided stereotactic body radiation Therapy: A Six-Year experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100627. [PMID: 37441543 PMCID: PMC10334127 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with optional online adaptation has shown promise in delivering ablative doses to unresectable primary liver cancer. However, there remain limited data on the indications for online adaptation as well as dosimetric and longer-term clinical outcomes following MRgSBRT. Methods and Materials Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and combined biphenotypic hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) who completed MRgSBRT to 50 Gy in 5 fractions between June of 2015 and December of 2021 were analyzed. The necessity of adaptive techniques was evaluated. The cumulative incidence of local progression was evaluated and survival and competing risk analyses were performed. Results Ninety-nine analyzable patients completed MRgSBRT during the study period and 54 % had planning target volumes (PTVs) within 1 cm of the duodenum, small bowel, or stomach at the time of simulation. Online adaptive RT was used in 53 % of patients to correct organ-at-risk constraint violation and/or to improve target coverage. In patients who underwent adaptive RT planning, online replanning resulted in superior target coverage when compared to projected, non-adaptive plans (median coverage ≥ 95 % at 47.5 Gy: 91 % [IQR: 82-96] before adaptation vs 95 % [IQR: 87-99] after adaptation, p < 0.01). The median follow-up for surviving patients was 34.2 months for patients with HCC and 10.1 months for patients with CCA/cHCC-CCA. For all patients, the 2-year cumulative incidence of local progression was 9.8 % (95 % CI: 1.5-18 %) for patients with HCC and 9.0 % (95 % CI: 0.1-18) for patients with CCA/cHCC-CCA. Grade 3 through 5 acute and late clinical gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in < 10 % of the patients. Conclusions MRgSBRT, with the option for online adaptive planning when merited, allows delivery of ablative doses to primary liver tumors with excellent local control with acceptable toxicities. Additional studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of MRgSBRT in the treatment of primary liver cancer are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Re-I Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Joshua P. Schiff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | | | - Kylie H. Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Neal Andruska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Alexander T. Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Olga L. Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Kevin Korenblat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jefferey Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Pamela P. Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Lauren E. Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| | - Shahed N. Badiyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dal Bello R, Lapaeva M, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Wallimann P, Günther M, Konukoglu E, Andratschke N, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S. Patient-specific quality assurance strategies for synthetic computed tomography in magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy of the abdomen. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100464. [PMID: 37497188 PMCID: PMC10366576 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The superior tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) compared to computed tomography (CT) led to an increasing interest towards MR-only radiotherapy. For the latter, the dose calculation should be performed on a synthetic CT (sCT). Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) methods have not been established yet and this study aimed to assess several software-based solutions. Materials and methods A retrospective study was performed on 20 patients treated at an MR-Linac, which were selected to evenly cover four subcategories: (i) standard, (ii) air pockets, (iii) lung and (iv) implant cases. The neural network (NN) CycleGAN was adopted to generate a reference sCT, which was then compared to four PSQA methods: (A) water override of body, (B) five tissue classes with bulk densities, (C) sCT generated by a separate NN (pix2pix) and (D) deformed CT. Results The evaluation of the dose endpoints demonstrated that while all methods A-D provided statistically equivalent results (p = 0.05) within the 2% level for the standard cases (i), only the methods C-D guaranteed the same result over the whole cohort. The bulk densities override was shown to be a valuable method in absence of lung tissue within the beam path. Conclusion The observations of this study suggested that the use of an additional sCT generated by a separate NN was an appropriate tool to perform PSQA of a sCT in an MR-only workflow at an MR-Linac. The time and dose endpoints requirements were respected, namely within 10 min and 2%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mariia Lapaeva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Group, Department of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Computer Vision Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Agustina La Greca Saint-Esteven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Computer Vision Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Wallimann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Günther
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Group, Department of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weykamp F, Hoegen P, Regnery S, Katsigiannopulos E, Renkamp CK, Lang K, König L, Sandrini E, Meixner E, Rippke C, Buchele C, Liermann J, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Long-Term Clinical Results of MR-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2786. [PMID: 37345123 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Magnetic-resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for ablative, non-invasive treatment of liver metastases. However, long-term clinical outcome data are missing. (2) Methods: Patients received MR-guided SBRT with a MRIdian Linac between January 2019 and October 2021 and were part of an ongoing prospective observational registry. Local hepatic control (LHC), distant hepatic control (DHC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was documented according to CTCAE (v.5.0). (3) Results: Forty patients were treated for a total of 54 liver metastases (56% with online plan adaptation). Median prescribed dose was 50 Gy in five fractions equal to a biologically effective dose (BED) (alpha/beta = 10 Gy) of 100 Gy. At 1 and 2 years, LHC was 98% and 75%, DHC was 34% and 15%, PFS was 21% and 5% and OS was 83% and 57%. Two-year LHC was higher in case of BED > 100 Gy (100% vs. 57%; log-rank p = 0.04). Acute grade 1 and 2 toxicity (mostly nausea) occurred in 26% and 7% of the patients, with no grade ≥ 3 event. (4) Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of MR-guided liver SBRT. Long-term local control was promising and underscores the aim of achieving >100 Gy BED. Nonetheless, distant tumor control remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Efthimios Katsigiannopulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Side, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klaar R, Rabe M, Gaass T, Schneider MJ, Benlala I, Eze C, Corradini S, Belka C, Landry G, Kurz C, Dinkel J. Ventilation and perfusion MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac: feasibility and reproducibility study. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:58. [PMID: 37013541 PMCID: PMC10069152 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02244-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid devices that combine radiation therapy and MR-imaging have been introduced in the clinical routine for the treatment of lung cancer. This opened up not only possibilities in terms of accurate tumor tracking, dose delivery and adapted treatment planning, but also functional lung imaging. The aim of this study was to show the feasibility of Non-uniform Fourier Decomposition (NuFD) MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac as a potential treatment response assessment tool, and propose two signal normalization strategies for enhancing the reproducibility of the results. METHODS Ten healthy volunteers (median age 28 ± 8 years, five female, five male) were repeatedly scanned at a 0.35 T MR-Linac using an optimized 2D+t balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence for two coronal slice positions. Image series were acquired in normal free breathing with breaks inside and outside the scanner as well as deep and shallow breathing. Ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps were generated for each image series using NuFD. For intra-volunteer ventilation map reproducibility, a normalization factor was defined based on the linear correlation of the ventilation signal and diaphragm position of each scan as well as the diaphragm motion amplitude of a reference scan. This allowed for the correction of signal dependency on the diaphragm motion amplitude, which varies with breathing patterns. The second strategy, which can be used for ventilation and perfusion, eliminates the dependency on the signal amplitude by normalizing the ventilation/perfusion maps with the average ventilation/perfusion signal within a selected region-of-interest (ROI). The position and size dependency of this ROI was analyzed. To evaluate the performance of both approaches, the normalized ventilation/perfusion-weighted maps were compared and the deviation of the mean ventilation/perfusion signal from the reference was calculated for each scan. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to test whether the normalization methods can significantly improve the reproducibility of the ventilation/perfusion maps. RESULTS The ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps generated with the NuFD algorithm demonstrated a mostly homogenous distribution of signal intensity as expected for healthy volunteers regardless of the breathing maneuver and slice position. Evaluation of the ROI's size and position dependency showed small differences in the performance. Applying both normalization strategies improved the reproducibility of the ventilation by reducing the median deviation of all scans to 9.1%, 5.7% and 8.6% for the diaphragm-based, the best and worst performing ROI-based normalization, respectively, compared to 29.5% for the non-normalized scans. The significance of this improvement was confirmed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test with [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text]. A comparison of the techniques against each other revealed a significant difference in the performance between best ROI-based normalization and worst ROI ([Formula: see text]) and between best ROI-based normalization and scaling factor ([Formula: see text]), but not between scaling factor and worst ROI ([Formula: see text]). Using the ROI-based approach for the perfusion-maps, the uncorrected deviation of 10.2% was reduced to 5.3%, which was shown to be significant ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS Using NuFD for non-contrast enhanced functional lung MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac is feasible and produces plausible ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps for volunteers without history of chronic pulmonary diseases utilizing different breathing patterns. The reproducibility of the results in repeated scans significantly benefits from the introduction of the two normalization strategies, making NuFD a potential candidate for fast and robust early treatment response assessment of lung cancer patients during MR-guided radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabea Klaar
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Gaass
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz J. Schneider
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- Antaros Medical AB, BioVenture Hub, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Ilyes Benlala
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- Univ. Bordeaux, Centre de Recherche Cardio-thoracique de Bordeaux, F-33600 Pessac, France
- CHU Bordeaux, Service d’Imagerie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire, Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Service d’Exploration Fonctionnelle Respiratoire, Unité de Pneumologie Pédiatrique, CIC 1401, F-33600 Pessac, France
- INSERM, U1045, Centre de Recherche Cardio-thoracique de Bordeaux, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julien Dinkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chuong MD, Palm RF, Tjong MC, Hyer DE, Kishan AU. Advances in MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:599-615. [PMID: 37182995 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Image guidance for radiation therapy (RT) has evolved over the last few decades and now is routinely performed using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT). Conventional linear accelerators (LINACs) that use CBCT have limited soft tissue contrast, are not able to image the patient's internal anatomy during treatment delivery, and most are not capable of online adaptive replanning. RT delivery systems that use MRI have become available within the last several years and address many of the imaging limitations of conventional LINACs. Herein, the authors review the technical characteristics and advantages of MRI-guided RT as well as emerging clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, 8900 North Kendall Drive, Miami, FL 33176, USA.
| | - Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Michael C Tjong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, 1338 S Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu X, Li Z, Yin Y. Clinical application of MR-Linac in tumor radiotherapy: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:52. [PMID: 36918884 PMCID: PMC10015924 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02221-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent years have seen both a fresh knowledge of cancer and impressive advancements in its treatment. However, the clinical treatment paradigm of cancer is still difficult to implement in the twenty-first century due to the rise in its prevalence. Radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial component of cancer treatment that is helpful for almost all cancer types. The accuracy of RT dosage delivery is increasing as a result of the quick development of computer and imaging technology. The use of image-guided radiation (IGRT) has improved cancer outcomes and decreased toxicity. Online adaptive radiotherapy will be made possible by magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) using a magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac), which will enhance the visibility of malignancies. This review's objectives are to examine the benefits of MR-Linac as a treatment approach from the perspective of various cancer patients' prognoses and to suggest prospective development areas for additional study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Liu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.,Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Zhenjiang Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China.
| | - Yong Yin
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China. .,Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chong IY, Chau I. Is there still a place for radiotherapy in gastric cancer? Curr Opin Pharmacol 2023; 68:102325. [PMID: 36610101 DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2022.102325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Stomach cancer is an aggressive disease and represents a global health problem. The majority of patients with localised disease present with locally advanced cancer that requires multimodality treatment. Chemoradiotherapy delivered after D2 gastrectomy has been evaluated in a number of clinical studies and best evidence, thus far, does not support its use in the post-operative setting. Data from currently recruiting and ongoing trials with exploratory translational endpoints are eagerly awaited to direct the use of chemoradiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Radiotherapy can be effective in the palliation of symptoms associated with advanced gastric cancer. Furthermore, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy has the potential to provide long term disease control in a proportion of gastric cancer patients with oligometastatic liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Y Chong
- Consultant Clinical Oncologist, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Ian Chau
- Consultant Medical Oncologist, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pérez Haas Y, Ludwig R, Dal Bello R, Tanadini-Lang S, Unkelbach J. Adaptive fractionation at the MR-linac. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36596262 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acafd4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Fractionated radiotherapy typically delivers the same dose in each fraction. Adaptive fractionation (AF) is an approach to exploit inter-fraction motion by increasing the dose on days when the distance of tumor and dose-limiting organs at risk (OAR) is large and decreasing the dose on unfavorable days. We develop an AF algorithm and evaluate the concept for patients with abdominal tumors previously treated at the MR-linac in 5 fractions.Approach. Given daily adapted treatment plans, inter-fractional changes are quantified by sparing factorsδtdefined as the OAR-to-tumor dose ratio. The key problem of AF is to decide on the dose to deliver in fractiont, givenδtand the dose delivered in previous fractions, but not knowing futureδts. Optimal doses that maximize the expected biologically effective dose in the tumor (BED10) while staying below a maximum OAR BED3constraint are computed using dynamic programming, assuming a normal distribution overδwith mean and variance estimated from previously observed patient-specificδts. The algorithm is evaluated for 16 MR-linac patients in whom tumor dose was compromised due to proximity of bowel, stomach, or duodenum.Main Results. In 14 out of the 16 patients, AF increased the tumor BED10compared to the reference treatment that delivers the same OAR dose in each fraction. However, in 11 of these 14 patients, the increase in BED10was below 1 Gy. Two patients with large sparing factor variation had a benefit of more than 10 Gy BED10increase. For one patient, AF led to a 5 Gy BED10decrease due to an unfavorable order of sparing factors.Significance. On average, AF provided only a small increase in tumor BED. However, AF may yield substantial benefits for individual patients with large variations in the geometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Pérez Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - R Ludwig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - R Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Weykamp F, Katsigiannopulos E, Piskorski L, Regnery S, Hoegen P, Ristau J, Renkamp CK, Liermann J, Forster T, Lang K, König L, Rippke C, Buchele C, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Dosimetric Benefit of Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246041. [PMID: 36551527 PMCID: PMC9775484 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: To assess dosimetry benefits of stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) of liver metastases. (2) Methods: This is a subgroup analysis of an ongoing prospective registry including patients with liver metastases. Patients were treated at the MRIdian Linac between February 2020 and April 2022. The baseline plan was recalculated based on the updated anatomy of the day to generate the predicted plan. This predicted plan could then be re-optimized to create an adapted plan. (3) Results: Twenty-three patients received 30 SMART treatment series of in total 36 liver metastases. Most common primary tumors were colorectal- and pancreatic carcinoma (26.1% respectively). Most frequent fractionation scheme (46.6%) was 50 Gy in five fractions. The adapted plan was significantly superior compared to the predicted plan in regard to planning-target-volume (PTV) coverage, PTV overdosing, and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints violations (91.5 vs. 38.0%, 6 vs. 19% and 0.6 vs. 10.0%; each p < 0.001). Plan adaptation significantly increased median BEDD95 by 3.2 Gy (p < 0.001). Mean total duration of SMART was 72.4 min. (4) Conclusions: SMART offers individualized ablative irradiation of liver metastases tailored to the daily anatomy with significant superior tumor coverage and improved sparing of OAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Efthimios Katsigiannopulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Piskorski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C. Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lapaeva M, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Wallimann P, Günther M, Konukoglu E, Andratschke N, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S, Dal Bello R. Synthetic computed tomographies for low-field magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in the abdomen. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 24:173-179. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
15
|
Byrne M, Archibald-Heeren B, Hu Y, Greer P, Luo S, Aland T. Assessment of semi-automated stereotactic treatment planning for online adaptive radiotherapy in ethos. Med Dosim 2022; 47:342-347. [PMID: 36127189 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Ethos treatment planning system allows for the rapid generation of online adaptive treatment plans while the patient is on the treatment couch. One promising application of online adaptive radiotherapy is its use in stereotactic radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to ensure the Ethos treatment planning system (TPS) can produce clinically acceptable stereotactic plans, that are non-inferior to those from the Eclipse TPS. METHOD Forty patients that received previous stereotactic radiotherapy treatment on a Halcyon, 20 of which were lung cases, and 20 that were brain cases, were replanned using the Ethos TPS. The generated IMRT and VMAT plans were compared to the clinical Eclipse VMAT plan. RESULTS This study found that the Ethos TPS can produce VMAT plans of equivalent quality (target coverage, conformity and OAR doses) to those from the Eclipse TPS for lung SBRT and brain SRT. The IMRT plans produced by the Ethos planning system were marginally inferior to Eclipse VMAT plans, with the differences likely primarily due to beam geometry rather than the optimization system. Ethos plans were generally more modulated than Eclipse plans. With careful selection of optimization structures and reduction in the body contour, VMAT plan generation time could be reduced by 87%. CONCLUSION Ethos can generate stereotactic VMAT plans that are equivalent to those from Eclipse in the timeframe required for online adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikel Byrne
- Strategic Investment & Clinical Care, Icon Group, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia; University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ben Archibald-Heeren
- Strategic Investment & Clinical Care, Icon Group, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Yunfei Hu
- Strategic Investment & Clinical Care, Icon Group, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter Greer
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Suhuai Luo
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Trent Aland
- Strategic Investment & Clinical Care, Icon Group, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Delpon G, Barateau A, Beneux A, Bessières I, Latorzeff I, Welmant J, Tallet A. [What do we need to deliver "online" adapted radiotherapy treatment plans?]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:794-802. [PMID: 36028418 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
During the joint SFRO/SFPM session of the 2019 congress, a state of the art of adaptive radiotherapy announced a strong impact in our clinical practice, in particular with the availability of treatment devices coupled to an MRI system. Three years later, it seems relevant to take stock of adaptive radiotherapy in practice, and especially the "online" strategy because it is indeed more and more accessible with recent hardware and software developments, such as coupled accelerators to a three-dimensional imaging device and algorithms based on artificial intelligence. However, the deployment of this promising strategy is complex because it contracts the usual time scale and upsets the usual organizations. So what do we need to deliver adapted treatment plans with an "online" strategy?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Delpon
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain et IMT Atlantique, Nantes université, CNRS/IN2P3, Subatech, Nantes, France.
| | - A Barateau
- Université Rennes, CLCC Eugène-Marquis, Inserm, LTSI-UMR 1099, Rennes, France
| | - A Beneux
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - I Bessières
- Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - J Welmant
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Tallet
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rammohan N, Randall JW, Yadav P. History of Technological Advancements towards MR-Linac: The Future of Image-Guided Radiotherapy. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164730. [PMID: 36012969 PMCID: PMC9409689 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) enables optimal tumor targeting and sparing of organs-at-risk, which ultimately results in improved outcomes for patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revolutionized diagnostic imaging with its superior soft tissue contrast, high spatiotemporal resolution, and freedom from ionizing radiation exposure. Over the past few years there has been burgeoning interest in MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) to overcome current challenges in X-ray-based IGRT, including but not limited to, suboptimal soft tissue contrast, lack of efficient daily adaptation, and incremental exposure to ionizing radiation. In this review, we present an overview of the technologic advancements in IGRT that led to MRI-linear accelerator (MRL) integration. Our report is organized in three parts: (1) a historical timeline tracing the origins of radiotherapy and evolution of IGRT, (2) currently available MRL technology, and (3) future directions and aspirations for MRL applications.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ehrbar S, Braga Käser S, Chamberlain M, Krayenbühl J, Wilke L, Mayinger M, Garcia Schüler H, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Tanadini-Lang S. MR-guided beam gating: Residual motion, gating efficiency and dose reconstruction for stereotactic treatments of the liver and lung. Radiother Oncol 2022; 174:101-108. [PMID: 35839937 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the efficiency and the geometric as well as the dosimetric benefit of magnetic-resonance guided beam gating for stereotactic treatments in moving organs. METHOD Patients treated with MR-guided (MRIdian system) SBRT for lung (n = 10) and liver (n = 10) targets were analyzed. Breath-hold gating was performed based on lesion tracking in sagittal cine MRI images. The target offset from the geometric center of the gating window with and without gating was evaluated. A dose reconstruction workflow based on convolution of these 2D position-probability maps and the daily 3D dose distribution was used to estimate the daily delivered dose including motion. The dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and to a 2-cm ring structure around the planning target volume were evaluated. RESULTS The applied gating protocol resulted in a mean (±standard deviation) gating efficiency of 55%±16%. Over all patients, the mean target offset (2D-root-mean-square error) was 8.3 ± 4.3 mm, which reduced to 2.4 ± 0.6 mm during gating. The dose reconstruction showed a mean deviation in CTV coverage (D95) from the static plans of -1.7%±1.8% with gating and -12.0%±8.4% if no gating would have been used. The mean dose (Dmean) in the ring structure, with respect to the static plans, showed mean deviations of -0.1%±0.3% with gating and -1.6%±1.8% without gating. CONCLUSION The MRIdian system enables gating based on the inner anatomy and the implemented dose reconstruction workflow demonstrated geometric robust delivery of the planned radiation doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Ehrbar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Sarah Braga Käser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Madalyne Chamberlain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Krayenbühl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Lotte Wilke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Helena Garcia Schüler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Towards Accurate and Precise Image-Guided Radiotherapy: Clinical Applications of the MR-Linac. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11144044. [PMID: 35887808 PMCID: PMC9324978 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in image-guided radiotherapy have brought about improved oncologic outcomes and reduced toxicity. The next generation of image guidance in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will improve visualization of tumors and make radiation treatment adaptation possible. In this review, we discuss the role that MRI plays in radiotherapy, with a focus on the integration of MRI with the linear accelerator. The MR linear accelerator (MR-Linac) will provide real-time imaging, help assess motion management, and provide online adaptive therapy. Potential advantages and the current state of these MR-Linacs are highlighted, with a discussion of six different clinical scenarios, leading into a discussion on the future role of these machines in clinical workflows.
Collapse
|
20
|
Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Kroon PS, Winkel D, van Gaal JC, Hes J, Snoeren LM, Timmer JK, Mout CC, Bol GH, Kotte AN, Eppinga WS, Intven M, Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM. Impact of magnetic resonance-guided versus conventional radiotherapy workflows on organ at risk doses in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:66-73. [PMID: 35814260 PMCID: PMC9263510 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
|
21
|
Iezzi M, Cusumano D, Piccari D, Menna S, Catucci F, D’Aviero A, Re A, Di Dio C, Quaranta F, Boschetti A, Marras M, Piro D, Tomei F, Votta C, Valentini V, Mattiucci GC. Dosimetric Impact of Inter-Fraction Variability in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: Towards New Criteria to Evaluate the Appropriateness of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:838039. [PMID: 35480103 PMCID: PMC9035849 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.838039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose As a discipline in its infancy, online adaptive RT (ART) needs new ontologies and ad hoc criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of its use in clinical practice. In this experience, we propose a predictive model able to quantify the dosimetric impact due to daily inter-fraction variability in a standard RT breast treatment, to identify in advance the treatment fractions where patients might benefit from an online ART approach. Methods The study was focused on right breast cancer patients treated using standard adjuvant RT on an artificial intelligence (AI)-based linear accelerator. Patients were treated with daily CBCT images and without online adaptation, prescribing 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions, with four IMRT tangential beams. ESTRO guidelines were followed for the delineation on planning CT (pCT) of organs at risk and targets. For each patient, all the CBCT images were rigidly aligned to pCT: CTV and PTV were manually re-contoured and the original treatment plan was recalculated. Various radiological parameters were measured on CBCT images, to quantify inter-fraction variability present in each RT fraction after the couch shifts compensation. The variation of these parameters was correlated with the variation of V95% of PTV (ΔV95%) using the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test. Fractions where ΔV95% > 2% were considered as adverse events. A logistic regression model was calculated considering the most significant parameter, and its performance was quantified with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results A total of 75 fractions on 5 patients were analyzed. The body variation between daily CBCT and pCT along the beam axis with the highest MU was identified as the best predictor (p = 0.002). The predictive model showed an area under ROC curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82–0.99) with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 83.8% at the best threshold, which was equal to 3 mm. Conclusion A novel strategy to identify treatment fractions that may benefit online ART was proposed. After image alignment, the measure of body difference between daily CBCT and pCT can be considered as an indirect estimator of V95% PTV variation: a difference larger than 3 mm will result in a V95% decrease larger than 2%. A larger number of observations is needed to confirm the results of this hypothesis-generating study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davide Cusumano
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Davide Cusumano,
| | - Danila Piccari
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Menna
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | | | - Andrea D’Aviero
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Alessia Re
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Carmela Di Dio
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Marras
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Domenico Piro
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Flavia Tomei
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Claudio Votta
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nierer L, Eze C, da Silva Mendes V, Braun J, Thum P, von Bestenbostel R, Kurz C, Landry G, Reiner M, Niyazi M, Belka C, Corradini S. Dosimetric benefit of MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy in different tumor entities: liver, lung, abdominal lymph nodes, pancreas and prostate. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:53. [PMID: 35279185 PMCID: PMC8917666 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02021-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hybrid magnetic resonance (MR)-Linac systems have recently been introduced into clinical practice. The systems allow online adaption of the treatment plan with the aim of compensating for interfractional anatomical changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dose volume histogram (DVH)-based dosimetric benefits of online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) across different tumor entities and to investigate which subgroup of plans improved the most from adaption. Methods Fifty patients treated with oMRgRT for five different tumor entities (liver, lung, multiple abdominal lymph nodes, pancreas, and prostate) were included in this retrospective analysis. Various target volume (gross tumor volume GTV, clinical target volume CTV, and planning target volume PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) related DVH parameters were compared between the dose distributions before and after plan adaption. Results All subgroups clearly benefited from online plan adaption in terms of improved PTV coverage. For the liver, lung and abdominal lymph nodes cases, a consistent improvement in GTV coverage was found, while many fractions of the prostate subgroup showed acceptable CTV coverage even before plan adaption. The largest median improvements in GTV near-minimum dose (D98%) were found for the liver (6.3%, p < 0.001), lung (3.9%, p < 0.001), and abdominal lymph nodes (6.8%, p < 0.001) subgroups. Regarding OAR sparing, the largest median OAR dose reduction during plan adaption was found for the pancreas subgroup (-87.0%). However, in the pancreas subgroup an optimal GTV coverage was not always achieved because sparing of OARs was prioritized. Conclusion With online plan adaptation, it was possible to achieve significant improvements in target volume coverage and OAR sparing for various tumor entities and account for interfractional anatomical changes.
Collapse
|
23
|
Garcia Schüler HI, Pavic M, Mayinger M, Weitkamp N, Chamberlain M, Reiner C, Linsenmeier C, Balermpas P, Krayenbühl J, Guckenberger M, Baumgartl M, Wilke L, Tanadini-Lang S, Andratschke N. Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:217. [PMID: 34775998 PMCID: PMC8591958 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01945-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Main purpose was to describe procedures and identify challenges in the implementation process of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), especially new risks in workflow due to the new technique. We herein report the single center experience for the implementation of (MRgRT) and present an overview on our treatment practice. METHODS Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and technical characteristics of treatment and patient characteristics including sites treated between April 2019 and end of March 2020 after ethical approval. A risk analysis was performed to identify risks of the online adaptive workflow. RESULTS A summary of the processes on the MR-Linac including workflows, quality assurance and possible pitfalls is presented. 111 patients with 124 courses were treated during the first year of MR-guided radiotherapy. The most commonly treated site was the abdomen (42% of all treatment courses). 73% of the courses were daily online adapted and a high number of treatment courses (75%) were treated with stereotactic body irradiation. Only 4/382 fractions could not be treated due to a failing online adaptive quality assurance. In the risk analysis for errors, the two risks with the highest risk priority number were both in the contouring category, making it the most critical step in the workflow. CONCLUSION Although challenging, establishment of MRgRT as a routinely used technique at our department was successful for all sites and daily o-ART was feasible from the first day on. However, ongoing research and reports will have to inform us on the optimal indications for MRgRT because careful patient selection is necessary as it continues to be a time-consuming treatment technique with restricted availability. After risk analysis, the most critical workflow category was the contouring process, which resembles the need of experienced staff and safety check paths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Isabel Garcia Schüler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. .,University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nienke Weitkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Madalyne Chamberlain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cäcilia Reiner
- University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Linsenmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jerome Krayenbühl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Baumgartl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lotte Wilke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Assessment of MRI-Linac Economics under the RO-APM. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204706. [PMID: 34682829 PMCID: PMC8539760 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The implementation of the radiation oncology alternative payment model (RO-APM) has raised concerns regarding the development of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART). We sought to compare technical fee reimbursement under Fee-For-Service (FFS) to the proposed RO-APM for a typical MRI-Linac (MRL) patient load and distribution of 200 patients. In an exploratory aim, a modifier was added to the RO-APM (mRO-APM) to account for the resources necessary to provide this care. Traditional Medicare FFS reimbursement rates were compared to the diagnosis-based reimbursement in the RO-APM. Reimbursement for all selected diagnoses were lower in the RO-APM compared to FFS, with the largest differences in the adaptive treatments for lung cancer (−89%) and pancreatic cancer (−83%). The total annual reimbursement discrepancy amounted to −78%. Without implementation of adaptive replanning there was no difference in reimbursement in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer between RO-APM and mRO-APM. Accommodating online adaptive treatments in the mRO-APM would result in a reimbursement difference from the FFS model of −47% for lung cancer and −46% for pancreatic cancer, mitigating the overall annual reimbursement difference to −54%. Even with adjustment, the implementation of MRgART as a new treatment strategy is susceptible under the RO-APM.
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
van Dams R, Wu TC, Kishan AU, Raldow AC, Chu FI, Hernandez J, Cao M, Lamb JM, Mikaeilian A, Low DA, Steinberg ML, Lee P. Ablative Radiotherapy for Liver Tumors Using Stereotactic MRI-Guidance: A Prospective Phase I Trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 170:14-20. [PMID: 34107296 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To prospectively determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to primary and secondary liver tumors with MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment plans with a conventional CT-guided linear accelerator and a MRI-guided tri-60Co teletherapy unit (MR-Co) were generated and compared for patients undergoing liver-directed SBRT from 2015 to 2017. If dosimetric parameters were met on MR-Co, patients were treated with MRgRT. The highest priority constraint was >1000 cc or >800 cc of normal liver receiving <15 Gy for single- or multiple-lesion treatments, respectively. Treatment was delivered every other day. RESULTS Of 23 patients screened, 20 patients (8 primary, 12 secondary) and 25 liver tumors underwent MR-guided SBRT to a median dose of 54 Gy (range 11.5-60) in a median of 3 fractions (range 1-5). With a median follow up of 18.9 months, the 1- and 2-year estimate of local control were 94.7% and 79.6%, respectively. A difference in local control between single and multiple lesions or BED ≥100Gy10 and BED <100Gy10, respectively, was observed. The 2-year estimate of overall survival (OS) was 50.7% with a median OS of 29 months. There were no acute grade ≥3 toxicities and one late grade 3/4 toxicity from a single patient whose plan exceeded an unrecognized dose constraint at the time. CONCLUSION MR-guided SBRT is a viable and safe option in the delivery of ultrahypofractionated ablative radiation treatment to primary and secondary liver tumors resulting in high rates of local control and very favorable toxicity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritchell van Dams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Trudy C Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fang-I Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jackie Hernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Argin Mikaeilian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|