DE-MR simulation imaging for prone radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: assessing its application in lumpectomy cavity delineation based on deformable image registration

Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without surgical clips: a pilot study on preoperative magnetic resonance simulation

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy without surgical clip implantation, the accuracy of tumor bed identification and the consistency of clinical target volume (CTV) delineation under computed tomography (CT) simulation remain suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) simulation on delineations by assessing interobserver variability (IOV).

METHODS

Preoperative MR and postoperative CT simulations were performed in patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with no surgical clips implanted. Custom immobilization pads were used to ensure the same supine position. Three radiation oncologists independently delineated the CTV of tumor bed on the images acquired from MR and CT simulation registration and CT simulation alone. Cavity visualization score (CVS) was assigned to each patient based on the clarity of the tumor bed on CT simulation images. IOV was indicated by generalized conformity index (CIgen), denoted as CIgen-CT and CIgen-MR/CT, and the distance between the centroid of mass (dCOM), denoted as dCOMCT and dCOMMR/CT. The variation of IOV in different CVS subgroups was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were enrolled in this study. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of maximum pathological diameter of the tumors in all patients were 1.55 (0.80-1.92) cm. No statistical significance was found between the volumes of CTVs on CT simulation and on MR/CT simulation registration images (p = 0.387). CIgen-MR/CT was significantly larger than CIgen-CT (p = 0.005). dCOMMR/CT was significantly smaller than dCOMCT (p = 0.037). The median and IQR of CVS in all patients were 2.34 (2.00-3.08). The difference of CIgen between CIgen-MR/CT and CIgen-CT was larger in the low CVS group (p = 0.016). The difference of dCOM showed a decreasing trend when CVS was lower, although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.095).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery without surgical clip implantation, the use of preoperative MR simulation in delineating the CTV of tumor bed decreased the IOV among observers. The consistency of tumor bed identification was improved especially in cases where the margins of tumor bed were challenging to visualize on CT simulation images. The study findings offer potential benefits in reducing local recurrence and minimizing tissue irritation in the surrounding areas. Future investigation in a larger patient cohort to validate our results is warranted.

Late/delayed gadolinium enhancement in MRI after intravenous administration of extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agents: is it worth waiting?

The acquisition of images minutes or even hours after intravenous extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) administration ("Late/Delayed Gadolinium Enhancement" imaging; in this review, further termed LGE) has gained significant prominence in recent years in magnetic resonance imaging. The major limitation of LGE is the long examination time; thus, it becomes necessary to understand when it is worth waiting time after the intravenous injection of GBCA and which additional information comes from LGE. LGE can potentially be applied to various anatomical sites, such as heart, arterial vessels, lung, brain, abdomen, breast, and the musculoskeletal system, with different pathophysiological mechanisms. One of the most popular clinical applications of LGE regards the assessment of myocardial tissue thanks to its ability to highlight areas of acute myocardial damage and fibrotic tissues. Other frequently applied clinical contexts involve the study of the urinary tract with magnetic resonance urography and identifying pathological abdominal processes characterized by high fibrous stroma, such as biliary tract tumors, autoimmune pancreatitis, or intestinal fibrosis in Crohn's disease. One of the current areas of heightened research interest revolves around the possibility of non-invasively studying the dynamics of neurofluids in the brain (the glymphatic system), the disruption of which could underlie many neurological disorders.

Target volumes comparison between postoperative simulation magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for prone breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the differences in target volumes between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRIpre) and postoperative MRI (MRIpost) for breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using deformable image registration (DIR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen eligible patients who underwent whole-breast irradiation in the prone position after BCS were enrolled. On MRIpre, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated as GTVpre, which was then expanded by 10 mm to represent the preoperative lumpectomy cavity (LC), denoted as LCpre. The LC was expanded to the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) on the MRIpre and MRIpost, denoted as CTVpre, CTVpost, PTVpre, and PTVpost, respectively. The MIM software system was used to register the MRIpre and MRIpost using DIR. Differences were evaluated regarding target volume, distance between the centers of mass (dCOM), conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI). The relationship between CILC /CIPTV and the clinical factors was also assessed.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in LC and PTV volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost (p < 0.0001). LCpre was 0.85 cm3 larger than LCpost, while PTVpre was 29.38 cm3 smaller than PTVpost. The dCOM between LCpre and LCpost was 1.371 cm, while that between PTVpre and PTVpost reduced to 1.348 cm. There were statistically significant increases in CI and DI for LCpost-LCpre and PTVpost-PTVpre (CI = 0.221, 0.470; DI = 0.472, 0.635). No obvious linear correlations (p > 0.05) were found between CI and GTV, primary tumor volume-to-breast volume ratio, distance from the primary tumor to the nipple and chest wall, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite using DIR technology, the spatial correspondence of target volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost was suboptimal. Therefore, relying solely on preoperative diagnostic MRI with DIR for postoperative LC delineation is not recommended.

Assessing Interobserver Variability in the Delineation of Structures in Radiation Oncology: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The delineation of target volumes and organs at risk is the main source of uncertainty in radiation therapy. Numerous interobserver variability (IOV) studies have been conducted, often with unclear methodology and nonstandardized reporting. We aimed to identify the parameters chosen in conducting delineation IOV studies and assess their performances and limits.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a systematic literature review to highlight major points of heterogeneity and missing data in IOV studies published between 2018 and 2021. For the main used metrics, we did in silico analyses to assess their limits in specific clinical situations.

RESULTS

All disease sites were represented in the 66 studies examined. Organs at risk were studied independently of tumor site in 29% of reviewed IOV studies. In 65% of studies, statistical analyses were performed. No gold standard (GS; ie, reference) was defined in 36% of studies. A single expert was considered as the GS in 21% of studies, without testing intraobserver variability. All studies reported both absolute and relative indices, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in 68% and the Hausdorff distance (HD) in 42%. Limitations were shown in silico for small structures when using the DSC and dependence on irregular shapes when using the HD. Variations in DSC values were large between studies, and their thresholds were inconsistent. Most studies (51%) included 1 to 10 cases. The median number of observers or experts was 7 (range, 2-35). The intraclass correlation coefficient was reported in only 9% of cases. Investigating the feasibility of studying IOV in delineation, a minimum of 8 observers with 3 cases, or 11 observers with 2 cases, was required to demonstrate moderate reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of future IOV studies would benefit from a more standardized methodology: clear definitions of the gold standard and metrics and a justification of the tradeoffs made in the choice of the number of observers and number of delineated cases should be provided.

Reduction of inter-observer variability using MRI and CT fusion in delineating of primary tumor for radiotherapy in lung cancer with atelectasis

Purpose

To compare the difference between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in delineating the target area of lung cancer with atelectasis.

Method

A retrospective analysis was performed on 15 patients with lung cancer accompanied by atelectasis. All positioning images were transferred to Eclipse treatment planning systems (TPSs). Six MRI sequences (T1WI, T1WI+C, T1WI+C Delay, T1WI+C 10 minutes, T2WI, DWI) were registered with positioning CT. Five radiation oncologists delineated the tumor boundary to obtain the gross tumor volume (GTV). Conformity index (CI) and dice coefficient (DC) were used to measure differences among observers.

Results

The differences in delineation mean volumes, CI, and DC among CT and MRIs were significant. Multiple comparisons were made between MRI sequences and CT. Among them, DWI, T2WI, and T1WI+C 10 minutes sequences were statistically significant with CT in mean volumes, DC, and CI. The mean volume of DWI, T2WI, and T1WI+C 10 minutes sequence in the target area is significantly smaller than that on the CT sequence, but the consistency is higher than that of CT sequences.

Conclusions

The recognition of atelectasis by MRI was better than that by CT, which could reduce interobserver variability of primary tumor delineation in lung cancer with atelectasis. Among them, DWI, T2WI, T1WI+C 10 minutes may be a better choice to improve the GTV delineation of lung cancer patients with atelectasis.