Treatment outcomes of passive scattering proton beam therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for operable early-stage lung cancer; a prospective nationwide registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the toxicity and survival outcomes of proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with operable early-stage lung cancer who are eligible for lobectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter nationwide prospective cohort study included patients with operable early-stage lung cancer. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy was performed according to the schedule stipulated in the unified treatment policy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patiets were enrolled and included in efficacy and safety analyses. The most common tumor type was adenocarcinoma (44 %), while 105 cases (38 %) were not histologically confirmed or diagnosed clinically. Overall, 250 (91 %) of the 274 patients had tumors that were peripherally situated, while 138 (50 %) and 136 (50 %) patients were treated by proton and carbon ion radiotherapy, respectively. The median follow-up time for all censored patients was 42.8 months (IQR 36.7-49.0). Grade 3 or severe treatment-related toxicity was observed in 4 cases (1.5 %). Three-year PFS was 80.5 % (95 % CI: 75.7 %-85.5 %) and OS was 92.5 % (95 % CI: 89.3 %-95.8 %). Pathological confirmation and clinical stage were factors significantly associated with PFS, while tumor location and particle-ion type were not. Meanwhile, clinical stage was significantly associated with OS, but pathological confirmation, tumor location, and particle-ion type were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Particle therapy for operable early-stage lung cancer resulted in excellent 3-year OS and PFS in each subset. In this disease context, proton and carbon ion beam therapies are feasible alternatives to curative surgery.

Lobectomy versus proton therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Lobectomy is the standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent years, an increasing number of patients with lung cancer have been treated using proton therapy (PT). We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis to compare the treatment outcomes of these 2 modalities.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 275 patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent lobectomy (n = 206) or PT (n = 69) at our institution from July 2013 to December 2020. The end points were overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), local control, regional lymph node control, and distant control. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The matched cohort consisted of 59 patients who underwent lobectomy and 59 patients who underwent PT with a median follow-up period of 50 months. There were no significant differences in OS (P = .26), cause-specific survival (P = .33), RFS (P = .53), local control (P = .41), regional lymph node control (P = .98), and distant control (P = .31). In the lobectomy and PT groups, the 5-year OS rate was 85.8% and 79.1%, respectively, the RFS rate was 82.3% and 77.8%, and the local control rate was 92.1% and 96.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in survival or disease control between lobectomy and PT in patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC. Despite these findings, the potential for unmeasured confounding factors remains, and randomized control trials are needed to better compare these treatment modalities.

Same-day consultation, simulation and lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy delivery on a Magnetic Resonance-linac

•

A same-day consultation and lung SABR workflow was introduced, and experience in 10 patients reported.

•

A detailed simulation procedure and the use of real-time cine magnetic resonance imaging enabled accurate treatment delivery.

•

All patients reported satisfaction with the procedure, which improved patient convenience.

•

On average, at least 94.4% (5th percentile) of the GTV was always located inside the PTV during beam-on.

•

System-latency for triggering a beam-off event comprised 5.3% of the delivery time.

Background and Purpose

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) with real-time intra-fraction tumor motion monitoring allows for high precision Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR). This study aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility, patient satisfaction and delivery accuracy of single-fraction MR-guided SABR in a single day (one-stop-shop, OSS).

Methods and Materials

Ten patients with small lung tumors eligible for single fraction treatments were included. The OSS procedure consisted of consultation, treatment simulation, treatment planning and delivery. Following SABR delivery, patients completed a reported experience measure (PREM) questionnaire. Prescribed doses ranged 28–34 Gy. Median GTV was 2.2 cm³ (range 1.3–22.9 cm³). A gating boundary of 3 mm, and PTV margin of 5 mm around the GTV, were used with auto-beam delivery control. Accuracy of SABR delivery was studied by analyzing delivered MR-cines reconstructed from machine log files.

Results

All 10 patients completed the OSS procedure in a single day, and all reported satisfaction with the process. Median time for the treatment planning step and the whole procedure were 2.8 h and 6.6 h, respectively. With optimization of the procedure, treatment could be completed in half a day. During beam-on, the 3 mm tracking boundary encompassed between 78.0 and 100 % of the GTV across all patients, with corresponding PTV values being 94.4–100 % (5th-95th percentiles). On average, system-latency for triggering a beam-off event comprised 5.3 % of the delivery time. Latency reduced GTV coverage by an average of −0.3 %. Duty-cycles during treatment delivery ranged from 26.1 to 64.7 %.

Conclusions

An OSS procedure with MR-guided SABR for lung cancer led to good patient satisfaction. Gated treatment delivery was highly accurate with little impact of system-latency.

Proton Beam Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SABR) is accepted as a standard of care for patients who are not candidates for surgery in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SABR has shown encouraging disease control and acceptable toxicity in peripherally located stage I NSCLC. However, for centrally located tumors around the proximal bronchial tree or for tumors located close to the chest wall, toxicities by SABR are not negligible. Therefore, proton beam therapy (PBT), which provides better organ at risk (OAR) sparing than photon radiotherapy by the Bragg peak, was tested and investigated to reduce radiation-induced toxicities in stage I NSCLC. Here, we compared 112 and 117 stage I NSCLC patients who underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure than photon radiotherapy without worsening disease control. PBT could be an effective treatment to reduce long-term toxicities of the lung and heart.

Abstract

Proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were compared in terms of clinical outcomes and dosimetry. Data were obtained from patients who underwent PBT or photon radiotherapy at two institutions—the only two facilities where PBT is available in the Republic of Korea. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare local progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival and radiation exposure to the lungs were compared in the matched population. Of 289 patients included in the analyses, 112 and 177 underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 27 months, the 2-year local PFS and OS rates were 94.0% and 83.0%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, a biologically effective dose (BED₁₀, using α/β = 10 Gy) of ≥125 cobalt gray equivalents was significantly associated with improved local PFS and OS. In the matched analyses, the local PFS and OS did not differ between groups. However, PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure in the mean dose, V5, and V10 than photon radiotherapy. PBT significantly reduced radiation exposure to the heart and lungs without worsening disease control in stage I NSCLC patients.

Dosimetric Comparisons between Proton Beam Therapy and Modern Photon Radiation Techniques for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Tumor Location

Simple Summary

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a well-established technique used to treat stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers dosimetric advantages over photon SABR techniques by reducing doses to normal organs. Hence, it is believed that PBT is helpful for patients with tumors located centrally in stage I NSCLC. However, the benefits of PBT for other locations, such as peripherally located tumors, have not been well-described. We investigated dosimetric benefits for PBT over modern photon radiation techniques for stage I NSCLC according to tumor locations. A total of 42 patients’ (including tumors that were central (11), peripheral (nine), and close to the chest wall (22)) PBT plans were compared with those of modern photon radiation techniques. In all locations, PBT significantly reduced radiation exposure to the lung and heart. To reduce potential lung and heart toxicities, PBT is ideal, even in the peripherally located stage I NSCLC.

Abstract

Herein, we investigated the dosimetric benefits for proton beam therapy (PBT) over modern photon radiation techniques according to tumor location (central, peripheral, and close to the chest wall) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 42 patients with stage I NSCLC were treated with PBT with a total dose of 50–70 Gy in four or 10 fractions considering the risk of treatment-related toxicities. Simulation plans for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), static-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were retrospectively generated using the same treatment volumes as implemented in the PBT plans for these patients. Dosimetric improvements were observed with PBT as compared with all the photon-based radiation techniques with regards to the mean lung dose, lung V5 and V10, mean heart dose, and heart V5 and V10 in all locations. Moreover, lower radiation exposure to the chest wall was observed within PBT for peripherally located and close to the chest wall tumors. All radiotherapy modalities achieved clinically satisfactory treatment plans in the current study. Notably, the usage of PBT resulted in significant dosimetric improvements in the lung and heart over photon-based techniques at all tumor locations, including the periphery, for stage I NSCLC.