Therapeutic effect of osimertinib plus cranial radiotherapy compared to osimertinib alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR-activating mutations and brain metastases: a retrospective study

Outcome of whole brain irradiation with a dose-escalated simultaneous-integrated boost in patients with multiple large and/or diffuse brain metastases: real live data and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively investigate feasibility and safety of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) including a simultaneous-integrated boost technique (WBRT-SIB) in a cohort of patients with a very poor prognosis suffering from multiple and/or large brain metastases, unfavorable primary histology, poor performance status and/or symptomatic BMs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients with high brain tumor burden, extracranial metastases and low life-expectancy were treated with WBRT-SIB mostly with 35-42 Gy/14 fractions. All metastases were boosted in patients with up to 12 BMs. In patients with > 12 BM, large and/or small metastases in critical brain regions were boosted up to a maximum of 12 SIB volumes.

RESULTS

The median number of BM was 8 (range 2-45) and the median BM diameter was 12 mm (range 4-90 mm). Fifteen (43%) patients had ≥ 10 BMs and 25 patients presented with a Karnofski index ≤ 80%. Primary tumor histology was NSCLC (n = 13), SCLC (n = 11), breast cancer (n = 7), melanoma (n = 2), other (n = 2). The median iPFS was not reached, and 12- and 18-months iPFS were 75% and 50%, respectively. Overall, seven patients had intracranial progression: two patients within the SIB and WBRT area, one patient only within the SIB region and four patients had new BMs in the WBRT volume alone. The median iPFS for non-SCLC patients was 17 months and the 12- and 18-month iPFS were 56.8% and 28.4%, respectively. There was no significant OS difference between SCLC-group and non-SCLC patients (p = 0.38). Overall, median OS was 8.7 months and 1-year OS was 25%. The treatment was generally well-tolerated with no observed cases of radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

Our WBRT-SIB approach involves a combination of whole brain radiotherapy and a simultaneous integrated boost to specific tumor volumes, and its effectiveness is compared with other treatment modalities in the literature. Further research, including prospective studies with larger patient cohorts, is necessary to validate and refine the findings.

Timing of stereotactic radiosurgery within the first-line systemic treatment in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a retrospective single-center cohort study

Background

Stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) and novel systemic treatments, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have demonstrated to be effective in managing brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal treatment sequence of SRS/SRT and TKI/ICI remains uncertain. This retrospective monocentric analysis addresses this question by comparing the outcomes of patients with NSCLC brain metastases who received upfront SRS/SRT versus those who were initially treated with TKI/ICI.

Methods

All patients treated with SRS/SRT and TKI/ICI for NSCLC brain metastases were collected from a clinical database. The patients who received first-line TKI or ICI for the treatment of brain metastases were then selected for further analysis. Within this cohort, a comparative analysis between upfront SRS/SRT and patients initially treated with TKI/ICI was conducted, assessing key parameters such as overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and treatment-related toxicity. Both OS and iPFS were defined as the time from SRS/SRT to either death or disease progression, respectively.

Results

The analysis encompassed 54 patients, of which 34 (63.0%) patients received SRS/SRT and TKI/ICI as their first-line therapy. Of the latter, 17 (50.0%) patients received upfront SRS/SRT and 17 (50.0%) were initially treated with TKI/ICI; 24 (70.6%) received SRS/SRT and ICI, and 10 (29.4%) received SRS/SRT and TKI. The cohorts did not significantly differ in the univariable analyses for the following parameters: sex, age, histology, molecular genetics, disease stage at study treatment, performance status, number of brain metastases, treatment technique, tumor volume, target volume, disease progression, radiation necrosis, dosimetry. While no significant differences were found in terms of iPFS and OS between patients treated with upfront SRS/SRT and patients initially treated with TKI, upfront SRS/SRT demonstrated significantly superior OS when compared to patients initially treated with ICI (median OS not reached vs. 17.5 months; mean 37.8 vs. 23.6 months; P=0.03) with no difference in iPFS. No significant differences in treatment-related toxicity were observed among the cohorts.

Conclusions

In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, patients treated with upfront SRS/SRT demonstrated significantly longer OS compared to patients initially treated with ICI in the cohort receiving first-line therapy for brain metastases. However, given the retrospective design and the limited cohort size, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from these findings. Nevertheless, the results suggest that the timing of SRS/SRT may play an important role in treatment outcomes. Further investigation, preferably through prospective randomized trials, is warranted to provide more conclusive answers to this important question.

Narrative review of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for oligometastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: present and future developments

Background and Objective

A significant number of individuals diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have distant metastases, and the concept of oligometastatic NSCLC has shown promise in achieving a cure. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is currently considered a viable treatment option for a limited number of tumor metastases. It has also been demonstrated that third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective in extending the survival of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC. Hence, the combination of SBRT with third-generation TKIs holds the potential to enhance treatment efficacy in patients with oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This review aimed to assess the possibility of combining SBRT with TKIs as an optimum treatment option for patients with oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Methods

We performed a narrative review by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for articles published in the English language from January 2009 to February 2024 and by reviewing the bibliographies of key references to identify important literature related to combining SBRT with third-generation TKIs in oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Key Content and Findings

This review aimed to assess the viability of combining SBRT and EGFR-TKIs in oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Current clinical trials suggest that the combined therapies have better progression free survival (PFS) when using SBRT as either concurrent with EGFR-TKIs or consolidated with EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, research with third-generation EGFR-TKIs and SBRT combinations has demonstrated tolerable toxicity levels without significant additional adverse effects as compared to prior therapies. However, further clinical trials are required to establish its effectiveness.

Conclusions

The combined approach of SBRT and TKIs can effectively impede the progression of oligometastatic NSCLC in patients harboring EGFR mutations and, most notably, can prolong progression-free survival rates. However, the feasibility of combining SBRT with third-generation TKIs in clinical trials remains unclear.

Long-term survival of a patient with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and untreated multiple brain metastases treated with zorifertinib: A case report

Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer poor prognoses. Zorifertinib (AZD3759), an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with high blood-brain barrier penetration, has previously demonstrated promising systemic and intracranial antitumor activity in phase 1-3 studies. This is the first report of a patient with EGFR-mutant (exon 21 L858R) NSCLC and symptomatic untreated multiple BM who achieved a long overall survival (OS) of more than 65 months after sequential treatment with zorifertinib and a third-generation EGFR-TKI. This new treatment paradigm offers a new treatment option and deserves further clinical exploration to prolong OS of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and untreated multiple BM.

Optimal sequence of LT for symptomatic BM in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a comparative study of first-line EGFR-TKIs with/without upfront LT

BACKGROUND

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can penetrate blood-brain barrier and are effective for brain metastases (BMs). There is no consensus on the optimal sequence of local therapy (LT) and EGFR-TKIs for symptomatic BM patients because patients suffering neurological symptoms were not enrolled in most clinical trials.

METHODS

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation (EGFRm) and symptomatic BM receiving first-line osimertinib and aumolertinib from two medical centers were collected. All participants were allocated into the third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs) group and the upfront LT (uLT) plus third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs + uLT) group. Demographic data, survival outcomes, treatment failure patterns, and adverse events were evaluated between the two groups. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of BM number on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

86 patients were enrolled, 44 in the TKIs group and 42 in the TKIs + uLT group. There were no significant differences in the short-term response between the groups. TKIs + uLT was associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) (43 vs. 28 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.77; p = .011). No differences in progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), failure patterns, or safety were observed. In subgroup analyses of oligo-BM patients, TKIs + uLT could prolong OS (43 vs. 31 months; HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.92; p = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFRm NSCLC patients with symptomatic BM might benefit from uLT, particularly oligo-BM patients. However, larger prospective cohort studies should be carried out to confirm the responses of the TKIs + uLT scheme.

The efficacy of upfront craniocerebral radiotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

The present study aims to investigate the therapeutic value of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with cranial radiotherapy (RT) in patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs).

Methodology

This is a retrospective study that involved 213 patients with EGFR-NSCLC and BMs, with the patients divided into two groups: the upfront cranial RT (ucRT) group (n = 96) and the non-ucRT group (n = 117). All patients were administered with osimertinib, and those in the ucRT group also underwent RT. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (IPFS) of the two groups were compared.

Results

The ucRT group manifested a markedly higher IPFS than the non-ucRT group (29.65 months vs 21.8 months; P < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis revealed that patients with oligometastases (OLOGO-BMs; 1-3 BMs) demonstrated a notably longer OS (44.5 months vs 37.3 months; P < 0.0001), PFS (32.3 months vs 20.8 months; P = 0.6884) and IPFS (37.8 months vs 22.1 months; P < 0.0001) in the ucRT group than in the non-ucRT group. However, for patients with multiple BMs, there was no significant difference in OS (27.3 months vs 34.4 months; P = 0.0710) and PFS (13.7 months vs 13.2 months; P = 0.0516) between the ucRT group and the non-ucRT group; the ucRT group exhibited a higher IPFS (26.4 months vs 21.35 months; P = 0.0028). Cox's multivariate analysis of patients with OLOGO-BM indicated that the use of ucRT was linked to a better OS (heart rate [HR] = 0.392; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.178-0.863; P = 0.020) and PFS (HR = 0.558; 95% CI: 0.316-0.986; P = 0.044).

Conclusion

Upfront cerebral cranial stereotactic radiosurgery can improve outcomes in EGFR-positive patients with NSCLC and OLOGO-BM. However, for patients with multiple BMs, the preferable strategy may be pre-treatment with EGFR-TKIs.

Recent advances progress of targeted drugs combined with radiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a review

Targeted drug therapy plays an important role in the clinical application of non-small cell lung cancer, especially adenocarcinoma. However, for patients with advanced disease, drug resistance after targeted therapy, unclear target, and other reasons that cannot or do not want surgery, the combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunity, etc. is often used. The synergistic effect of targeted drugs and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer has shown good clinical efficacy. This article reviews the clinical progress of targeted drug therapy combined with radiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in recent years, in order to provide new ideas for further clinical research of this treatment mode.

Combination of EGFR-Directed Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) with Radiotherapy in Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 2010-2019 Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, brain metastases have been treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole-brain radiation (WBRT), and/or surgical resection. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), over half of which carry EGFR mutations, are the leading cause of brain metastases. EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown promise in NSCLC; but their utility in NSCLC brain metastases (NSCLCBM) remains unclear. This work sought to investigate whether combining EGFR-TKI with WBRT and/or SRS improves overall survival (OS) in NSCLCBM.

METHODS

A retrospective review of NSCLCBM patients diagnosed during 2010-2019 at a tertiary-care US center was performed and reported following the 'strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines. Data regarding socio-demographic and histopathological characteristics, molecular attributes, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes were collected. Concurrent therapy was defined as the combination of EGFR-TKI and radiotherapy given within 28 days of each other.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients with EGFR mutations were included. Of these, 32 patients had been treated with WBRT only, 51 patients received SRS only, 36 patients received SRS and WBRT only, 18 were given EGFR-TKI and SRS, and 29 were given EGFR-TKI and WBRT. Median OS for the WBRT-only group was 3.23 months, for SRS + WBRT it was 3.17 months, for EGFR-TKI + WBRT 15.50 months, for SRS only 21.73 months, and for EGFR-TKI + SRS 23.63 months. Multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly higher OS in the SRS-only group (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84, p = 0.017) compared to the WBRT reference group. There were no significant differences in overall survival for the SRS + WBRT combination cohort (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.60, 2.82, p = 0.50), EGFR-TKIs and WBRT combination cohort (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.41, 2.08, p = 0.85), or the EGFR-TKI + SRS cohort (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.20, 1.09, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLCBM patients treated with SRS had a significantly higher OS compared to patients treated with WBRT-only. While sample-size limitations and investigator-associated selection bias may limit the generalizability of these results, phase II/III clinicals trials are warranted to investigate synergistic efficacy of EGFR-TKI and SRS.

Overall survival in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer using different tyrosine kinase inhibitors in The Netherlands: a retrospective, nationwide registry study

Background

Clinical guidelines advise osimertinib as preferred first line treatment for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with deletions in exon 19 (del19) or exon 21 L858R mutation. However, for first-line osimertinib the real world overall survival (OS) in mutation subgroups remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world OS of those patients treated with different generations of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and to identify predictors of survival.

Methods

Using real-world data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) we assessed patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC with del19 or L858R mutation between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, primarily treated with then regularly available TKIs (including osimertinib).

Findings

Between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, 57,592 patients were included in the NCR. Within this cohort we identified 1109 patients, 654 (59%) with del19 and 455 (41%) with L858R mutations, respectively; 230 (21%) patients were diagnosed with baseline brain metastases (BM). Patients were treated with gefitinib (19%, 213/1109), erlotinib (42%, 470/1109), afatinib (15%, 161/1109) or osimertinib (24%, 265/1109). Median OS was superior for del19 versus L858R (28.4 months (95% CI 25.6-30.6) versus 17.7 months (95% CI 16.1-19.5), p < 0.001. In multivariable analysis, no difference in survival was observed between various TKIs in both groups. Only in the subgroup of patients with del19 and baseline BM, a benefit was observed for treatment with osimertinib.

Interpretation

In this nationwide real-world cohort, survival of Dutch patients with advanced NSCLC and an EGFR del19 mutation was superior versus those harboring an L858R mutation. Osimertinib performed only better as first-line treatment in patients with del19 and BM.

Funding

None.

Emerging Systemic Treatment Perspectives on Brain Metastases: Moving Toward a Better Outlook for Patients

The diagnosis of brain metastases has historically been a dreaded, end-stage complication of systemic disease. Additionally, with the increasing effectiveness of systemic therapies that prolong life expectancy and improved imaging tools, the incidence of intracranial progression is becoming more common. Within this context, there has been increasing attention directed at understanding the molecular underpinnings of intracranial progression. Exploring the unique features of brain metastases compared with their extracranial counterparts to identify aberrant signaling pathways, which can be targeted pharmacologically, may help lead to new treatments for this patient population. Additionally, critical discoveries outside the sphere of the central nervous system are increasingly being applied to brain metastases with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibition, becoming a prevalent treatment option for patients with brain metastases across multiple histologies. As novel treatment strategies are considered, they require thoughtful incorporation of agents that can cross the blood-brain barrier and can synergize with pre-existing agents through rational combinations. Lastly, as clinicians and scientists continue to understand key molecular features of these tumors, they will continue to influence the treatment algorithms that are developing for the management of these patients. Due to the complexity of treatment decisions for patients with brain metastases, an emerging tool is the utilization of multidisciplinary brain metastasis tumor boards to ensure optimal treatment decisions are made and that patients are provided access to applicable clinical trials. Looking to the future, the collective effort to understand the various tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic factors that promote central nervous system seeding and propagation will have the potential to change the clinical trajectory for these patients.