Prostate deformation during hypofractionated radiotherapy: an analysis of implanted fiducial marker displacement

Critical Review: Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy

Dramatic strides have been made in real-time adaptive radiation therapy, where treating single tumors as dynamic but rigid bodies has demonstrated a halving of toxicities for prostate cancer. However, the human body is much more complex than a rigid body. This review explores the ongoing development and future potential of dose-guided radiation therapy, where the three core process steps of volumetric imaging of the patient, dose accumulation, and dose-guided treatment adaptation occur quasi-continuously during treatment, fully accounting for the complexity of the dynamic human body. The clinical evidence supporting real-time adaptive radiation therapy was reviewed. The foundational studies, status, and potential of real-time volumetric imaging using both x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging technology were described. The development of real-time dose accumulation to the dynamic patient was evaluated, and a method to measure real-time dose delivery was assessed. The growth of real-time treatment adaptation was examined. Literature demonstrates continued improvements in patient outcomes because the treatment becomes more conformal to the dynamic patient. Real-time volumetric imaging using both x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging technology is poised for broader implementation. Real-time dose accumulation has demonstrated clinical feasibility, with approximations made to achieve real-time operation. Real-time treatment adaptation to deforming targets and multiple targets has been experimentally demonstrated. Tying together the inputs of the real-time volumetric anatomy and dose accumulation is real-time treatment adaptation that uses the available degrees of freedom to optimize the dose delivered to the patient, maximizing the treatment intent. Opportunities exist for artificial intelligence to accelerate the application of dose-guided radiation therapy to broader patient use. In summary, the emerging field of real-time dose-guided radiation therapy has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes. The advances are primarily software-driven and therefore could be widely available and cost-effective upgrades to improve imaging and targeting cancer.

Longitudinal analysis of T2 relaxation time variations following radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Aim of this paper is to evaluate short and long-term changes in T 2 relaxation times after radiotherapy in patients with low and intermediate risk localized prostate cancer. A total of 24 patients were selected for this retrospective study. Each participant underwent 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging on seven separate occasions: initially after the implantation of gold fiducials, the required step for Cyberknife therapy guidance, followed by MRI scans two weeks post-therapy and monthly thereafter. As part of each MRI scan, the prostate region was manually delineated, and the T 2 relaxation times were calculated for quantitative analysis. The T 2 relaxation times between individual follow-ups were analyzed using Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance that revealed a significant difference across all measurements (F (6, 120) = 0.611, p << 0.001). A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed significant differences in median T 2 values between the baseline and subsequent measurements, particularly between pre-therapy (M 0 ) and two weeks post-therapy (M 1 ), as well as during the monthly interval checks (M 2 - M 6 ). Some cases showed a delayed decrease in relaxation times, indicating the prolonged effects of therapy. The changes in T 2 values during the course of radiotherapy can help in monitoring radiotherapy response in unconfirmed patients, quantifying the scarring process, and recognizing the therapy failure.

Dynamic intrafractional position monitoring with implanted fiducial markers for enhanced accuracy in radiotherapy of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer have brought a shift toward moderate- and ultra-hypofractionated treatment schedules. Reducing safety margins can broaden the therapeutic window in stereotactic treatments and alleviate concerns for toxicity in high dose-per-fraction treatment schedules. Management of intrafractional motion is a necessity for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). It can be achieved by performing intrafractional image guidance and position corrections. We evaluate the suitability of such a novel prostate motion management system and its potential benefit for treatment accuracy.

METHODS

Intrafractional IGRT was performed for 22 patients during 149 treatment sessions using repeated orthogonal kV-XR imaging of implanted fiducial markers with the ExacTrac Dynamic (EXTD) system. Position measurements were taken four times during each arc of the applied volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Position correction was performed if translational deviation exceeded 2 mm in any direction.

RESULTS

Of 677 single EXTD measurements, 20.6% exceeded the predefined threshold of 2 mm 3D deviation. Without intrafractional corrections, 39.4% of all individual measurements would exceed the threshold. The 3D accuracy could thus significantly be improved, reducing mean 3D shifts from 1.97 (± 1.44) mm to 1.39 (± 1.01) mm by performing intrafractional IGRT. In total, 34% of all treatment sessions required correction of intrafractional position shifts.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring of prostate motion using repeated intrafractional orthogonal kV-X-ray-based position measurements of implanted fiducial markers proved to be a reliable method to improve precision of stereotactic irradiations of the prostate. It can prevent unacceptable translation deviations in one third of all sessions.

Impact of rectal gas on the planning target volume margin for pelvic bone and prostate matching in prostate cancer patients receiving volumetric-modulated arc therapy

We performed daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to determine the impact of rectal gas on the movements of prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs). We aimed to determine the relationship between planning target volume (PTV) margins and rectal gas. In 30 treatments of 15 prostate cancer patients, excessive rectal gas was removed and CBCT images were analyzed. Image registration between planning CT and daily CBCT images before and after rectal gas removal was performed for pelvic bone and prostate matching. The couch movement distance between each matching was considered the prostate movement. In addition, we measured SV tip movement between each matching. The anterior-posterior movement of the prostate before rectal gas removal (3.1 ± 2.9 mm) was significantly greater than that after rectal gas removal (1.2 ± 1.2 mm; p < 0.01). The left-right and superior-inferior movements were similar regardless of the presence or absence of rectal gas. The SV movement distances before and after rectal gas removal were 11.0 ± 5.8 mm and 4.6 ± 3.8 mm, respectively (p < 0.01), in pelvic bone matching, and 8.0 ± 4.2 mm and 3.8 ± 3.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.01), in prostate matching. After rectal gas removal, the SV position did not differ significantly between each matching. In 26 of the 30 treatments, SV movement distance in the presence of rectal gas was >6 mm, which is the minimum PTV margin at our institution. In comparison, after rectal gas removal and prostate matching, only 6 treatments demonstrated an SV movement distance of >6 mm. In the presence of rectal gas, the SVs require greater PTV margins than the prostate. Rectal gas removal should be considered if the movement distance on prostate matching is greater than the minimum PTV margin at treating institution.