Dosimetric evaluation of VMAT and helical tomotherapy techniques comparing conventional volumes with clinical target volumes based on new ESTRO ACROP post-mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction contouring guidelines

Evaluation of helical tomotherapy as an alternative for left-sided breast cancer patients not compliant with deep inspiration breath hold

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate, from a dosimetric perspective, whether helical Tomotherapy (HT) during free breathing (FB) can serve as an alternative technique for treating left-sided breast cancer patients who are unable to comply with the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique.

Material and Methods

For this purpose, the CT images of 20 left breast-only cancer patients acquired in both FB and DIBH phases were utilized. The left breast was contoured as the target volume, while the heart, LAD, ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, and contralateral breast were contoured as organs at risk on the CT images obtained in both DIBH and FB. Planning with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique was performed on the CT scans obtained in the DIBH (VMAT-DIBH), while planning with the HT technique was carried out on the CT scans obtained in the FB (HT-FB). Subsequently, dosimetric comparison of the plans were done in terms of target coverage and preservation of normal tissues.

Results

Both techniques achieved the desired target coverage; however, in terms of D2, Vpres values, Conformity Number (CN), and Homogeneity Index (HI), the HT-FB technique was found to be superior. While the mean doses to the heart were similar for both techniques, doses to the LAD and left lung were found to be superior in plans generated with the HT-FB technique. When compared in terms of contralateral breast and right lung protection, VMAT-DIBH technique was found to be significantly superior.

Conclusion

The treatment of left breast-only patients with the HT-FB technique has been observed to provide similar heart protection and better LAD and ipsilateral lung protection compared to the VMAT-DIBH technique without compromising target coverage. However, when the HT-FB technique is used, doses to the contralateral lung and contralateral breast should be carefully evaluated.

A Comparative Analysis of Implant-sparing Plan Versus Conventional Plans Utilizing Helical Tomotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND/AIM

To compare implant sparing irradiation with conventional radiotherapy (RT) using helical (H) and TomoDirect (TD) techniques in breast cancer patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction (IBR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The dosimetric parameters of 40 patients with retropectoral implants receiving 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions were analyzed. Three plans were created: H plan using conventional planning target volume (PTV) that included the chest wall, skin, and implant; TD plan using conventional PTV; and Hs plan using implant-sparing PTV. The H, TD, and Hs plans were compared for PTV doses, organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and treatment times.

RESULTS

Dose distribution in the Hs plan was less homogeneous and uniform than that in the H and TD plans. The TD plan had lower lung, heart, contralateral breast, spinal cord, liver, and esophagus doses than the Hs plan. Compared to the Hs plan, the H plan had lower lung volume receiving 5Gy (V5) (39.1±3.9 vs. 41.2±3.9 Gy; p<0.001), higher V20 (12.3±1.3 vs. 11.5±2.6 Gy; p=0.02), and higher V30 (7.5±1.6 vs. 4.4±1.7 Gy; p<0.001). H plan outperformed Hs plan in heart dosimetric parameters except V20. The Hs plan had significantly lower mean implant doses (43.4±2.1 Gy) than the H plan (51.4±0.5 Gy; p<0.001) and the TD plan (51.9±0.6 Gy; p<0.001). Implementing an implant sparing technique for silicone dose reduction decreases lung doses.

CONCLUSION

Conventional H and TD plans outperform the implant sparing helical plan dosimetrically. Because capsular contracture during RT is unpredictable, long-term clinical outcomes are required to determine whether silicon should be spared.

Clinical Outcomes of Curative Intent Radiotherapy by Helical Tomotherapy for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis in a Tertiary Referral Center

Background

The management of laryngeal cancer involves balancing curative treatment with preserving essential functions. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of helical tomotherapy, an advanced form of radiation therapy, as a primary treatment modality for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of data obtained from a tertiary referral center was performed to assess treatment response rates, survival outcomes, disease control, and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

The study included 45 patients with LSCC treated with helical tomotherapy between May 2015 and September 2022. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate were 89.2% and 71.1%, respectively. Local control and laryngeal preservation rates at 5 years were 79.7% and 84.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed higher DFS rates in early-stage patients (84.2%) compared to advanced-stage patients (58.9%).

Conclusions

The results indicate that helical tomotherapy offers effective tumor control and potential for laryngeal preservation in LSCC. Further prospective studies and longer follow-up are needed to validate these findings and optimize treatment strategies for LSCC patients.