A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees

Medial tibial bone resorption following total knee arthroplasty comparing a traditional with a kinematic design

BACKGROUND

New total knee prostheses are being designed to improve clinical outcome, survivorship and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A new knee system was developed with improvements in patellofemoral joint, trochlear geometry, polyethylene formulation and tibial baseplate. Aim of this study was to compare the newer kinematic knee system with its existing predecessor knee system in terms of clinical outcome, revision rates, radiographic outcomes specifically medial tibial bone resorption.

METHODS

The prospective matched-pair study included 88 TKA surgeries using newer kinematic design knee prostheses, performed between January 2015 and December 2016, out of which 82 patients were available for final follow-up. The control cohort of 82 traditional TKA prosthesis was matched in terms of age, gender and body mass index. All surgeries were performed by the single surgeon using medial parapatellar arthrotomy and posterior stabilized implants were used. Clinical outcomes were assessed using knee society score, range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain and crepitation. Radiological examinations included recording of radiolucent lines and medial tibial bone resorption.

RESULTS

At the 5-year follow-up, no significant differences were noted in terms of mean knee society score (93.3 ± 6.6 vs 94.2 ± 8.1), knee function score (88.5 ± 10.5 vs 89.1 ± 11.2) and ROM. The incidences of anterior knee pain and crepitation were lower in the newer group (8.5% vs 21.9% and 14.6% vs 32.9%, respectively) compared to the traditional prosthesis group. No cases of aseptic loosening were observed in either cohort. No significant difference was seen in terms of radiolucent lines (29.3% vs 26.8%) and medial tibial resorption (2.43% in each group) incidences.

CONCLUSIONS

At the 5 years follow-up no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes, except the former proved to be better for anterior knee pain and crepitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

No difference in clinical outcome but in RSA in total knee arthroplasty with the ATTUNE vs. the PFC Sigma: a randomized trial with 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite usage of the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for about 10 years, few randomized trials exist. We evaluated whether the ATTUNE CR design showed improved clinical results compared with the PFC Sigma CR after 2 years and if there was a difference in tibial component migration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

96 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly treated with cemented ATTUNE or PFC Sigma TKA. 42 patients with the ATTUNE and 48 with the PFC Sigma attended the 2-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), migration measured with RSA, implant position, and the development of radiolucent zones were studied. Non-parametric tests and repeated measures analysis were used at the statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 2 years (primary outcome) and neither of the secondary PROM outcomes differed between the groups (mean difference OKS ATTUNE - PFC: -0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.9 to 2.7). RSA showed posterior tilt of the tibial component in the ATTUNE group with proximal lift-off anteriorly and subsidence of the tibial tray posteriorly. In contrast, the PFC Sigma tibial component tilted forward (mean difference ATTUNE - PFC: -0.7°, CI -1.1° to -0.4°) with maximum subsidence in the front and maximum lift-off of the posterior edge. The postoperative implant positions and the extension of radiolucent lines around the tibial component at 2 years did not differ.

CONCLUSION

We found no significant differences in clinical outcome between the 2 groups but minor differences in migration pattern of the tibial component. The clinical long-term significance of this finding if any is not known.

Modern implants in total knee arthroplasty are more patellofemoral joint friendly compared to their traditional design: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implant designs for total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are continuously evolving to improve outcomes and satisfaction rates after TKA. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the evidence in the literature regarding the outcomes of the Attune knee system over the PFC Sigma knee design and investigate the advantage of one over the other.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies till August 2021 was performed using the defined eligibility criteria. This was a systematic review of the literature published in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Library, PUBMED, and EMBASE. The analysis included prospective and retrospective comparative trials comparing TKA by PFC sigma or Attune posterior stabilized (PS) or cruciate-retaining (CR), fixed bearing, or rotating platform systems. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and postoperative patellar complications were analysed in the studies utilizing attune knee system (modern implants) to its counterpart PFC sigma (traditional implants) for TKA. Quality assessment was conducted using NIH Quality Assessment Tool for controlled intervention studies (RCTs and case-control studies).

RESULTS

This review included 3 RCTs and the rest, 10 of which were non-RCT, including 5852 patients. ATTUNE designs suggested a statistically significant improvement in KSS over PFC Sigma designs. Other PROMs such as OKS and WOMAC scores yielded comparable results between the two groups. ATTUNE knee prosthesis did not result in better knee range of motion, patient satisfaction, or radiological outcomes than the PFC design. Regarding the complications, attune knee prosthesis demonstrated favourable results over PFC Sigma for anterior knee pain and patellofemoral (PF) crepitus.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review highlights better KSS and lesser chances of PF complications favouring a modern implant design over its traditional counterpart. Other patient-reported outcome analyses at a short-term follow-up period were comparable among patients undergoing total knee replacements with two different implant designs. Radiological outcomes for component positioning also suggested similar results among the two groups.

Clinical advantages of gradually reducing radius versus multi-radius total knee arthroplasty: a noninferiority randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The rationale for gradually reducing radius (GR) femoral component aims to prevent flexion instability by gradually change the center of femoral rotation, unlike a discrete change by the multi-radius (MR) which is more common for most of total knee arthroplasties (TKA). However, no strong evidence has been reported the clinical significance of the GR design.

METHODS

This patient-blinded, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted between January 2018-December 2020. Patients with knee osteoarthritis consented for cruciate retaining TKA were randomly allocated to a GR or MR group. Primary outcome measures were knee functions at postoperative 6 and 12 months using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcome measures were performance-based tests (30-s chair stand test, 40-m fast paced walk test, and 3-m timed up and go test), and knee motions.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and randomized; GR (n = 30) and MR (n = 30) group. The changes of KOOS at 6 and 12 months from baseline showed clinical meaningful for both GR and MR group. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between both groups in all KOOS subscales. The length of stay was not different between GR and MR group (5.93 ± 1.44 vs 6.17 ± 1.86 days, p = 0.59). Patients on both groups presented similar performance-based tests. However, the improvement in degrees of knee motion for the GR group was significantly greater than the MR group (34.67 ± 12.52 vs 23.67 ± 12.59, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

GR was noninferiority to MR for the functional outcomes and performances after TKA. The GR femoral component gave more knee motions than did the MR prostheses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Early outcomes using a 'kinematic retaining' total knee replacement - A multicentre prospective study at two years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Although predictable implant longevity in total knee replacement (TKR) is now established, work continues to satisfy the demands of patients who seek full restoration of the painless function of the native knee following TKR. This prospective study examines the early clinical outcomes of 156 patients implanted with a novel 'kinematic-retaining' (KR) implant.

METHODS

156 Physica KR TKRs were implanted for primary osteoarthritis at three European centres. Patients were reviewed up to two years using radiographic, clinical and functional evaluations.

RESULTS

Of the 137 patients retained at two years' follow up, none had been revised. Within 6 post-operative months, 51.7% and 79.9% had excellent clinical and functional KSS values respectively, increasing to 81.8% and 88.3% beyond two years. Mean KSS improvement was 34.8 (from 48.6 to 83.4). All KOOS sub-scores improved significantly with total KOOS improving from a mean of 35.5 (SD ±13.0) to 86.5 (±13.7) at two years post-operatively. Pain and sports KOOS sub-scores improved rapidly during the early post-operative periods, with sustained improvements beyond this. Mean OKS improved by 44.1 (±5.1) at two years. VAS satisfaction scores improved significantly at all time points beyond six weeks. Mean FJS-12 was 75.7 at two years, with no significant effects of age or gender. No progressive adverse radiographic features were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of this kinematic-retaining knee prosthesis are promising, with improvements in clinical parameters similar to, or exceeding those published in other contemporary TKR designs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Multicentre Prospective cohort study.

Comparison of Patellofemoral Outcomes between Attune and PFC Sigma Designs: A Prospective Matched-Pair Analysis

Backgroud

Attune (DePuy Synthes) prosthesis was designed to overcome patellofemoral complications associated with PFC Sigma (DePuy Synthes) prosthesis. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP), patellofemoral crepitus (PCr), and functional outcome between them.

Methods

This prospective matched-pair study was conducted between January 2014 and June 2015, during which 75 consecutive Attune total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were matched with 75 PFC Sigma TKAs based on age, sex, body mass index, pathology, and deformity. A single surgeon performed all the operations with aid of computer navigation, using a posterior-stabilized prosthesis with patellar resurfacing. Outcome was assessed by new Knee Society Score (NKSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. AKP and PCr were assessed by a patient-administered questionnaire till 2 years of follow-up. Three pairs were lost to follow-up and finally 72 pairs were analyzed.

Results

One patient in each group reported AKP and 1 patient from each group had PCr at 2 years postoperatively. None of these patients required additional surgery. The incidence of lateral retinacular release was higher with PFC Sigma (5/72) than Attune (2/72); however, this was statistically not significant (p = 0.4). The Attune group had a significantly greater range of motion (ROM) at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.049). At final follow-up, ROM was comparable between two prosthesis designs. NKSS and WOMAC scores were also comparable between the groups.

Conclusions

We observed that both Attune and PFC Sigma had a low and comparable incidence of AKP and PCr up to 2 years of follow-up. The Attune group achieved a significantly greater ROM at 3 months postoperatively. At 2 years of follow-up, both prostheses had excellent and comparable clinical and functional results.

Notching is less, if femoral component sagittal positioning is planned perpendicular to distal femur anterior cortex axis, in navigated TKA

Purpose

In navigated TKA, the risk of notching is high if femoral component sagittal positioning is planned perpendicular to the sagittal mechanical axis of femur (SMX). We intended to determine if, by opting to place the femoral component perpendicular to distal femur anterior cortex axis (DCX), notching can be reduced in navigated TKA.

Methods

We studied 171 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral computer-assisted TKA. Femoral component sagittal positioning was planned perpendicular to SMX in one knee (Femur Anterior Bowing Registration Disabled, i.e. FBRD group) and perpendicular to DCX in the opposite knee (Femur Anterior Bowing Registration Enabled, i.e. FBRE group). Incidence and depth of notching were recorded in both groups. For FBRE knees, distal anterior cortex angle (DCA), which is the angle between SMX and DCX, was calculated by the computer.

Results

Incidence and mean depth of notching was less (p = 0.0007 and 0.009) in FBRE versus FBRD group, i.e. 7% versus 19.9% and 0.98 mm versus 1.53 mm, respectively. Notching was very high (61.8%) in FBRD limbs when the anterior bowing was severe (DCA > 3°) in the contralateral (FBRE) limbs.

Conclusion

Notching was less when femoral component sagittal positioning was planned perpendicular to DCX, in navigated TKA.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic level II.

Early Functional Outcomes After Evolutionary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Is New Always Better?

Total knee replacement (TKR) designs continue to evolve with the aim of improving patient outcomes; however, there remains a significant patient dissatisfaction rate. We report the early functional outcomes of an evolutionary knee design in the context of a single-blinded, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.

Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system

Background

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) remains the gold standard for treatment of debilitating symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Even though providing satisfactory results for the majority of patients, some studies report dissatisfaction after TKA to be as high as 20%. Among other things, pain catastrophising and self-efficacy are thought to compromise results of TKA. Implant manufacturers keep improving upon their designs in an attempt to improve functional outcomes. One of these novel knee systems is the Attune. To our knowledge, there are no clinical follow-up studies reporting results of the uncemented version. The main objective of this multicentre prospective observational study is to evaluate revision rate, complications, radiographic outcomes (i.e. alignment and radiolucent lines) and patient reported outcomes of the uncemented Attune mobile bearing TKA. Secondary objectives are (1) to assess physical function, return to sport and return to work after TKA and (2) to evaluate the long-term effect of preoperative psychological factors on satisfaction after TKA.

Methods

All patients presenting in the participating centres with knee pathology warranting joint replacement therapy will be considered for inclusion, an absolute indication for cemented fixation is the only exclusion criterium. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic performance (e.g. radiolucent lines) is done at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years after surgery using validated patient reported outcome measures. Cumulative revision rates are calculated after 5 and 10 years using Kaplan–Meier methods. Physical function is assessed with performance based measurements before and 1 year after surgery. Return to sports is assessed using the Tegner and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity rating scale before and 1 year after surgery. Return to work is evaluated by inviting patients of working age to complete a short questionnaire 1 year after surgery. Psychologic factors are assessed using questionnaires for pain catastrophising, pain self-efficacy and mental health before, 5 years and 10 years after surgery. Preoperative psychologic scores are correlated to functional outcomes.

Discussion

The current study aims to report the clinical performance of a novel implant and can help provide insight in factors that play a role in satisfaction after TKA.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04247672 (January 30, 2020)

Midterm functional recovery of Total knee arthroplasty patients compared between the ATTUNE knee system and the press fit condylar (PFC) SIGMA knee system

BACKGROUND

The ATTUNE Knee System is a new prosthetic design that has theoretical advantages over the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma Knee System specific to improved knee kinematics and patellofemoral joint tracking. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes compared between the ATTUNE and PFC Sigma designs at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who received either the ATTUNE or PFC Sigma system during November 2013 to February 2015 at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). Functional outcomes were evaluated using Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, 2-min walk test (2MWT), modified knee score, numerical rating scale-pain, range of motion (ROM), and rate of anterior knee pain and crepitation at preoperation, 3-months, 1-year, and 5-years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 113 patients, 59 and 54 received the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE systems, respectively. At a minimum of 5-years follow-up, all functional outcomes improved significantly from the preoperative period although TUG test and 2MWT declined significantly from 1- to 5-years postoperatively only in the PFC Sigma group. The mean ROM at 5-years postoperatively was significantly higher in ATTUNE than in PFC Sigma; however, the difference was small (116° vs. 110°, respectively; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in any of the other outcome measurements, including anterior knee pain, clunking, and crepitation, between groups at any study time point.

CONCLUSIONS

​Our results revealed no major differences in functional outcomes between the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE TKA designs at an intermediate-term follow-up of at least 5 years. Longer-term follow-up study is needed to evaluate the benefits of the ATTUNE design relative to polyethylene wear and the rate of aseptic loosening.

Loading on Attune® fixed-bearing cruciate-substituting total knee implant in knee malalignment during activities of daily living: A finite element analysis

Purpose

To compare contact stresses between Attune® and PFC Sigma® total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants in the presence of knee malalignment.

Methods

Maximum contact stress after finite element analysis were compared during standing, walking, and stair climbing in 0°, 2.5° and 5°varus/valgus knee alignments.

Results

The percentage increase in contact stress was highest during walking with PFC Sigma® in 5° varus (238.5%), standing with Attune® in 5° valgus (127.2%), and standing with Attune® in 2.5° valgus (107.8%).

Conclusion

The newer Attune® design may be associated with higher maximum contact stresses and increased risk of wear and implant failure.

Has the modern design of Attune total knee replacement improved outcome in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis?

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Modern knee replacements aim to improve patient function in arthritis affecting different compartments of the knee. This study evaluates the Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) and functional outcome of a modern total knee replacement (Attune, DePuy) in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis.

METHODS

A total of 50 consecutive patients with isolated unilateral patellofemoral arthritis having had Attune total knee replacements at a single institution between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively studied. Five patients who developed symptoms on the opposite side during the study and two patients lost to follow-up were excluded. One patient needed early revision for loosening, leaving a total of 42 patients to be followed up over a period of 4 years. The Oxford Knee score (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) recorded pre-operatively and at follow-up was compared. A Functional assessment at around 8 months after operation was undertaken.

RESULTS

At average follow-up of 24 months the mean OKS score improved by 15 points and the KOOS score improved by 20 points. Final KOOS sub-score for Pain was 80, Symptom 80, and ADL 82, Sports & Recreation 32 and QOL 60. Functional assessment at mean 8 months showed that a significant number of patients were able to Kneel (50%); Sit cross legged (23%); sit on their heel (23%) and were able do a single leg dip test (86%).

CONCLUSION

This unique study of a modern design total knee replacement (Attune) in patients with isolated unilateral patellofemoral arthritis shows good PROM scores at 2 years and good functional assessment results at 8 months. The PROM scores are marginally better than the published results with Attune's predecessor, in a similar cohort of patients, but falls short of the published results of patellofemoral replacement implants. Large randomised comparative studies between traditional and the modern implant design is recommended to answer the question if design modification has influenced clinical outcome in patients with patellofemoral arthritis.

Modern femoral component design in total knee arthroplasty shows a lower patellar contact force during knee flexion compared with its predecessor

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the femoral component design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the patellofemoral contact force, as well as the soft tissue balance, has not been well reported thus far.

METHODS

Twenty-eight mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs using the traditional model (PFC Sigma) and 27 mobile-bearing PS TKAs using the latest model (Attune) were included. Surgeries were performed using the measured resection technique assisted with the computed tomography (CT)-based free-hand navigation system. After all the trial components were placed, patellar contact forces on the medial and lateral sides were measured using two uniaxial ultrathin force transducers with the knee at 0°, 10°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 135° of flexion. The joint component gap and the varus ligament balance of the femorotibial joint were also measured. The non-paired Student's t-test was conducted to compare the values of the two groups.

RESULTS

The medial patellar contact force was significantly lower for Attune group than for PFC Sigma group at 120° of knee flexion (P = 0.0058). The lateral patellar contact force was also significantly lower for Attune group than PFC Sigma group at 120° and 135° of knee flexion (P = 0.0068 and P = 0.036). The joint component gap, as well as the varus ligament balance, showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced thickness and width of the anterior flange of the femoral component in the Attune may play a role in low patellar contact force.

Mid-term results show no significant difference in postoperative clinical outcome, pain and range of motion between a well-established total knee arthroplasty design and its successor: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcome scores following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with two different systems. The hypothesis was that there is a difference between patients receiving the newer design than those receiving the predecessor.

METHODS

Two hundred patients who underwent TKA were randomized into two groups: patients received either Attune TKA or PFC Sigma (both DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN). Clinically, the Knee Society Knee and Function Scores (KS and FS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Range of Motion (ROM) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were evaluated and compared between the groups 2 years after surgery. 158 patients (80 in the Attune group and 78 in the PFC Sigma group) were available for follow-up.

RESULTS

Through bivariate analysis using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests, no significant differences in postoperative KS, FS, WOMAC, ROM or VAS between the two groups were detected. Both groups significantly improved regarding all evaluated endpoints 2 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study population, no difference in clinical outcome between the two systems was found. The expected benefits of design modifications could not be observed in clinical outcome scores 2 years postoperatively. Both designs are effective options for improving pain and function in end-stage osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

A Biomechanical Comparison of the Effect of Baseplate Design and Bone Marrow Fat Infiltration on Tibial Baseplate Pullout Strength

BACKGROUND

Early clinical results of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant design show promise for improved outcomes and patellofemoral function scores. However, reports of early tibial component-cement interface debonding requiring revision have been published. This study investigated the biomechanical properties of three different tibial baseplates to understand potential causes of failure.

METHODS

PFC Sigma (control), Attune (1st generation) and Attune S+ (2nd generation) tibial baseplates were implanted into 4th generation sawbone tibia models using a standardized technique. Three of each baseplate were cemented with and without additional bovine bone marrow fat. All models were tested to failure with measured axial distraction force. Implant type, presence or absence of bovine marrow and load to failure were all recorded and compared. Two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons were used to determine statistical significance, which was set to P < .05.

RESULTS

The 2nd generation tibial baseplates required significantly more force to failure. The presence of bovine marrow significantly reduced the pullout force of the implant designs overall. No significant difference was detected between the 1st generation and control baseplates. Failure mode for each model was also noted to be different irrespective of the presence or absence of bone marrow fat.

CONCLUSION

The 2nd generation baseplates required significantly more force to failure compared with older designs. The presence of bone marrow during cementation of a tibial base plate significantly decreased axial pullout strength of a tibial baseplate in this laboratory model. All 1st generation baseplates exhibited debonding at the cement-implant interface.

Recommendations for Patients with High Return to Sports Expectations after TKA Remain Controversial

(1) Background: Improved surgical techniques and implants in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have led to broader indications for surgical interventions of osteoarthritis of the knee. There is a growing young and active patient subgroup with high return to sports (RTS) expectations after TKA. The current lack of evidence regarding RTS capacity in this patient cohort, requires the consolidation of experts' opinions and experiences to address the special needs among these patients. The aim of this study was to assess current expert opinions in regard to preoperative patient assessment, surgical technique and decision-making and patient counseling for these patients. (2) Methods: We performed a survey among surgeons specialized in arthroplasty with a questionnaire designed to assess current recommendations, surgical techniques, and implant preferences as well as patient counseling in patients with high expectations for RTS after TKA. (3) Results: The majority of surgeons are in favor of return to low-impact sports after TKA within 3 to 6 months. Some even recommend return to high-impact sports. Despite improvement of surgical techniques and implants, we observed no clear preference for a single surgical technique or implant specification in active patients. (4) Conclusions: Current evidence for sports-associated complications after TKA is scarce. Despite a growing array of surgical techniques and implants, the available literature is still controversial with no single surgical technique or TKA design distinguishing itself clearly from others. Surgeons' recommendations are mostly based on their experience and training. Nonetheless, we observed growing faith in modern implants with some surgeons even recommending high-impact sports after TKA.

Clinical Outcomes of a Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Prosthesis Compared to Its Predecessor at 5-Year Follow-Up: Matched Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Residual pain is an important cause of patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A recent study at our institution found that a modern prosthesis was associated with less residual and anterior knee pain at 2-year follow-up when compared to its predecessor. The aim of this study is to evaluate these implants at 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

From July 2012 to December 2013, 100 consecutive modern TKAs were identified from our prospective Institutional Review Board approved database. All patients with 5-year clinical follow-up (n = 77) were matched in a one-to-one fashion based on age, gender, body mass index, and follow-up with a predecessor TKA. Clinical outcomes were assessed with a patient-administered questionnaire for specifically anterior knee pain, painless noise, painful crepitation, and satisfaction. Overall function was assessed using Knee Society Scores and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index.

RESULTS

At 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between the modern TKA and a predecessor TKA in the Knee Society pain or function scores (P = .24 and P = .54, respectively). The overall prevalence of residual pain was less with the modern TKA compared to its predecessor (19.5% vs 36.3%; P = .02), but the prevalence of isolated anterior knee pain was similar in both cohorts (11.7% vs 22.1%; P = .09). There was no difference in painless noise (19.5% vs 13.3%; P = .28) or satisfaction scores (7.9 ± 2.4 vs 7.6 ± 2.6; P = .25) between the modern and predecessor cohorts.

CONCLUSION

At 5-year follow-up, we found that both the modern and predecessor prostheses provided excellent clinical outcomes. The modern TKA was associated with less residual pain compared to its predecessor, but we were unable to detect differences in the prevalence of isolated anterior knee pain, painless noise, Knee Society Scores, or radiographic evaluation.

No difference in the anteroposterior stability between the GRADIUS and multi-radius designs in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to compare stability and clinical and radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the GRADIUS and multi-radius femoral designs after minimum of two-year follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 142 patients who underwent TKA using ATTUNE posterior stabilized (PS) implants (68 patients, GRADIUS group) or Persona PS implants (74 patients, multi-radius group) for degenerative osteoarthritis were included. After an average of 2-year follow-up, the anteroposterior (AP) stability at 30°, 60°, and 90° was measured using KT 2000 device and compared between the two groups. The clinical outcome measurements included range of motion (ROM) of the knee, patient-reported outcomes and anterior knee pain (AKP). For the clinical evaluation of mid-flexion instability, pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) score recorded during climbing up or going down stairs. The radiolucent lines on knee radiographs obtained at final follow-up were evaluated and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The average AP stability at 30° knee flexion was 5.7 mm in the GRADIUS group and 5.9 mm in the multi-radius group; however, the difference was not significant. The AP stability at 60° and 90° knee flexion was also similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in the ROM, patient-reported outcomes at follow-up, incidence of AKP and VAS scores between the two groups. There were no differences in the incidence of radiolucency around the components between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The GRADIUS design did not show any advantage with respect to the stability or clinical outcomes compared with the multi-radius design in TKA.

No reduced patellar loading with latest-generation cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty-a comparative study of Attune and Press-Fit Condylar®

PURPOSE

To investigate if the latest-generation cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) systems through more patella-friendly femoral trochlea reduce the patellar bone loading.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent Attune CR-TKA were matched with twenty-one patients who underwent Press-Fit Condylar® (PFC) CR-TKA. The patella was always preserved. The in vivo patellar loading was measured twice by two blinded observers and localised on an 8-quadrant grid on 1-year post-operatively SPECT/CT images. The position of the TKA components, patella height, thickness, tilt, and tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove index were measured in 3D CT. Knee function was assessed pre-operatively, at 12 and 24 months post-operatively with the knee society score (KSS). All data were compared between groups with the Mann-Whitney U test and within groups with Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

A significantly higher bone tracer uptake (BTU) was seen in the Attune group in the lateral non-articular patellar quadrants. No other significant differences of the BTU were seen. The post-operative KSS did not differ significantly. Spearman's correlation showed no correlations between the significantly higher BTU of the lateral non-articular patellar quadrants and the position of the TKA and patellar measurements. All patellar measurements did not correlate with bone stress in SPECT/CT.

CONCLUSION

No significant improvement in terms of in vivo patellar bone stress was seen with the latest-generation CR-TKA system. The increased bone stress at the non-articular lateral patellar quadrants of the Attune could be due to higher stabilising quadriceps forces.

Influence of femoral implant design modification on anterior knee pain and patellar crepitus in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing

Background

The incidence of patient dissatisfaction due to anterior knee pain (AKP) and patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a concern. However, it has been shown that improvements in the femoral component of traditional prostheses could reduce these instances of pain in the case of TKA performed with patellar resurfacing. This study aims to investigate whether TKA without patellar resurfacing can also benefit from the aforementioned femoral component modification in reducing AKP and patellar crepitus post-TKA.

Methods

Sixty-two patients (85 knees) who underwent TKA using the modern prosthesis and 62 age- and sex-matched patients (90 knees) fitted with the traditional prosthesis were enrolled in this study. The occurrence of AKP and patellar crepitus as well as the Knee Society Score (KSS) were consequently recorded, and the data was analyzed in order to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Results

The incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group at the 3-month and 1-year follow-ups (4.7% vs. 13.3% [p = 0.048] and 3.5% vs. 13.3% [p = 0.021], respectively). In addition, the incidence of patellar crepitus was also significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group at the 3-month and 1-year follow-ups (15.3% vs. 34.4% [p = 0.004] and 10.6% vs. 28.9% [p = 0.002], respectively). There was no significant difference in the KSS between the two groups.

Conclusions

These results revealed that TKA without patellar resurfacing will indeed benefit from the modified femoral implant design in reducing AKP and patellar crepitus, a finding that may be beneficial to surgeons who select implants for their patients when patellar resurfacing is not planned or not possible due to other reasons.

Two different posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA designs: navigator evaluation of intraoperative kinematic differences

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare two types of posterior-stabilized (PS) mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The hypothesis was that no major differences were going to be found among the two TKA designs.

METHODS

Two cohorts of patients who were divided according to implant design (Cohort A, new design gradually reducing radius PS MB TKA; Cohort B, traditional dual-radius PS MB TKA) were analyzed by means of intraoperative navigation. All operations were guided by a non-image-based navigation system that recorded relative femoral and tibial positions in native and implanted knees during the following kinematic tests: passive range of motion (PROM), varus-valgus stress test at 0° and 30° (VV0, VV30) and anterior/posterior drawer test at 90° of flexion (AP90).

RESULTS

There were no significative differences in kinematic tests between the two implants. Cohort A, however, showed a different post-implant trend for VV0 and VV30 that were lower than the pre-implant ones, as expected, while for Cohort B, the trend is opposite. However, the gradually reducing radius prosthesis (Cohort A) showed a trend of improving stability (29% compared to the preoperative status) in mid-flexion (VV30) which the traditional dual-radius design (Cohort B) would not. Moreover, we found no differences among postoperative results of the two TKA designs.

CONCLUSION

Despite design variations, no difference has been found among the prostheses in terms of PROM, rotations and translations. Both design kinematics did not show paradoxical external rotations, but an increase in femoral translation in mid-flexion without affecting the functioning of the prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Sagittal radius of curvature, trochlea design and ultracongruent insert in total knee arthroplasty

Multi radius (MR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with mid-flexion instability.

Single radius (SR) TKA may provide better anteroposterior stability through single flexion axis and biomechanical advantage for quadriceps function.

Medial pivot (MP) TKA and gradually reducing (GR) radius TKA produce better knee kinematics.

Clinical outcomes are equivalent for SR, MR and MP TKA.

Short-term studies have shown better clinical outcomes and kinematics for GR TKA.

Thinner and narrow anterior flange, deeper trochlea groove and more anatomical trochlea design reduces patellofemoral complications in TKA

Ultracongruent inserts provide comparable clinical outcomes to posterior-stabilized TKA and cruciate retaining TKA.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:519-524. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180083

Role of Anatomical Patella Replacement on Anterior Knee Pain

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain (AKP) remains a complex issue affecting patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Several radiographic parameters have been shown to be causative factors with various designs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the known radiographic parameters of AKP and clinical outcomes (ie, AKP) in the setting of a modern prosthesis with an anatomic patella button.

METHODS

Between July 2012 and December 2013, 90 total knee arthroplasties received 3 skyline views taken at 30°, 45°, and 60°. A patient-administered questionnaire was administered at 2-year follow-up to assess the incidence of AKP, painless noise, and satisfaction. Radiographs were analyzed for patellofemoral overstuffing, patellar tilt, and patellar displacement, and evaluated the patella resection angle.

RESULTS

On the patient-administered questionnaire, 10 (11.1%) patients reported AKP of a mild-to-moderate nature. Thirty-one had the best view at 30 Merchant views, 24 had best views at 45, and 35 had best views at 60. We found that patellar resection angle correlated with AKP (odds ratio 1.21, P = .044) and painless noise (odds ratio 1.22, P = .034). Patellar displacement and patellofemoral stuffing did not correlate with AKP or painless noise. No radiographic measurements correlated with changes in Knee Society Score pain or function scores or range of motion.

CONCLUSION

We found that a patellar resection angle correlated with the incidence of AKP and painless noise at 2-year follow-up. We failed to find any correlation with patellofemoral overstuffing, patellar displacement, or patellar tilt with clinical outcomes. We recommend the use of 3 Merchant views to fully evaluate the patellofemoral joint.

Modern TKA implants are equivalent to traditional TKA implants in functional and patellofemoral joint-related outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare patient-reported outcomes measures, health-related quality of life and satisfaction rates between a new Modern TKA system (M-TKA) and an existing Traditional TKA system (T-TKA).

METHODS

Prospectively collected registry data of 65 patients who underwent T-TKA and 65 patients who underwent M-TKA at a single institution from 2014 to 2015 was reviewed. The range of motion, Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36, satisfaction and expectation fulfilment were compared at Pre-op, 6 months and 2 years. Patellofemoral joint-related OKS subscores (3, 5, 7, 12) were also compared between the groups. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in OKS/SF-36 were analysed for both groups. Propensity scores generated using logistic regression were used to adjust for confounding variables, thus allowing matching of T-TKA to M-TKA in a 1:1 ratio.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant improvement in all measured variables at 6 month and 2 years (p < 0.001) when compared to baseline. There was no significant difference in KSKS, KSFS, OKS, SF-36 and Patellofemoral joint-related OKS subscores (3, 5, 7, 12) between the two groups (n.s.). At 2 years, there were high satisfaction rates of 89.2% and 92.2% in the T-TKA and M-TKA groups, respectively (n.s.). Similarly, both groups demonstrated high expectation fulfilment rates of 84.6% and 90.6% for the T-TKA and M-TKA groups, respectively (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Using an extensive battery of standardized patient-reported, health-related quality of life and MCID assessments, our study demonstrated no difference in clinical outcomes between M-TKA and T-TKA that would justify the use of the newer and costlier M-TKA. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate the possible advantages of this new implant design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective Study.