1
|
Honis HR, Gruber H, Honold S, Konschake M, Moriggl B, Brenner E, Skalla-Oberherber E, Loizides A. Anatomical considerations of US-guided carpal tunnel release in daily clinical practice. J Ultrason 2023; 23:e131-e143. [PMID: 37732109 PMCID: PMC10508271 DOI: 10.15557/jou.2023.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most frequent compression neuropathy with an incidence of one to three subjects per thousand. As specific anatomical variations might lead to unintended damage during surgical interventions, we present a review to elucidate the anatomical variability of the carpal tunnel region with important considerations for daily clinical practice: several variants of the median nerve branches in and around the transverse carpal ligament are typical and must - similarly to the variant courses of the median artery, which may be found eccentric ulnar to the median nerve - be taken into account in any interventional therapy at the carpal tunnel. Unintended interference in these structures might lead to heavy arterial bleeding and, in consequence, even underperfusion of segments of the median nerve or, if neural structures such as variant nerve branches are impaired or even cut, severe pain-syndromes with a profound impact on the quality of life. This knowledge is thus crucial for outcome- and safety-optimization of different surgical procedures at the volar aspect of the wrist and surgical therapy of the carpal tunnel syndrome e.g., US-guided carpal tunnel release, as injury might result in dysfunction and/or pain on wrist motion or direct impact in the region concerned. For most variations, anatomical and surgical descriptions vary, as official classifications are still lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne-Rose Honis
- Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hannes Gruber
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sarah Honold
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marko Konschake
- Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Moriggl
- Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Erich Brenner
- Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Alexander Loizides
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lam KHS, Wu YT, Reeves KD, Galluccio F, Allam AES, Peng PWH. Ultrasound-Guided Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13061138. [PMID: 36980446 PMCID: PMC10046938 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment, and recently, ultrasound-guided perineural injection (UPIT) and percutaneous flexor retinaculum release (UPCTR) have been utilized to treat CTS. However, no systematic review or meta-analysis has included both intervention types of ultrasound-guided interventions for CTS. Therefore, we performed this review using four databases (i.e., PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane) to evaluate the quality of evidence, effectiveness, and safety of the published studies on ultrasound-guided interventions in CTS. Among sixty studies selected for systemic review, 20 randomized treatment comparison or controlled studies were included in six meta-analyses. Steroid UPIT with ultrasound guidance outperformed that with landmark guidance. UPIT with higher-dose steroids outperformed that with lower-dose steroids. UPIT with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) outperformed control injection and hydrodissection with high-volume D5W was superior to that with low-volume D5W. UPIT with platelet-rich plasma outperformed various control treatments. UPCTR outperformed open surgery in terms of symptom improvement but not functional improvement. No serious adverse events were reported in the studies reviewed. The findings suggest that both UPIT and UPCTR may provide clinically important benefits and appear safe. Further treatment comparison studies are required to determine comparative therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- King Hei Stanley Lam
- The Department of Clinical Research, The Hong Kong Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Hong Kong
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +852-23720888
| | - Yung-Tsan Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
- Integrated Pain Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
- Department of Research and Development, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
| | - Kenneth Dean Reeves
- Private Practice PM&R and Pain Management, 4840 El Monte, Roeland Park, KS 66205, USA
| | - Felice Galluccio
- Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Fisiotech Lab. Studio, Rheumatology and Pain Management, 50136 Firenze, Italy
- Morphological Madrid Research Center (MoMaRC), 10107 Madrid, Spain
| | - Abdallah El-Sayed Allam
- Morphological Madrid Research Center (MoMaRC), 10107 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
- Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship, Arab Board of Health Specializations, Ministry of Health, Baghdad 61298, Iraq
| | - Philip W. H. Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Babaei-Ghazani A, Forogh B, Raissi GR, Ahadi T, Eftekharsadat B, Yousefi N, Rahimi-Dehgolan S, Moradi K. Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Comparison Between Radial and Ulnar Approaches. J Pain Res 2020; 13:1569-1578. [PMID: 32617017 PMCID: PMC7326201 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s248600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare two common approaches for ultrasonography (US)-guided injection. Patients and Methods Sixty patients with mild-to-moderate CTS were included in this double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). They received a single shot of corticosteroid injection through either the US-guided in-plane approach: radial or ulnar side. Participants were evaluated using Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, as well as electrodiagnosis (EDX) and US parameters before the intervention, and within 12 weeks of follow-up. Results In both groups, all outcomes, except for the electrodiagnostic measures, significantly improved within the follow-up. Pain-VAS and both subscales of BCTQ questionnaire, as our main subjective outcomes, revealed dramatic improvement, with the largest amount of changes in VAS (70%; comparing to baseline value), and about 37% for both of BQSS and BQFS scales, all indicating superiority of radial to ulnar in-plane approach. During the first follow-up, we did not detect any remarkable preference between the groups in either subjective or electrodiagnostic variables. However, there was a significant difference at next follow-up time-points in terms of VAS for pain and BQFS favoring radial approach (Table 3). Furthermore, US-measured parameters including nerve-circumference and CSA improved only in the radial in-plane group. Conclusion The current data proved that radial in-plane approach for CTS injection could be at least as effective as the more common ulnar in-plane method. Even the pain-relief effect was longer for the radial in-plane approach. Also, patients’ functional status and objective variables all revealed better outcomes via the new approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Babaei-Ghazani
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Bijan Forogh
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Gholam Reza Raissi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Tannaz Ahadi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Bina Eftekharsadat
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Naseh Yousefi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, IKHC Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Katayoun Moradi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D, Allen G, Aparisi Gómez MP, Bazzocchi A, Beggs I, Bignotti B, Chianca V, Corazza A, Dalili D, De Dea M, Del Cura JL, Di Pietto F, Drakonaki E, Facal de Castro F, Filippiadis D, Gielen J, Gitto S, Gupta H, Klauser AS, Lalam R, Martin S, Martinoli C, Mauri G, McCarthy C, McNally E, Melaki K, Messina C, Mirón Mombiela R, Neubauer B, Obradov M, Olchowy C, Orlandi D, Gonzalez RP, Rutkauskas S, Snoj Z, Tagliafico AS, Talaska A, Vasilevska-Nikodinovska V, Vucetic J, Wilson D, Zaottini F, Zappia M, Plagou A. Clinical indications for image guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part III, nerves of the upper limb. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:1498-1506. [PMID: 31712960 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06479-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image-guided interventional procedures of the nerves are commonly performed by physicians from different medical specialties, although there is a lack of clinical indications for these types of procedures. This Delphi-based consensus provided a list of indications on image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb based on updated published evidence. METHODS An expert panel of 45 members of the Ultrasound and Interventional Subcommittees of the ESSR participated in this Delphi-based consensus study. After revision of the published papers on image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb updated to September 2018, the experts drafted a list of statements according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence. Consensus on statements regarding clinical indications was considered as strong when more than 95% of experts agreed, and broad if more than 80% agreed. RESULTS Ten statements were drafted on procedures for nerves of the upper limb. Only two statements reached the highest level of evidence (ultrasound guidance is a safe and effective method for brachial plexus block; ultrasound-guided non-surgical approaches are safe and effective methods to treat carpal tunnel syndrome in the short term, but there is sparse evidence on the mid- and long-term effectiveness of these interventions). Strong consensus was obtained on 6/10 statements (60%), while 4/10 statements reached broad consensus (40%). CONCLUSIONS This Delphi-based consensus study reported poor evidence on image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb. Sixty percent of statements on clinical indications provided by the expert board reached a strong consensus. KEY POINTS • An expert panel of the ESSR provided 10 evidence-based statements on clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb • Two statements reached the highest level of evidence • Strong consensus was obtained on 6/10 statements (60%), while 4/10 statements reached broad consensus (40%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Miraude Adriaensen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen, Brunssum, Kerkrade, The Netherlands
| | - Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
- Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Georgina Allen
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Vithas Nueve de Octubre, 46015, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ian Beggs
- Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Vito Chianca
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
| | - Angelo Corazza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Danoob Dalili
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - Miriam De Dea
- UOC Radiologia, Ospedale di Feltre, AULSS1 Dolomiti, Veneto, Italy
| | - Jose Luis Del Cura
- Department of Radiology, Donostia University Hospital, 20014, Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain
- University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
| | - Francesco Di Pietto
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, (CE), Italy
| | - Eleni Drakonaki
- Private Institution of Ultrasonography and MSK Radiology, Heraklion, Greece
- Department of Anatomy, Medical School of the European University of Cyprus, Engomi, Cyprus
| | - Fernando Facal de Castro
- IBERORAD 1895 S.L., 08021, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Radiology, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jan Gielen
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- University of Antwerp Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| | | | | | - Andrea S Klauser
- Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Radhesh Lalam
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Gobowen, Oswestry, UK
| | - Silvia Martin
- Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Universidad de las Islas Baleares Medicine, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Carlo Martinoli
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- University of Genoa - DISSAL Department of Health Sciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Catherine McCarthy
- The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Musculoskeletal Radiology, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Kalliopi Melaki
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Rebeca Mirón Mombiela
- Department of Physiology, Universidad de Valencia/INCLIVA, 46010, Valencia, Spain
- Herlev og Gentofte Hospital Radiologisk Afdeling, Herlev Ringvej 75, opgang 51, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Benedikt Neubauer
- Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Marina Obradov
- Sint Maartenskliniek, 9011, Nijmegen, 6500GM, The Netherlands
| | - Cyprian Olchowy
- Department of Oral Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | | | | | - Saulius Rutkauskas
- Radiology Department, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ziga Snoj
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska
- Medical Faculty, University "Ss.Cyril and Methodius", Skopje, North Macedonia
- University Surgical Clinic "St.Naum Ohridski", Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Jelena Vucetic
- Department of Radiology, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Universidad de Valencia/INCLIVA, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - David Wilson
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Federico Zaottini
- University of Genoa - DISSAL Department of Health Sciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Zappia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Varelli Institute, Naples, Italy
| | - Athena Plagou
- Department of Radiology, Private Institution of Ultrasonography, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|